Abstract
Down's syndrome (DS), a common chromosomal disease caused by chromosome 21 trisomy, is the main cause of cognitive impairment in children worldwide. Emerging evidence suggests that the microbiota–gut–brain axis plays a potential role in cognitive impairment. However, data regarding gut microbiota alterations in DS patients remain scarce, especially data from children with DS. This case–control study was conducted to explore the gut microbiota composition in Chinese DS children. Additionally, the potential association between gut microbiota and cognitive function in DS was evaluated. Microbiota communities in the feces of 15 DS subjects and 15 matched controls were investigated using high-throughput Illumina Miseq sequencing targeting the V3–V4 region of 16S rRNA gene. The relationships between gut microbiota composition and DS cognitive function scores were analyzed. The structure and richness of the gut microbiota differed between DS patients and healthy controls. The abundance of Acidaminococcaceae was decreased in DS patients. Moreover, the Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes analysis showed increased modules related to peptidases and pyrimidine metabolism. Overall, we confirmed that gut microbiota alterations occurred in Chinese patients with DS. Additionally, the fecal microbiota was closely related to DS cognitive impairment. Larger cohorts are needed to confirm these findings and to clarify the mechanisms involved. Elucidating these novel findings in the field of microbiota-gut-brain axis will provide a promising strategy for future studies of DS cognitive impairment.
Similar content being viewed by others
Introduction
Down's syndrome (DS) is the most common chromosomal disease in China. It occurs in approximately 26,600 births annually, resulting in an estimated prevalence of 13 per 10,000 live births [1]. Around 5–8 million people are living with DS-associated cognitive impairment worldwide, and about 70% of them have progressive dementia associated with Alzheimer's disease (AD) after the age of 40 [2]. As there is no effective medical therapy to improve cognitive function or delay the occurrence of AD-related dementia, DS patients cannot function normally, which results in a heavy burden to their families and society [3].
DS is caused by chromosome 21 trisomy. Chromosome 21 contains hundreds of genes, including the gene for amyloid precursor protein [4]. Accumulation of amyloid-β (Aβ), a cleavage product of amyloid precursor protein gene, in the brain can trigger microglial activation and neuron damage in AD patients [5, 6]. Since DS patients have three copies of the amyloid precursor protein gene, DS is associated with a significant increase in the risk of early AD-related dementia [7]. Prior to Aβ plaque formation, higher levels of plasma Aβ40 and Aβ42 were founded in the brains of children with DS [8]. Meanwhile, Aβ-induced inflammatory cell activation can affect brain growth in DS, suggesting that some common pathogenic mechanisms may exist between DS-associated cognitive impairment and AD [9, 10].
Recent studies have shown that alterations in the gut microbiome [11, 12] may play a role in the pathogenesis of cognitive impairment in AD [13, 14]. Additionally, studies have found that gut microbiota alterations in AD affect cognitive function by altering the status of the microglia [15]. Although this evidence indicates a pathogenic link between gut microbiota and cognitive function, few studies have explored the role of the gut microbiota in DS-associated cognitive impairment. Additionally, these studies have not been carried out in pediatric DS patients or in the Chinese population. A recent study from Italy using 16S rRNA gene sequencing showed that adult patients with DS exhibit gut microbiota alterations [16]. However, there are major differences in the bacterial profiles of the gut between adults and children in different populations. Childhood is a key stage of cognitive development [17]. In addition, increasing evidence has shown that age, geographic origin, and eating habits have a great influence on the composition of the gut microbiota [18, 19].
Therefore, in our study, we utilized a healthy control group consisting of children who attended the same school as the DS patients for at least 2 years. Their ages, geographic origins, and diets were well matched to those of the DS patients. We aimed to compare the microbiota communities in the feces of DS subjects to those of the matched controls, and the results of this study may provide a new target for future studies of cognitive impairment in DS.
Materials and methods
Study subjects and ethical approval
The study protocol was approved by the Ethical Review Committee of Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, China (approval no. 2019PHB110-01). All participants and their parents received verbal and documented information on the study, and written consent was obtained prior to recruitment.
We randomly recruited 68 DS children and 29 healthy volunteers from the boarding integrated school in Beijing and its surrounding areas. All the study subjects had the same diet offered by school. 18 DS children with other diseases and 21 DS subjects who have no age-matched healthy controls were excluded. Among the remaining 29 pairs of subjects, each pair consists of a DS subject and an age-matched healthy control. Additionally, 14 pairs were excluded due to the use of probiotics and refusal to provide samples (detail information provided in supplementary Fig. S1). A total of 15 pairs of subjects were included in the final analysis of 16S rRNA sequencing (recruitment flow chart provided in Fig. 1). 11 pairs of participants over the age of 6 were tested with the Chinese version of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children (WISC-IV) [20]. Given that the cognition test of WISC-IV is only applicable to children over the age of 6, 4 pairs of participants under the age of 6 were excluded.
A chromosome test was used to establish a diagnosis of DS, and the healthy controls exhibited no disease symptoms. Exclusion criteria for participants included a history of nutritional supplement use and special diets, presence of significant physical abnormalities, and neurological disorders of known etiology. Individuals who took antibiotics or probiotic supplements within the three months prior to sample collection were also excluded.
Clinical data collection
Each subject’s weight and height were measured, and their body mass index was calculated. Participants were interviewed by a nurse or resident regarding their bowel habits. Gastrointestinal symptoms were assessed following a constipation scoring system adapted for children. The constipation scoring system, also known as the Cleveland Clinic score, was proposed by Agachan et al. to assess the severity of intestinal dysfunction [21]. It includes frequency of bowel movements, painful evacuation efforts, feeling incomplete, abdominal pain, minutes in lavatory per attempt, type of assistance, unsuccessful evacuation attempts per 24 h, and duration of constipation. The scores ranged from 0 to 30, with 0 indicating normal bowel function and 30 indicating severe constipation. A score of 15 or more is used to define "constipation" in this scoring system.
For the purposes of the present study, we examined the scores obtained in the 10 core subtests of the WISC-IV: block design, similarities, digit span, picture concepts, coding, vocabulary, letter-number sequencing, matrix reasoning, comprehension, and symbol search. We calculated the Full scale IQ (FSIQ) and the four factor indices: the perceptual reasoning index (PRI), which includes block design, picture concepts, and matrix reasoning; the verbal comprehension index (VCI), including similarities, vocabulary and comprehension; the working memory index (WMI), including digit span and letter-number sequencing; and the processing speed index (PSI), including coding and symbol search. Cognitive tests were standardly administered by two trained pediatricians at hospital meeting room that were free of distractions. The intra-class correlation coefficient was about 0.857.
Fecal sample collection and DNA extraction
Fecal samples were collected using fecal bacteria DNA storage tubes (Longsee Biological Company, Guangzhou, China). The samples were transferred on ice and stored at − 80 ℃ prior to processing. The average transfer time between sample collection and stored at − 80 ℃ was 19 min, and the maximum time was 23 min. Total fecal DNA was extracted using a QIAamp DNA Stool Mini Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). All DNA extractions were performed in a Class II biological safety cabinet. The concentration of genomic DNA in each fecal sample was quantified using a Nano-Drop 2000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, MA, USA). DNA integrity and sizes were assessed by 1% agarose gel electrophoresis. The DNA was re-suspended in H2O and stored at − 80 ℃ prior to use.
16S rRNA gene amplicon and sequencing
The isolated bacterial genomic DNA was used as a template for PCR amplification of V3-V4 region of the bacterial 16S rRNA gene in a multiplex approach with the forward primers and the reverse primer. The amplicons were extracted and further purified using the AxyPrep DNA Gel Extraction Kit (Axygen Biosciences, Union City, CA, USA) and quantified using the QuantiFluor™-ST system (Promega, USA) per the manufacturer’s instructions. The sequencing data were pooled equimolarly and paired-end sequenced (2 × 300) on an Illumina MiSeq platform (Illumina, San Diego, USA) according to standard protocols from Majorbio Bio-Pharm Technology Co. Ltd. (Shanghai, China). We obtained 1,851,666 sequences and 763,428,366 bases from 30 samples with an average of 61,722 sequences per sample. The average length of sequences was about 412 bases (amplify region, 338F_806R) and length distribution of sequences is shown in Fig. S2. Detailed descriptions of the amplicons and the sequencing analysis protocol were provided in the eMethods in the Supplementary data.
Statistical analysis
SPSS (ver. 20.0, SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) and R software (ver. 3.1.0, the R Project for Statistical Computing) were used for statistical analysis. Comparisons between groups were assessed using the Student’s t test or the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for quantitative variables and Pearson’s Chi-square test for categorical variables, respectively. Rarefaction was applied to the operational taxonomic units (OTUs) to reduce sampling heterogeneity for further alpha and beta-diversity calculations. Partial least-squares-latent structure discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) was performed to compare the fecal microbiota structures in different groups based on OTUs from the sequencing data of each sample. The principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) of weighted Unifrac distance matrices was performed to measure the β-diversity. Differential abundance analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon rank-sum test at the class, order, family, genus, and species levels. And the false discovery rate was calculated using the Benjamini–Hochberg method. The linear discriminant analysis (LDA) effect size (LEfSe) analysis, an algorithm for high-dimensional biomarker discovery, was used to identify differentially abundant taxa between two groups. The LEfSe method was used to estimate the effect of each differentially abundant taxon and discriminate the most biologically relevant taxon.
Random forest analysis was used to predict the disease status based on the microbiota profile (genus and OTU-level relative abundance data) using the default parameters of the R implementation of the algorithm (R random forest package). Bootstrapping (n = 500) was used to assess the classification accuracy. To evaluate the discriminatory ability of the random forest model, receiving operational curves (ROC) were constructed and the area under curve (AUC) was calculated. Additionally, Phylogenetic Investigation of Communities by Reconstruction of Unobserved States (PICRUSt) was used to predict the abundance of functional categories, such as KEGG pathways, based on the 16S rRNA sequence data. The Principal component analysis (PCA) colored by FSIQ score was also performed (intergroup difference test method: ANOSIM, permutations = 999). The coloring order of the label scale was the order of FSIQ levels. Spearman correlation and MaAslin analysis were used to assess the relationship between bacterial taxa and WISC-IV scores. p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Characteristics of the DS and healthy groups
The demographic characteristics of the DS group and the healthy group are summarized in Table 1. There were no differences in age, gender, or weight between the two groups. The DS group had a lower average height (p = 0.037) and higher body mass index (p = 0.009) than the healthy group (Table 1). A higher proportion of the DS group patients reported constipation compared to the healthy group (33.3% vs 0%, p = 0.042, Table 1). Significant differences were found in frequency of bowel movements (p = 0.043), feeling incomplete evacuation (p = 0.043), abdominal pain (p = 0.009), minutes in lavatory per attempt (p = 0.03), type of assistance (p = 0.028), and duration of constipation (p < 0.001). The DS group had lower FSIQ, VCI, PRI, WMI, and PSI scores compared to the healthy group (all p < 0.001, Table 2).
Alpha and beta-diversity between the DS and healthy groups
To assess the alteration of the fecal microbiota composition in the DS group, we performed parallel Miseq sequencing. As shown in Fig. 2a, the Shannon diversity index was significantly reduced in the DS group (control: 3.18 vs. DS: 2.82, p = 0.01), whereas the Simpson’s diversity index (control: 0.1 vs. DS: 0.16, p = 0.01) was increased (Fig. 2b), suggesting decreased commensal diversity in patients with DS. As shown in the Venn diagram, 410 out of 626 total OTUs were shared among all the samples (Fig. 2c). The distinctive fecal microbial communities associated with DS are presented in a supervised PLS-DA plot (Fig. 2d). Significant differences were also found in the beta-diversity, indicating that the fecal microbial structure in the DS group differed significantly from that of healthy group (Fig. 2e).
Alteration in taxa abundance between the DS and healthy groups
We assessed the mean relative abundances of various taxa in the DS and healthy groups to identify specific alterations in the microbiota. 9 bacteria taxa were identified in supplementary Table S1 (p < 0.05). After adjustment by the Benjamini–Hochberg method, only proportions of family Acidaminococcaceae were different between two groups (q = 0.04001, 95% confidence interval: − 1.819 to 1.445, effect size = 0.1965, Fig. 3a, b).
To assess the impact of digestive problems on the differences found in microbiota, we divided the DS group into DS_C group (DS with constipation, n = 5) and DS_NC group (DS without constipation, n = 10). Kruskal–Wallis H test was performed between healthy control group, DS_C group and DS_NC group. No significant difference in microbiota was found after adjusted by the Benjamini–Hochberg method (Fig. S3). To observe the effect of constipation on DS gut microbiota, we have made a further analysis between DS_C group and DS_NC group. There was no significantly different abundance on genus level between two groups (Fig. S4). It needs more large-scale studies to confirm these results in the future.
We performed a supervised comparison of the microbiota between the DS and healthy groups using the LEfSe analysis, which is often used to identify the presence and effect size of region-specific OTUs among different groups. We used a logarithmic LDA score cut-off of 2.0 to identify important taxonomic differences between the DS and healthy groups. In particular, we examined differences in the taxa at the genus level. The results indicated a remarkable difference in the fecal microbiota between the DS and healthy groups. The relative abundances of the genera Megamonas, Tyzzerella_4, Prevotella_6, Collinsella, Klebsiella, Slackia, Ruminiclostridium_5, and Coprobacillus were higher in the healthy group than in the DS group, whereas the relative abundances of genera Faecalibacterium, Anaerostipes, Phascolarctobacterium, and Turicibacter were higher in the DS patients than in the healthy controls (LDA score (log10) > 2, Fig. 3c, d).
Random forest predictive models
To evaluate DS disease status based on an ensemble of decision trees, we used random forest analysis based on AUC verification method to build a predictive model at the OTU and genus levels (Fig. 4a, b). According to the point with the highest AUC value, 3 genera and 6 OTUs were selected to construct the random forest model. ROC curves were calculated using the predominant fecal microbial taxa, including 3 genera and 6 OTUs. At the genus level, the area under the ROC curve was 0.86 (95% confidence interval 0.71–1, Fig. 4c), indicating that the diagnostic model had certain accuracy. At the OTU level, the area under the ROC curve was 0.91 (95% confidence interval 0.81–1, Fig. 4d), indicating that the diagnostic model had high accuracy.
Predictive function analysis
PICRUSt based on the closed-reference OTUs was used to predict the abundances of functional categories of the KEGG orthology (KO). A total of 9 KOs in the fecal microbiome between the DS and healthy groups were identified (Fig. 5a). In the level 1 KEGG pathway, the environmental information processing and genetic information processing functions were higher in the fecal microbiome of the DS group (Fig. 5b). In level 2, the pathway involved in translation of genetic information processing was higher in the DS group (Fig. 5c). In level 3, pathways involved with ribosome biogenesis in translation, replication and repair of chromosome in genetic information processing, pyrimidine metabolism of nucleotide metabolism, and peptidases of enzyme families in metabolism were higher in the fecal microbiome of the DS group (Fig. 5d). Larger-scale studies are needed to confirm our findings, considering that the FDR-adjusted results were not statistically significant.
Association between fecal microbiota and cognitive function
The PCA on OTU level colored by FSIQ score was significantly different (R = 0.1186, p = 0.037, Fig. 6). It indicates that the fecal microbial composition of these two groups was significantly different. The interpretation degree of PC1 axis and PC2 axis to the results were 22.89% and 11.12%, respectively. Next, we examined correlations between the WISC-IV scores and fecal microbiota genera and species. All significant correlations were negative. The significant negative correlations between genus of Blautia and all WISC-IV scores were identified by both Heatmap analysis and MaAslin analysis (Figs. 7a, 8a–e). The significant negative correlations between genus of Citrobacter and FSIQ, PSI, VCI, and WMI scores were identified by both Heatmap analysis and MaAslin analysis (Figs. 7a, 8f–i). The significant negative correlations between species of ruminococcus_sp._5_1_39BFAA and VCI scores were identified by both Heatmap analysis and MaAslin analysis (Figs. 7b, 8j).
Discussion
Our study confirms that gut microbiota alterations occur in Chinese children with DS and that alterations significantly correlate with cognitive function in DS. Interestingly, we found that the Blautia and Citrobacter genera were negatively associated with cognitive scores measured in our study. Importantly, the rank forest discriminating models generated in this study can effectively distinguish DS from healthy controls. Moreover, the KEGG pathway analysis indicated that the modules for ribosome biogenesis, replication and repair of chromosome, peptidases of enzyme families, and pyrimidine metabolism enriched in DS patients. To the best of our knowledge, this is one of the first studies characterizing the gut microbiota of Chinese children with DS. The recruitment of well-matched healthy controls is another important strength of our study, which greatly reduces the impacts of age, geographic region, and eating habits on gut microbiota profile outcomes. Additionally, larger cohorts that controlled for more confounders including sex, body mass index and stool consistency are needed to confirm our findings.
In our study, the Shannon diversity index of the fecal microbiota in children with DS was significantly reduced compared to the healthy group. Reduction in microbiota diversity has recently been found to be associated with autism [22], AD [23, 24], Parkinson’s disease [25], and other conditions linked to gut microbiota alterations [26, 27]. In a previous study investigating the fecal microbiota in adult DS patients using 454 pyrosequencing of the V4 region of the 16S rRNA gene, Elena Biagi et al. reported no statistically significant differences in the Shannon diversity index in Italian adult DS patients, indicating the importance of controlling for environmental factors between the DS and control groups [16]. Additionally, the beta-diversity index in Chinese children with DS differed significantly from that of healthy group, which is consistent with previous study [16]. Larger sample size studies are needed to confirm the differences in beta-diversity after accounting for stool consistency using the Bristol stool chart.
Previous comparable studies addressing differences in the gut microbiota between DS patients and controls have mainly examined the phylum or family levels [16]. Since we obtained more sequencing reads than previous studies, our results are focused on differences at the genus and species levels. One innovation of our study is the discovery of several new different taxa between DS children and well-matched healthy controls. Interestingly, only family Acidaminococcaceae remained statistically different after adjusting for FDR. However, the effect size of 95% confidence interval cannot strongly support obvious difference. It may be related to the limited sample size. The family Acidaminococcaceae, which includes the recognized genera Acidaminococcus, Phascolarctobacterium, Succinispira and Succiniclasticum, is a known producer of propionate [28]. The decreased abundance of Acidaminococcaceae in DS children may lead to a decrease in fecal propionate. Ravinder et al. have reported that fecal propionate correlates negatively with Aβ-42 in cerebrospinal fluid of subjects with mild cognitive impairment [29]. Moreover, it has been reported that the accumulation of Aβ 42 in AD brain is associated with the elevation of IL-22 and neuro-inflammation [30]. Importantly, a decreased abundance of Acidaminococcaceae has been found following IL-22 neutralization [31]. Overall, these results indicate that the gut microbiota in Chinese children with DS has undergone changes which may result in neuronal damage through neuro-inflammation.
The random forest model of the predominant taxa in the fecal microbiota used to identify DS in our study had similar area under the ROC curve as previous studies [22]. The KEGG pathway of ribosomal biogenesis is enriched in DS and is closely related to cognitive impairment [32, 33], Allen et al. reported that transient disruption of ribosome biogenesis could cause memory impairment [34], whereas persistent severe disruption can lead to cell death due to insufficient protein synthesis [35, 36]. Therefore, gut microbiota alterations may also affect cognitive function via the ribosomal biogenesis pathway.
It has been reported that there are significant differences in the gut microbiota among different populations and individuals due to ethnic, geographical, host genetics, age and other factors [37]. To minimize the effect of age on the microbiota, healthy controls of the same age as DS subjects were included. Each healthy control included in our study had lived in the same school as DS subjects for at least two years. This approach can largely reduce the effect of diets on the results. Similar to AD, specific taxa in the DS microbiome were correlated with cognitive function scores in this study. We found that Citrobacter and Blautia genera were negatively associated with the cognitive scores, demonstrating that the microbiota may influence cognitive function or that cognitive function may affect the microbiota [38, 39]. However, the second hypothesis has not been reported in the literature. The negative association between Escherichia-Shigella and WISC-IV scores, which was founded in Heatmap analysis, was not observed in the MaAslin analysis. It indicates that false positives were excluded by multiple comparative correction. In addition, there seem to be two individuals driving the correlations in MaAslin analysis. Given the small sample size, it is difficult to know whether these individuals are outliers or representative. More larger-scale studies are needed to confirm these findings. As a sulfur-producing bacterium, Citrobacter can produce copious amounts of hydrogen sulfide, which is the reversible inhibitor of cytochrome c oxidase. And hydrogen sulfide can influence the energy generation process mediated by the cytochrome c oxidase and cause neural damage in the brain [40, 41]. Increased abundance of Blautia genera has been reported in an AD mouse model [42]. And this model overexpressed the amyloid precursor protein gene, suggesting common characteristics of gut microbiota alterations between AD and DS [43]. Although an association has been reported in above animal experiments, no clinical research has directly indicated an association between cognitive impairment and the genus of Blautia. Our results provide the first evidence of a relationship between these bacteria taxa and DS cognitive impairment.
From our study, we confirm that gut microbiota in the DS children is altered. However, the specific role of the gut microbiota in the pathogenesis of cognitive impairment in DS cannot be clarified from this cross-sectional study. It needs more large sample size studies and further analysis tools (such as the gut-brain modules introduced by the Raes lab) to clarify the mechanisms involved and to explore therapeutic options for improving DS cognitive function by regulating gut microbiota [44, 45]. We hope to provide a promising strategy for future studies.
The limitations of this study should be considered. First, our study is a cross-sectional study with a limited sample size, and large-scale longitudinal studies focusing on DS patients of different age or populations are needed to confirm our results. Second, fecal samples used in microbiome analysis cannot reflect the biogeography of the microbiome across the gastrointestinal tract. This is a critical point, because the fecal microbiome which better represents the main connections to the microbiota–gut–brain axis is in the upper small intestine. Using endoscopy to collect stool samples from the upper small intestine would be a more effective method. Third, metagenomics analysis is needed to provide more detailed microbial community information, especially in terms of species function analysis and deeper analysis of DS fecal microbiota.
Conclusion
Overall, we provide evidence of gut microbiota alterations in a Chinese cohort of children with Down’s syndrome. Additionally, the identification of genera Blautia and Citrobacter may provide a promising strategy for future studies of DS cognitive impairment. Larger cohorts from different geographic regions are needed to confirm these findings and to clarify the mechanisms involved.
Data availability
The high-throughput sequence data have been deposited in the China National Center for Bioinformation (CNCB) BioProject database (https://bigd.big.ac.cn/) with the project number of PRJCA004065. All other data are available upon request from the authors.
References
Gu E (2010) Effectiveness evaluation of screening of Down syndrome in China. Dissertation, Fudan University (in Chinese)
Ballard C, Mobley W, Hardy J, Williams G, Corbett A (2016) Dementia in Down’s syndrome. Lancet Neurol 15(6):622–636
Mcgrath RJ, Stransky ML, Cooley WC, Moeschler JB (2011) National profile of children with Down Syndrome: disease burden, access to care, and family impact. J Pediatr 159(4):535-540.e532
Wolvetang EW, Bradfield OM, Tymms M, Zavarsek S, Hertzog PJ (2003) The chromosome 21 transcription factor ETS2 transactivates the beta-APP promoter: implications for Down syndrome. Biochem Biophys Acta 1628(2):105–110
Perlmutter LS, Barron E, Chui HC (1990) Morphological association between microglia and senile plaque amyloid in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurosci Lett 30:673–681
Meda L, Cassatella M, Szendrei G, Otvos L, Baron P, Villalba M, Ferrari D, Rossi F (1995) Activation of microglial cells by |[beta]|-amyloid protein andinterferon-|[gamma]. Nature 374(6523):647–650
Rovelet-Lecrux A, Hannequin D, Raux G, Meur NL, Campion D (2006) APP locus duplication causes autosomal dominant early-onset Alzheimer disease with cerebral amyloid angiopathy. Nat Genet 38(1):24–26
Englund H, Annerén G, Gustafsson J et al (2007) Increase in β-amyloid levels in cerebrospinal fluid of children with down syndrome. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord 24:369–374. https://doi.org/10.1159/000109215
Mehta PD, Capone G, Jewell A, Freedland RL (2007) Increased amyloid beta protein levels in children and adolescents with Down syndrome. J Neurol Ences 254(1–2):22–27
Wilcock DM, Griffin WST (2013) Down’s syndrome, neuroinflammation, and Alzheimer neuropathogenesis. J Neuroinflamm 10(1):864
Zhuang ZQ, Shen LL, Li WW et al (2018) Gut microbiota is altered in patients with Alzheimer′s disease. J Alzheimers Dis 63(4):1337–1346. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-180176
Bostanciklio J (2018) Intestinal bacterial flora and Alzheimer’s disease. Neurophysiology 50(2):140–148
Galland L (2014) The gut microbiome and the brain. J Med Food 17(12):1261–1272
Carlson AL, Xia K, Azcarate-Peril MA, Goldman BD, Ahn M, Styner MA, Thompson AL, Geng X, Gilmore JH, Knickmeyer RC (2017) Infant gut microbiome associated with cognitive development. Biol Psychiatry 83(2):148–159
Jimenez S, Baglietto-Vargas D, Caballero C, Moreno-Gonzalez I, Torres M, Sanchez-Varo R, Ruano D, Vizuete M, Gutierrez A, Vitorica J (2008) Inflammatory response in the hippocampus of PS1M146L/APP751SL mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease: age-dependent switch in the microglial phenotype from alternative to classic. J Neuroence 28(45):11650–11661
Elena B, Marco C, Manuela C, Clarissa C, Simone R, Silvia T, Marco S, Clelia P, Alessandro G, Maria S (2014) Gut microbiome in Down Syndrome. PLoS ONE 9(11):e112023
Nan Z, Mohammad A, Sun H, Xu W, Ping X, Zan G (2017) Effects of physical activity on motor skills and cognitive development in early childhood: a systematic review. Biomed Res Int 2017:1–13
Paul O, Jeffery IB (2015) Gut microbiota and aging. Ence 350(6265):1214–1215
Rinninella E, Cintoni M, Raoul P, Lopetuso LR, Mele MC (2019) Food components and dietary habits: keys for a healthy gut microbiota composition. Nutrients 11(10):2393
Zhang HC (2009) The revision of WISC-IV Chinese Version. Psychol Ence 32:1177–1179
Agachan F, Chen T, Pfeifer J, Reissman P, Wexner SD (1996) A constipation scoring system to simplify evaluation and management of constipated patients. Dis Colon Rectum 39(6):681
Francesca M (2016) Gut microbiota in autism and mood disorders. World J Gastroenterol 22(1):361–368
Harach T, Marungruang N, Dutilleul N, Cheatham V, Bolmont T (2015) Reduction of Alzheimer's disease beta-amyloid pathology in the absence of gut microbiota. Quant Biol. arxiv:1509.02273v2
Hu X, Wang T, Jin F (2016) Alzheimer’s disease and gut microbiota. Sci China Life Sci 59(10):1006–1023
Petrov VA, Saltykova IV, Zhukova IA, Alifirova VM, Zhukova NG, Dorofeeva YB, Tyakht AV, Kovarsky BA, Alekseev DG, Kostryukova ES (2017) Analysis of gut microbiota in patients with Parkinson’s disease. Bull Exp Biol Med 162(6):734–737
Round JL, Mazmanian SK (2009) The gut microbiota shapes intestinal immune responses during health and disease. Nat Rev Immunol 9(5):313–323
Yamashiro Y (2017) Gut microbiota in health and disease. Ann Nutr Metab 71(3–4):242–246
Gallier S, Abbeele PVD, Prosser C (2020) Comparison of the bifidogenic effects of goat and cow milk-based infant formulas to human breast milk in an in vitro gut model for 3-month-old infants. Front Nutr 7:608495
Nagpal R, Neth BJ, Wang S, Craft S, Yadav HJE (2019) Modified Mediterranean-ketogenic diet modulates gut microbiome and short-chain fatty acids in association with Alzheimer’s disease markers in subjects with mild cognitive impairment. EBioMedicine 47:529–542
Chen JH, Ke KF, Lu JH, Qiu YH, Peng YP (2015) Protection of TGF-β1 against neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration in Aβ1–42-induced Alzheimer’s disease model rats. PLoS ONE 10(2):e0116549
Nagao-Kitamoto H, Leslie JL, Kitamoto S, Jin C, Thomsson KA, Gillilland MG 3rd, Kuffa P, Goto Y, Jenq RR, Ishii C, Hirayama A, Seekatz AM, Martens EC, Eaton KA, Kao JY, Fukuda S, Higgins PDR, Karlsson NG, Young VB, Kamada N (2020) Interleukin-22-mediated host glycosylation prevents Clostridioides difficile infection by modulating the metabolic activity of the gut microbiota. Nat Med 26(4):608–617. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-020-0764-0
Slomnicki L, Malinowska A, Kistowski M, Palusinski A, Zheng JJ, Sepp M, Timmusk T, Dadlez M, Hetman M (2016) Nucleolar enrichment of brain proteins with critical roles in human neurodevelopment. Mol Cell Proteomics 15(6):2055–2075
Regier MLJ, Choi A et al (2019) Evidence for decreased nucleolar PARP-1 as an early marker of cognitive impairment. Neural Plast 2:8
Allen KD, Regier MJ, Hsieh C, Tsokas P, Barnard M, Phatarpekar S, Wolk J, Sacktor TC, Fenton AA, Hernández AI (2018) Learning-induced ribosomal RNA is required for memory consolidation in mice—evidence of differentially ex-pressed rRNA variants in learning and memory. PLoS ONE 13(10):e0203374
Parlato R, Liss B (2014) How Parkinson’s disease meets nucleolar stress. Biochem Biophys Acta 1842(6):791–797
Zeng J, Libien J, Shaik F et al (2016) Nucleolar PARP-1 expression is decreased in Alzheimer's disease: consequences for epigenetic regulation of rDNA and cognition. Neural Plast 2016(8987928):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/8987928
Yang B, Yan S, Chen Y, Ross RP, Stanton C, Zhao J, Zhang H, Chen W (2020) Diversity of gut microbiota and bifidobacterial community of Chinese subjects of different ages and from different regions. Microorganisms. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8081108
Gareau MG (2014) Microbiota-gut-brain axis and cognitive function. Adv Exp Med Biol 817:357
Xu HU, Wang T, Liang S, Wei LI, Xiao-Li WU, Jin F (2015) The role of gut microbiota in cognitive function. Chin J Microecol 27(11):1359–1364. https://doi.org/10.13381/j.cnki.cjm.201511032(in Chinese)
Verma S, Landisch R, Quirk B, Schmainda K, Prah M, Whelan HT, Willoughby RE Jr (2013) Presumed hydrogen sulfide-mediated neurotoxicity after streptococcus anginosus group meningitis. Pediatr Infect Dis J 32(2):189–191. https://doi.org/10.1097/INF.0b013e3182748fe9
Cooper CE, Brown GC (2008) The inhibition of mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase by the gases carbon monoxide, nitric oxide, hydrogen cyanide and hydrogen sulfide: chemical mechanism and physiological significance. J Bioenerg Biomembr 40(5):533–539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10863-008-9166-6
Jin-Young P, Juli C, Yunjin L, Jung-Eun L, Eun-Hwa L, Hye-Jin K, Yang J, Bo-Ri J, Yoon-Keun K, Han PL (2017) Metagenome analysis of bodily microbiota in a mouse model of Alzheimer disease using bacteria-derived membrane vesicles in blood. Exp Neurobiol 26(6):369–379
Lok K, Zhao H, Shen H, Wang Z, Gao X, Zhao W, Yin M (2013) Characterization of the APP/PS1 mouse model of Alzheimer’s disease in senescence accelerated background. Neurosci Lett 557(Pt B):84–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2013.10.051
Valles-Colomer M, Falony G, Darzi Y, Tigchelaar EF, Wang J, Tito RY, Schiweck C, Kurilshikov A, Joossens M, Wijmenga C, Claes S, Van Oudenhove L, Zhernakova A, Vieira-Silva S, Raes J (2019) The neuroactive potential of the human gut microbiota in quality of life and depression. Nat Microbiol 4(4):623–632. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-018-0337-x
Butler MI, Bastiaanssen TFS, Long-Smith C, Berding K, Morkl S, Cusack AM, Strain C, Busca K, Porteous-Allen P, Claesson MJ, Stanton C, Cryan JF, Allen D, Dinan TG (2020) Recipe for a healthy gut: intake of unpasteurised milk is associated with increased lactobacillus abundance in the human gut microbiome. Nutrients. https://doi.org/10.3390/nu12051468
Acknowledgements
We thank all the subjects and their parents who made this study possible.
Funding
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 31671066 and No. 81801348) and Peking University People’s Hospital Scientific Research Development Funds (Grant No. RDY2018-30).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Clinical analyses and manuscript writing: SR, XW and JQ; Sample collection and DNA extraction: SR, QM, SY, and YZ; Statistical analyses: SR, XW, YZ and JQ; Sequencing analyses and management: XW, QM, and SY; Project supervision and manuscript revision: WY; Study design, project management, financial support, and manuscript revision: JG.
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Ren, S., Wang, X., Qin, J. et al. Altered gut microbiota correlates with cognitive impairment in Chinese children with Down’s syndrome. Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry 31, 189–202 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-021-01799-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00787-021-01799-2