Abstract
Proteins are not static molecules but dynamic entities able to modify their structure for several reasons, from the necessity to recognize partners to the regulation of their thermodynamic stability. Conformational disorder is frequent in protein structures and atoms can have, in protein crystal structures, two or more alternative, equilibrium positions close to each other. Here, a set of protein crystal structures refined at very high resolution (1 Å or better) is examined to characterize the conformational disorder of the backbone atoms, which is not infrequent: about 15% of the protein backbone atoms are conformationally disordered and three quarters of them have been deposited with two or more equilibrium positions (most of the others were not detected in the electron density maps). Several structural features have been examined and it was observed that Cα atoms tend to be disordered more frequently than the other backbone atoms, likely because their disorder is induced by disordered side chains: side-chain disorder is two times more frequent than backbone disorder. Surprisingly, backbone disorder is only slightly more frequent in loops than in helices and strands and this is in agreement with the observation that backbone disorder is a localized phenomenon: in about 80% of the cases, it is observed in one amino acid and not in its neighbors. However, although backbone disorder does not cluster along the polypeptide sequence, it tends to cluster in 3D, since backbone-disordered amino acids distant in sequence are close in the 3D space.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atkins P, de Paula J (2014) Physical chemistry: thermodynamics, structure and change. W. H. Freeman, Oxford
Berman HM, Westbrook J, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Bhat TN, Weissig H, Shindyalov IN, Bourne PE (2000) The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res 28:235–242
Bernstein FC, Koetzle TF, Williams GJB, Meyer EFJ, Brice MD, Rodgers JR, Kennard O, Shimanouchi T, Tasumi M (1977) The protein data bank: a computer-based archival file for macromolecular structures. J Mol Biol 112:535–542
Bowler BE (2012) Residual structure in unfolded proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol 22:4–13
Carugo O (2018a) How large B-factors can be in protein crystal structures. BMC Bioinform 19:61
Carugo O (2018b) Atomic displacement parameters in structural biology. Amino Acids 50:775–786
Carugo O (2018c) Maximal B-factors in protein crystal structures. Zeit Krist. https://doi.org/10.1515/zkri-2018-2057
Carugo O, Djinović-Carugo K (2012) How many packing contacts are observed in protein crystals? J Struct Biol 180:96–100
Chou PY, Fasman GD (1974) Prediction of protein conformation. Biochemistry 13:222–245
Dauter Z, Lamzin VS, Wilson KS (1997) The benefits of atomic resolution. Curr Opin Struct Biol 7:681–688
Djinovic Carugo K, Carugo O (2015) Missing strings of residues in protein crystal structures. Intrinsically Disord Proteins 3:1–7
Frauenfelder H, Chen G, Berendzen J, Fenimore PW, Jansson H, McMahon BH, Stroe IR, Swenson J, Young RD (2009) A unified model of protein dynamics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:5129–5134
Hintze BJ, Lewis SM, Richardson JS, Richardson DC (2016) Molprobity’s ultimate rotamer-library distributions for model validation. Proteins 84:1177–1189
Hubbard SJ, Thornton JM (1993) NACCESS. Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, University College, London
Kabsch W, Sander C (1983) Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features. Biopolymers 22:2577–2637
Lesk AM (2016) Introduction to protein science, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Lovell SC, Word JM, Richardson JS, Richardson DC (2000) The penultimate rotamer library. Proteins 40:389–408
Piovesan D, Tabaro F, Mičetić I, Necci M, Quaglia F, Oldfield CJ, Aspromonte MC, Davey NE, Davidović R, Dosztányi Z, Elofsson A, Gasparini A, Hatos A, Kajava AV, Kalmar L, Leonardi E, Lazar T, Macedo-Ribeiro S, Macossay-Castillo M, Meszaros A, Minervini G, Murvai N, Pujols J, Roche DB, Salladini E, Schad E, Schramm A, Szabo B, Tantos A, Tonello F, Tsirigos KD, Veljković N, Ventura S, Vranken W, Warholm P, Uversky VN, Dunker AK, Longhi S, Tompa P, Tosatto SC (2017) DisProt 7.0: a major update of the database of disordered proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 45:D1123–D1124
Schrauber H, Eisenhaber F, Argos P (1993) Rotamers: to be or not to be? An analysis of amino acid side-chain conformations in globular proteins. J Mol Biol 230:592–612
Tompa P (2010) Structure and function of intrinsically disordered proteins. Chapman & Hall, Boca Raton
Viterbo D (2002) Solution and refinement of crystal structures. In: Giacovazzo C (ed) Fundamentals of crystallography. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 413–501
Vitkup D, Ringe D, Petsko GA, Karplus M (2000) Solvent mobility and the protein ‘glass’ transition. Nat Struct Biol 7:34–38
Wong KB, Daggett V (1998) Barstar has a highly dynamic hydrophobic core: evidence from molecular dynamics simulations and nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation data. Biochemistry 37:11182–11192
Acknowledgements
Kristina Djinovic is gratefully acknowledged for her kind hospitality at the University of Vienna and for helpful discussions.
Funding
This work was supported by the MIUR-FFABR and by the University of Pavia.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Research involving human participants and/or animals
This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.
Additional information
Handling Editor: D. Frishman.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carugo, O. Globular protein backbone conformational disorder in crystal structures. Amino Acids 51, 475–481 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00726-018-2683-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00726-018-2683-7