Skip to main content
Log in

Advancing Ecosystem Science by Promoting Greater Use of Theory and Multiple Research Approaches in Graduate Education

  • 20th Anniversary Paper
  • Published:
Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Since the inaugural edition of Ecosystems was published in 1998, ecosystem science has undergone substantial changes including the development of new research methods and an increasing emphasis on collaborations across traditional academic boundaries. In response to this transformation, we reflect on the current state of theory in ecosystem science, and make recommendations for training the next generation of Ph.D.-level ecosystem scientists. Specifically, we call for increased integration of theory into ecosystem science and outline the utility of iterating between theory and data generated by observations, experiments, and quantitative models. We recommend exposing graduate students to these three major approaches for generating data and propose strategies that students, advisors, and departments can employ to ensure this exposure. Ultimately, a successful training program will provide students with an understanding of key theories related to ecosystem science and how they interact with data, an appreciation for the interconnectedness of approaches to scientific inference, and a well-developed skill set in at least one approach—thereby empowering them to confidently tackle our pressing environmental problems. Although this is a daunting list of goals, continuing to advance our understanding of how ecosystems function necessitates a rigorous and well-developed training program.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brown JH, Gillooly JF, Allen AP, Savage VM, West GB. 2004. Toward a metabolic theory of ecology. Ecology 85:1771–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpenter SR. 1998. The need for large-scale experiments to assess and predict the response of ecosystems to perturbation. In: Pace ML, Groffman PM, Eds. Successes, limitations, and frontiers in ecosystem science. New York: Springer. p 287–312.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chamberlin TC. 1965. The method of multiple working hypotheses. Science 148:754–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cottingham KL, Brown BL, Lennon JT. 2005. Knowing when to draw the line: the role of regression and ANOVA in ecological experiments. Front Ecol Environ 3:145–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duarte CM, Amthor JS, DeAngelis DL, Joyce LA, Maranger RJ, Pace ML, Pastor J, Running SW. 2003. The limits to models in ecology. In: Canham CD, Cole JJ, Lauenroth WK, Eds. Models in ecosystem Science. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press. p 437–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall BE. 2015. Some directions in ecological theory. Ecology 96:3117–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Levin SA. 1989. Challenges in the development of a theory of community and ecosystem structure and function. In: Roughgarden J, May RM, Levin SA, Eds. Perspectives in ecological theory. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press. p 242–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • LINX Collaborators. 2014. The Lotic Intersite Nitrogen Experiments: an example of successful ecological research collaboration. Freshw Sci 33:700–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loreau M, Naeem S, Inchausti P, Bengtsson J, Grime JP, Hector A, Hooper DU, Huston MA, Raffaelli D, Schmid B, Tilman D, Wardle DA. 2001. Biodiversity and ecosystem functioning: current knowledge and future challenges. Science 294:804–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Marquet PA, Allen AP, Brown JH, Dunne JA, Enquist BJ, Gillooly JF, Gowaty PA, Green JL, Harte J, Hubbell SP, O’Dwyer J, Okie JG, Ostling A, Ritchie M, Storch D, West GB. 2014. On theory in ecology. Bioscience 64:701–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pace ML, Groffman PM. 1998. Successes, Limitations, and Frontiers in Ecosystem Science. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sala OE, Jackson RB, Mooney HA, Howarth RW. 2000. Introduction. Methods in ecosystem science: progress, tradeoffs, and limitations. In: Sala OE, Jackson RB, Mooney HA, Howarth RW, Eds. Methods in ecosystem science. New York: Springer. p 1–3.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Scheiner SM. 2013. The ecological literature, an idea-free distribution. Ecol Lett 16:1421–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shugart HH. 2000. Ecosystem modeling. In: Sala OE, Jackson RB, Mooney HA, Howarth RW, Eds. Methods in ecosystem science. New York (NY): Springer. p 373–88.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sterner RW, Elser JJ. 2002. Ecological Stochiometry: The Biology of Elements from Molecules to the Biosphere. Princeton University Press: Princeton (NJ).

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokstad E. 2011. Open-source ecology takes root across the world. Science 334:308–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • van der Putten WH, Bardgett RD, Bever JD, Bezemer TM, Casper BB, Fukami T, Kardol P, Klironomos JN, Kulmatiski A, Schweitzer JA, Suding KN, Van de Voorde TFJ, Wardle DA. 2013. Plant-soil feedbacks: the past, the present and future challenges. J Ecol 101:265–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weathers KC, Strayer DL, Likens GE. 2013. Introduction to ecosystem science. In: Weathers KC, Strayer DL, Likens GE, Eds. Fundamentals of ecosystem science. Waltham (MA): Academic Press. p 3–23.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Steve Carpenter and Monica Turner for giving us the opportunity to contribute to this anniversary celebration. Conversations with Matt Ayres and Mike Dietrich informed our thinking on the nature of theory in science, while Kassaundra Amann, Matt Ayres, Precious Kilimo, Jaclyn Hatala Matthes, and Andrew Vacca provided thoughtful comments and constructive suggestions that helped to improve our previous drafts. This work is funded by the National Science Foundation (DEB-1601269 to KLC & JVTH; PLR-1506155 to Ross Virginia); a James S. MacDonnell Foundation Postdoctoral Fellowship (SBF); a Department of Education Graduate Assistance in Areas of National Need Fellowship through grant P200A120087 (KJF); and by Dartmouth College (Scholarly Innovation and Advancement Award and Neukom CompX faculty grant to KLC and McCulloch Graduate Fellowship in Environmental Change to KJF).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kathryn L. Cottingham.

Additional information

Samuel B. Fey, Keith J. Fritschie, and Jessica V. Trout-Haney have contributed equally to this paper and are listed alphabetically.

Author contributions

All authors jointly conceived the ideas presented in this paper and contributed to the writing and editing of the text.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 230 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cottingham, K.L., Fey, S.B., Fritschie, K.J. et al. Advancing Ecosystem Science by Promoting Greater Use of Theory and Multiple Research Approaches in Graduate Education. Ecosystems 20, 267–273 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-016-0070-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-016-0070-3

Keywords

Navigation