Summary.
The liner of a pressure tunnel needs to be designed such that it can withstand the loads from the ground, the internal pressure, and minimize the development of significant pore pressures at the liner-ground interface. Pore pressures behind the liner reduce the effective stresses in the ground immediately in contact with the liner and can ultimately produce loss of support from the ground. Deformations and loads of the liner are intimately connected to the interplay that exists between liner, ground, and pore pressures in the ground. A closed-form analytical solution has been derived that accounts for the inter-relation between liner, ground, and pore pressures. Elastic response of the liner and ground, and plane strain conditions at any cross-section of the tunnel are assumed. The solution shows that stresses in the ground depend on the following dimensionless factors: relative stiffness of the ground and liner, ground Poisson’s ratio, surface slope angle, coefficient of earth pressure at rest, relative tunnel depth, and magnitude of the pore pressure behind the liner relative to the internal pressure. The minimum ground effective tangential stresses at the ground-liner interface increase with the relative stiffness of the liner, with the coefficient of earth pressure at rest, and with tunnel depth. They decrease with increasing surface slope angle and pore pressures behind the liner. As leakage through the liner increases, the pore pressures in the ground increase. This results in a decrease of effective radial and tangential stresses in the ground while displacements and loads of the liner are relatively less affected.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ABAQUS (1998): Finite Element Program, from Hibbit, Karlson & Sorensen Inc., 1080 Main Street, Pawtucket, RI, USA.
A. Bobet (2001) ArticleTitleAnalytical solutions for shallow tunnels in saturated ground ASCE J. Engng. Mech. 127 IssueID12 1258–1266 Occurrence Handle10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2001)127:12(1258)
A. Bobet (2003) ArticleTitleEffect of pore water pressure on tunnel support during static and seismic loading Tunn. Undergr. Sp. Tech. 18 377–393 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0886-7798(03)00008-7
Brekke, T. L., Ripley, B. D. (1985): Leakage from pressure tunnels and shafts. Waterpower. In: Roluti, M. J. (ed.) ASCE, New York, pp 1228–1237.
Brekke, T. L., Ripley, B. D. (1989): Geotechnical engineering challenges in the design of pressure tunnels and shafts. In: Cording, E. J., Hall, W. J., Haltiwanger, J. D., Hendron, A. J., Mesri, G. (eds.) The Art of Science of Geotechnical Engineering, Prentice Hall, pp. 521–535.
E. Broch (1984) ArticleTitleDevelopment of unlined pressure shafts and tunnels in Norway Undergr. Sp. 8 177–184
F. Corbetta D. Bernaud D. Nguyen-Minh (1991) ArticleTitleContribution à la méthode convergence-confinement par le principe de la similitude Rev. Fr. Géotech. 54 5–11
Deere, D. U. (1983): Unique Geotechnical Problems at Some Hydroelectric Projects. Proceedings of the Seventh Panamerican Conference in Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Associaçao Brasileira de Mecahnica dos Solos, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
H. H. Einstein C. W. Schwartz (1979) ArticleTitleSimplified analysis for tunnel supports J. Geotech. Engng. Division, ASCE 105 IssueIDGT4 499–518
G. Fernández (1994) ArticleTitleBehavior of pressure tunnels and guidelines for liner design J. Geotech. Engng. 120 IssueID10 1768–1791 Occurrence Handle10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1994)120:10(1768)
G. Fernández T. A. Alvarez SuffixJr (1994) ArticleTitleSeepage-Induced Effective Stresses and water Pressures around Pressure Tunnels J. Geotech. Engng.-ASCE 120 IssueID1 108–128 Occurrence Handle10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1994)120:1(108)
W. Flügge (1966) Stresses in shells Springer-Verlag Inc. New York
M. E. Harr (1962) Groundwater and Seepage McGraw-Hill Book Co. Inc. New York
Hendron, A. J., Fernández, G., Lenzini, P. A., Hendron, M. A. (1989): Design of pressure tunnels. In: Cording, E. J., Hall, W. J., Haltiwanger, J. D., Hendron, A. J., Mesri, G. (eds.) The art and science of geotechnical engineering at the dawn of the twenty first century. Prentice Hall, pp. 161–192.
Mindlin, R. D. (1940): Stress distribution around a tunnel. Transactions of the American Society of Civil Engineers, pp. 1117–1153.
Panet, M., Guenot, A. (1982): Analysis of convergence behind the face of a tunnel. Proc. Int. Sym. Tunnelling. IMM, London, pp. 197–204.
Panet, M. (1995): Calcul des Tunnels par la Méthode de Convergence-Confinement. Presses de l’Ecole Nationale des Ponts et Chaussées, Paris, France.
PENTAGON-3D (1998): User’s Manual Emerald Soft Consulting Co., Seoul, Korea.
J. Penzien (2000) ArticleTitleSeismically induced raking of tunnel linings Earthquake Engng. Struc. 29 683–691 Occurrence Handle10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(200005)29:5<683::AID-EQE932>3.0.CO;2-1
C. W. Schwartz H. H. Einstein (1978) ArticleTitleImprovement of ground-support performance by full consideration of ground displacements Transportation Res. Record 684 14–20
Schwartz, C. W., Einstein, H. H. (1980): Simplified analysis for ground-structure interaction in tunneling. Proceedings of the 21st U.S. Symposium on Rock Mechanics, University of Missouri-Rolla, pp. 787–796.
G. Seeber (1985a) ArticleTitlePower conduits for high-head plants International Water Power and Dam Construction 37 IssueID7 50–54
G. Seeber (1985b) ArticleTitlePower conduits for high-head plants International Water Power and Dam Construction 37 IssueID7 95–98
R. W. Soutas-Little (1973) Elasticity Dover Publications Mineola, N.Y.
S. P. Timoshenko J. N. Goodier (1970) Theory of elasticity McGraw-Hill New York
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Bobet, A., Nam, S. Stresses around Pressure Tunnels with Semi-permeable Liners. Rock Mech. Rock Engng. 40, 287–315 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-006-0123-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-006-0123-6