Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of the Stress Wave Effect During Rock Breakage by Pulsating Jets

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Formation, propagation and attenuation of stress waves during rock breakage by pulsating jets are simulated by introducing the Johnson–Holmquist-Concrete nonlinear constitutive model, and using the smoothed particle hydrodynamics approach. The curve of stress over time at different locations of the rock surface under the action of high-velocity pulsating jets is obtained, as well as relationship curve between amplitude of stress wave and distance to jet action spot. Based on the computational results, breakage behavior of rocks under stress wave effect, and impacts of jet velocity and rock properties on stress wave effect are analyzed. The results show that the stress wave effect of pulsating jets is rather strongly localized, and the amplitude of stress wave decreases sharply with increasing distance to jet action spot. The intensity and effect range of stress wave are in direct proportion to jet velocity; besides, there is a threshold velocity regarding macroscopic failure of rocks. Rocks of different lithologies have somewhat different failure modes under stress wave action of pulsating jets; failure mode of low strength rocks like sandstone is mainly crack propagation under tensile stress during rock loading and unloading processes, whereas the failure mode of hard brittle rocks such as limestone and granite is mainly longitudinal failure caused by stress concentration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

a :

First-order volume correction to \(\gamma_{0}\)

A :

Dimensionless viscous strength

B :

Dimensionless pressure hardening coefficient

c :

Sound velocity in aqueous medium

C :

Dimensionless strain rate effect coefficient

C 0 :

Intercept of relationship graph between stress wave velocity and particle velocity

C w :

Shock wave velocity

D :

Dimensionless damage factor

D 1 :

Damage constants

D 2 :

Damage constants

\(e_{i}\) :

Energy of particle i

\(f^{\prime}_{c}\) :

Quasi-static uniaxial compressive strength of the material

\(K_{1}\) :

Material constants

\(K_{2}\) :

Material constants

\(K_{3}\) :

Material constants

m j :

Mass of particle j

N :

Total number of particles

N′:

Pressure hardening exponent

p :

Pressure

P*:

Normalized pressure

P w :

Pump pressure

S 1 :

Constant

S 2 :

Constant

S 3 :

Constant

T*:

Maximum dimensionless tensile volumetric stress of material

t :

Particle movement time

v :

Jet velocity

\(v_{i}^{\alpha }\) :

Velocity of particle i in α direction

\(v_{ij}^{{^{\beta } }}\) :

Velocity between two particles in β direction

\(W_{ij}\) :

Smooth kernel function with B-spline type

x :

Location vectors in different positions

α :

Contravariant indexes

β :

Contravariant indexes

γ 0 :

Gruneisen coefficient

Δε p :

Equivalent plastic strain increment

Δθ p :

Plastic volumetric strain increment

\(\varepsilon_{i}^{\alpha \beta }\) :

Stress of particle i

\(\varepsilon_{j}^{\alpha \beta }\) :

Stress of particle j

\(\dot{\varepsilon }^{ * }\) :

Dimensionless strain rate

\(\dot{\varepsilon }\) :

Strain rate

\(\dot{\varepsilon }_{0}\) :

Reference strain rate

μ :

Viscosity coefficient of fluid

\(\bar{\mu }\) :

Amended volumetric strain

μ lock :

Locked volumetric strain

ρ :

Actual density

ρ 0 :

Initial density

ρ w :

Density of water

ρ i :

Density of particle i

σ :

Actual equivalent stress

\(\sigma_{i}^{\alpha \beta }\) :

Stress of particle i

\(\sigma^{\prime}_{ij}\) :

Shear stress

\(\varepsilon^{\prime}_{ij}\) :

Shear strain

ϕ :

Medium parameter

References

  • Adler WF (ed) (1979) Erosion: prevention and useful applications (ASTM STP 664). American Society for Testing and Materials, Philadelphia, pp 227–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowden FP, Brunton JH (1961) The deformation of solids by liquid impact at supersonic speeds. Proc R Soc London Ser A Math Phys Sci 263:433–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunton JH (1966) High speed liquid impact. Phil Trans R Soc Lond Ser A Math Phys Sci 260:79–85

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dehkhodan S, Hood M (2013) An experimental study of surface and sub-surface damage in pulsed water-jet breakage of rocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 63:138–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Heymann FG (1968) On the shock wave velocity and impact pressure in high-speed liquid solid impact. J Fluids Eng 3:400–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmquist TJ, Johnson GR, Cook WH (1993) A computational constitutive model for concrete subjected to large strains, high strain rates, and high pressures. In: 4th international symposium on ballistics. American Defense Preparedness Association, Quebec City, pp 591–600

  • Jiang HX, Du CL, Liu SY, Gao KD (2014) Numerical simulation of rock fragmentation under the impact load of water jet. Shock Vib 21:1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu MB (2003) Smoothed particle method. World Scientific, Singapore

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Momber AW (2003) An SEM-study of high-speed hydrodynamic erosion of cementitious composites. Compos Part B Eng 2:135–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shi H, Field JE (2004) Stress wave propagation in high speed liquid solid impact. Sci China Ser G 5:577–590

    Google Scholar 

  • Si H, Wang D, Li X (2008) Stress wave effect in numerical simulation on rock breaking under high pressure water jet. J Chongqing Univ 8:942–950

    Google Scholar 

  • Tadic DM (2003) Investigation of cavitating and pulsed high pressure water jet devices for process scale removal. University of Queensland, Brisbane

    Google Scholar 

  • Vijay MM, Remisz J, Shen X (1993) Potential of pulsating jets for cutting and fracturing of hard rock formations. Int J Surf Min Reclam Environ 7:121–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang R, Ni H (2003) Theoretical study on rock break-off process during high pressure water jet drilling. J Univ Pet 274:44–47

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Xie Y, Zhang D (2008) Numerical simulation of material surface damage by high speed liquid-solid impact. J Xi’an Jiao Tong Univ 11:1435–1440

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper is jointly Supported by Program for Changjiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University (IRT1235), National Program on Key Basic Research Project (973 program, 2012CB723103), Chinese Ministry of Education (213022A), and supported by Scientific Research Foundation of State Key Lab. of Coal Mine Disaster Dynamics and Control (2011DA105287—FW201204).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jianping Wei.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, Y., Wei, J. & Ren, T. Analysis of the Stress Wave Effect During Rock Breakage by Pulsating Jets. Rock Mech Rock Eng 49, 503–514 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-015-0753-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-015-0753-7

Keywords

Navigation