Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Hydraulic Fracture Initiation and Propagation from Wellbore with Oriented Perforation

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Considering the influence of casing, analytical solutions for stress distribution around a cased wellbore are derived, based on which a prediction model for hydraulic fracture initiation with the oriented perforation technique (OPT) is established. Taking well J2 of Z5 oilfield for an example, the predicted initiation pressure with the OPT of our model is about 4.2 MPa higher than the existing model, which neglects the influence of casing. In comparison with the results of laboratory fracturing experiments with OPT on a 400 × 400 × 400 mm3 rock sample for a cased well with the deviation of 45°, the fracture initiation pressure of our model has an error of 3.2 %, while the error of the existing model is 6.6 %; when the well azimuth angle is 0° and the perforation angle is 45°, the prediction error of the fracture initiation pressure of the existing model and our model are 3.4 and 7.7 %, respectively. The study verifies that our model is more applicable for hydraulic fracturing prediction of wells with OPT completion; while the existing model is more suitable for hydraulic fracturing with conventional perforation completion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abass HH, Brumley JL, Venditto JJ (1994) Oriented perforations—a rock mechanics view. SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, Society of Petroleum Engineers, New Orleans, Louisiana

  • Almaguer J, Manrique J, Wickramasuriya S, Habbtar A, López-de-Cárdenas J, May D, McNally AC, Sulbarán A (2002) Orienting perforations in the right direction. Oilfield Rev 14(1):16–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Behrmaan LA, Elbel JL (1991) Effect of perforations on fracture initiation. J Pet Technol 43(5):608–615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behrmann LA, Nolte KG (1998) Perforating requirements for fracture stimulations. SPE formation damage control conference, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Lafayette, Louisiana

  • Bunger AP, Jeffrey RG, Detournay E (2005) Application of scaling laws to laboratory-scale hydraulic fractures. The 40th U.S. symposium on rock mechanics (USRMS), American Rock Mechanics Association, Anchorage, AK

  • Chen M, Chen ZX, Huang RZ (1995) Hydraulic fracturing of highly deviated wells. J Univ Pet CHN 19(2):30–35 (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifton RJ, Abou-Sayed AS (1979) On the computation of the three-dimensional geometry of hydraulic fracturings. Symposium on low permeability gas reservoirs, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Denver, Colorado

  • Crosby DG, Yang Z, Rahman SS (2001) Methodology to predict the initiation of multiple transverse fractures from horizontal wellbores. J Can Pet Technol 40(10):68–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crosby DG, Rahman MM, Rahman MK, Rahman SS (2002) Single and multiple transverse fracture initiation from horizontal wells. J Pet Sci Eng 35(3–4):191–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui L, Ekbote S, Abousleiman Y, Zaman MM, Roegiers J-C (1998) Borehole stability analysis in fluid saturated formations with impermeable wall. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 35(4):582–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daneshy AA (1973) A study of inclined hydraulic fractures. SPE J 13(2):61–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Pater CJ, Cleary MP, Quinn TS, Barr DT, Johnson DE, Weijers L (1994) Experimental verification of dimensional analysis for hydraulic fracturing. SPE Prod Facil 9(4):230–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deeg WFJ, Brumley JL, Abass HH (1997) Hydraulic fracturing of deviated wells: an investigation of pressure trends in fracture propagation during two stages of injection. SPE western regional meeting, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Long Beach, California

  • Deng JG, Wang KP, Huang RZ, Chen M (1994) Collapse resistance of oil well casing-cement mantle combination subjected to non-uniform loading by rock creep. Chin J Rock Mech Eng 13(2):161–167 (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • EI Rabaa W (1989) Experimental study of hydraulic fracture geometry initiated from horizontal wells. SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, Society of Petroleum Engineers, San Antonio, Texas

  • Fallahzadeh SH, Shadizadeh SR, Pourafshary P, Zare MR (2010a) Modeling the perforation stress profile for analyzing hydraulic fracturing initiation in a cased Hole. In: The 34th annual SPE international conference and exhibition held in Tinapa. Society of Petroleum Engineers, Calabar, Nigeria

  • Fallahzadeh SH, Shadizadeh SR, Pourafshary P (2010b) Dealing with the challenges of hydraulic fracturing in deviated cased perforated boreholes. In: Trinidad and Tobago energy resources conference. Society of Petroleum Engineers, Port of Spain, Trinidad

  • Hallam SD, Last NC (1991) Geometry of hydraulic fractures from modestly deviated wellbore. J Pet Technol 43(6):742–748

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hashin Z, Rosen BW (1964) The elastic moduli of fiber reinforced materials. J Appl Mech 31:223–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hossain MM, Rahman MK, Rahman SS (1999) Comprehensive monograph for hydraulic fracturing initiation from deviated wellbores under arbitrary stress regimes. In: SPE Asia Pacific oil and gas conference and exhibition, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Jakarta, Indonesia

  • Hossain MM, Rahrnan MK, Rahman SS (2000) Hydraulic fracture initiation and propagation: roles of wellbore trajectory, perforation and stress regimes. J Pet Sci Eng 27(3–4):129–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones C, Sargeant JP (1993) Obtaining the minimum horizontal stress from microfracture test data: a new approach using a derivative algorithm. SPE Prod Facil 8(1):39–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • King GE (1989) Perforating the horizontal well. J Pet Technol 41(7):671–672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Y (1991) On initiation and propagation of fractures from deviated wellbores. The University of Texas at Austin, Houston

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu GH, Pang F, Chen ZX (2000) Development of scaling laws for hydraulic fracturing simulation tests. J Univ Pet CHN 24(5):45–48 (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Luo TY, Guo JC, Zhao JZ, Wang JH, Pan JJ (2007) Study on fracture initiation pressure and fracture starting point in deviated wellbore with perforations. Acta Pet Sin 28(1):139–142 (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Osorio JG, Lopez CF (2009) Geomechanical factors affecting the hydraulic fracturing performance in a geomechanically complex, tectonically active area in Colombia. In: Latin American and Caribbean petroleum engineering conference, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Cartagena de Indias, Colombia

  • Pearson CM, Bond AJ, Eck ME, Schmldt JH (1992) Results of stress oriented and aligned perforating in fracturing deviated wells. J Pet Technol 44(1):10–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soliman MY, Boonen P (2000) Rock mechanics and stimulation aspects of horizontal wells. J Pet Sci Eng 25(3–4):187–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soliman MY, East L, Adams D (2004) Geomechanics aspects of multiple fracturing of horizontal and vertical wells. In: SPE international thermal operations and heavy oil symposium and western regional meeting, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Bakersfield, CA

  • Timoshenko S, Goodier JN (1969) Theory of elasticity, 3rd edn. McGraw Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • van de Ketterij RG, de Pater CJ (1997) Experimental study on the impact of perforations on hydraulic fracturing tortuosity. In: SPE European formation damage conference held in The Hague, Society of Petroleum Engineers, The Netherlands

  • van de Ketterij RG, de Pater CJ (1999) Impact of perforations on hydraulic fracturing Tortuosity. SPE Prod Facil 14(2):131–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weng XW (1993) Fracture initiation and propagation from deviated wellbores. In: SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, 3–6 October 1993, Society of Petroleum Engineers, Houston, TX

  • Yew CH (1997) Mechanics of hydraulic fracturing. Houston, Texas

    Google Scholar 

  • Yew CH, Li Y (1987) Fracturing of a deviated well. SPE Prod Eng 3(4):429–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin YQ, Chen ZW, Li PE (2006) Theoretical solutions of stress distribution in casing-cement and stratum system. Chin J Theor Appl Mech 38(6):835–842 (In Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou J, Jin Y, Chen M (2010) Experimental investigation of hydraulic fracturing in random naturally fractured blocks. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 47(7):1193–1199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu HY, Deng JG, Liu SJ, Wen M, Peng CY, Li JR, Chen ZJ, Hu LB, Lin H, Dong G (2014) Hydraulic fracturing experiments of highly deviated well with oriented perforation technique. Geomech Eng 6(2):153–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the SWPU Science & Technology Fund (No. 2013XJZ003), the research Foundation of Sichuan Province under Grant No. 2014HH0004, and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51374178, 51221003, 51174219), and the Key Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 51134004). This work was also supported by the National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program, No. 2014CB239205).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haiyan Zhu.

Appendix

Appendix

The governing equations are cited from the 3D model proposed by Clifton and Abou-Sayed (1979), whose assumptions include: (1) the rock formation acts as isotropic and linear elastic solid; (2) the porosity and permeability of the reservoir are so low that the poroelastic effect is negligible; (3) the fluid flow between the porous parallel plates is non-compressible, non-Newtonian, and laminar; (4) the fluid velocity gradient in the direction of fracture width is neglected in comparison with those along the fracture height and length, due to the smallness of the width; and (5) the fracture propagation is governed by the cracking opening criteria from LEFM. To facilitate the application of similarity principle, the fracturing fluid here is considered to be a Newtonian fluid.

Clifton and Abou-Sayed’s governing equations for hydraulic fracture propagation consist of an equilibrium equation, a fluid continuity equation and a pressure gradient equation (1979).

1. The elastic equilibrium equation.

$$p(x,y) - \sigma_{zz}^{0} (x,y,0) = {\text{Ee}}\iint\limits_{A} {\left\{ {\frac{\partial }{\partial x}\left[ {\frac{1}{R}\frac{\partial w(x,y)}{\partial x}} \right] + \frac{\partial }{\partial y}\left[ {\frac{1}{R}\frac{\partial w(x,y)}{\partial y}} \right]} \right\}{\text{d}}x{\text{d}}y}$$
(63)

where \({\text{Ee}} = {G \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {G {\left( {4\pi \left( {1 - v} \right)} \right)}}} \right. \kern-0pt} {\left( {4\pi \left( {1 - v} \right)} \right)}}\) is the equivalent elastic modulus; \(R = [(x - x_{0} )^{2} + (y - y_{0} )^{2} ]^{1/2}\) is the distance between integral point \((x,y)\) of the integrand and the pressure point \((x_{0} ,y_{0} )\).

2. The fluid continuity equation.

$$\frac{{\partial q_{x} }}{\partial x} + \frac{{\partial q_{y} }}{\partial y} + \frac{\partial w}{\partial t} + \frac{{2K_{\text{L}} \frac{{p_{i} - p_{0} }}{{\sigma_{zz}^{0} (0,0) - p_{0} }}}}{{\sqrt {t - \tau (x,y} )}} - q_{1} = 0$$
(64)

where \(p_{i}\) is the fluid pressure inside the fracture; \(\sigma_{zz}^{0}\) is the normal pressure on fracture surface before hydraulic fracturing; \(K_{\text{L}}\) is the total leak-off coefficient; \(w\) is the fracture width; \(q_{x}\) is the volume flow rate per unit length along x direction; \(q_{y}\) is the volume flow rate per unit length along y direction; \(\tau\) is the contact time between the fracture and fracturing fluid; \(t\) is the fracture propagation time; \(q_{1}\) is the injection rate per unit area of the fracture.

3. The pressure gradient equation.

$$\left\{ \begin{gathered} \frac{\partial p}{\partial x} + \eta \frac{{q_{x} }}{{w^{3} }} = 0 \hfill \\ \frac{\partial p}{\partial y} + \eta \frac{{q_{y} }}{{w^{3} }} = \rho F_{y} \hfill \\ \end{gathered} \right.$$
(65)

where \(\eta\) is the viscosity coefficient of hydraulic fracturing fluid; \(\rho\) is the density of fracturing fluid, the \(\rho F_{y}\) is the force per unit volume.

4. Fracture propagation condition.

$$w_{a} (s) > w_{c} = K_{Ic} \left( {2a(s)/\pi } \right)^{1/2} /2\pi Ee$$
(66)

where \(a\) is the width of vicinity area at the fracture tip; \(K_{Ic}\) is the critical stress intensity factor for fracture propagation; and \(w_{c}\) is the critical fracture width for fracture propagation. When \(w_{a} (s) < w_{c}\), fracture propagation terminates.

5. Single-value conditions include the geometric condition, medium conditions, boundary conditions, and the initial conditions.

The geometric condition: the dimension of the hydraulic fracture is restricted by the rock sample geometry.

The medium conditions: parameters \(\rho F_{y}\), \(\eta\), \(Ee\), \(K_{Ic}\) and \(K_{L}\) are classified as the medium conditions.

The boundary conditions: parameters \(\sigma_{zz}^{0}\), \(p_{i}\), \(q_{1}\) and the flow rate \(Q = 2\int_{ - h/2}^{h/2} {q_{x} } (0,y,t){\text{d}}y\) are classified as the boundary conditions.

The initial conditions: the hydraulic fracturing time is \(t = T\), the effective fracture length achieved is \(x_{\hbox{max} } = L\).

Then, to obtain the experimental parameters, the similarity principle is employed to derive the governing equations. First, some units of measurement are used as temporary variables, which are

$$l_{0} ,p_{0} ,\sigma_{0} ,{\text{Ee}}_{ 0} ,q_{0} ,q_{I} ,t_{0} ,Q_{0} ,K_{L0} ,\eta_{0} ,\rho F_{y0} ,K_{{{\text{IC}}0}}$$
(67)

Then, the identical equations can be obtained as follows:

$$\begin{gathered} p = \frac{p}{{p_{0} }}p_{0} = \overline{p} p_{0} ,\quad p_{f} = \frac{{p_{f} }}{{p_{0} }}p_{0} = \overline{p}_{f} p_{0} ,\quad \sigma_{zz}^{0} = \frac{{\sigma_{zz}^{0} }}{{\sigma_{0} }}\sigma_{0} = \overline{\sigma }_{zz}^{0} \sigma_{0} , \hfill \\ {\text{Ee}} = \frac{\text{Ee}}{{{\text{Ee}}_{0} }}{\text{Ee}}_{0} = \overline{\text{Ee}} {\text{Ee}}_{0} ,\quad x = \frac{x}{{l_{0} }}l_{0} = \overline{x} l_{0} ,\quad y = \frac{y}{{l_{0} }}l_{0} = \overline{y} l_{0} , \hfill \\ w = \frac{w}{{l_{0} }}l_{0} = \overline{w} l_{0} ,\quad w_{c} = \frac{{w_{c} }}{{l_{0} }}l_{0} = \overline{w}_{c} l_{0} ,\quad \rho F_{y} = \frac{{\rho F_{y} }}{{\rho F_{y0} }}\rho F_{y0} = \overline{{\rho F_{y} }} \rho F_{y0} , \hfill \\ R = \frac{R}{{l_{0} }}l_{0} = \overline{R} l_{0} ,\quad h = \frac{h}{{l_{0} }}l_{0} = \overline{h} l_{0} ,\quad a = \frac{a}{{l_{0} }}l_{0} = \overline{a} l_{0} ,\quad q_{\text{I}} = \frac{{q_{\text{I}} }}{{q_{0} }}q_{0} = \overline{{q_{I} }} q_{0} , \hfill \\ q_{x} = \frac{{q_{x} }}{{q_{0} }}q_{0} = \overline{q}_{x} q_{0} ,q_{y} = \frac{{q_{y} }}{{q_{0} }}q_{0} = \overline{q}_{y} q_{0} ,Q = \frac{Q}{{Q_{0} }}Q_{0} = \overline{Q} Q_{0} , \hfill \\ t = \frac{t}{{t_{0} }}t_{0} = \overline{t} t_{0} ,\quad \tau = \frac{\tau }{{\tau_{0} }}\tau_{0} = \overline{\tau } \tau_{0} ,\quad K_{\text{L}} = \frac{{K_{\text{L}} }}{{K_{{{\text{L}}0}} }}K_{{{\text{L}}0}} = \overline{K}_{\text{L}} K_{{{\text{L}}0}} , \hfill \\ K_{IC} = \frac{{K_{\text{IC}} }}{{K_{{{\text{IC}}0}} }}K_{{{\text{IC}}0}} = \overline{K}_{\text{IC}} K_{{{\text{IC}}0}} ,\quad \eta = \frac{\eta }{{\eta_{0} }}\eta_{0} = \overline{\eta } \eta_{0} , \hfill \\ \end{gathered}$$
(68)

According to the Gaussian rule of absolute measurement units, the expressions of the governing equations should not be affected by the selection of different measurement units. Substituting Eq. (68) into the governing equations, nine constraints are obtained:

$$\left\{ \begin{gathered} \frac{{p_{0} }}{{{\text{Ee}}_{0} }} = 1;\frac{{\sigma_{0} }}{{{\text{Ee}}_{0} }} = 1;\frac{{l_{0}^{2} }}{{t_{0} q_{0} }} = 1;\frac{{t_{0} K_{L0} }}{{q_{0} \sqrt {t_{0} } }} = 1;\frac{{q_{10} l_{0} }}{{q_{0} }} = 1 \hfill \\ \frac{{q_{0} \eta_{0} }}{{p_{0} l_{0}^{2} }} = 1;\frac{{l_{0} \rho F_{y0} }}{{p_{0} }} = 1;\frac{{K_{{{\text{IC}}0}} }}{{{\text{Ee}}_{0} \sqrt {L_{0} } }} = 1;\frac{{Q_{0} }}{{q_{0} l_{0} }} = 1 \hfill \\ \end{gathered} \right.$$
(69)

Selecting \(l_{0} ,{\text{Ee}}_{0} ,Q_{0}\)as the free measurement units, \(l_{0} = L,{\text{Ee}}_{0} = {\text{Ee}},Q_{0} = Q\), and substituting these expressions into Eq. (69), nine measurement units are achieved:

$$\left\{ \begin{gathered} p_{0}^{(k)} = {\text{Ee}},\sigma_{0}^{(k)} = {\text{Ee}},q_{0}^{(k)} = \frac{Q}{L},t_{0}^{(k)} = \frac{{L^{3} }}{Q},K_{L0}^{(k)} = \sqrt {\frac{Q}{L}} \hfill \\ q_{I0}^{(k)} = \frac{Q}{{L^{2} }},\eta_{0}^{(k)} = \frac{{{\text{Ee}}L^{3} }}{Q},\rho F_{y0}^{(k)} = \frac{\text{Ee}}{{L^{{}} }},K_{{{\text{IC}}0}}^{(k)} = {\text{Ee}}\sqrt L \hfill \\ \end{gathered} \right.$$
(70)

Substituting Eq. (70) into the governing equations, and non-dimensionalizing the governing equations:

$$\left\{ \begin{gathered} \bar{p}^{(k)} - \bar{\sigma }_{zz}^{0(k)} = \iint\limits_{{\bar{A}}} {\left\{ {\frac{\partial }{{\partial \bar{x}}}\left[ {\frac{1}{{\bar{R}}}\frac{{\partial \bar{w}}}{{\partial \bar{x}}}} \right] + \frac{\partial }{{\partial \bar{y}}}\left[ {\frac{1}{{\bar{R}}}\frac{{\partial \bar{w}}}{{\partial \bar{y}}}} \right]} \right\}{\text{d}}\bar{x}{\text{d}}\bar{y}} \hfill \\ \frac{{\partial \bar{q}_{x}^{(k)} }}{{\partial \bar{x}}} + \frac{{\partial \bar{q}_{y}^{(k)} }}{{\partial \bar{y}}} + \frac{{\partial \bar{w}}}{{\bar{\partial }t^{( - k)} }} + \frac{{2\bar{K}_{L}^{(k)} \frac{{\bar{p}_{i}^{(k)} - \bar{p}_{0}^{(k)} }}{{\bar{\sigma }_{zz}^{0(k)} - \bar{p}_{f}^{(k)} }}}}{{\sqrt {\bar{t}^{(k)} - \bar{\tau }^{(k)} } }} - \bar{q}_{1}^{(k)} = 0 \hfill \\ \frac{{\partial \bar{p}^{(k)} }}{{\partial \bar{x}}} + \bar{\eta }^{(k)} \frac{{\bar{q}_{x}^{(k)} }}{{\bar{w}^{3} }} = 0 \hfill \\ \frac{{\partial \bar{p}^{(k)} }}{{\partial \bar{y}}} + \bar{\eta }^{(k)} \frac{{\bar{q}_{y}^{(k)} }}{{\bar{w}^{3} }} = \overline{{\rho F_{y} }}^{(k)} \hfill \\ \bar{w}_{c} = \frac{{\bar{K}_{1C}^{(k)} }}{2\pi }\left[ {\frac{{2\bar{a}}}{\pi }} \right]^{1/2} \hfill \\ 1 = 2\int_{{ - \bar{h}/2}}^{{\bar{h}/2}} {\bar{q}_{x}^{(k)} (0,\bar{y},\bar{t}^{(k)} )} {\text{d}}\bar{y} \hfill \\ \bar{t}^{(k)} = \bar{T}^{(k)} \hfill \\ \bar{x}_{\hbox{max} } = 1 \hfill \\ \end{gathered} \right.$$
(71)

where the dimensionless variables are

$$\left\{ \begin{gathered} \bar{L} = 1,\bar{E}_{e} = 1,\bar{Q} = 1,\bar{x} = \frac{x}{L},\bar{y} = \frac{y}{L} \hfill \\ \bar{w} = \frac{w}{L},\bar{w}_{c} = \frac{{w_{c} }}{L},\bar{R} = \frac{R}{L},\bar{h} = \frac{h}{L},\bar{a} = \frac{a}{L},\bar{p}^{(k)} = \frac{p}{\text{Ee}} \hfill \\ \bar{p}_{f}^{(k)} = \frac{{p_{f} }}{\text{Ee}},\bar{\sigma }_{zz}^{0(k)} = \frac{{\sigma_{zz}^{0} }}{\text{Ee}},\overline{\rho Fy}^{(k)} = \frac{\rho FyL}{\text{Ee}},\overline{q}_{1}^{(k)} = \frac{{q_{1} L^{2} }}{Q} \hfill \\ \overline{q}_{x}^{(k)} = \frac{{q_{x} L^{{}} }}{Q},\overline{q}_{y}^{(k)} = \frac{{q_{y} L^{{}} }}{Q},\overline{\eta }_{{}}^{(k)} = \frac{\eta Q}{{{\text{Ee}}L^{3} }},\overline{t}_{{}}^{(k)} = \overline{\tau }_{{}}^{(k)} = \frac{\tau Q}{{L^{3} }} \hfill \\ \overline{K}_{L}^{(k)} = \frac{{K_{L} }}{{K_{L0}^{(k)} }} = K_{L} \sqrt {\frac{{L^{{}} }}{Q}} ,\overline{K}_{\text{IC}}^{(k)} = \frac{{K_{IC} }}{{K_{{{\text{IC}}0}}^{(k)} }} = \frac{{K_{IC} }}{{{\text{Ee}}\sqrt L }} \hfill \\ \end{gathered} \right.$$
(72)

Substituting the single-value condition (67) into dimensionless Eq. (72), we get the dimensionless similarity principle:

$$\left\{ \begin{gathered} \frac{p}{\text{Ee}} = {\text{idem}},\frac{{p_{f} }}{\text{Ee}} = {\text{idem}},\frac{{\sigma_{zz}^{0} }}{\text{Ee}} = {\text{idem}},\frac{{L\rho F_{y} }}{\text{Ee}} = {\text{idem}}, \hfill \\ \frac{TQ}{{L^{3} }} = {\text{idem}},K_{L} \sqrt{\frac{L}{Q}} = {\text{idem}},\frac{{K_{IC} }}{{{\text{Ee}}\sqrt L }} = {\text{idem}},\frac{\eta Q}{{{\text{Ee}}L^{3} }} = {\text{idem}} \hfill \\ \end{gathered} \right.$$
(73)

where \({\text{idem}}\) is the criterion numeral. After simplifying (73), we obtain the dimensionless similarity index:

$$\frac{{C_{p} }}{{C_{\text{Ee}} }} = \frac{{C_{{\sigma_{zz}^{0} }} }}{{C_{\text{Ee}} }} = \frac{{C_{T} C_{Q} }}{{C_{{^{{_{L} }} }}^{3} }} = C_{{K_{L} }} \sqrt {\frac{{C_{L} }}{{C_{Q} }}} = \frac{{C_{{K_{\text{IC}} }}^{2} }}{{C_{\text{Ee}}^{2} C_{L} }} = \frac{{C_{\eta } C_{Q} }}{{C_{p} C_{L}^{3} }} = 1$$
(74)

where the similarity coefficient is

$$C_{V} = V_{\text{model}} /V_{\text{field}}$$
(75)

where subscript \(V = L,{\text{Ee}},Q,T,K_{L} ,\eta ,p,\sigma_{ZZ}^{0} ,K_{\text{IC}}\), and \(C_{V}\) is the ratio of the model quantities to the field quantities.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, H., Deng, J., Jin, X. et al. Hydraulic Fracture Initiation and Propagation from Wellbore with Oriented Perforation. Rock Mech Rock Eng 48, 585–601 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-014-0608-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-014-0608-7

Keywords

Navigation