Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Classification of a patient’s caries activity based on lesion activity assessment among adults: findings from a prospective cohort study

  • Research
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To investigate whether the classification of a patient’s caries activity based on lesion activity assessment can predict the increment and progression of coronal and root caries lesions among adults.

Methods

This population-based prospective cohort study followed 413 individuals (mean age 54.1) from southern Brazil for 4 years. Data collection included a questionnaire and clinical examination to record coronal/root caries and gingival recession. The main outcomes were caries increment measured as decayed, missing and filled tooth surfaces (DMFS) and caries progression (surface-level analysis). The main predictor variable was patients’ caries activity at baseline (“caries-inactive” or “caries-active”). Negative binomial regression models (unadjusted and adjusted) were used.

Results

Caries-active individuals were more likely to present DMFS increment than caries-inactive ones when migrations among DMFS components were considered (IRR [incidence risk ratio] = 1.26, 95%CI [confidence interval] = 1.01–1.58). On the other hand, no such association was found when these migrations were disregarded. The risk for coronal caries progression on filled surfaces was 90% higher among caries-active patients (IRR=1.9; 95%CI=1.4–2.6). In addition, patient’s caries activity was able to predict higher risk for root caries progression in newly exposed root surfaces (IRR=1.9; 95%CI=1.0–3.6).

Conclusion

The classification of a patient’s caries activity based on lesion activity was able to foresee lesion progression on the coronal and root surfaces more susceptible to caries among adults.

Clinical relevance

Classifying a patient’s caries activity is a useful tool for the clinical management of dental caries in adults.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fejerskov, O., et al.,Defining the disease: an introduction, in Dental caries: the disease and its clinical management. 2008, Blackwell Publishing Ltd: Oxford, UK.

  2. Cury JA, Tenuta LM (2009) Enamel remineralization: controlling the caries disease or treating early caries lesions? Braz Oral Res 23(Suppl 1):23–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Pitts NB, Ekstrand KR, Foundation I (2013) International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS) and its International Caries Classification and Management System (ICCMS) - methods for staging of the caries process and enabling dentists to manage caries. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 41(1):e41-52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Schwendicke F et al (2019) When to intervene in the caries process? An expert Delphi consensus statement. Clin Oral Investig 23(10):3691–3703

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Banerjee A et al (2020) When to intervene in the caries process? A Delphi consensus statement. Br Dent J 229(7):474–482

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nyvad B, Machiulskiene V, Baelum V (2003) Construct and predictive validity of clinical caries diagnostic criteria assessing lesion activity. J Dent Res 82(2):117–122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ferreira Zandoná A et al (2012) The natural history of dental caries lesions: a 4-year observational study. J Dent Res 91(9):841–846

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Maltz M et al (2020) Can we diagnose a patient’s caries activity based on lesion activity assessment? Findings from a cohort study. Caries Res 54(3):218–225

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cabral RN et al (2022) Caries lesion transition patterns of schoolchildren in a fluoridated community in Brazil. Clin Oral Investig 26(1):689–695

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Nyvad B, Fejerskov O (1997) Assessing the stage of caries lesion activity on the basis of clinical and microbiological examination. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 25(1):69–75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ismail AI et al (2007) The International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS): an integrated system for measuring dental caries. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 35(3):170–178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Costa RS et al (2014) Prevalence and risk indicators of dentin hypersensitivity in adult and elderly populations from Porto Alegre. Brazil. J Periodontol 85(9):1247–1258

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rios FS et al (2014) Estimates and multivariable risk assessment of gingival recession in the population of adults from Porto Alegre. Brazil. J Clin Periodontol 41(11):1098–1107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wagner TP et al (2016) Gingival recession and oral health-related quality of life: a population-based cross-sectional study in Brazil. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 44(4):390–399

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Associação Brasileira de Empresas de Pesquisa. 2013.

  16. Maltz M et al (2003) Results after two years of non-operative treatment of occlusal surface in children with high caries prevalence. Braz Dent J 14(1):48–54

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Demarco FF et al (2012) Longevity of posterior composite restorations: not only a matter of materials. Dent Mater 28(1):87–101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Montagner AF et al (2018) Survival, reasons for failure and clinical characteristics of anterior/posterior composites: 8-year findings. Braz Dent J 29(6):547–554

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Paris S et al (2020) How to intervene in the caries process in older adults: a Joint ORCA and EFCD Expert Delphi Consensus Statement. Caries Res 54(5–6):1–7

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lynch RJ (2013) The primary and mixed dentition, post-eruptive enamel maturation and dental caries: a review. Int Dent J 63(Suppl 2):3–13

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Carvalho J.C, Mestrinho HD 2014 Diagnosing non-cavitated lesions in epidemiological studies: practical and scientific considerations. Braz Oral Res, 28 Spec No: p. 1-7.

  22. Ministry of Health: Project SB Brasil 2010: National Survey on Oral Health: Main Findings. Brasilia, 2011.

  23. Carvalho JC, Schiffner U (2019) Dental caries in European adults and senior citizens 1996–2016: ORCA Saturday Afternoon Symposium in Greifswald. Germany - Part II. Caries Res 53(3):242–252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the Ph.D.s Mauricio Santos Moura and Tassiane Panta Wagner and the MSs Bárbara Rocha Christofoli, Guilherme Andrade Denadai, Natacha Amin, and Joseane Goergen for their invaluable help with the daily running during the fieldwork.

Funding

We received the support of the National Coordination of Post-Graduate Education (CAPES), the Ministry of Education of Brazil (funding code 001), and the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

A.G.R., C.M.I., F.S.R., and R.S.A.C. collected the data. A.G.R, A.N.H., and L.S.A. conducted the statistical analysis. A.G.R., J.J.J., L.S.A., and M.M. wrote the manuscript. M.M. designed the study and supervised the project. All the authors reviewed the manuscript and gave their final approval.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Luana Severo Alves.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval

The study protocol was approved by the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul Research Ethics Committee number 1974. The research was conducted ethically, in accordance with the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki.

Informed consent

All the participants and their parents/legal guardians provided written informed consent.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rup, A.G., Izquierdo, C.d., Rios, F.S. et al. Classification of a patient’s caries activity based on lesion activity assessment among adults: findings from a prospective cohort study. Clin Oral Invest 27, 1123–1131 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04702-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-022-04702-8

Keywords

Navigation