Skip to main content
Log in

Investigating large curved interaction devices

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Large interactive surfaces enable novel forms of interaction for their users, particularly in terms of collaborative interaction. During longer interactions, the ergonomic factors of interaction systems have to be taken into consideration. Using the full interaction space may require considerable motion of the arms and upper body over a prolonged period of time, potentially causing fatigue. In this work, we present Curved, a large-surface interaction device, whose shape is designed based on the natural movement of an outstretched arm. It is able to track one or two hands above or on its surface by using 32 capacitive proximity sensors. Supporting both touch and mid-air interaction can enable more versatile modes of use. We use image processing methods for tracking the user’s hands and classify gestures based on their motion. Virtual reality is a potential use case for such interaction systems and was chosen for our demonstration application. We conducted a study with ten users to test the gesture tracking performance, as well as user experience and user preference for the adjustable system parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://simple.sourceforge.net/

References

  1. Annett M, Grossman T, Wigdor D, Fitzmaurice G (2011) Medusa: a proximity-aware multi-touch tabletop. In: Proceedings UIST. ACM, pp 337–346

  2. Bachynskyi M, Oulasvirta A, Palmas G, Weinkauf T (2014) Is motion capture-based biomechanical simulation valid for HCI studies?: study and implications. In: Proceedings of the 32nd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, pp 3215–3224

  3. Bachynskyi M, Palmas G, Oulasvirta A, Steimle J, Weinkauf T (2015) Performance and ergonomics of touch surfaces: a comparative study using biomechanical simulation

  4. Benko H, Jota R, Wilson A (2012) Miragetable: freehand interaction on a projected augmented reality tabletop. In: Proceedings CHI. ACM, pp 199–208

  5. Braun A, Hamisu P (2011) Designing a multi-purpose capacitive proximity sensing input device. In: Proceedings PETRA, p. Article No. 15. https://doi.org/10.1145/2141622.2141641. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?doid=2141622.2141641

  6. Braun A, Krepp S, Kuijper A (2015) Acoustic tracking of hand activities on surfaces. In: Proceedings iWOAR, WOAR ’15. ACM, New York, pp 9:1–9:5. https://doi.org/10.1145/2790044.2790052. http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2790044.2790052

  7. Braun A, Wichert R, Kuijper A, Fellner DW (2015) Capacitive proximity sensing in smart environments. J Ambient Intell Smart Environ 7(4):1–28. https://doi.org/10.3233/AIS-150324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Braun A, Zander-Walz S, Krepp S, Rus S, Wichert R, Kuijper A (2016) CapTap: combining capacitive gesture recognition and acoustic touch detection. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international workshop on sensor-based activity recognition and interaction. ACM, p 6

  9. Braun A, Zander-Walz S, Majewski M, Kuijper A (2017) Curved—free-form interaction using capacitive proximity sensors. Procedia Comput Sci 109:59–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.05.295 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2017.05.295. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877050917309523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Earnshaw RA (2014) Virtual reality systems. Academic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  11. Faulkner L (2003) Beyond the five-user assumption: benefits of increased sample sizes in usability testing. Behav Res Methods 35(3):379–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Grosse-Puppendahl T, Berghoefer Y, Braun A, Wimmer R, Kuijper A (2013) OpenCapSense: a rapid prototyping toolkit for pervasive interaction using capacitive sensing. In: Proceedings PerCom, pp 152–159. https://doi.org/10.1109/PerCom.2013.6526726

  13. Grosse-Puppendahl T, Braun A, Kamieth F, Kuijper A (2013) Swiss-cheese extended: an object recognition method for ubiquitous interfaces based on capacitive proximity sensing. In: Proceedings of the 2013 ACM annual conference on human factors in computing systems. ACM, pp 1401–1410

  14. Grossman T, Wigdor D, Balakrishnan R (2004) Multi-finger gestural interaction with 3D volumetric displays. In: Proceedings UIST. ACM, pp 61–70. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1029644

  15. Hu MK (1962) Visual pattern recognition by moment invariants. IRE Trans Inf Theory 8(2):179–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Le Goc M, Taylor S, Izadi S, Keskin C et al (2014) A low-cost transparent electric field sensor for 3D interaction on mobile devices. In: Proceedings CHI, pp 3167–3170

  17. Ma D, Fan X, Gausemeier J, Grafe M (2011) Virtual reality & augmented reality in industry, Springer, Berlin. http://www.springerlink.com/index/10.1007/978-3-642-17376-9

  18. Rekimoto J (2002) SmartSkin: an infrastructure for freehand manipulation on interactive surfaces. In: Proceedings CHI. ACM, pp 113–120

  19. Ren Z, Meng J, Yuan J, Zhang Z (2011) Robust hand gesture recognition with kinect sensor. In: Multimedia. ACM Press, New York, p 759. https://doi.org/10.1145/2072298.2072443. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2072298.2072443

  20. Roudaut A, Pohl H, Baudisch P (2011) Touch input on curved surfaces. In: Proceedings CHI. ACM, pp 1011–1020

  21. Samsung Inc. (2014) CES 2014: Samsung unveils first curved ultra high definition (UHD) TVs

  22. Schlömer T, Poppinga B, Henze N, Boll S (2008) Gesture recognition with a Wii controller. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on tangible and embedded interaction. ACM, pp 11–14

  23. Smith J, White T, Dodge C, Paradiso J, Gershenfeld N, Allport D (1998) Electric field sensing for graphical interfaces. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 18(3):54–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. University of Groningen (2011) Reality touch theatre. http://www.rug.nl/news/2011/01/touchscreen1?lang=en

  25. Weichert F, Bachmann D, Rudak B, Fisseler D (2013) Analysis of the accuracy and robustness of the leap motion controller. Sensors 13(5):6380–6393

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Wimmer R, Baudisch P (2011) Modular and deformable touch-sensitive surfaces based on time domain reflectometry. In: Proceedings UIST. ACM, pp 517–526

  27. Wimmer R, Kranz M, Boring S, Schmidt A (2007) Captable and capshelf-unobtrusive activity recognition using networked capacitive sensors. In: INSS. IEEE, pp 85–88

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Stefan Krepp, Steeven Zeiss, Joachim Loge, and Maxim Djakow for their input to the hardware and software development, as well as our study participants for their valuable comments.

Funding

This work was partially supported by EC Grant Agreement No. 610840.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Braun.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Braun, A., Zander-Walz, S., Majewski, M. et al. Investigating large curved interaction devices. Pers Ubiquit Comput 23, 739–748 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-018-1109-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-018-1109-6

Keywords

Navigation