Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Advantages of the prone position for minimally invasive esophagectomy in comparison to the left decubitus position: better oxygenation after minimally invasive esophagectomy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this retrospective study was to evaluate whether minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) in the prone position has advantages over the left decubitus position.

Method

A total of 110 consecutive patients with esophageal cancer who had undergone MIE were included in the analysis. The clinical outcomes were compared between 51 patients treated in the prone position (prone group) and 59 patients treated in the left decubitus position (LD group). The main outcome was postoperative respiratory complications and postoperative oxygenation [arterial oxygen pressure/fraction of inspired oxygen (P/F ratio)]. The secondary outcomes included the length of the operation, blood loss, number of dissected lymph nodes, postoperative morbidities and mortality.

Results

The P/F ratio after the operation was significantly higher in the prone group (0 h: P = 0.01, 12 h: P < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in the frequency of respiratory complications (P = 0.89). The blood loss in the prone group was significantly lower (P < 0.001), and the number of dissected intrathoracic lymph nodes was significantly higher (P = 0.03) than in the LD group. No significant differences were observed in the frequencies of overall postoperative complications.

Conclusion

MIE in the prone position preserves better oxygenation of patients during the early recovery period, and is associated with less blood loss and a larger number of dissected lymph nodes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:69–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Altorki N, Kent M, Ferrara C, Port J. Three-field lymph node dissection for squamous cell and adenocarcinoma of the esophagus. Ann Surg. 2002;236:177–83.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Akiyama H, Tsurumaru M, Udagawa H, Kajiyama Y. Radical lymph node dissection for cancer of the thoracic esophagus. Ann Surg. 1994;220:364–72 discussion 372–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Putnam JB, Suell DM, McMurtrey MJ, Ryan MB, Walsh GL, Natarajan G, et al. Comparison of three techniques of esophagectomy within a residency training program. Ann Thorac Surg. 1994;57:319–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Luketich JD, Alvelo-Rivera M, Buenaventura PO, Christie NA, McCaughan JS, Litle VR, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: outcomes in 222 patients. Ann Surg 2003; 238:486–494; discussion 485–94.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nguyen NT, Hinojosa MW, Smith BR, Chang KJ, Gray J, Hoyt D. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: lessons learned from 104 operations. Ann Surg. 2008;248:1081–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Watanabe M, Baba Y, Nagai Y, Baba H. Minimally invasive esophagectomy for esophageal cancer: an updated review. Surg Today. 2013;43:237–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Iwahashi M, Nakamori M, Nakamura M, Ojima T, Katsuda M, Iida T, et al. Clinical benefits of thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position for esophageal cancer. Surg Today. 2014;44:1708–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Maas KW, Bonavina L, Rosman C, Garcia JR, et al. Minimally invasive versus open oesophagectomy for patients with oesophageal cancer: a multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2012; 379:1887–1892.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Noshiro H, Iwasaki H, Kobayashi K, Uchiyama A, Miyasaka Y, Masatsugu T, et al. Lymphadenectomy along the left recurrent laryngeal nerve by a minimally invasive esophagectomy in the prone position for thoracic esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:2965–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Palanivelu C, Prakash A, Senthilkumar R, Senthilnathan P, Parthasarathi R, Rajan PS, et al. Minimally invasive esophagectomy: Thoracoscopic mobilization of the esophagus and mediastinal lymphadenectomy in prone position–experience of 130 patients. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;203:7–16.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Fabian T, Martin J, Katigbak M, McKelvey AA, Federico JA. Thoracoscopic esophageal mobilization during minimally invasive esophagectomy: a head-to-head comparison of prone versus decubitus positions. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:2485–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Feng M, Shen Y, Wang H, Tan L, Zhang Y, Khan MA, et al. Thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy: is the prone position a safe alternative to the decubitus position? J Am Coll Surg. 2012;214:838–44.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Yatabe T, Kitagawa H, Yamashita K, Akimori T, Hanazaki K, Yokoyama M. Better postoperative oxygenation in thoracoscopic esophagectomy in prone positioning. J Anesth. 2010;24:803–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Luketich JD, Pennathur A, Awais O, Levy RM, Keeley S, Shende M, et al. Outcomes after minimally invasive esophagectomy: review of over 1,000 patients. Ann Surg. 2012;256:95–103.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kinjo Y, Kurita N, Nakamura F, Okabe H, Tanaka E, Kataoka Y, et al. Effectiveness of combined thoracoscopic-laparoscopic esophagectomy: comparison of postoperative complications and midterm oncological outcomes in patients with esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:381–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Jarral OA, Purkayastha S, Athanasiou T, Darzi A, Hanna GB, Zacharakis E. Thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:2095–103.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ando N, Kato H, Igaki H, Shinoda M, Ozawa S, Shimizu H, et al. A randomized trial comparing postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil versus preoperative chemotherapy for localized advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus (jcog9907). Ann Surg Oncol. 2012;19:68–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Itami A, Watanabe G, Tanaka E, Nakayama S, Fujimoto A, Kondo M, et al. Multimedia article. Upper mediastinal lymph node dissection for esophageal cancer through a thoracoscopic approach. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:2741.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tanaka E, Okabe H, Tsunoda S, Obama K, Kan T, Kadokawa Y, et al. Feasibility of thoracoscopic esophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Asian J Endosc Surg. 2012;5:111–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Okabe H, Tanaka E, Tsunoda S, Obama K, Sakai Y. Intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis using a linear stapler following minimally invasive esophagectomy in the prone position. J Gastrointest Surg. 2013;17:397–402.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sato N, Koeda K, Ikeda K, Kimura Y, Aoki K, Iwaya T, et al. Randomized study of the benefits of preoperative corticosteroid administration on the postoperative morbidity and cytokine response in patients undergoing surgery for esophageal cancer. Ann Surg. 2002;236:184–90.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pelosi P, Croci M, Calappi E, Mulazzi D, Cerisara M, Vercesi P, et al. Prone positioning improves pulmonary function in obese patients during general anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 1996;83:578–83.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Blanch L, Mancebo J, Perez M, Martinez M, Mas A, Betbese AJ, et al. Short-term effects of prone position in critically ill patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome. Intensive Care Med. 1997;23:1033–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Fridrich P, Krafft P, Hochleuthner H, Mauritz W. The effects of long-term prone positioning in patients with trauma-induced adult respiratory distress syndrome. Anesth Analg. 1996;83:1206–11.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Chatte G, Sab JM, Dubois JM, Sirodot M, Gaussorgues P, Robert D. Prone position in mechanically ventilated patients with severe acute respiratory failure. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1997;155:473–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Yatabe T, Kitagawa H, Yamashita K, Hanazaki K, Yokoyama M. Comparison of the perioperative outcome of esophagectomy by thoracoscopy in the prone position with that of thoracotomy in the lateral decubitus position. Surg Today. 2013;43:386–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Yoshida N, Watanabe M, Baba Y, Iwagami S, Ishimoto T, Iwatsuki M, et al. Risk factors for pulmonary complications after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Surg Today. 2014;44:526–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

Authors Eiji Tanaka, Hiroshi Okabe, Yousuke Kinjo, Shigeru Tsunoda, Kazutaka Obama, Shigeo Hisamori, and Yoshiharu Sakai have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-Ku, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan

    Eiji Tanaka, Hiroshi Okabe, Yousuke Kinjo, Shigeru Tsunoda, Kazutaka Obama, Shigeo Hisamori & Yoshiharu Sakai

Authors
  1. Eiji Tanaka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hiroshi Okabe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yousuke Kinjo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shigeru Tsunoda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kazutaka Obama
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Shigeo Hisamori
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Yoshiharu Sakai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroshi Okabe.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 51 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tanaka, E., Okabe, H., Kinjo, Y. et al. Advantages of the prone position for minimally invasive esophagectomy in comparison to the left decubitus position: better oxygenation after minimally invasive esophagectomy. Surg Today 45, 819–825 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-014-1061-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-014-1061-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation