Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The T-CEA score: a useful prognostic indicator based on postoperative CEA and pathological T4 levels for patients with stage II–III colorectal cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate a prognostic score for stage II–III colorectal cancer (CRC) based on post-CEA and pT4 levels.

Methods

Two cohorts of stage II–III CRC patients who underwent curative surgery between 2011 and 2017 were included. The prognostic score (T-CEA score) was calculated as follows: T-CEA-0, post-CEA ≤ 5 ng/mL and pT1–3; T-CEA-1, post-CEA > 5 ng/mL or pT4; T-CEA-2, post-CEA > 5 ng/mL and pT4.

Results

The T-CEA scores of the 587 patients were as follows: T-CEA-0 (n = 436; 74%), T-CEA-1 (n = 129; 22%), and T-CEA-2 (n = 10; 2%). The 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates of the T-CEA-0, 1, and 2 groups were 80.3%, 54.8%, and 0%, respectively (P < 0.01), and the 5-year overall survival (OS) rates were 90.9%, 74.2%, and 0%, respectively (T-CEA-0 vs T-CEA-1: P < 0.01, T-CEA-1 vs T-CEA-2: P = 0.04). Multivariate analysis revealed that an elevated T-CEA score of 1 or 2 was a significant risk factor for poor RFS (HR: 2.89, P < 0.01) and OS (HR: 2.85, P < 0.01).

Conclusion

The T-CEA score is a reliable and convenient prognostic score for stage II–III CRC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All authors are available for the raw data of this study.

References

  1. Hashiguchi Y, Muro K, Saito Y, Ito Y, Ajioka Y, Hamaguchi T, et al. Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2019 for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Int J Clin Oncol. 2000;25(1):1–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chiba S, Okayama H, Noda M, Saito K, Nakajima T, Aoto K, et al. Stromal VCAN expression as a potential prognostic biomarker for disease recurrence in stage II–III colon cancer. Carcinogenesis. 2016;37(9):878–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ujiie D, Okayama H, Saito K, Ashizawa M, Min AKT, Endo E, et al. KRT17 as a prognostic biomarker for stage II colorectal cancer. Carcinogenesis. 2020;41(5):591–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Weiser MR, Landmann RG, Kattan MW, Gonen M, Shia J, Chou J, et al. Individualized prediction of colon cancer recurrence using a nomogram. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:380–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Weiser MR, Gönen M, Chou JF, Kattan MW, Schrag D. Predicting survival after curative colectomy for cancer: individualizing colon cancer staging. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:4796–802.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Kanemitsu Y, Shida D, Tsukamoto S, Ueno H, Ishiguro M, Ishihara S, et al. Nomograms predicting survival and recurrence in colonic cancer in the era of complete mesocolic excision. BJS Open. 2019;3:539–48.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Sonoda H, Yamada T, Matsuda A, Ohta R, Shinji S, Yokoyama Y, et al. Elevated serum carcinoembryonic antigen level after curative surgery is a prognostic biomarker of stage II–III colorectal cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2021;47(11):2880–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Snaebjornsson P, Coupe VMH, Jonasson L, Meijer GA, van Grieken NC, Jonasson JG. pT4 stage II and III colon cancers carry the worst prognosis in a nationwide survival analysis. Shepherd’s local peritoneal involvement revisited. Int J Cancer. 2014;135:467–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Park JH, Fuglestad AJ, Køstner AH, Oliwa A, Graham J, Horgan PG, et al. Systemic inflammation and outcome in 2295 patients with stage I-III colorectal cancer from Scotland and Norway: first results from the Scotscan colorectal cancer group. Ann Surg Oncol. 2020;27:2784–94.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Takagi K, Buettner S, Ijzermans JNM. Prognostic significance of the controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg. 2020;78:91–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Song W, Wang K, Zhang RJ, Zou SB. Prognostic value of the lymphocyte monocyte ratio in patients with colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(49): e5540.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhang J, Zhang HY, Li J, Shao XU, Zhang CX. The elevated NLR, PLR and PLT may predict the prognosis of patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Oncotarget. 2017;8(40):68837–46.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Okugawa Y, Toiyama Y, Yamamoto A, Shigemori T, Ide S, Kitajima T, et al. Lymphocyte-C-reactive protein ratio as promising new marker for predicting surgical and oncological outcomes in colorectal cancer. Ann Surg. 2020;272:342–51.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ito K, Hibi K, Ando H, Hidemura K, Yamazaki T, Akiyama S, et al. Usefulness of analytical CEA doubling time and half-life time for overlooked synchronous metastases in colorectal carcinoma. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2002;32(2):54–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN). Clinical practice guidelines in oncology: colon cancer. Version 4.2020. Fort Washington: NCCN; 2020.

  16. Argiles G, Tabernero J, Labianca R, Hochhauser D, Salazar R, Iveson T, et al. Localized colon cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2020;31(10):1291–305.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Gill S, Loprinzi CL, Sargent DJ, Thomé SD, Alberts SR, Haller DG, et al. Pooled analysis of fluorouracil-based adjuvant therapy for stage II and III colon cancer: who benefits and by how much? J Clin Oncol. 2004;22(10):1797–806.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Merkel S, Wein A, Günther K, Papadopoulos T, Hohenberger W, Hermanek P. High-risk groups of patients with Stage II colon carcinoma. Cancer. 2001;92:1435–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gunderson LL, Jessup JM, Sargent DJ. Revised TN categorization for colon cancer based on national survival outcome data. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(2):264–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tie J, Wang Y, Tomasetti C, Li L, Springer S, Kinde I, et al. Circulating tumor DNA analysis detects minimal residual disease and predicts recurrence in patients with stage II colon cancer. Sci Transl Med. 2016;8(346):346ra92.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Tie J, Cohen JD, Wang Y, Christie M, Simons K, Lee M, et al. Circulating tumor DNA analyses as markers of recurrence risk and benefit of adjuvant therapy for stage III colon cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5(12):1710–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Reinert T, Henriksen TV, Christensen E, Sharma S, Salari R, Sethi H, et al. Analysis of plasma cell-free DNA by ultradeep sequencing in patients with stages I to III colorectal cancer. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5(8):1124–31.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Iwai T, Yamada T, Takahashi G, Takeda K, Koizumi M, Shinji S, et al. Circulating cell-free long DNA fragments predict post-hepatectomy recurrence of colorectal liver metastases. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2020;46(1):108–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Lonardi S, Montagut C, Pietrantonio F, Elez E, Sartore-Bianchi A, Tarazona N, et al. The PEGASUS trial: Post-surgical liquid biopsy-guided treatment of stage III and high-risk stage II colon cancer patients. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(15):suppl.TPS124.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Shirasu H, Taniguchi H, Matsuhashi N, Kotaka M, Nakamura Y, Oki E, et al. A randomized, double-blind, phase III study comparing trifluridine/tipiracil hydrochloride therapy versus placebo in resected colorectal cancer patients who are positive for blood circulating tumor DNA after standard adjuvant therapy (EPOC 1905): ALTAIR trial in CIRCULATE-Japan (trial in progress). J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(4):suppl.TPS215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Moretto R. Exploiting circulating tumour DNA to intensify the postoperative treatment resected colon cancer patients (ERASE-CRC). ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05062889.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank Mr. Steven D. Aird for preliminary English language editing.

Funding

This research did not receive any grants from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or non-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiromichi Sonoda.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sonoda, H., Yamada, T., Matsuda, A. et al. The T-CEA score: a useful prognostic indicator based on postoperative CEA and pathological T4 levels for patients with stage II–III colorectal cancer. Surg Today 53, 890–898 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-023-02644-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-023-02644-6

Keywords

Navigation