Skip to main content
Log in

Simultaneous determination of epimers (+)-catechin and (‒)-epicatechin in Onosma bracteatum Wall. using high-performance thin-layer chromatography‒mass spectrometry method

  • Original Research Paper
  • Published:
JPC – Journal of Planar Chromatography – Modern TLC Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

High-performance thin-layer chromatography‒mass spectrometry (HPTLC‒MS) method was developed for the estimation of epimers (+)-catechin (CA) and (‒)-epicatechin (ECA) in Onosma bracteatum Wall. Resolving these epimers is challenging and so method optimization was done for the selection of the stationary phase and the mobile phase to achieve their coherent separation. To further increase the reliability of the obtained densitometric results, HPTLC–MS analysis was performed. The genus Onosma L. is a species-rich genus that exhibits complex patterns of morphological and karyological diversity, and highly debatable taxonomic approaches. Thus, many similar species are described based on morphological differences and often quite ambiguous. To facilitate the identification of O. bracteatum, separation was achieved using pre-coated silica gel 60 F254 HPTLC plate as the stationary phase and a mixture of diisopropyl ether–ethyl acetate–formic acid (9.0:0.2:0.7, V/V) as the mobile phase for the separation of epimers CA and ECA. Sample preparation, mobile phase selection and optimization were given importance to manage good resolution (RF) of these markers. Flavan-3-ols CA and ECA were identified and confirmed on the basis of RF and in situ UV and MS overlaid spectra with respective standards. The method was validated for linearity, inter-day precision, intra-day precision, repeatability, accuracy, specificity, limit of detection, and limit of quantification. The average recoveries for epimers CA and ECA from ethyl acetate extract fraction (MEF) were found 98.86 and 99.03% indicating the good reproducibility for each marker. The proposed validated HPTLC method is simple, accurate and reproducible and is the first report on the separation and quantification of the epimers CA and ECA in O. bracteatum using HPTLC–MS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vaidya B (1982) Some controversial drugs in Indian medicine. Chaukhambha Orientlia, Varanasi

  2. Khare P (2007) Indian medicinal plants: an illustrated dictionary. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Kirtikar K, Basu B (1935) Indian medicinal plants, 2nd edn. International Book Distributors, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kaur S, Kumar A, Kaur V, et al (2020) Antioxidant phytoconstituents from Onosma bracteata Wall. (Boraginaceae) ameliorate the CCl4 induced hepatic damage: in vivo study in male wistar rats. Front Pharmacol 11:1301. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2020.01301

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Kumar N, Kumar R, Kishore K (2013) Onosma L.: a review of phytochemistry and ethnopharmacology. Pharmacogn Rev 7:140–151. https://doi.org/10.4103/0973-7847.120513

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Dandiya PC, Arora RB (1957) A phytochemical and pharmacological study of Onosma bracteatum Wall. J Am Pharm Assoc 46:111–114. https://doi.org/10.1002/jps.3030460210

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Nadkarni K (2002) Indian materia medica, 3rd edn. Popular Prakashan Pvt Ltd, Bombay, p 871

    Google Scholar 

  8. Umer F, Yanjun P, Dejene D, et al (2019) Novel anti-aging benzoquinone derivatives from Onosma bracteatum Wall. Molecules 24:1428. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules24071428

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ahmad B, Ali N, Bashir S, et al (2009) Parasiticidal, antifungal and antibacterial activities of Onsoma griffithi. Afr J Bot 8:5084–5087. https://doi.org/10.4314/ajb.v8i19.65228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Walter C, Shinwari ZK, Afzal I, et al (2011) Antibacterial activity in herbal products used in Pakistan. Pak J Bot 43:155–162

    Google Scholar 

  11. Imran H, Rahman AU, Sohail T, et al (2018) Onosma bracteatum Wall: a potent analgesic agent. Bangladesh J Med Sci 17:36–41. https://doi.org/10.3329/bjms.v17i1.35276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Menghani E, Sudhanshu RN, Mittal S (2011) Free radical scavenging capacity and antioxidant activity of Onosma bracteatum. Int J Pharm Res Dev 4:16–20

    Google Scholar 

  13. Badruddeen FS, Siddiqui HH, Haque SE, et al (2012) Psychoimmunomodulatory effects of Onosma bracteatum Wall. (Gaozaban) on stress model in sprague dawley rats. Exp Res 6:1356–1360

    Google Scholar 

  14. Choudhary GP (2012) Wound healing activity of the ethanolic extract of Onosma bracteatum Wall. Int J Pharm Chem Sci 1:1035–1037

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rajapara AM, Bhatt VP, Shah MB (2021) Phytochemical and pharmacological investigation on Onosma bracteatum Wall. Asian J Biol Life Sci 10:141–149. https://doi.org/10.5530/ajbls.2021.10.21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Yanjun P, Yanan L, Rui I, et al (2021) Ehretiquinone from Onosma bracteatum Wall. exhibits antiaging effect on yeasts and mammals through antioxidative stress and autophagy induction. Oxid Med Cell Longev. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/5469849

  17. Dalluge JJ, Nelson BC (2000) Determination of Tea Catechins. J Chromatogr A 881:411–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(00)00062-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Vovk I, Simonovska B, Vuorela P, Vuorela H (2002) Optimization of separation of (+)-catechin and (−)-epicatechin on cellulose thin-layer chromatography plates. J Planar Chromatogr-Mod TLC 15:433–436. https://doi.org/10.1556/JPC.15.2002.6.8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang KB, Liu ZH, Huang JA, Fu DH, Liu F, Gong YS, Wu XS (2009) TLC separation of catechins and theaflavins on polyamide plates. J Planar Chromatogr Mod TLC 22:97–100. https://doi.org/10.1556/jpc.22.2009.2.4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fecka I, Cisowski W, Luczkiewicz M (2001) Determination of catechin and epicatechin in an extract from Uncaria tomentosa bark by TLC with chemically modified stationary phases. J Planar Chromatogr Mod TLC 14:405–409

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Vovk I, Simonovska BS, Andrensek P, Vuorela H (2003) Rotation planar extraction and rotation planar chromatography of oak (Quercus robur L.) bark. J Chromatogr A 991:267–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0021-9673(03)00271-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Friedrich H, Wiedemeyer H (1976) Quantitative determination of the tannin-precursors and the tannins in Ephedra helvetica. Planta Med 30:223–231. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0028-1097722

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Poblocka-Olech L, Krauze-Baranowska M, Wiwart M (2007) HPTLC determination of catechins in different clones of the genus Salix. J Planar Chromatogr Mod TLC 20:61–64. https://doi.org/10.1556/jpc.20.2007.1.10

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Sharma OP, Bhat TK, Singh B (1998) Thin-layer chromatography of gallic acid, methyl gallate, pyrogallol, phloroglucinol, catechol, resorcinol, hydroquinone, catechin, epicatechin, cinnamic acid, p-coumaric acid, ferulic acid and tannic acid. J Chromatogr A 822:167–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(98)00490-7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Glavnik V, Simonovska B, Vovk I (2009) Densitometric determination of (+)-catechin and (−)-epicatechin by 4-dimethylaminocinnamaldehyde reagent. J Chromatogr A 1216:4485–4491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2009.03.026

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. International Conference on Harmonization, Q2 (R1) (2005) Validation of Analytical Procedures, Text and Methodology, Geneva

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank L. M. College of Pharmacy, Ahmedabad, and SAIF, GTU, Ahmedabad, for support and to provide facilities to carry out research work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mamta B. Shah.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rajpara, A., Gandhi, N., Bhatt, V. et al. Simultaneous determination of epimers (+)-catechin and (‒)-epicatechin in Onosma bracteatum Wall. using high-performance thin-layer chromatography‒mass spectrometry method. JPC-J Planar Chromat 35, 89–95 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00764-022-00157-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00764-022-00157-5

Keywords

Navigation