Skip to main content
Log in

Metrological traceability is not always a straight line

  • General Paper
  • Published:
Accreditation and Quality Assurance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The two most important concepts in metrology are certainly “traceability to standards” and “measurement uncertainty evaluation”. So far the questions related to these concepts have been reasonably solved in the metrology of “classical quantities”, but for the introduction of metrological concepts in new fields, such as chemistry and biology, a lot of problems remain and must be solved in order to support international arrangements. In this presentation, the authors want to develop the strategy implemented at Laboratoire national de métrologie et d’essais (LNE) in metrology in chemistry and biology. The strategy is based on: (1) pure solutions for calibration of analytical instruments, (2) use of certified reference materials (matrix reference materials), and (3) participation to proficiency testing schemes. Examples will be presented in organic and inorganic chemistry. For laboratory medicine, proficiency testing providers play an important role in the organization of External Quality Assessment Schemes. For the time being, the reference value or the assigned value of the comparison is calculated with the results obtained by the participants. This assigned value is not often traceable to SI units. One of the methods suggested by LNE is to ensure the metrological traceability to SI units of the assigned value for the more critical quantities carried on analytes by implementing the Joint committee for traceability in laboratory medicine reference methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. International Vocabulary of Metrology—basic and general concepts and associated terms. JCGM 200: 2008: http://www.bipm.org/utils/common/documents/jcgm/JCGM_200_2008.pdf

  2. Milton MJT, Quinn TJ (2001) Metrologia 38:289–296. doi:10.1088/0026-1394/38/4/1

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Majors RE (1991) LC–GC Int 4:10

    Google Scholar 

  4. Vial J, Le Mapihan K, Jardy A (2002) Bio-forum Int Ed Fr 2:18

    Google Scholar 

  5. Quevauviller P (2004) Trends Analyt Chem 23:171. doi:10.1016/S0165-9936(04)00314-0

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Emons H, Linsinger TPJ (2003) Trends Analyt Chem 23:442. doi:10.1016/S0165-9936(04)00604-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Institut français de l’environnement (2000) In: IFEN (eds) Etudes et Travaux IFEN, ‘‘les pesticides dans les eaux’’. IFEN, Orleans

  8. Deplagne J, Vial J, Pichon V, Hennion M-C, Lalere B, Hervouet G (2006) J Chromatogr A 1123:31. doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2006.04.085

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. NF ISO 5725 standard (1994) Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results. Internal Organization for Standardization, Geneva

  10. Eurachem/Citac guide CG4 (2000) In: Ellison SLR, Rosslein M, Williams A (eds) Quantifying uncertainty in analytical measurement, 2nd edn. United Kingdom

  11. Vial J, Ménier I, Jardy A, Anger P, Brun A, Burbaud L (1998) J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 708:131. doi:10.1016/S0378-4347(97)00668-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. ISO/CEI 17025 standard (2005) General requirements for the competence of testing and calibration laboratories. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva

  13. Cofrac Guide d’évaluation des incertitudes de mesure des analyses de biologie médicale Doc LAB GTA 14 Novembre 2006

  14. Fisicaro P, Amarouche S, Lalere B, Labarraque G, Priel M (2008) Accred Qual Assur 13:361–366. doi:10.1007/s00769-008-0402-x

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Thompson M, Ellison SLR, Wood R (2006) The international harmonized protocol for the proficiency testing of analytical chemistry laboratories (IUPAC Technical Report). Pure Appl Chem 78:145–196. doi:10.1351/pac200678010145

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Priel M, Amarouche S, Désenfant M, De Graeve J (2008) Using proficiency testing results latest alternative method for uncertainty evaluation: application in clinical chemistry. Transverse disciplines in metrology. In: Proceedings of the 13th international metrology congress (Publication ISTE)

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marc Priel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Priel, M., Amarouche, S. & Fisicaro, P. Metrological traceability is not always a straight line. Accred Qual Assur 14, 593–599 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-009-0540-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00769-009-0540-9

Keywords

Navigation