Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A nodal diagnosis by computed tomography is unreliable for patients who need additional gastrectomy after endoscopic submucosal dissection

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

T1 gastric cancer is treated by endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) or surgery, considering the risk of lymph node metastasis. Additional gastrectomy is necessary when the pathological specimens after ESD show some risk of lymph node metastasis. Preoperative computed tomography (CT) after ESD sometimes reveals enlarged lymph nodes, which should prompt surgeons to select D2 over D1/D1+. However, whether or not CT after ESD is reliable remains unclear.

Methods

Patients who underwent radical gastrectomy for clinical T1 between April 2015 and June 2019 were enrolled. The patients were classified into those who underwent CT after ESD (group A) and those who underwent CT before primary surgery or ESD (group B). The accuracy of the nodal diagnosis was compared between groups.

Results

A total of 650 patients (group A; 81, group B; 569) were examined. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value (group A vs. group B) were 77.8% vs. 84.2%, 0.0% vs. 15.9%, 84.0% vs. 95.7%, 0.0% vs. 38.2%, and 91.3% vs. 87.1%, respectively. The false-positive rate was 100% in group A and 61.8% in group B (p = 0.011).

Conclusions

A nodal diagnosis by CT is unreliable for patients who need additional gastrectomy after ESD.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018;68(6):394–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Isobe Y, Nashimoto A, Akazawa K, Oda I, Hayashi K, Miyashiro I, et al. Gastric cancer treatment in Japan: 2008 annual report of the JGCA nationwide registry. Gastric Cancer. 2011;14(4):301–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Information Committee of Korean Gastric Cancer A. Korean Gastric Cancer Association Nationwide Survey on Gastric Cancer in 2014. J Gastric Cancer. 2016;16(3):131–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tanabe S, Ishido K, Higuchi K, Sasaki T, Katada C, Azuma M, et al. Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for early gastric cancer: a retrospective comparison with conventional endoscopic resection in a single center. Gastric Cancer. 2014;17(1):130–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hiki N, Katai H, Mizusawa J, Nakamura K, Nakamori M, Yoshikawa T, et al. Long-term outcomes of laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy with suprapancreatic nodal dissection for clinical stage I gastric cancer: a multicenter phase II trial (JCOG0703). Gastric Cancer. 2018;21(1):155–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nashimoto A, Akazawa K, Isobe Y, Miyashiro I, Katai H, Kodera Y, et al. Gastric cancer treated in 2002 in Japan: 2009 annual report of the JGCA nationwide registry. Gastric Cancer. 2013;16(1):1–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Japanese Gastric Cancer A. Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2014 (ver. 4). Gastric Cancer. 2017;20(1):1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Gotoda T, Yanagisawa A, Sasako M, Ono H, Nakanishi Y, Shimoda T, et al. Incidence of lymph node metastasis from early gastric cancer: estimation with a large number of cases at two large centers. Gastric Cancer. 2000;3(4):219–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bonenkamp JJ, Songun I, Hermans J, Sasako M, Welvaart K, Plukker JT, et al. Randomised comparison of morbidity after D1 and D2 dissection for gastric cancer in 996 Dutch patients. Lancet. 1995;345(8952):745–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Yin JX, Oda I, Suzuki H, Gotoda T, Shimoda T, Saito D. Endoscopic diagnosis of gastric cancer invasion depth. Nihon Shokakibyo Gakkai Zasshi. 2009;106(11):1603–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kwee RM, Kwee TC. Imaging in assessing lymph node status in gastric cancer. Gastric Cancer. 2009;12(1):6–22.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Fukagawa T, Katai H, Mizusawa J, Nakamura K, Sano T, Terashima M, et al. A prospective multi-institutional validity study to evaluate the accuracy of clinical diagnosis of pathological stage III gastric cancer (JCOG1302A). Gastric Cancer. 2018;21(1):68–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Association JGC. Japanese classification of gastric carcinoma. 15th ed. Tokyo: Kanehara Publisher; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kato M, Kaise M, Obata T, Yonezawa J, Toyoizumi H, Yoshimura N, et al. Bacteremia and endotoxemia after endoscopic submucosal dissection for gastric neoplasia: pilot study. Gastric Cancer. 2012;15(1):15–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Shida A, Mitsumori N, Fujioka S, Takano Y, Fujisaki M, Hashizume R, et al. Sentinel node navigation surgery for early gastric cancer: analysis of factors which affect direction of lymphatic drainage. World J Surg. 2018;42(3):766–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Fujikawa H, Yoshikawa T, Hasegawa S, Hayashi T, Aoyama T, Ogata T, et al. Diagnostic value of computed tomography for staging of clinical T1 gastric cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2014;21(9):3002–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Isozaki H, Matsumoto S, Murakami S. Survival outcomes after sentinel node navigation surgery for early gastric cancer. Ann Gastroenterol Surg. 2019;3(5):552–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kitagawa Y, Takeuchi H, Takagi Y, Natsugoe S, Terashima M, Murakami N, et al. Sentinel node mapping for gastric cancer: a prospective multicenter trial in Japan. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31(29):3704–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Takaki Yoshikawa.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wada, T., Yoshikawa, T., Kamiya, A. et al. A nodal diagnosis by computed tomography is unreliable for patients who need additional gastrectomy after endoscopic submucosal dissection. Surg Today 50, 1032–1038 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-020-01985-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-020-01985-w

Keywords

Navigation