Skip to main content
Log in

Long-term complaints after elective repair for small umbilical or epigastric hernias

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Hernia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Elective repair for umbilical or epigastric hernia is a frequent minor surgical procedure. Several studies have demonstrated chronic pain after groin hernia repair but long-term complaints have been only scarcely studied. This study was undertaken to investigate long-term pain and discomfort after open repair for small umbilical or epigastric hernias.

Methods

This is a retrospective study with prospective long-term follow-up. Only elective primary umbilical or epigastric hernias with an open mesh or sutured repair were included. A structured follow-up questionnaire was sent to all patients regarding verbal rating scores (VRS) of pain and discomfort (no, little, moderate, or severe) and recurrence. Patients with suspected recurrence were clinically examined.

Results

There were 139 eligible patients, and 132 patients answered the questionnaire (95 % response rate). The median follow-up time was 36 months (range 15–85), and defect size was 1.0 cm (0.2–8.0). Sixteen patients reported moderate or severe pain and/or discomfort (12 %, 95 % confidence interval (CI): 6–18). The cumulated risk of recurrence was 11.5 %. Of the 15 patients with clinical recurrence or reoperation for recurrence, 5 patients reported moderate/severe complaints (31 %) whereas 11 of the remaining 116 patients with no recurrence (10 %) reported moderate/severe complaints (P = 0.014).

Conclusion

Surprisingly, many patients complained about pain and discomfort 3 years after elective repair for a small umbilical or epigastric hernia.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Helgstrand F, Rosenberg J, Jørgensen LN, Kehlet H, Bisgaard T (2010) Surgical treatment of ventral hernia. Ugeskr Laeger 172:1987–1989

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bisgaard T, Kehlet H, Bay-Nielsen M, Iversen MG, Rosenberg J, Jørgensen LN (2011) A nationwide study on readmission, morbidity, and mortality after umbilical and epigastric hernia repair. Hernia 15:541–546. doi:10.1007/2s10029-011-0823-z

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Witherspoon P, O`Dwyer PJ (2009) Surgeons perspectives on options for ventral abdominal hernia repair: results of a postal questionnaire. Hernia 9:259–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Aslani N, Brown CJ (2010) Does mesh offer an advantage over tissue in the open repair of umbilical hernias? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Hernia 14:455–462. doi:10.1007/2s10029-010-0705-9

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Berrevoet F, D’Hont F, Rogiers X, Troisi R, de Hemptinne B (2011) Open intraperitoneal versus retromuscular mesh repair for umbilical hernias less than 3 cm diameter. Am J Surg 201:85–90. doi:10.1016/2j.amjsurg.2010.01.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Iversen E, Lykke A, Hensler M, Jørgensen LN (2010) Abdominal wall hernia repair with composite ePTFE/polypropylene mesh: clinical outcome and quality of life in 152 patients. Hernia 14:555–560. doi:10.1007/2s10029-010-0729-1

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Venclauskas L, Silanskaite J, Kiudelis M (2008) Umbilical hernia: factors indicative of recurrence. Medicina (Kaunas) 44:855–859

    Google Scholar 

  8. Helgstrand F, Rosenberg J, Kehlet H, Strandfelt P, Bisgaard T (2012) Reoperation vs. clinical recurrence rate after ventral hernia repair. Ann Surg (In press)

  9. Aasvang EK, Gmaehle E, Hansen JB, Gmaehle B, Forman JL, Schwarz J, Bittner R, Kehlet H (2010) Predictive risk factors for persistent postherniotomy pain. Anesthesiology 112:957–969. doi:10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181f6a158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Muysoms FE, Bontinck J, Pletinckx P (2011) Complications of mesh devices for intraperitoneal umbilical hernia repair: a word of caution. Hernia 15:463–468. doi:10.1007/s10029-010-0692-x

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Burger JW, Luijendik RW, Hop WC, Halm JA, Veerdasdonk EG, Jeekel J (2004) Long-term follow-up of a randomized controlled trial of suture versus mesh repair of incisional hernia. Ann Surg 40:578–583. doi:10.1097/01.sla.0000141193.08524.e7

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study was approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency using a preliminary approval given to the Department of Surgery, Region Sjaelland (reg. no. 2008-58-0020). A protocol was sent to the National Board of Health but no approval was necessary since no invasive methods were applied. Additionally, the study was registered online on clinicaltrials.gov (ID: NCT01501682).

Conflict of interest

No authors have conflicts of interest regarding the present study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. W. Christoffersen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Erritzøe-Jervild, L., Christoffersen, M.W., Helgstrand, F. et al. Long-term complaints after elective repair for small umbilical or epigastric hernias. Hernia 17, 211–215 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-012-0960-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-012-0960-z

Keywords

Navigation