Abstract
Superficial carcinoma of the esophagus with isolated para-aortic lymph node metastasis is quite rare. A 56-year-old female demonstrated a type 0-IIa+IIb lesion in the middle thoracic esophagus on endoscopic examination. Enhanced computed tomography and positron emission tomography demonstrated two swollen lymph nodes on the right side of the inferior vena cava, but did not demonstrate either a primary lesion or regional lymph node metastasis. A retroperitoneal videoscopic lymph node biopsy was thus performed, and the histopathological diagnosis was metastasis of squamous cell carcinoma. Induction chemotherapy was administered with cisplatin/5-FU, and followed by definitive chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin/5-FU plus 60 Gy radiation. The patient showed satisfactory responses in both the primary and metastatic lesions. This is the first case report describing superficial carcinoma of the esophagus with isolated lymph node metastasis around the abdominal aorta. A precise histological diagnosis of the lymph node is quite important in such cases, and an adequate curative effect can be expected.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Japanese Society for Esophageal Disease. Guide lines for the clinical and pathologic studies on carcinoma of the esophagus, 10th ed.; 2008.
Kumagai Y, Toi M, Kawada K, kawano T. Angiogenesis in superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: magnifying endoscopic observation and molecular analysis. Dig Endosc. 2010;22:259–67.
Kato H, Sato A, Fukuda H, Kagami Y, Udagawa H, Togo A, et al. A phase II trial of chemoradiotherapy for stage I esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: Japan Clinical Oncology Group Study(JCOG9708). Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2009;39:638–43.
Wakui R, Yamashita H, Okuma K, Kobayashi S, Shiraishi K, Terahara A, et al. Esophageal cancer: definitive chemoradiotherapy for elderly patients. Dis Esophagus. 2010;23:572–9.
Ando N, Ozawa S, Kitagawa Y, Shinozawa Y, Kitajima M. Improvement in the results of surgical treatment of advanced squamous esophageal carcinoma during 15 consecutive years. Ann Surg. 2000;232:225–32.
Prenzel KL, Bollshweiler E, Schröder W, Mönig SP, Drebber U, Vallboehmer D, et al. Prognostic relevance of skip metastases in esophageal cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010;90:1662–80.
Patti MG, Gantert W, Way LW. Surgery of the esophagus. Anatomy and physiology. Surg Clin N Am. 1997;77:959–70.
Takeuchi H, Fujii H, Ando N, Ozawa S, Saikawa Y, Suda K, et al. Validation study of radio-guided sentinel lymph node navigation in esophageal cancer. Ann Surg. 2009;249:757–63.
Nishimura T, Sayama J, Ueda H, Sugawara K, Takano R, Sagawa J, et al. Lymph flow and lymph node metastasis in esophageal cancer. Surg Today. 1995;25:307–17.
Kato H, Kuwano H, Nakajima M, Miyazaki T, Yoshikawa M, Ojima H, et al. Comparison between positron emission tomography and computed tomography in the use of the assessment of esophageal carcinoma. Cancer. 2002;94:921–8.
Flamen P, Lerut A, Van Cutsem E, De Wever W, Peeters M, Stroobants S, et al. Utility of positron emission tomography for the staging of patients with potentially operable esophageal carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2000;181(8):3202–10.
van Neiveen Dijkum EJ, de Wit LT, van Delden OM, Rauws EAJ, van Lanschot JJB, Obertop H, et al. The efficacy of laparoscopic staging in patients with upper gastrointestinal tumors. Cancer. 1997;79(7):1315–9.
Takeno A, Takiguchi S, Yamasaki M, Miyata H, Kawabata R, Nushijima Y, et al. A suspected [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography negative metastatic lymph node successfully diagnosed by laparoscopic staging in esophageal cancer: report of two cases. Surg Today. 2009;39:888–91.
Shitara K, Muro K. Chemoradiotherapy for treatment of esophageal cancer in japan: current status and perspectives. Gastrointest Cancer Res. 2009;3:66–72.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hatakeyama, T., Shiozaki, A., Fujiwara, H. et al. A case of a superficial carcinoma of the esophagus with isolated lymph node metastasis around the abdominal aorta. Surg Today 42, 676–680 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-012-0148-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-012-0148-2