Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Systematic comparison of cervical and extra-cervical surgical approaches for endoscopic thyroidectomy

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Surgery Today Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

To evaluate the clinical application of different surgical approaches for endoscopic thyroidectomy and provide more rational treatment criteria.

Methods

Collect all randomized controlled trials, multi-center studies, clinical controlled trials, clinical trials and other comparative studies of endoscopic thyroidectomy with a large sample size in different databases through an established search strategy, make a systematic analysis of all the included literature.

Results

This study selected 12 publications for analysis from more than 800 articles: these included six publications describing cervical thyroidectomy (A) and six publications describing extra-cervical thyroidectomy (B). Conversion to open surgery occurred in 29 patients in group A and only 4 in group B (p < 0.001). The patients in group A experienced shorter hospital stays than patients in group B (1.90 ± 0.80 vs. 4.03 ± 0.99 days, p < 0.001), and there was shorter operating time in group A (p < 0.001). Hemorrhage occurred in 3 cases in group A and 8 cases in group B (p = 0.04), Seroma occurred in 25 cases in group B but in no cases in group A (p < 0.001). Postoperative cosmetic results evaluated by verbal response scales (VRS) registered showed: group A (3.35 ± 0.60) and group B (3.74 ± 0.50; p < 0.001). Other complications such as recurrent laryngeal nerve injury and hypocalcemia showed no significant differences.

Conclusions

Evaluation of the different surgical approaches for endoscopic thyroidectomy shows that the incidence of hemorrhage and seroma are higher in the extra-cervical group, but the rate of conversion to conventional open surgery is significantly higher in the cervical group. Furthermore, patients who undergo extra-cervical endoscopic thyroidectomy are associated with longer operating time and hospital stays; however, these studies suggest that the extra-cervical surgical approach for endoscopic thyroidectomy is preferable for dealing with more kinds of thyroid tumor and leaving no scars on neck.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gagner M. Endoscopic subtotal parathyroidectomy in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. Brit J Surg. 1996;83:875.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Huscher CS, Chiodini S, Napolitato C, Recher A. Endoscopic right thyroid lobectomy. Surg Endosc. 1997;11:887.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Yeung HC, Ng WT, Kong CK. Endoscopic thyroid and parathyroid surgery. Surg Endosc. 1997;11:1136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Shimizu K, Akira S, Tanaka S. Video-assisted neck surgery: endoscopic resection of benign thyroid tumor aiming at scarless surgery on the neck. J Surg Oncol. 1998;69:178.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Shimizu K, Kitagawa W, Akasu H, Tanaka S. Endoscopic hemithyroidectomy and prophylactic lymph node dissection for micropapillary carcinoma of the thyroid by using a totally gasless anterior neck skin lifting method. J Surg Oncol. 2001;77:217–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Shimizu K. Minimally invasive thyroid surgery. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001;15:123–37.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Miccoli P, Berti P, Bendinelli C, Conte M, Fasolini F, Martino E. Minimally invasive video-assisted surgery of the thyroid: a preliminary report. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2000;385:261–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Yamashita H, Watanabe S, Koike E, Ohshima A, Uchino S, Kuroki S, Tanaka M, Noguchi S. Video-assisted thyroid lobectomy through a small wound in the submandibular area. Am J Surg. 2002;183:286–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Witzel K, von Rahden BH, Kaminski C, Stein HJ. Transoral access for endoscopic thyroid resection. Surg Endosc. 2008;22:1871–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Yasser H, Rafik K. Video-assisted submandibular resection: two-step technique. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:2785–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chantawibul S, Lokechareonlarp S, Pokawatana C. Total video endoscopic thyroidectomy by an axillary approach. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2003;13:295–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Eckhard B, Tahar B. Cervical scarless endoscopic thyroidectomy: axillo-bilateral-breast approach (ABBA). Surg Endosc. 2008;22:154–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jun-Ho C, Seok Won K, Ki-Wook C, Kyoung Sik P, Wonshik H, Dong-Young N, Seung Keun O, Yeo-Kyu Y. Endoscopic thyroidectomy using a new bilateral axillo-breast approach. World J Surg. 2007;31:601–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu YW, Li XY, Liu HF, Gao WS, Zhao YP. Endoscopic thyroid surgery: a comparison of the trans-subclavian and the trans-areolar approach. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2006;44:1044–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu M. How to understand and apply evidence of evidence-based medicine. Chin J Evid Based Med. 2006;6:77–9.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Moher D, Jadad AR, Tugwell P. Assessing the quality of randomized controlled trials: current issues and future directions. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 1996;12:195–208.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ardito G, Revelli L, Moschella F, Fadda G, Ardito F, Galata G, Rulli F. Diagnostic lobectomy for unilateral follicular nodules of the thyroid gland. Surg Today. 2004;34(6):557–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Alesina PF, Rolfs T, Rühland K, Brunkhorst V, Groeben H, Walz MK. Evaluation of postoperative pain after minimally invasive video-assisted and conventional thyroidectomy: results of a prospective study. ESES Vienna presentation. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2010;395(7):845–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Terris DJ, Angelos P, Steward DL, Simental AA. Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy: a multi-institutional North American experience. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;134:81–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Dobrinja C, Trevisan G, Makovac P, Liguori G. Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy compared with conventional thyroidectomy in a general surgery department. Surg Endosc. 2009;23(10):2263–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Miccoli P, Berti P, Frustaci GL, Ambrosini CE, Materazzi G. Video-assisted thyroidectomy: indications and results. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2006;391:68–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Samy AK, Ridgway D, Orabi A, Suppiah A. Minimally invasive, video-assisted thyroidectomy: first experience from the United Kingdom. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2010;92:379–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Inukai M, Usui Y. Clinical evaluation of gasless endoscopic thyroid surgery. Surg Today. 2005;35:199–204.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Koh YW, Park JH, Kim JW, Lee SW, Choi EC. Clipless and sutureless endoscopic thyroidectomy using only the harmonic scalpel. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:1117–25.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Jeong JJ, Kang SW, Yun JS, Sung TY, Lee SC, Lee YS, Nam KH, Chang HS, Chung WY, Park CS. Comparative study of endoscopic thyroidectomy versus conventional open thyroidectomy in papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC) patients. J Surg Oncol. 2009;100:477–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Chung YS, Choe JH, Kang KH, Kim SW, Chung KW, Park KS, Han W, Noh DY, Oh SK, Youn YK. Endoscopic thyroidectomy for thyroid malignancies: comparison with conventional open thyroidectomy. World J Surg. 2007;31:2302–6 (discussion 2307–8).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Shimizu K, Kitagawa W, Akasu H, Hirai K, Tanaka S. Video-assisted minimally invasive endoscopic thyroid surgery using a gasless neck skin lifting method—153 cases of benign thyroid tumors and applicability for large tumors. Biomed Pharmacother. 2002;56(Suppl 1):88s–91s.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Chen KY, Xiang GA, Wang HN, Xiao FL. Endoscopic thyroidectomy: a comparison of the trans-axilloareolar approach and the trans-thoracoareolar approach. Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2007;45:1626–8.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Del Rio P, Sommaruga L, Cataldo S, Robuschi G, Arcuri MF, Sianesi M. Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy: the learning curve. Eur Surg Res. 2008;41:33–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Liu S, Qiu M, Jiang DZ, Zheng XM, Zhang W, Shen HL, Shan CX. The learning curve for endoscopic thyroidectomy: a single surgeon’s experience. Surg Endosc. 2009;23:1802–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Carlos C, Rafael F, Jaqueline R, Herrera MF. A randomized, prospective, parallel group study comparing the Harmonic Scalpel to electrocautery in thyroidectomy. Surgery. 2005;137:337–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Barczyński M, Konturek A, Cichoń S. Minimally invasive video-assisted thyreoidectomy (MIVAT) with and without use of harmonic scalpel—a randomized study. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2008;393:647–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Bellantone R, Lombardi CP, Bossola M, Boscherini M, De Crea C, Alesina PF, Traini E. Video-assisted vs. conventional thyroid lobectomy: a randomized trial. Arch Surg. 2002;137:301–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Hegazy MA, Khater AA, Setit AE, Amin MA, Kotb SZ, El Shafei MA, Yousef TF, Hussein O, Shabana YK, Dayem OT. Minimally invasive video-assisted thyroidectomy for small follicular thyroid nodules. World J Surg. 2007;31:1743–50.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Terris DJ, Anderson SK, Watts TL, Chin E. Laryngeal nerve monitoring and minimally invasive thyroid surgery: complementary technologies. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;133:1254–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Sasaki A, Nakajima J, Ikeda K, Otsuka K, Koeda K, Wakabayashi G. Endoscopic thyroidectomy by the breast approach: a single institution’s 9-year experience. World J Surg. 2008;32:381–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Yamamoto M, Sasaki A, Asahi H, Shimada Y, Sato N, Nakajima J, Mashima R, Saito K. Endoscopic subtotal thyroidectomy for patients with graves’ disease. Surg Today. 2001;31:1–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Han Hui.

Additional information

C. Geng-Zhen and Z. Xuan contributed equally to this work.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 63 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Geng-Zhen, C., Xuan, Z., Wei-Lin, S. et al. Systematic comparison of cervical and extra-cervical surgical approaches for endoscopic thyroidectomy. Surg Today 42, 835–841 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-011-0100-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-011-0100-x

Keywords

Navigation