Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Pain and discomfort following immediate and delayed loading by overdentures in the single mandibular implant study (SMIS)

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

This randomized clinical trial compares immediate and delayed loading of single implants to support mandibular overdentures. The aim of this preliminary analysis is to test the hypothesis whether patients with immediate loading will experience less pain and discomfort through the intervention than patients with delayed loading.

Materials and methods

Edentulous patients in nine German dental schools received a midline implant with a length of 11 mm. Implants with a minimum insertion torque of 30 Ncm and an implant stability quotient of ≥60 were randomly allocated to group A for immediate loading using ball attachments or to group B for delayed loading after 3 months. Patients completed questionnaires with 100-mm visual analogue scales about the items pain, pain during chewing, swelling, bleeding, and perception of the intervention at the day of surgery and 1, 2, 3, and 7 days, thereafter. Groups were compared by Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney tests (P ≤ 0.05).

Results

The questionnaires of 81 patients in group A and 74 patients in group B were completed. The medians for pain and discomfort were moderate (<30). Participants of group A felt significantly more pain from the first day and more swelling from the third day after implantation than participants of group B. The individual perception of interventions showed no significant differences between groups.

Conclusions

Immediate loading evoked more postoperative pain and swelling than the two stages of delayed loading.

Clinical relevance

Immediate loading of a single mandibular midline implant supporting overdentures should be carefully considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Feine JS, Carlsson GE, Awad MA, Chehade A, Duncan WJ, Gizani S, et al. (2002) The McGill consensus statement on overdentures. Montreal, Quebec, Canada. May 24-25, 2002. Int J Prosthodont 15:413–414

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Passia N, Kern M (2014) The single midline implant in the edentulous mandible: a systematic review. Clin Oral Investig 18:1719–1724

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Mundt T, Polzer I, Samietz S, Grabe HJ, Doren M, Schwarz S, et al. (2011) Gender-dependent associations between socioeconomic status and tooth loss in working age people in the study of health in Pomerania (SHIP), Germany. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 39:398–408

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cordioli G, Majzoub Z, Castagna S (1997) Mandibular overdentures anchored to single implants: a five-year prospective study. J Prosthet Dent 78:159–165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bryant SR, Walton JN, MacEntee MI (2015) A 5-year randomized trial to compare 1 or 2 implants for implant overdentures. J Dent Res 94:36–43

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Passia N, Wolfart S, Kern M (2015) Six-year clinical outcome of single implant-retained mandibular overdentures—a pilot study. Clin Oral Implants Res 26:1191–1194

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Liddelow G, Henry P (2010) The immediately loaded single implant-retained mandibular overdenture: a 36-month prospective study. Int J Prosthodont 23:13–21

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Kronstrom M, Davis B, Loney R, Gerrow J, Hollender L (2010) A prospective randomized study on the immediate loading of mandibular overdentures supported by one or two implants: a 12-month follow-up report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 25:181–188

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Al-Khabbaz AK, Griffin TJ, Al-Shammari KF (2007) Assessment of pain associated with the surgical placement of dental implants. J Periodontol 78:239–246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tan WC, Krishnaswamy G, Ong MM, Lang NP (2014) Patient-reported outcome measures after routine periodontal and implant surgical procedures. J Clin Periodontol 41:618–624

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Schropp L, Isidor F, Kostopoulos L, Wenzel A (2004) Patient experience of, and satisfaction with, delayed-immediate vs. delayed single-tooth implant placement. Clin Oral Implants Res 15:498–503

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kuroi R, Minakuchi H, Hara ES, Kawakami A, Maekawa K, Okada H, et al. (2015) A risk factor analysis of accumulated postoperative pain and swelling sensation after dental implant surgery using a cellular phone-based real-time assessment. J Prosthodont Res 59:194–198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Urban T, Wenzel A (2010) Discomfort experienced after immediate implant placement associated with three different regenerative techniques. Clin Oral Implants Res 21:1271–1277

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Vercruyssen M, De Laat A, Coucke W, Quirynen M (2014) An RCT comparing patient-centred outcome variables of guided surgery (bone or mucosa supported) with conventional implant placement. J Clin Periodontol 41:724–732

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Parmigiani-Izquierdo JM, Sanchez-Perez A, Cabana-Munoz ME (2013) A pilot study of postoperative pain felt after two implant surgery techniques: a randomized blinded prospective clinical study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 28:1305–1310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Pozzi A, Tallarico M, Marchetti M, Scarfo B, Esposito M (2014) Computer-guided versus free-hand placement of immediately loaded dental implants: 1-year post-loading results of a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Eur J Oral Implantol 7:229–242

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Tsoukaki M, Kalpidis CD, Sakellari D, Tsalikis L, Mikrogiorgis G, Konstantinidis A (2013) Clinical, radiographic, microbiological, and immunological outcomes of flapped vs. flapless dental implants: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin Oral Implants Res 24:969–976

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tallarico M, Vaccarella A, Marzi GC (2011) Clinical and radiological outcomes of 1- versus 2-stage implant placement: 1-year results of a randomised clinical trial. Eur J Oral Implantol 4:13–20

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ribeiro AB, Della Vecchia MP, Cunha TR, Sorgini DB, Dos Reis AC, Muglia VA, et al. (2015) Short-term post-operative pain and discomfort following insertion of mini-implants for retaining mandibular overdentures: a randomized controlled trial. J Oral Rehabil 42:605–614

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Passia N, Brezavscek M, Fritzer E, Kappel S, Kern T, Luthardt RG, et al. (2014) Single dental implant retained mandibular complete dentures—influence of the loading protocol: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 15:186

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. McGarry TJ, Nimmo A, Skiba JF, Ahlstrom RH, Smith CR, Koumjian JH (1999) Classification system for complete edentulism. The American College of Prosthodontics J Prosthodont 8:27–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Alsabeeha NH, Payne AG, De Silva RK, Thomson WM (2011) Mandibular single-implant overdentures: preliminary results of a randomised-control trial on early loading with different implant diameters and attachment systems. Clin Oral Implants Res 22:330–337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Fardal O, McCulloch CA (2012) Impact of anxiety on pain perception associated with periodontal and implant surgery in a private practice. J Periodontol 83:1079–1085

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study is funded by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German research foundation, KE 477/8-1). We thank all co-workers in the study centres that supported this study by treating patients, special thanks to Michael Becker (Greifswald), Martin Sasse (Kiel), Franz Sebastian Schwindling (Heidelberg), Samir Abou-Ayash (Freiburg), and Thomas Kern (Aachen).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Mundt.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

S. Wolfart received grants, personal fees, and non-financial support from the Camlog Foundation. The other authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Funding

The study is funded by Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German research foundation, KE 477/8-1).

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in this study were conducted in accordance with the ethical standards of the Ethics Commission of the University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, UKSH (AZ 138/12), with the Ethics Commissions of all other participating centres, and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mundt, T., Passia, N., Att, W. et al. Pain and discomfort following immediate and delayed loading by overdentures in the single mandibular implant study (SMIS). Clin Oral Invest 21, 635–642 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1930-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-016-1930-0

Keywords

Navigation