Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Previous Fires Moderate Burn Severity of Subsequent Wildland Fires in Two Large Western US Wilderness Areas

  • Published:
Ecosystems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wildland fire is an important natural process in many ecosystems. However, fire exclusion has reduced frequency of fire and area burned in many dry forest types, which may affect vegetation structure and composition, and potential fire behavior. In forests of the western U.S., these effects pose a challenge for fire and land managers who seek to restore the ecological process of fire to ecosystems. Recent research suggests that landscapes with unaltered fire regimes are more “self-regulating” than those that have experienced fire-regime shifts; in self-regulating systems, fire size and severity are moderated by the effect of previous fire. To determine if burn severity is moderated in areas that recently burned, we analyzed 117 wildland fires in 2 wilderness areas in the western U.S. that have experienced substantial recent fire activity. Burn severity was measured using a Landsat satellite-based metric at a 30-m resolution. We evaluated (1) whether pixels that burned at least twice since 1984 experienced lower burn severity than pixels that burned once, (2) the relationship between burn severity and fire history, pre-fire vegetation, and topography, and (3) how the moderating effect of a previous fire decays with time. Results show burn severity is significantly lower in areas that have recently burned compared to areas that have not. This effect is still evident at around 22 years between wildland fire events. Results further indicate that burn severity generally increases with time since and severity of previous wildfire. These findings may assist land managers to anticipate the consequences of allowing fires to burn and provide rationale for using wildfire as a “fuel treatment”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agee JK. 1993. Fire ecology of Pacific Northwest forests. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agee JK. 1999. Fire effects on landscape fragmentation in interior west forests. In: Rochelle JA, Lehmann LA, Wisniewski J, Eds. Forest fragmentation: wildlife and management implications. Leiden, The Netherlands: Koninklijke Brill NV. p 323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arkle RS, Pilliod DS, Welty JL. 2012. Pattern and process of prescribed fires influence effectiveness at reducing wildfire severity in dry coniferous forests. For Ecol Manage 276:174–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arno SF, Parsons DJ, Keane RE. 2000. Mixed-severity fire regimes in the northern Rocky Mountains: consequences of fire exclusion and options for the future. In: Cole DN, McCool SF, Borrie WT, O’Loughlin J, Eds. Wilderness science in a time of change conference. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, RMRS-P-15-VOL-5, Missoula, MT.

  • Backer DM, Jensen SE, McPherson GR. 2004. Impacts of fire-suppression activities on natural communities. Coserv Biol 18:937–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker WL. 2009. Fire ecology in Rocky Mountain landscapes. Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett SW. 1988. Fire suppression’s effects on forest succession within a central Idaho wilderness. West J Appl For 3:76–85.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckman S. 2008. An assessment of wildland fire use in areas of the Selway-Bitterroot and Frank Church—River of No Return wilderness. USDA Forest Service, Washington Office, Fire and Aviation Management, Boise.

  • Bradstock RA. 2010. A biogeographic model of fire regimes in Australia: current and future implications. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 19:145–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burrough PA, McDonnell RA. 1998. Principles of geographical information systems. 2nd edn. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cansler CA, McKenzie D. 2012. How robust are burn severity indices when applied in a new region? Evaluation of alternate field-based and remote-sensing methods. Remote Sens 4:456–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cocke AE, Fule PZ, Crouse JE. 2005. Comparison of burn severity assessments using differenced normalized burn ratio and ground data. Int J Wildland Fire 14:189–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins BM, Kelly M, van Wagtendonk JW, Stephens SL. 2007. Spatial patterns of large natural fires in Sierra Nevada wilderness areas. Landsc Ecol 22:545–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins BM, Miller JD, Thode AE, Kelly M, van Wagtendonk JW, Stephens SL. 2009. Interactions among wildland fires in a long-established Sierra Nevada natural fire area. Ecosystems 12:114–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane MF, Fischer WC. 1986. Fire ecology of the forest habitat types on central Idaho. USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report, GTR-INT-218.

  • Dillon GK, Holden ZA, Morgan P, Crimmins MA, Heyerdahl EK, Luce CH. 2011. Both topography and climate affected forest and woodland burn severity in two regions of the western US, 1984 to 2006. Ecosphere 2: art130.

  • Eidenshink J, Schwind B, Brewer K, Zhu ZL, Quayle B, Howard S. 2007. A project for monitoring trends in burn severity. Fire Ecol 3:3–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finklin AI. 1988. Climate of the Frank Church—River of No Return wilderness, central Idaho. USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report, GTR-INT-240.

  • Fu P, Rich PM. 2002. A geometric solar radiation model with applications in agriculture and forestry. Comput Electron Agric 37:25–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geospatial multi-agency coordinating group (GeoMAC). 2013. Fire perimeter dataset. Available at http://www.Geomac.Gov/index.Shtml.

  • Gunderson LH. 2000. Ecological resilience—in theory and application. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 31:425–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haire SL, McGarigal K, Miller C. 2013. Wilderness shapes contemporary fire size distributions across landscapes of the western United States. Ecosphere 4: art15.

  • Hessburg PF, Agee JK, Franklin JF. 2005. Dry forests and wildland fires of the inland Northwest USA: Contrasting the landscape ecology of the pre-settlement and modern eras. For Ecol Manage 211:117–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heyerdahl EK, Brubaker LB, Agee JK. 2001. Spatial controls of historical fire regimes: a multiscale example from the interior west, USA. Ecology 82:660–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holden ZA, Morgan P, Evans JS. 2009. A predictive model of burn severity based on 20-year satellite-inferred burn severity data in a large southwestern US wilderness area. For Ecol Manage 258:2399–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holden ZA, Morgan P, Hudak AT. 2010. Burn severity of areas reburned by wildfires in the Gila National Forest, New Mexico, USA. Fire Ecol 6:77–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huete AR. 1988. A soil-adjusted vegetation index (SAVI). Remote Sens Environ 25:295–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huete AR, Jackson RD, Post DF. 1985. Spectral response of a plant canopy with different soil backgrounds. Remote Sens Environ 17:37–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutto RL. 2008. The ecological importance of severe wildfires: some like it hot. Ecol Appl 18:1827–34.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy MC, McKenzie D. 2010. Using a stochastic model and cross-scale analysis to evaluate controls on historical low-severity fire regimes. Landsc Ecol 25:1561–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Key CH, Benson NC. 2006. Landscape assessment (LA). In: Lutes D, Keane RE, Caratti JF, Key CH, Benson NC, Sutherland S, Gangi L, Eds. FIREMON: Fire effects monitoring and inventory system. USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report, RMRS-GTR-164.

  • Kilgore BM, Taylor D. 1979. Fire history of a sequoia mixed conifer forest. Ecology 60:129–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krawchuk MA, Moritz MA, Parisien M-A, Van Dorn J, Hayhoe K. 2009. Global pyrogeography: the current and future distribution of wildfire. Plos One 4:e5102.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Larson AJ, Belote RT, Cansler CA, Parks SA, Dietz MS. 2013. Latent resilience in ponderosa pine forest: effects of resumed frequent fire. Ecol Appl 23:1243–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Legendre P. 1993. Spatial autocorrelation: trouble or new paradigm? Ecology 74:1659–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legendre P, Fortin MJ. 1989. Spatial pattern and ecological analysis. Vegetatio 80:107–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mack M, Treseder K, Manies K, Harden J, Schuur EG, Vogel J, Randerson J, Chapin FSIII. 2008. Recovery of aboveground plant biomass and productivity after fire in mesic and dry black spruce forests of interior Alaska. Ecosystems 11:209–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie D, Gedalof Z, Peterson DL, Mote P. 2004. Climatic change, wildfire, and conservation. Coserv Biol 18:890–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie D, Miller C, Falk DA. 2011. Toward a theory of landscape fire. In: McKenzie D, Miller C, Falk DA, Eds. The landscape ecology of fire. Dordrecht: Springer. p 3–25.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Miller JD, Thode AE. 2007. Quantifying burn severity in a heterogeneous landscape with a relative version of the delta normalized burn ratio (dNBR). Remote Sens Environ 109:66–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller JD, Safford HD, Crimmins M, Thode AE. 2009. Quantitative evidence for increasing forest fire severity in the Sierra Nevada and Southern Cascade Mountains, California and Nevada, USA. Ecosystems 12:16–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller JD, Skinner CN, Safford HD, Knapp EE, Ramirez CM. 2012. Trends and causes of severity, size, and number of fires in northwestern California, USA. Ecol Appl 22:184–203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Naficy C, Sala A, Keeling EG, Graham J, DeLuca TH. 2010. Interactive effects of historical logging and fire exclusion on ponderosa pine forest structure in the northern Rockies. Ecol Appl 20:1851–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • North M, Hurteau M, Innes J. 2009. Fire suppression and fuels treatment effects on mixed-conifer carbon stocks and emissions. Ecol Appl 19:1385–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Odion DC, Frost EJ, Strittholt JR, Jiang H, Dellasala DA, Moritz MA. 2004. Patterns of fire severity and forest conditions in the western Klamath Mountains, California. Coserv Biol 18:927–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parisien M-A, Parks SA, Miller C, Krawchuk MA, Heathcott M, Moritz MA. 2011a. Contributions of Ignitions, Fuels, and weather to the burn probability of a boreal landscape. Ecosystems 14:1141–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parisien M-A, Parks SA, Krawchuk MA, Flannigan MD, Bowman LM, Moritz MA. 2011b. Scale-dependent controls on the area burned in the boreal forest of Canada, 1980–2005. Ecol Appl 21:789–805.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Parks SA, Parisien M-A, Miller C. 2011. Multi-scale evaluation of the environmental controls on burn probability in a southern Sierra Nevada landscape. Int J Wildland Fire 20:815–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parks SA, Parisien M-A, Miller C. 2012. Spatial bottom-up controls on fire likelihood vary across western North America. Ecosphere 3(1): Article12. doi:10.1890/ES11-00298.1.

  • Peterson GD. 2002. Contagious disturbance, ecological memory, and the emergence of landscape pattern. Ecosystems 5:329–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Development Core Team. 2007. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. In: R foundation for computing. Vienna, Austria.

  • Rollins MG. 2009. LANDFIRE: a nationally consistent vegetation, wildland fire, and fuel assessment. Int J Wildland Fire 18:235–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rollins MG, Swetnam TW, Morgan P. 2001. Evaluating a century of fire patterns in two Rocky Mountain wilderness areas using digital fire atlases. Can J For Res 31:2107–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rollins MG, Morgan P, Swetnam T. 2002. Landscape-scale controls over 20th century fire occurrence in two large Rocky Mountain (USA) wilderness areas. Landsc Ecol 17:539–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Romme WH, Knight DH. 1982. Landscape diversity: the concept applied to Yellowstone Park. Bioscience 32:664–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy DP, Lewis PE, Justice CO. 2002. Burned area mapping using multi-temporal moderate spatial resolution data: a bi-directional reflectance model-based expectation approach. Remote Sens Environ 83:263–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwilk DW, Knapp EE, Ferrenberg SM, Keeley JE, Caprio AC. 2006. Tree mortality from fire and bark beetles following early and late season prescribed fires in a Sierra Nevada mixed-conifer forest. For Ecol Manage 232:36–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soverel NO, Perrakis DDB, Coops NC. 2010. Estimating burn severity from Landsat dNBR and RdNBR indices across western Canada. Remote Sens Environ 114:1896–909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steele R, Phfister RD, Ryker RA, Kittams JA. 1981. Forest habitat types of central Idaho. USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report INT-114.

  • Stephens SL. 2005. Forest fire causes and extent on United States Forest Service lands. Int J Wildland Fire 14:213–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens SL, Ruth LW. 2005. Federal forest-fire policy in the United States. Ecol Appl 15:532–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens SL, Moghaddas JJ, Edminster C, Fiedler CE, Haase S, Harrington M, Keeley JE, Knapp EE, McIver JD, Metlen K, Skinner CN, Youngblood A. 2009. Fire treatment effects on vegetation structure, fuels, and potential fire severity in western US forests. Ecol Appl 19:305–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Swetnam TW, Baisan CH. 1996. Historical fire regime patterns in the southwestern United States since ad 1700. In: Allen CD, Ed. Fire effects in southwestern forests: Proceedings of the second La Mesa Fire symposium. USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report, RM-GTR-286.

  • Swetnam TW, Dieterich JH. 1985. Fire history of ponderosa pine forests in the Gila Wilderness, New Mexico. In: Lotan JE, Kilgore BM, Fischer WC, Mutch RW, Eds. Proceedings–symposium and workshop on wilderness fire. USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report, GTR-INT-182. pp 390–397.

  • Taylor AH. 2000. Fire regimes and forest changes in mid and upper montane forests of the southern Cascades, Lassen Volcanic National Park, California, USA. J Biogeogr 27:87–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor AH, Skinner CN. 2003. Spatial patterns and controls on historical fire regimes and forest structure in the Klamath Mountains. Ecol Appl 13:704–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teske CC, Seielstad CA, Queen LP. 2012. Characterizing fire-on-fire interactions in three large wilderness areas. Fire Ecol 8:82–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson JR, Spies TA. 2009. Vegetation and weather explain variation in crown damage within a large mixed-severity wildfire. For Ecol Manage 258:1684–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson JR, Spies TA. 2010. Factors associated with crown damage following recurring mixed-severity wildfires and post-fire management in southwestern Oregon. Landsc Ecol 25:775–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson JR, Spies TA, Ganio LM. 2007. Reburn severity in managed and unmanaged vegetation in a large wildfire. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:10743–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Turner MG. 1989. Landscape ecology: the effect of pattern on process. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 20:171–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USDA Forest Service. 2003. The Frank Church—River of No Return wilderness management plan.

  • USDA Forest Service. 2013. MODIS Fire and Thermal Anomalies Product for Terra and Aqua MODIS. http://activefiremaps.fs.fed.us/gisdata.php.

  • van Wagtendonk JW, Root RR, Key CH. 2004. Comparison of AVIRIS and Landsat ETM+ detection capabilities for burn severity. Remote Sens Environ 92:397–408.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Wagtendonk JW, van Wagtendonk KA, Thode AE. 2012. Factors associated with the severity of intersecting fires in Yosemite National Park, California, USA. Fire Ecol 8:11–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss AD. 2001. Topographic positions and landforms analysis (Poster). San Diego, CA: ESRI International User Conference.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westerling AL, Hidalgo HG, Cayan DR, Swetnam TW. 2006. Warming and earlier spring increase western US forest wildfire activity. Science 313:940–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman T, Frary T, Crook S, Fay B, Koppenol P, Lasko R. 2006. Wildland fire use: challenges associated with program management across multiple ownerships and land use situations, Proceedings RMRS-P-41. In: Andrews PL, Butler BW, Eds. Fuels management: how to measure success. USDA Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, CO, p. 809.

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank S. Dobrowski, R. Hutto, R. Keane, and A. Larson for their thoughtful comments that significantly improved this manuscript. We also thank L. Baggett and D. Turner for statistical advice. Funding was provided by the U.S. Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station’s National Fire Plan research project on “Fire management strategies for Wilderness and other protected wildlands” and the Joint Fire Science Program under Project JFSP 12-1-03-19.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sean A. Parks.

Additional information

Author Contributions

SAP designed study, analyzed data, wrote paper. CM designed study, wrote paper. CRN wrote paper. ZAH designed study, wrote paper.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Parks, S.A., Miller, C., Nelson, C.R. et al. Previous Fires Moderate Burn Severity of Subsequent Wildland Fires in Two Large Western US Wilderness Areas. Ecosystems 17, 29–42 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-013-9704-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-013-9704-x

Key words

Navigation