Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Spatial metaphors for a speech-based mobile city guide service

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Personal and Ubiquitous Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Speech-based automated mobile phone services allow people to access information whilst on the move, but are difficult to use due to the arbitrary assignment of numbers to menu options. For this study, it was hypothesised that the use of spatial interface metaphors could lead to higher levels of usability for a mobile city guide service by capitalising on humans’ well developed spatial ability. One non-metaphor, numbered menu service, and three different spatial metaphor-based services were implemented. The metaphors used were: a travel system, an office filing system and a shopping metaphor. Measures of participant performance with each service and their corresponding subjective evaluations were recorded for each trial. The results indicated that, for first-time users, the non-metaphor service was the most usable, but after three trials, the office filing system metaphor service was the most usable. Navigational cues provided by spatial interface metaphors may improve user attitudes and interactions with automated phone services.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Advisor PC (2003) Mobile users to reach 1 billion, Issue 91, Spring, http://www.pcadvisor.co.uk

  2. Schumacher RM, Hardzinski M, Schwartz A (1995) Increasing the usability of interactive voice response systems. Hum Factors 37(2):251–264

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Sawhney N, Schmandt C (1998) Speaking and listening on the run: design for wearable audio computing. In: Proceedings of the second international symposium on wearable computers (ISWC’98), pp 108–115

  4. Rosson M (1985) Using synthetic speech for remote access to information. Behav Res Meth Instr 17(2):250–252

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bewley W, Roberts TL, Schroit D, Verplank WL (1983) Human factors testing in the design of Xerox’s 8010 “Star” office workstation. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Boston, Massachusetts. ACM Press, New York, pp 72–77

  6. Lakoff G, Johnson M (1980) Metaphors we live by. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

  7. Halasz FG, Moran TP (1982) Analogy considered harmful. In: Proceedings of the conference on human factors in computing systems, Gaithersburg, Maryland, pp 383–386

  8. Gentner D, Nielsen J (1996) The anti-mac interface. Commun ACM 39(8):70–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Alty JL, Knott RP (1999) Metaphor and human-computer interaction: a model based approach. In: Nehaniv CL (ed) Computations for metaphors, analogy and agents. University of Aizu, Japan, pp 307–321

  10. Hamilton A (2000) Interface metaphors and logical analogies: a question of terminology. J Am Soc Inform Sci 51(2):111–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Johnson J (1987) How faithfully should the electronic office simulate the real one? ACM SIGCHI Bull 19(2):21–25

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Kay A (1990) User interface: a personal view. In: Laurel B, Mountford S (eds) The art of human computer interface design. Addison-Wesley, New York

  13. Carroll J, Mack R (1985) Metaphor, computing systems and active learning. Int J Man Mach Stud 22(1):39–57

    Google Scholar 

  14. Carroll J, Thomas J (1982) Metaphor and the cognitive representation of computing systems. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 12(2):107–116

    Google Scholar 

  15. Alty JA, Knott RP, Anderson B, Smyth M (2000) A framework for engineering metaphor at the user interface. Interact Comput 13:301–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Cates WM (2002) Systematic selection and implementation of graphical user interface metaphors. Comput Educ 38:385–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hutchins E (1989) Metaphors for interface design. In: Taylor M et al. (eds) The structure of multimodal dialogues. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 11–28

  18. Benking H, Judge A (1994) Design considerations for spatial metaphors. In: The European conference on hypermedia technology, Edinburgh, Scotland, September 1994

  19. Dutton R, Foster J, Jack M (1999) Please mind the doors—do interface metaphors improve the usability of voice response services? BT Technol J 17(1):172–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Blattner MM, Sumikawa DA, Greenberg RM (1989). Earcons and icons: their structure and common design principles. Hum Comput Interact 4(1):11–44

    Google Scholar 

  21. Howell MD, Love S, Turner M, Van Laar DL (2003) Generating interface metaphors: a comparison of 2 methodologies. In: McCabe PT (ed) Contemporary ergonomics 2003. Taylor & Francis, London, pp 235–240

  22. Lumbreras M, Rossi G (1995) A metaphor for the visually impaired: browsing information in a 3D aural environment only. In: Proceedings of the ACM conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI’95), Denver, Colorado. 7–11 May 1995, pp 261–262

  23. Savidis A, Stephanidis C (1995) Developing dual user interfaces for integrating blind and sighted users: the HOMER UIMS. In: Proceedings of the ACM conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI’95), Denver, Colorado, 7–11 May 1995, pp 106–113

  24. Mynatt E, Edwards WK (1992) Mapping GUIs to auditory interfaces. In: Proceedings of ACM symposium on user interface software and technology (UIST). ACM Press, Monterey, pp 61–70

  25. Gaver WW (1989) The SonicFinder: an interface that uses auditory icons. Hum Comput Interact 4(1):67–94

    Google Scholar 

  26. Howell MD, Love S, Turner M, Van Laar DL (2003) Interface metaphors for automated mobile phone services. In: Proceedings of HCI International ‘03, 10th international conference on human–computer interaction, Crete, Greece, pp 128–132

  27. Halstead-Nussloch R (1989) The design of phone-based interfaces for consumers. In: Proceedings of CHI-89: human factors in computing systems. ACM, New York, pp 347–352

  28. Schumacher RM (1992) Phone-based interfaces: research and guidelines. In: Proceedings of the human factors society 36th annual meeting. Human Factors Society, Santa Monica, pp 1051–1055

  29. Johnson P (1998) Usability and mobility: interactions on the move. In: The first workshop on human–computer interaction with mobile devices, Glasgow University, UK

  30. Hone KS, Graham R (2000) Towards a tool for the subjective assessment of speech system interfaces (SASSI). Nat Lang Eng 6(3/4):287–305

    Google Scholar 

  31. Fraser NM, Gilbert GN (1991) Simulating speech systems. Comput Speech Lang 5(1):81–99

    Google Scholar 

  32. Rumelhart D, Norman D (1981) Analogical processes in learning. In: Anderson JR (ed) Cognitive skills and their acquisition. Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, pp 335–361

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank Dr. Darren Van Laar from the Department of Psychology, University of Portsmouth, UK, for his help with this research. Thanks also to the anonymous reviewers for their useful comments on the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Information Systems and Computing, Brunel University, Uxbridge, Middlesex, UB8 3PH, UK

    Mark Howell & Steve Love

  2. Department of Psychology, University of Portsmouth, King Henry Building, King Henry I Street, Portsmouth, PO1 2DY, UK

    Mark Turner

Authors
  1. Mark Howell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Steve Love
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mark Turner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Howell.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Howell, M., Love, S. & Turner, M. Spatial metaphors for a speech-based mobile city guide service. Pers Ubiquit Comput 9, 32–45 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-004-0271-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-004-0271-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation