Skip to main content
Log in

Cytogenetic variability in four species of Gnamptogenys Roger, 1863 (Formicidae: Ectatomminae) showing chromosomal polymorphisms, species complex, and cryptic species

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Protoplasma Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Gnamptogenys includes 138 described species that are widely distributed, with high diversity, in the Neotropics. Some Neotropical species have taxonomic issues, as is the case with Gnamptogenys striatula, for which morphological variations have been observed between different populations. For the ant species with taxonomic issues, classical and molecular cytogenetic studies have assisted in the resolution of these issues. Cytogenetic studies of Gnamptogenys are scarce and have only been reported for 14 taxa. These reports have rarely presented chromosomal morphology. Considering the importance of the taxonomic revision of some species, such as G. striatula, the present study cytogenetically characterized four species of Gnamptogenys: G. striatula, G. moelleri, G. regularis, and G. triangularis, discussing their phylogenetic and biogeographic characteristics. The number of chromosomes ranged from 2n = 26 to 2n = 44, with distinct karyotypes at both species and population levels. All four species presented a pair of 18S rDNA gene markers that coincided with GC-rich regions. In the case of G. striatula from the Atlantic rainforest, a chromosomal polymorphism was observed, with chromosomal translocations being the likely origin of this polymorphism. Two populations of G. striatula showed karyotype differences, thus corroborating previous morphological data indicating the existence of a species complex in this taxon. In addition, G. regularis showed a polymorphism involving a chromosome pair bearing ribosomal genes, possibly caused by unequal crossing-over. Although G. moelleri has a well-defined taxonomy, a population from the eastern Amazon rainforest presented a divergent karyotype from the Atlantic rainforest populations, suggesting the existence of a cryptic species in this taxon.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aguiar HJAC, Barros LAC, Alves DR, Mariano CSF, Delabie JHC, Pompolo SG (2017) Cytogenetic studies on populations of Camponotus rufipes (Fabricius, 1775) and Camponotus renggeri Emery, 1894 (Formicidae: Formicinae). PLoS One 12(5):e0177702. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0177702

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Alves-Silva AP, Barros LAC, Chaul JCM, Pompolo SG (2014) The First cytogenetic data on Strumigenys louisianae Roger, 1863 (Formicidae: Myrmicinae: Dacetini): The lowest chromosome number in the Hymenoptera of the Neotropical region. PLoS One 9(11):e111706. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111706

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Barros LAC, Aguiar HJAC, Mariano CSF, Delabie JHC, Pompolo SG (2010) Cytogenetic characterization of the lower-Attine Mycocepurus goeldii (Formicidae: Myrmicinae: Attini). Sociobiology 56:57–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Barros LAC, Aguiar HJAC, Andrade-Souza V, Mariano CSF, Delabie JHC, Pompolo SG (2012) Occurrence of pre-nucleolar bodies and 45S rDNA location on the chromosomes of the ant Mycocepurus goeldii (Forel) (Formicidae, Myrmicinae, Attini). Hereditas 149:50–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5223.2011.02237.x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barros LAC, Teixeira GA, Aguiar HJAC, Mariano CSF, Delabie JHC, Pompolo SG (2014a) Banding patterns of three leafcutter ant species of the genus Atta (Formicidae: Myrmicinae) and chromosomal inferences. Fla Entomol 97:1694–1701. https://doi.org/10.1653/024.097.0444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barros LAC, Aguiar HJAC, Mariano CSF, Delabie JHC, Pompolo SG (2014b) Cytogenetic characterization of the ant Trachymyrmex fuscus Emery, 1934 (Formicidae: Myrmicinae: Attini) with the description of a chromosomal polymorphism. Ann Soc Entomol Fr 49(4):367–373. https://doi.org/10.1080/00379271.2013.856201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barros LAC, Aguiar HJAC, Mariano CS, Andrade-Souza V, Costa MA, Delabie JH, Pompolo SG (2016) Cytogenetic data on six leafcutter ants of the genus Acromyrmex Mayr, 1865 (Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Myrmicinae): insights into chromosome evolution and taxonomic implications. Comp Cytogenet 10(2):229–243. https://doi.org/10.3897/CompCytogen.v10i2.7612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blatrix R, Jaisson P (2000) Optional gamergates in the queenright ponerine ant Gnamptogenys striatula Mayr. Insect Soc 47:193–197. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00001701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borges DS, Mariano CSF, Delabie JHC, Pompolo SG (2004) Cytogenetics studies in Neotropical ants of the genus Gnamptogenys Roger (Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Ectatominae). Rev Bras Entomol 48(4):481–484. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0085-56262004000400009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camacho GP (2013) Estudo taxonômico do grupo striatula de Gnamptogenys Roger (Hymenoptera, Formicidae, Ectatomminae) para o Brasil. Dissertation, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa

    Google Scholar 

  • Camacho JPM, Navas-Castillo J, Cabrero J (1986) Extra nucleolar activity associated with presence of a supernumerary chromosome segment in the grasshopper Oedipoda fuscocincta. Heredity 56:237–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camacho GP, Feitosa RM (2015) Estado da arte sobre a taxonomia e filogenia de Ectatomminae. In: Delabie JHC, Feitosa RM, Serrao JE, Mariano CSF, Majer JD (eds) As formigas poneromorfas do Brasil, 1st edn. Ilhéus, Brasil, pp 22–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Correia JPSO, Mariano CSF, Delabie JHCD, Lacau S, Costa MA (2016) Cytogenetic analysis of Pseudoponera stigma and Pseudoponera gilberti (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ponerinae): a taxonomic approach. Fla Entomol 99(4):718–721. https://doi.org/10.1653/024.099.0422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cristiano MP, Cardoso DC, Fernandes-Salomão TM (2013) Cytogenetic and molecular analyses reveal a divergence between Acromyrmex striatus (Roger, 1863) and other congeneric species: taxonomic implications. PLoS One 8(3):e59784. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0059784

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Feitosa RM (2015) Lista de formigas poneromorfas do Brasil. In: Delabie JHC, Feitosa RM, Serrao JE, Mariano CSF, Majer JD (eds) As formigas poneromorfas do Brasil, 1st edn. Ilhéus, Brasil, pp 94–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Giraud T, Blatrix R, Poteaux R, Solignac M, Jaisson P (2000) Population structure and mating biology of the polygynous ponerine ant Gnamptogenys striatula in Brazil. Mol Ecol 9:1835–1184. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-294x.2000.01085.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goñi B, Imai HT, Kubota M, Kondo M, Yong HS, Tso YP (1982) Chromosome observations of tropical ants in Western Malaysia and Singapore. Annu Rep Natl Inst Genet (Japan) 32:71–73

    Google Scholar 

  • Imai HT, Crozier RH, Taylor RW (1977) Karyotype evolution in Australian ants. Chromosoma 59:341–393. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00327974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imai HT, Brown WL, Kubota M, Yong HS, Tho YP (1983) Chromosome observations on Tropical ants from Western Malaysia. II Annu Rep Natl Inst Genet (Japan) 34:66–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Imai H, Taylor RW, Crosland MW, Crozier RH (1988) Modes of spontaneous chromossomal mutation and karyotype evolution in ants with reference to the minimum interaction hypothesis. Jpn J Genet 63:159–185. https://doi.org/10.1266/jjg.63.159

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Imai HT (1991) Mutability of constitutive heterochromatin (C-bands) during eukaryotic chromosomal evolution ad their cytological meaning. Jpn J Genet 66:635–661. https://doi.org/10.1266/jjg.66.635

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Imai HT, Taylor RW, Crozier RH (1994) Experimental bases for the minimum interaction theory. Chromosome evolution in ants of the Myrmecia pilosula species complex (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Myrmeciinae). Jpn J Genet 69:137–182. https://doi.org/10.1266/jjg.69.137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasahara S (2009) Introdução à pesquisa em Citogenética de Vertebrados. Ribeirão Preto, Brazil

    Google Scholar 

  • Lattke JE (1990) Revisión del género Gnamptogenys Roger en Venezuela (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Acta Terramaris 2:1–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Lattke JE (1995) Revision of the ant genus Gnamptogenys in the New World (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). J Hymenopt Res 4:137–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Lattke JE (2004) A taxonomic revision and phylogenetic analysis of the ant genus Gnamptogenys Roger in Southeast Asia and Australasia (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ponerinae). Univ Calif publ entomol 122:1–266. https://doi.org/10.1525/california/9780520098442.001.0001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lattke JE, Fernández F, Arias-Penna TM, Palacio EE, Mackay W, Mackay E (2008) Género Gnamptogenys Roger. In: Jiménez E, Fernández F, Arias-Penna TM, Lozano-Zambrano FH (eds) Sistemática, Biogeografía y conservación de las hormigas cazadoras de Colombia, 1st edn. Bogotá D.C, Colombia, pp 66–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Levan A, Fredga K, Sandberg A (1964) Nomenclature for centromeric position on chromosomes. Hereditas 52:201–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1601-5223.1964.tb01953.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorite P, Palomeque T (2010) Karyotype evolution in ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae), with a review of the known ant chromosome numbers. Myrmecol News 13:89–102

    Google Scholar 

  • Mariano CSF, Pompolo SG, Delabie JHC, Campos LAO (2001) Estudos cariotípicos de algumas espécies neotropicais de Camponotus Mayr (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Rev Bras Entomol 45:267–274

    Google Scholar 

  • Mariano CSF, Pompolo SG, Barros LAC, Mariano-Neto E, Campiolo S, Delabie JCHD (2008) A biogeographical study of the threatened ant Dinoponera lucida Emery (Hymenoptera: Formicidae: Ponerinae) using a cytogenetic approach. Insect Conserv Diver 1:161–168. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-4598.2008.00022.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mariano CSF, Santos IS, Silva JG, Costa MA, Pompolo SG (2015) Citogenética e evolução do cariótipo em formigas poneromorfas. In: Delabie JHC, Feitosa RM, Serrao JE, Mariano CSF, Majer JD (eds) As formigas poneromorfas do Brasil, 1st edn. Ilhéus, Brasil, pp 102–125

    Google Scholar 

  • Moen DS, Irschick DJ, Wiens JJ (2013) Evolutionary conservatism and convergence both lead to striking similarity in ecology, morphology and performance across continents in frogs. P Roy Soc B-Biol Sci es 280(1773):20132156. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2013.2156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palomeque T, Chica E, Díaz de la Guardia G (1993) Supernumerary chromosome segments in different genera of Formicidae. Genetica. 90:17–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pereira JOP (2006) Diversidade genética da abelha sem ferrão Melipona quinquefasciata baseada no sequenciamento das regiões ITS1 parcial e 18S do DNA ribossômico nuclear. Thesis, Universidade Federal do Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil

  • Phimpan S, Tanomtong A, Jumrusthanasan S, Supiwong W, Siripiyasing P, Sanoamuang L (2013) First report of NOR polymorphism and chromosome analysis of John’s Snapper, Lutjanus johnii (Perciformes, Lutjanidae) in Thailand. Cytologia 78(4):335–344. https://doi.org/10.1508/cytologia.78.335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinkel D, Straume T, Gray JW (1986) Cytogenetic analysis using quantitative, high-sensitivity, fluorescence hybridization. PNAS USA 83:2934–2938. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.83.9.2934

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Santos IS, Mariano CSF, Delabie JHC, Costa MA, Carvalho AF, Silva JG (2016) "Much more than a neck": karyotype differentiation between Dolichoderus attelaboides (Fabricius, 1775) and Dolichoderus decollatus F. Smith, 1858 (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and karyotypic diversity of five other Neotropical species of Dolichoderus Lund, 1831. Myrmecol News 23:61–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Santos RP, Mariano CSF, Delabie JHC, Costa MA, Lima KM, Pompolo SG, Fernandes IO, Miranda EA, Carvalho AF, Silva JG (2018) Genetic characterization of some Neoponera (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) populations within the foetida species complex. J Insect Sci 18(4):14; 1–14; 7. https://doi.org/10.1093/jisesa/iey079

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schubert I, Lysak MA (2011) Interpretation of karyotype evolution should consider chromosome structural constraints. Trends Genet 27(6):207–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2011.03.004

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schweizer D (1980) Simultaneous fluorescent staining of R bands and specific heterocromatic regions (DA/DAPI-bands) in human chromosomes. Cytogenet Cell Genet 27:190–193. https://doi.org/10.1159/000131482

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Silva-Rocha PNC, Correia JPSO, Mariano CSF, Delabie JHC, Costa MA (2017) A note on the karyotype and morphology of the ant Platythyrea sinuata (Roger, 1860) (Formicidae, Ponerinae, Plathytyreini). Sociobiology 64(4):484–487. https://doi.org/10.13102/sociobiology.v64i4.1820

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sumner AT (2003) Chromosomes: Organization and Function. North Berwick – United Kingdom

  • Teixeira GA, Barros LAC, Aguiar HJAC, Pompolo SG (2017) Comparative physical mapping of 18S rDNA in the karyotypes of six leafcutter ant species of the genera Atta and Acromyrmex (Formicidae: Myrmicinae). Genetica 145:351–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10709-017-9970-1

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vicari MR, Artoni RF, Bertollo LA (2003) Heterochromatin polymorphism associated with 18S rDNA: a differential pathway among Hoplias malabaricus fish populations. Cytogenet Genome Res 101(1):24–28. https://doi.org/10.1159/000073413

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vicari MR, Almeida MC, Bertollo LAC, Moreira-Filho O, Artoni RF (2006) Cytogenetic analysis and chromosomal characteristics of the polymorphic 18S rDNA in the fish Prochilodus lineatus (Characiformes, Prochilodontidae). Genet Mol Biol 29(4):621–625. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1415-47572006000400008

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to Silvia G. Pompolo for valuable advices during this project, Júlio C. M. Chaul for kindly yielding Gnamptogenys triangularis for cytogenetic analysis and to Dr. Jacques H. Delabie for species identification. The authors also thank the Laboratório de Biologia Molecular de Insetos of the Universidade Federal de Viçosa (UFV) for technical support. GAT thanks the Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) for the scholarship granted.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hilton Jeferson Alves Cardoso de Aguiar.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Georg Krohne

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Fig. S1

Fluorochrome staining of Gnamptogenys from mordax and rastrata groups. (a, b) Metaphases of G. triangularis (rastrata group), and (c - f) Gnamptogenys regularis (mordax group). Metaphases stained with Chromomycin A3 (a, c, e) and 4’6- diamidino-2-phenylindole (b, d, f), respectively. Arrows indicate regions rich in GC base pairs. Bar = 5 μm. (PNG 4159 kb)

High Resolution Image (TIF 7830 kb)

Fig. S2

Fluorochrome staining of Gnamptogenys striatula. Female metaphases of individuals from Rio de Janeiro (2n = 32) and Petrópolis (2n = 34) stained with Chromomycin A3 (a, c) and 4’6- diamidino-2-phenylindole (b, d), respectively. Arrows indicate regions rich in GC base pairs. Bar = 5 μm. (PNG 2942 kb)

High Resolution Image (TIF 2670 kb)

Fig. S3

Fluorochrome staining of Gnamptogenys moelleri. Female metaphases of individuals from Petrópolis (2n = 34), Viçosa (2n = 34), and Açailândia (2n = 44) stained with Chromomycin A3 (a, c, e) and 4’6- diamidino-2-phenylindole (b, d, f), respectively. Arrows indicate regions rich in GC base pairs. Bar = 5 μm. (PNG 5513 kb)

High Resolution Image` (TIF 4994 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Teixeira, G.A., Barros, L.A.C., Lopes, D.M. et al. Cytogenetic variability in four species of Gnamptogenys Roger, 1863 (Formicidae: Ectatomminae) showing chromosomal polymorphisms, species complex, and cryptic species. Protoplasma 257, 549–560 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-019-01451-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00709-019-01451-6

Keywords

Navigation