Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Influence of different heat treatments and temperatures on the cyclic fatigue resistance of endodontic instruments with the same design

  • Research
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

To evaluate the influence of different heat treatments and temperatures on the cyclic fatigue resistance of 2Shape instruments (Micro Mega, Besancon, France) with the same design.

Materials and methods

A total of 80 2Shape TS1 (#25/.04) and 80 TS2 (#25/.06) files with different heat treatments (no heat-treated, NHT; C-Wire; T-Wire; CM-Wire) were tested at room (25° ± 1 °C) and body (37° ± 1 °C) temperatures in 16-mm stainless steel artificial canal with a curvature of 60° and 5 mm of radius. Files were tested in continuous rotation at 300 rpm using a customized device. Cyclic fatigue resistance was expressed in the number of cyclic to fracture (NCF). The phase transformation temperature of each file was determined by differential scanning calorimetry. Data were statistically analyzed using the two-way ANOVA and the Bonferroni post-hoc test with p < 0.05.

Results

All CM-Wire TS1 and TS2 files showed higher NCF than the other groups at both temperatures (p < 0.001). C-Wire TS2 showed higher resistance than NHT and T-Wire TS2 (p < 0.001), with no significant differences between the last two. Body temperature significantly decreased NCF of all tested files (p < 0.05) except for NHT and T-Wire TS1.

Conclusions

Body temperature negatively affected the cyclic fatigue resistance of C-Wire and CM-Wire TS1 and of all TS2 files compared with room temperature. The CM-Wire instruments exhibited the highest cyclic fatigue resistance of all tested files.

Clinical relevance

Heat-treated nickel-titanium files can differently perform according to environmental temperature and file dimensions. The CM-Wire 2Shape prototypes displayed the highest flexural resistance in all experimental conditions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Grande NM, Plotino G, Silla E et al (2017) Environmental temperature drastically affects flexural fatigue resistance of nickel-titanium rotary files. J Endod 43:1157–1160

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Uygun AD (2020) Cyclic fatigue resistance of VDW.ROTATE and Reciproc blue nickel-titanium files at root canal temperature. J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects 14:177–180

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Generali L, Puddu P, Borghi A et al (2020) Mechanical properties and metallurgical features of new and ex vivo used Reciproc blue and Reciproc. Int Endod J 53:250–264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Zanza A, D’Angelo M, Reda R et al (2021) An update on nickel-titanium rotary instruments in endodontics: mechanical characteristics, testing and future perspective-an overview. Bioengineering (Basel) 16:218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Vieira TM, Alves NC, de Andrade SS et al (2020) Influence of temperature on the cyclic fatigue resistance of Reciproc blue instruments. J Contemp Dent Pract 21:277–279

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Keskin C, Sivas Yilmaz Ö, Keleş A, Inan U (2021) Comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of rotate instrument with reciprocating and continuous rotary nickel-titanium instruments at body temperature in relation to their transformation temperatures. Clin Oral Investig 25:151–157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Dosanjh A, Paurazas S, Askar M (2017) The effect of temperature on cyclic fatigue of nickel-titanium rotary endodontic instruments. J Endod 43:823–826

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Plotino G, Grande NM, Testarelli L et al (2018) Cyclic fatigue of Reciproc and Reciproc blue nickel-titanium reciprocating files at different environmental temperatures. J Endod 44:1549–1552

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Staffoli S, Grande NM, Plotino G et al (2019) Influence of environmental temperature, heat-treatment and design on the cyclic fatigue resistance of three generations of a single-file nickel-titanium rotary instrument. Odontology 107:301–307

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Klymus ME, Alcalde MP, Vivan RR et al (2019) Effect of temperature on the cyclic fatigue resistance of thermally treated reciprocating instruments. Clin Oral Investig 23:3047–3052

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. de Arruda Santos L, de Azevedo Bahia MG, de Las Casas EB, Buono VTL (2013) Comparison of the mechanical behavior between controlled memory and superelastic nickel-titanium files via finite element analysis. J Endod 39:1444–1447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Elnaghy AM, Elsaka SE (2018) Cyclic fatigue resistance of One Curve, 2Shape, ProFile Vortex, Vortex Blue, and RaCe nickel-titanium rotary instruments in single and double curvature canals. J Endod 44:1725–1730

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Gündoğar M, Uslu G, Özyürek T, Plotino G (2020) Comparison of the cyclic fatigue resistance of VDW ROTATE, TruNatomy, 2Shape, and HyFlex CM nickel-titanium rotary files at body temperature. Restor Dent Endod 45:e37

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. La Rosa GRM, Palermo C, Ferlito S et al (2021) Influence of surrounding temperature and angle of file access on cyclic fatigue resistance of two single file nickel-titanium instruments. Aust Endod J 47:260–264

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Alcalde MP, Duarte MAH, Bramante CM et al (2018) Cyclic fatigue and torsional strength of three different thermally treated reciprocating nickel-titanium instruments. Clin Oral Investig 22:1865–1871

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pedullà E, Lo Savio F, La Rosa GRM et al (2018) Cyclic fatigue resistance, torsional resistance, and metallurgical characteristics of M3 Rotary and M3 Pro Gold NiTi files. Restor Dent Endod 43:e25

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Pedullà E, La Rosa GRM, Virgillito C et al (2020) Cyclic fatigue resistance of nickel-titanium rotary instruments according to the angle of file access and radius of root canal. J Endod 46:431–436

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Pedullà E, Lo Savio F, Boninelli S et al (2015) Influence of cyclic torsional preloading on cyclic fatigue resistance of nickel - titanium instruments. Int Endod J 48:1043–1050

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Capar ID, Kaval ME, Ertas H, Sen BH (2015) Comparison of the cyclic fatigue resistance of 5 different rotary pathfinding instruments made of conventional nickel-titanium wire, M-wire, and controlled memory wire. J Endod 41:535–538

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Plotino G, Grande NM, Mercadé Bellido M, Testarelli L, Gambarini G (2017) Influence of temperature on cyclic fatigue resistance of ProTaper Gold and ProTaper Universal rotary files. J Endod 43:200–202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Al-Obaida MI, Merdad K, Alanazi MS et al (2019) Comparison of cyclic fatigue resistance of 5 heat-treated nickel-titanium reciprocating systems in canals with single and double curvatures. J Endod 45:1237–1241

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Keleş A, Eymirli A, Uyanık O, Nagas E (2019) Influence of static and dynamic cyclic fatigue tests on the lifespan of four reciprocating systems at different temperatures. Int Endod J 52:880–886

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Ertuğrul İF, Orhan EO (2019) Cyclic fatigue and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy examination of the novel ROTATE instrument. Microsc Res Tech 82:2042–2048

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Shen Y, Qian W, Abtin H, Gao Y et al (2011) Fatigue testing of controlled memory wire nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod 37:997–1001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Keskin NB, Inan U (2019) Cyclic fatigue resistance of rotary NiTi instruments produced with four different manufacturing methods. Microsc Res Tech 82:1642–1648

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Goo H-J, Kwak SW, Ha J-H, Pedullà E et al (2017) Mechanical properties of various heat-treated nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod 43:1872–1877

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Özyürek T, Gündoğar M, Uslu G et al (2018) Cyclic fatigue resistances of Hyflex EDM, WaveOne gold, Reciproc blue and 2shape NiTi rotary files in different artificial canals. Odontology 106:408–413

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Adıgüzel M, Öztekin F (2020) Comparison of the resistance to cyclic fatigue of One Curve, One Shape, 2Shape and EdgeFile X3 files in simulated single and S-shaped (double) curvatures. Int Dent Res 10:55–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. de Vasconcelos RA, Murphy S, Carvalho CAT et al (2016) Evidence for reduced fatigue resistance of contemporary rotary instruments exposed to body temperature. J Endod 42:782–787

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Shen Y, Zhou H, Zheng Y et al (2013) Current challenges and concepts of the thermomechanical treatment of nickel-titanium instruments. J Endod 39:163–172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Plotino G, Grande NM, Cordaro M et al (2009) A review of cyclic fatigue testing of nickel-titanium rotary instruments. J Endod 35:1469–1476

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: EP and WN. Data curation: MLL, GRMLR, and AN. Formal analysis: EP, WN, and AN. Investigation: AN and FD. Methodology: EP, MLL, and GRMLR. Project administration: EP, WN, and AN. Resources: EP and WN. Software: AN and FD. Supervision: WN. Validation: GRMLR and FD. Visualization: MLL. Roles/writing—original draft: GRMLR, MLL, and AN. Writing—review and editing: EP, WN, and FD. All authors have read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giusy Rita Maria La Rosa.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Local ethics committee ruled that no formal ethics approval was required in this particular case.

Research involving Human Participants and/or Animals

Not applicable.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nehme, W., Naaman, A., Diemer, F. et al. Influence of different heat treatments and temperatures on the cyclic fatigue resistance of endodontic instruments with the same design. Clin Oral Invest 27, 1793–1798 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04808-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04808-z

Keywords

Navigation