Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Performance of laser fluorescence devices, visual and radiographic examination for the detection of occlusal caries in primary molars

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Clinical Oral Investigations Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the performance of two laser fluorescence devices (LF, LFpen), conventional visual criteria (VE), ICDAS and radiographic examination on occlusal surfaces of primary teeth. Thirty-seven primary human molars were selected from a pool of extracted teeth, which were stored frozen at −20°C until use. Teeth were assessed twice by two experienced examiners using laser fluorescence devices (LF and LFpen), conventional visual criteria, ICDAS and bitewing radiographs, with a 2-week interval between measurements. After measurement, the teeth were histologically prepared and assessed for caries extension. The highest sensitivity was observed for ICDAS at D1 and D3 thresholds, with no statistically significant difference when compared to the LF devices, except at the D3 threshold. Bitewing radiographs presented the lowest values of sensitivity. Specificity at D1 was higher for LFpen (0.90) and for VE at D3 (0.94). When VE was combined with LFpen the post-test probabilities were the highest (94.0% and 89.2% at D1 and D3 thresholds, respectively). High values were observed for the combination of ICDAS and LFpen (92.0% and 80.0%, respectively). LF and LFpen showed the highest values of ICC for interexaminer reproducibility. However, regarding ICDAS, BW and VE, intraexaminer reproducibility was not the same for the two examiners. After primary visual inspection using ICDAS or not, the use of LFpen may aid in the detection of occlusal caries in primary teeth. Bitewing radiographs may be indicated only for approximal caries detection.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Marthaler TM (2004) Changes in dental caries 1953–2003. Caries Res 38:173–181

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Pendlebury ME, Horner K, Eaton KA (eds) (2004) Selection criteria for dental radiography. Faculty of General Dental Practice (UK), London

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jablonski-Momeni A, Stachniss V, Ricketts DN, Heinzel-Gutenbrunner M, Pieper K (2008) Reproducibility and accuracy of the ICDAS-II for detection of occlusal caries in vitro. Caries Res 42:79–87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ricketts DN, Ekstrand KR, Kidd EA, Larsen T (2002) Relating visual and radiographic ranked scoring systems for occlusal caries detection to histological and microbiological evidence. Oper Dent 27:231–237

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ismail AI (2004) Visual and visuo-tactile detection of dental caries. J Dent Res 83 Spec No C:C56-66

  6. Rocha RO, Ardenghi TM, Oliveira LB, Rodrigues CR, Ciamponi AL (2003) In vivo effectiveness of laser fluorescence compared to visual inspection and radiography for the detection of occlusal caries in primary teeth. Caries Res 37:437–441

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nyvad B, Machiulskiene V, Baelum V (1999) Reliability of a new caries diagnostic system differentiating between active and inactive caries lesions. Caries Res 33:252–260

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Ismail AI, Sohn W, Tellez M, Amaya A, Sen A, Hasson H, Pitts NB (2007) The International Caries Detection and Assessment System (ICDAS): an integrated system for measuring dental caries. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 35:170–178

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kühnisch J, Goddon I, Berger S, Senkel H, Bücher K, Oehme T, Hickel R, Heinrich-Weltzien R (2009) Development, methodology and potential of the new Universal Visual Scoring System (UniViSS) for caries detection and diagnosis. Int J Environ Res Public Health 6:2500–2509

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ismail AI, Sohn W, Lim S, Willem JM (2008) Progression of early carious lesions in children aged 5 years or less. Caries Res 42:226

    Google Scholar 

  11. Rodrigues JA, Hug I, Diniz MB, Lussi A (2008) Performance of fluorescence methods, radiographic examination and ICDAS II on occlusal surfaces in vitro. Caries Res 42:297–304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Diniz MB, Rodrigues JA, Hug I, Cordeiro Rde C, Lussi A (2009) Reproducibility and accuracy of the ICDAS-II for occlusal caries detection. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 37:399–404

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lussi A, Imwinkelried S, Pitts N, Longbottom C, Reich E (1999) Performance and reproducibility of a laser fluorescence system for detection of occlusal caries in vitro. Caries Res 33:261–266

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. König K, Flemming G, Hibst R (1998) Laser-induced autofluorescence spectroscopy of dental caries. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand) 44:1293–1300

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kavvadia K, Lagouvardos P (2008) Clinical performance of a diode laser fluorescence device for the detection of occlusal caries in primary teeth. Int J Paediatr Dent 18:197–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Rodrigues JA, Diniz MB, Josgrilberg EB, Cordeiro RC (2009) In vitro comparison of laser fluorescence performance with visual examination for detection of occlusal caries in permanent and primary molars. Lasers Med Sci 24:501–506

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Braga M, Nicolau J, Rodrigues CR, Imparato JC, Mendes FM (2008) Laser fluorescence device does not perform well in detection of early caries lesions in primary teeth: an in vitro study. Oral Health Prev Dent 6:165–169

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Barberia E, Maroto M, Arenas M, Silva CC (2008) A clinical study of caries diagnosis with a laser fluorescence system. J Am Dent Assoc 139:572–579

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Francescut P, Zimmerli B, Lussi A (2006) Influence of different storage methods on laser fluorescence values: a two-year study. Caries Res 40:181–185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lussi A, Reich E (2005) The influence of toothpastes and prophylaxis pastes on fluorescence measurements for caries detection in vitro. Eur J Oral Sci 113:141–144

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ekstrand KR, Martignon S, Ricketts DJ, Qvist V (2007) Detection and activity assessment of primary coronal caries lesions: a methodologic study. Oper Dent 32:225–235

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lussi A, Firestone A, Schoenberg V, Hotz P, Stich H (1995) In vivo diagnosis of fissure caries using a new electrical resistance monitor. Caries Res 29:81–87

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Bland JM, Altman DG (1986) Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307–310

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Alberg AJ, Park JW, Hager BW, Brock MV, Diener-West M (2004) The use of "overall accuracy" to evaluate the validity of screening or diagnostic tests. J Gen Intern Med 19:460–465

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Schulze RK, Nackat D, D'Hoedt B (2004) In vitro carious lesion detection on D-, E-, and F-speed radiographic films. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 97:529–534

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Schulte AG, Wittchen A, Stachniss V, Jacquet W, Bottenberg P (2008) Approximal caries diagnosis after data import from different digital radiography systems: interobserver agreement and comparison to histological hard-tissue sections. Caries Res 42:57–61

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Nair MK, Nair UP (2001) An in-vitro evaluation of Kodak Insight and Ektaspeed Plus film with a CMOS detector for natural proximal caries: ROC analysis. Caries Res 35:354–359

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kühnisch J, Berger S, Goddon I, Senkel H, Pitts N, Heinrich-Weltzien R (2008) Occlusal caries detection in permanent molars according to WHO basic methods, ICDAS II and laser fluorescence measurements. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 36:475–484

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Lussi A, Francescut P (2003) Performance of conventional and new methods for the detection of occlusal caries in deciduous teeth. Caries Res 37:2–7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Attrill DC, Ashley PF (2001) Occlusal caries detection in primary teeth: a comparison of DIAGNOdent with conventional methods. Br Dent J 190:440–443

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ketley CE, Holt RD (1993) Visual and radiographic diagnosis of occlusal caries in first permanent molars and in second primary molars. Br Dent J 174:364–370

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Machiulskiene V, Nyvad B, Baelum V (1999) A comparison of clinical and radiographic caries diagnoses in posterior teeth of 12-year-old Lithuanian children. Caries Res 33:340–348

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ekstrand KR, Ricketts DN, Kidd EA (1997) Reproducibility and accuracy of three methods for assessment of demineralization depth of the occlusal surface: an in vitro examination. Caries Res 31:224–231

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Burin C, Burin C, Loguercio AD, Grande RH, Reis A (2005) Occlusal caries detection: a comparison of a laser fluorescence system and conventional methods. Pediatr Dent 27:307–312

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. European Commission (2004) Radiation protection. European guidelines on radiation protection in dental radiology. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  36. Lussi A, Hellwig E (2006) Performance of a new laser fluorescence device for the detection of occlusal caries in vitro. J Dent 34:467–471

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Kühnisch J, Bücher K, Henschel V, Hickel R (2007) Reproducibility of DIAGNOdent 2095 and DIAGNOdent Pen measurements: results from an in vitro study on occlusal sites. Eur J Oral Sci 115:206–211

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Huth KC, Neuhaus KW, Gygax M, Bücher K, Crispin A, Paschos E, R. H, Lussi A (2008) Clinical performance of a new laser fluorescence device for detection of occlusal caries lesions at permanent molars. J Dent 35:1033–1040

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Fung L, Smales R, Ngo H, Moun G (2004) Diagnostic comparison of three groups of examiners using visual and laser fluorescence methods to detect occlusal caries in vitro. Aust Dent J 49:67–71, quiz 101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Declaration of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Klaus W. Neuhaus.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Neuhaus, K.W., Rodrigues, J.A., Hug, I. et al. Performance of laser fluorescence devices, visual and radiographic examination for the detection of occlusal caries in primary molars. Clin Oral Invest 15, 635–641 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-010-0427-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-010-0427-5

Keywords

Navigation