Skip to main content
Log in

Live sequence charts applied to hardware requirements specification and verification

A VCI bus interface model

  • Special section on high-level test of complex systems
  • Published:
International Journal on Software Tools for Technology Transfer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Techniques and tools for formally verifying compliance with industry standards are important, especially in System-on-Chip (SoC) designs: a failure to integrate externally developed intellectual property (IP) cores is prohibitively costly. There are three essential components in the practical verification of compliance with a standard. First, an easy-to-read and yet formal specification of the standard is needed; we propose Live Sequence Charts (LSCs) as a high-level visual notation for writing specifications. Second, assertions should be generated directly from the specification; an implementation will be scrutinized, usually by model checking, to check that it satisfies each assertion. Third, a formal link must be made between proofs of assertions and compliance with the original specification. As an example, we take the Virtual Component Interface (VCI) Standard. We compare three efforts in verifying that the same register transfer level code is VCI-compliant. The first two efforts were manual, while the third used a tool, lscAssert, to automatically generate assertions in LTL. We discuss the details of the assertion generation algorithm.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Albin K (2001) Nuts and bolts of core and SoC verification. In: Proceedings of the 2001 conference on design automation, pp 249–252

  2. Alur R, Etessami K, Yannakakis M (2000) Inference of Message Sequence Charts. In: Proceedings of the 22nd international conference on software engineering, pp 304–313

  3. Bell Labs Design Automation and Lucent Technologies (1998) FormalCheck User’s Guide, v2.1 edn

  4. Bohn J, Damm W, Wittke H, Klose J, Moik A (2002) Modeling and validating train system applications using statemate and Live Sequence Charts. In: Ehrig H, Krämer BJ, Ertas A (eds) Proceedings of the 6th biennial world conference on integrated design and process technology, June 2002. Society for Design and Process Science, p 34

  5. Bontemps Y, Heymans P (2003) Turning high-level live sequence charts into automata. Technical report, Computer Science Department, University of Namur

  6. Bunker A (2003) Applying a visual specification language to hardware protocol verification. PhD thesis, University of Utah, August

  7. Bunker A, Gopalakrishnan G (2001) Using Live Sequence Charts for hardware protocol specification and compliance verification. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international workshop high level design validation and test workshop, November 2001. IEEE Press, pp 95–100

  8. Bunker A, Gopalakrishnan G (2002) Verifying a VCI bus interface model using an LSC-based specification. In: Ehrig H, Krämer BJ, Ertas A (eds) Proceedings of the 6th biennial world conference on integrated design and process technology, June 2002. Society of Design and Process Science, p 48

  9. Chauhan P, Clarke EM, Lu Y, Wang D (1999) Verifying IP-Core based System-On-Chip designs. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international ASIC/SOC conference, September 1999, pp 27–31

  10. Damm W, Harel D (2001) LSCs: Breathing life into Message Sequence Charts. Formal Methods Sys Des 19(1):45–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Damm W, Klose J (2001) Verification of a radio-based signaling system using the statemate verification environment. Formal Methods Sys Des 19:121–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Grahm T, Clark B (2001) SoC integration of reusable baseband bluetooth IP. In: Proceedings of the 2001 conference on design automation, pp 256–261

  13. Gunter EL, Muscholl A, Peled DA (2001) Compositional message sequence charts. In: Margaria T, Yi W (eds) Proceedings of the conference on tools and algorithms for the construction and analysis of systems. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 2031. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 496–511

  14. Harel D, Marelly R (2002) Playing with time: on the specification and execution of time-enriched LSCs. In: Proceedings of the 10th IEEE/ACM international symposium on modeling, analysis and simulation of computer and telecommunication systems, October 2002, pp 193–202

  15. Jones MD (2001) Formal verification of parameterized protocols on branching networks. PhD thesis, University of Utah

  16. Klose J, Wittke H (2001) An automata based interpretation of live sequence charts. In: Margaria T, Yi W (eds) Proceedings of the conference on tools and algorithms for the construction and analysis of systems. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 2031. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 512–527

  17. Krüger I, Grosu R, Scholz P, Broy M (1999) From MSCs to statecharts. In: Distributed and parallel embedded systems. Kluwer, Dordrecht

  18. Martin AJ (1993) Synthesis of asynchronous VLSI circuits. Technical report Caltech-CS-TR-93-28, California Institute of Technology

  19. McMillan KL (1999) Circular compositional reasoning about liveness. In: Pierre L, Kropf T (eds) Correct hardware design and verifiation methods. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 1703. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 342–345

  20. Moretti G (2001) Your core – my problem? Integration and verification of IP. In: Proceedings of the 2001 conference on design automation, pp 170–171

  21. Muscholl A, Peled D (2000) Analyzing message sequence charts. In: Proceedings of SDL and MSC’00, June 2000

  22. Namjoshi KS, Trefler RJ (2000) On the completeness of compositional reasoning. In: Proceedings of the conference on computer aided verification. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 1855. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 139–153

  23. OCB Design Working Group (2000) VSI Alliance Virtual Component Interface Standard. Virtual Socket Interface Alliance, November 2000

  24. Rushby J (2001) Formal verification of McMillan’s compositional assume-guarantee rule. Technical report, Computer Science Laboratory, SRI International, September 2001

  25. Shimizu K, Dill DL (2002) Deriving a simulation input generator and a coverage metric from a formal specification. In: Proceedings of the 39th conference on design automation. Association for Computing Machinery, pp 801–806

  26. Shimizu K, Dill DL, Hu AJ (2000) Monitor-based formal specification of PCI. In: Hunt WA Jr, Johnson SD (eds) Proceedings of the conference on formal methods in computer-aided design, November 2000. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 1954. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg New York, pp 335–352

  27. Wang D (1999) Formal verification of the PCI local bus: a step towards IP Core based System-On-Chip design verification. Master’s thesis, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, May 1999

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Annette Bunker.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bunker, A., Gopalakrishnan, G. & Slind, K. Live sequence charts applied to hardware requirements specification and verification. Int J Softw Tools Technol Transfer 7, 341–350 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10009-004-0145-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10009-004-0145-x

Keywords

Navigation