Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Preoperative demonstration of the neurovascular compression characteristics with special emphasis on the degree of compression, using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective study, with comparison to surgical findings, in 100 consecutive patients who underwent microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia

  • Clinical Article
  • Published:
Acta Neurochirurgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Surgical outcome after microvascular decompression (MVD) for primary trigeminal neuralgia (TN) has been demonstrated as being related to the characteristics of the neurovascular compression (NVC), especially to the degree of compression exerted on the root. Therefore, preoperative determination of the NVC features could be of great value to the neurosurgeon, for evaluation of conflicting nature, exact localization, direction and degree of compression. This study deals with the predictive value of MRI in detecting and assessing features of vascular compression in 100 consecutive patients who underwent MVD for TN.

Methods

The study included 100 consecutive patients with primary TN who were submitted to a preoperative 3D MRI 1.5 T with T2 high-resolution, TOF-MRA, and T1-Gadolinium. Image analysis was performed by an independent observer blinded to the operative findings and compared with surgical data.

Findings

In 88 cases, image analysis showed NVC features that coincided with surgical findings. There were no false-positive results. Among 12 patients that did not show NVC at image analysis, nine did not have NVC at intraoperative observation, resulting in three false-negative cases. MRI sensitivity was 96.7% (88/91) and specificity 100% (9/9). Image analysis correctly identified compressible vessel in 80 of the 91 cases and degree of compression in 77 of the 91 cases. Kappa-coefficient predicting degree of root compression was 0.746, 0.767, and 0.86, respectively, for Grades I (simple contact), II (distortion), and III (marked indentation; p < 0.01).

Conclusion

3D T2 high-resolution in combination with 3D TOF-MRA and 3D T1-Gadolinium proved to be reliable in detecting NVC and in predicting the degree of the root compression.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Akimoto H, Nagaoka T, Nariai T, Takada Y, Ohno K, Yoshino N (2002) Preoperative evaluation of neurovascular compression in patients with trigeminal neuralgia by use of three-dimensional reconstruction from two types of high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Neurosurgery 51:956–962

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson VC, Berryhill PC, Sandquist MA, Ciaverella DP, Nesbit GM, Burchiel KJ (2006) High-resolution three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography and three-dimensional spoiled gradient-recalled imaging in the evaluation of neurovascular compression in patients with trigeminal neuralgia: a double-blind pilot study. Neurosurgery 58:666–673

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Barker FG, Jannetta PJ, Bissonette DJ, Larkins MV, Jho HD (1996) The long-term outcome of microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia. N Engl J Med 334:1077–1083

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Benes L, Shiratori K, Gurschi M, Sure U, Tirakotai W, Krischek B, Bertalanffy H (2005) Is preoperative high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging accurate in predicting neurovascular compression in patients with trigeminal neuralgia: a single-blind study. Neurosurg Rev 28:131–136

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Boecher-Schwarz HG, Bruehl K, Kessel G, Guenthner M, Perneczky A, Stoeter P (1998) Sensitivity and specificity pf MRA in the diagnosis of neurovascular compression in patients with trigeminal neuralgia: a correlation of MRA and surgical findings. Neuroradiology 40:88–95

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Burchiel KJ, Clarke H, Haglund M (1988) Long-term efficacy of microvascular decompression in trigeminal neuralgia. J Neurosurg 69:35–38

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Dandy WE (1934) Concerning the cause of trigeminal neuralgia. Am J Surg 24:447–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fukuda H, Ishikawa M, Okumura R (2003) Demonstration of neurovascular compression in trigeminal neuralgia and hemifacial spasm with magnetic resonance imaging: comparison with surgical findings in 60 consecutive cases. Surg Neurol 59:93–100

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Furuya Y, Ryu H, Uemura K, Sugiyama K, Isoda H, Hasegawa S, Takahashi M, Kaneko M (1992) MRI of intracranial neurovascular compression. J Comput Assist Tomogr 16:503–505

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Haines SJ, Jannetta PJ, Zorub DS (1980) Microvascular relations of the trigeminal nerve. An anatomical study with clinical correlation. J Neurosurg 52:381–386

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hamly PJ, King TT (1992) Neurovascular compression in trigeminal neuralgia: a clinical and anatomical study. J Neurosurg 76:948–954

    Google Scholar 

  12. Jannetta PJ (1967) Arterial compression of the trigeminal nerve at the pons in patients with trigeminal neuralgia. J Neurosurg 26:159–162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jannetta PJ (1990) Microvascular decompression of the trigeminal nerve root entry zone. Theoretical considerations, operative anatomy, surgical technique and results. In: Rovit RL, Murali R, Jannetta PJ (eds) Trigeminal Neuralgia. Williams and Williams, Baltimore, pp 201–222

    Google Scholar 

  14. Korogi Y, Nagahiro S, Du C, Sakamoto Y, Takada A, Ushio Y, Ikushima I, Takahashi M (1995) Evaluation of vascular compression in trigeminal neuralgia by 3D time-of-flight MRA. J Comput Assist Tomogr 19:879–884

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Leal PRL, Froment JC, Sindou M (2009) Predictive value of MRI for detecting and characterizing vascular compression in cranial nerve hyperactivity syndromes (trigeminal and facial nerves). Neurochirurgie 55:174–180

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Meaney JFM, Eldridge PR, Dunn LT, Nixon TE, Whitehouse GH, Miles JB (1995) Demonstration of neurovascular compression in trigeminal neuralgia with magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosurg 83:799–805

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Miller JP, Acar F, Bronwyn EH, Burchiel J (2009) Radiographic evaluation of trigeminal neurovascular compression in patients with and without trigeminal neuralgia. J Neurosurg 110:627–632

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nagaseki Y, Horikoshi T, Omata T, Ueno T, Uchida M, Nukui H, Tsuji R, Sasaki H (1992) Oblique sagittal magnetic resonance imaging visualizing vascular compression of the trigeminal or facial nerve. J Neurosurg 77:379–386

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Patel NK, Aquilina K, Clarke Y, Renowden SA, Coakham HB (2003) How accurate is magnetic resonance angiography in predicting neurovascular compression in patients with trigeminal neuralgia? A prospective, single-blinded comparative study. Br J Neurosurg 17:60–64

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Sindou M, Howeidy T, Acevedo G (2002) Anatomical observations during microvascular decompression for idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia (with correlations between topography of pain and site of the neurovascular conflict). Prospective study in a series of 579 patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 144:1–13

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Sindou M, Leston J, Decullier E, Chapuis F (2007) Microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia: long-term effectiveness and prognostic factors in a series of 362 consecutive patients with clear-cut neurovascular conflicts who underwent pure decompression. J Neurosurg 107:1144–1153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sindou M, Leston JM, Decullier E, Chapuis F (2008) Microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia: the importance of a noncompressive technique–Kaplan-Meier analysis in a consecutive series of 330 patients. Neurosurgery 63(4 Suppl 2):341–350

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Sindou M, Leston J, Howeidy T, Decullier E, Chapuis F (2006) Microvascular decompression for primary TN (typical or atypical). Long-term effectiveness on pain; prospective study with survival analysis in a consecutive series of 362 patients. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 148:1235–1245

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Tashiro H, Kondo A, Aoyama I, Kin K, Shimotake K, Nishioka T, Jkai Y, Takashi J (1982) Trigeminal neuralgia caused by compression from arteries transfixing le nerf. J Neurosurg 75:783–786

    Google Scholar 

  26. Umehara F, Kamishima K, Kashio N, Yamaguchi K, Sakimoto T, Osame M (1995) Magnetic resonance tomographic angiography: Diagnostic value in trigeminal neuralgia. Neuroradiology 37:353–355

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Yoshino N, Akimoto H, Yamada I, Nagaoka T, Tetsumura A, Kurabayashi T, Honda E, Nakamura S, Sasaki T (2003) Trigeminal neuralgia: evaluation of neuralgic manifestation ans site of neurovascular compression with 3D CISS MR imaging and MR angiography. Radiol 228:539–545

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yousry I, Moriggl B, Holtmannspoetter M, Schmid UD, Naidich TP, Yousry TA (2004) Detailed anatomy of the motor and sensory roots of the trigeminal nerve and their neurovascular relationships: a magnetic resonance imaging. J Neurosurg 101:427–434

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paulo Roberto Lacerda Leal.

Additional information

This paper provides interesting and important prospective data on radiological viteria for evaluation and selection of patients for microvascular decompression. An important feature is that patients were selected according to clinical criteria: they had typical trigeminal neuralgia. The likelihood of a neurovascular conflict is very high in this group, hence the high specificity and sensitivity. It is necessary to remember, that the MRI demonstration of a neurovascular conflict in other groups of patients, such as normal controls or atypical facial pain patients, will probably have lower specificity.

A good clinical diagnosis remains of primary importance. The figures even suggest that exploration may be justified with negative MRI findings. A false-negative rate of 3/12 suggests that up to 25% of patients in this subgroup may benefit from surgery. Of course, this subgroup needs to receive appropriate information of the expected success rate.

Tilt Mathiesen

Sweden

This paper is very informative and presents results on imaging in patients with TN in a clear way. The authors should be aware of the fact that the results come from a very experienced surgeon. Moreover, the imaging and its analysis are related to a very dedicated specialist group that uses more than one advanced MR technique in combination.

It is clear from the (cited) literature that others have so far not been able to reach the high sensitivity and selectivity figures that are presented here. Such “own” results have to be taken into account when recommendations are made to use this imaging for decision making by other institutions. So, these results cannot be generalized since with a little lower sensitivity, much more patients would be denied the “causative surgery” which is offered by a proper decompression.

Even with the authors’ results, one should be aware that from the 12 “negative” images, three would have been denied surgery when the decision had been made on these: that is 25% of the negatives, meaning a negative predictive value of 75%, as stated by the authors. Also, these data give strong evidence (being the result of a prospective study) about the frequency of real vascular compression as a cause for TN in patients with typical complaints: 91%!

That might be enough to warrant surgery in all cases.

Another conclusion of the authors is that when the images convincingly prove “only contact,” they state that alternatives are to be offered, the result of MVD then being only 60%.

Such a far-reaching conclusion is challenging but should be put forward as a topic for another prospective study, including the analysis of cost effectiveness of all the treatment options proposed in these cases.

Jan Jakob Mooij,

Groningen, The Netherlands

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Leal, P.R.L., Hermier, M., Froment, J.C. et al. Preoperative demonstration of the neurovascular compression characteristics with special emphasis on the degree of compression, using high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging: a prospective study, with comparison to surgical findings, in 100 consecutive patients who underwent microvascular decompression for trigeminal neuralgia. Acta Neurochir 152, 817–825 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-009-0588-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00701-009-0588-7

Keywords

Navigation