Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Influence of bone density, drill diameter, drilling speed, and irrigation on temperature changes during implant osteotomies: an in vitro study

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the influence of bone type, drill diameter, drilling speed, and irrigation on heat generation while performing osteotomy for dental implants.

Materials and methods

Six polyurethane foam blocks simulating type I (dense) and type IV (soft) bone were selected for the study. Each block was subjected to two different experimental conditions for each drill (2- and 3.5-mm diameter): three sub-groups were created: (a) revolutions per minute (50, 100, or 800 rpm) and (b) irrigation (with or without irrigation).

Results

In 2-mm drill group, maximum temperature attained was practically identical: 23.73 ± 2.28 °C in the cortical bone and 23.74 ± 2.03 °C in the cancellous bone. For 3.5-mm, groups showed similar results (25.01 ± 1.88 °C for cortical and 24.05 ± 1.94 °C for trabecular bone). In any type of bone, the presence of irrigating fluid helped to control the maximum temperature (p = 0.001). When comparing the 2-mm and 3.5-mm drills, most differences were found at 100 rpm without irrigation (p < 0.001) and at 800 rpm with irrigation (p = 0.001).

Conclusions

Maximum temperature attained was always below the critical threshold that can cause osteonecrosis, showing that both external irrigation with higher drilling speeds and no irrigation with lower speeds were effective methods to avoid excessive heat generation.

Clinical relevance

Despite being always below the critical temperature, bone type, drill diameter, drilling speed, and irrigation must be considered temperature-influencing factors during implant osteotomies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schroeder A, Van Der Zypen E, Stich H, Sutter F (1981) The reaction of bone, connective tissue and epithelium to endosteal implants with sprayed titanium surfaces. J Maxillofac Surg 9:15–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Carvalho AC, Queiroz TP, Okamoto R, Margonar R, Garcia IR Jr, Magro Filho O (2011) Evaluation of bone heating, immediate bone cell viability, and wear of high-resistance drills after the creation of implant osteotomies in rabbit tibias. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 26:1193–1201

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tehemar SH (1999) Factors affecting heat generation during implant site preparation: a review of biologic observations and future considerations. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 14:127–136

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Möhlhenrich SC, Modabber A, Steiner T, Mitchell DA, Hölzle F (2015) Heat generation and drill wear during dental implant site preparation: systematic review. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 53:679–689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Van Staden RC, Guan H, Johnson NW, Loo YC, Meredith N (2008) Step-wise analysis of the dental implant insertion process using the finite element technique. Clin Oral Implants Res 3:303–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Albrektsson T, Albrektsson B (1978) Microcirculation in grafted bone. A chamber technique for vital microscopy of rabbit bone transplant. Acta Orthop Scand 49:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Almeida KP, Delgado-Ruiz R, Carneiro LG, Leiva AB, Calvo-Guirado JL, Gómez-Moreno G, Malmström H, Romanos GE (2016) Influence of drilling speed on stability of tapered dental implants: an ex vivo experimental study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 31(4):795–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Leunig M, Hertel R (1996) Thermal necrosis after tibial reaming for intramedullary nail fixation. A report of three cases. J Bone Joint Surg Br 78:584–587

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gehrke SA, Bettach R, Taschieri S, Boukhris G, Corbella S, Del Fabbro M (2015) Temperature changes in cortical bone after implant site preparation using a single bur versus multiple drilling steps: an in vitro investigation. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 17:700–707

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Eriksson AR, Albrektsson T (1983) Temperature threshold levels for heat-induced bone tissue injury: a vital microscopic study in the rabbit. J Prosthet Dent 50:101–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Eriksson RA, Adell R (1986) Temperatures during drilling for the placement of implants using the osseointegration technique. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 44:4–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Gehrke SA, Aramburu JS (2016) The influence of drill length and irrigation system on heat production during osteotomy preparation for dental implants: an ex vivo study. Clin Oral Implants Res 0:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pirjamalineisiani A, Jamshidi N, Sarafbidabad M, Soltani N (2015) Assessment of experimental thermal, numerical, and mandibular drilling factors in implantology. Brit J Oral Max Surg 54:400–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cordioli G, Majzoub Z (1997) Heat generation during implant site preparation: an in vitro study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 12:186–193

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Oh HJ, Wikesjö UM, Kang HS, Ku Y, Eom TG, Koo KT (2011) Effect of implant drill characteristics on heat generation in osteotomy sites: a pilot study. Clin Oral Implants Res 22:722–726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Karaca F, Aksakal B (2013) Effects of various drilling parameters on bone during implantology: an in vitro experimental study. Acta Bioeng Biomech 15:25–32

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Oliveira N, Alaejos-Algarra F, Mareque-Bueno J, Ferrés-Padró E, Hernández-Alfaro F (2012) Thermal changes and drill wear in bovine bone during implant site preparation. A comparative in vitro study: twisted stainless steel and ceramic drills. Clin Oral Implants Res 23:963–969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sumer M, Misir AF, Telcioglu NT, Guler AU, Yenisey M (2011) Comparison of heat generation during implant drilling using stainless steel and ceramic drills. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 69:1350–1354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ercoli C, Funkenbusch PD, Lee HJ, Moss ME, Graser GN (2004) The influence of drill wear on cutting efficiency and heat production during osteotomy preparation for dental implants: a study of drill durability. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 19:335–349

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jochum RM, Reichart PA (2000) Influence of multiple use of timedur-titanium cannon drills: termal response and scanning electron microscopic findings. Clin Oral Implants Res 11:139–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Reingewirtz Y, Szmukler-Moncler S, Senger B (1997) Influence of different parameters on bone heating and drilling time in implantology. Clin Oral Implants Res 8:189–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sharawy M, Misch CE, Weller N, Tehemar S (2002) Heat generation during implant drilling: the significance of motor speed. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 60:1160–1169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kondo S, Okada Y, Iseki H, Hori T, Takakura K, Kobayashi A, Nagata H (2000) Thermological study of drilling bone tissue with a high- speed drill. Neurosurgery 46:1162–1168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Eriksson RA, Albrektsson T, Albrektsson B (1984) Heat caused by drilling cortical bone. Temperature measured in vivo in patients and animals. Acta Orthop Scand 55:629–631

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Delgado-Ruiz RA, Sacks D, Palermo A, Calvo-Guirado JL, Perez-Albacete C, Romanos GE (2016) Temperature and time variations during osteotomies performed with different piezosurgical devices: an in vitro study. Clin Oral Implants Res 27:1137–1143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gehrke SA, Loffredo Neto H, Mardegan FE (2013) Investigation of the effect of movement and irrigation on temperature in the drilling of cortical bone. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 51:953–957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Chacon GE, Bower DL, Larsen PE, McGlumphy EA, Beck FM (2006) Heat production by 3 implant drill systems after repeated drilling and sterilization. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 64:265–269

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Benington IC, Biagioni PA, Briggs J, Sheridan S, Lamey PJ (2002) Thermal changes observed at implant sites during internal and external irrigation. Clin Oral Implants Res 13:293–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sener BC, Dergin G, Gursoy B, Kelesoglu E, Slih I (2009) Effects of irrigation temperature on heat control in vitro at different drilling depths. Clin Oral Implants Res 20:294–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Scarano A, Lorusso F, Noumbissi S (2020) Infrared thermographic evaluation of temperature modifications induced during implant site preparation with steel vs. zirconia implant drill. J Clin Med 9:148–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Laurito D, Lamazza L, Garreffa G, De Biase A (2010) An alternative method to record rising temperatures during implant site preparation: a preliminary study using bovine bone. Ann Ist Super Sanita 46:405–410

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Misch CE, Degidi M (2003) Five-year prospective study of immediate/early loading of fixed prostheses in completely edentulous jaws with a bone quality-based implant system. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 5:17–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. ASTM F1839–08 (2016) Standard specification for rigid polyurethane foam for use as a standard material for testing orthopaedic devices and instruments. ASTM International West Conshohocken. PA. www.astm.org. Accessed Sept 2019

Download references

Funding

The work was supported by the Department of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery, Universitat Internacional the Catalunya, Spain.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oscar Salomó-Coll.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Salomó-Coll, O., Auriol-Muerza, B., Lozano-Carrascal, N. et al. Influence of bone density, drill diameter, drilling speed, and irrigation on temperature changes during implant osteotomies: an in vitro study. Clin Oral Invest 25, 1047–1053 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03398-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-020-03398-y

Keywords

Navigation