Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

The efficacy of epiduroscopic neural decompression with Ho:YAG laser ablation in lumbar spinal stenosis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although epiduroscopy is one of the popular interventions for the management of lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS), only a part of these patients show improvement in pain and functional level. Consequently, the authors thought that holmium:YAG (Ho:YAG) laser can be a reasonable alternative as an adjunct of epiduroscopic procedure, but has not been thoroughly determined yet which influence is resulted by it. This study was conducted to evaluate and compare the efficacy of epiduroscopic neural decompression (END) and END with Ho:YAG laser (ELND) in patients with LSS. Forty-seven patients with LSS were enrolled, all of whom underwent END or ELND and were followed up for 2 years or more. Clinical outcomes were evaluated using the visual analog scale (VAS) for back and leg pain and the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ). Procedure-related complications, especially including laser-related complications, were also evaluated. The only laser-related complication that occurred was transient mild motor paralysis in one case (3.1 %). In the END group, clinical score is exhibiting V-shaped upward trend that ended after procedure with the almost similar score obtained with preoperative status. However, in the ELND group, it is exhibiting relatively consistent improvement after procedure. There was a statistically significant improvement in the VAS and RMDQ score after 6 months after ELND procedure compared with END procedure (p = 0.01, 0.03, respectively). ELND could produce significant improvement of low back pain (LBP) at the last follow-up time (p = 0.01), but radiating pain of leg could not be improved significantly (p = 0.09). In conclusion, the current study suggests that performing Ho:YAG laser ablation concurrently with END could produce more decreased intensity of pain and prolonged effect of pain relief compared with END in LSS patients. LSS patients with LBP would be an ideal candidate for ELND, but radiating pain of LSS might not be managed effectively with ELND.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Weinstein JN, Tosteson TD, Lurie JD, Tosteson ANA, Blood E, Hanscom B et al (2008) Surgical versus nonsurgical therapy for lumbar spinal stenosis. N Engl J Med 358:794–810

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Manchikanti L, Boswell M, Rivera J, Pampati V, Damron K, McManus C, Brandon DE, Wilson SR (2005) A randomized, controlled trial of spinal endoscopic adhesiolysis in chronic refractory low back and lower extremity pain [ISRCTN 16558617]. BMC Anesthesiol 5:10

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Avellanal M, Diaz-Reganon G (2008) Interlaminar approach for epiduroscopy in patients with failed back surgery syndrome. Br J Anaesth 101:244–249

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Geurts JW, Kallewaard JW, Richardson J, Groen GJ (2002) Targeted methylprednisolone acetate/hyaluronidase/clonidine injection after diagnostic epiduroscopy for chronic sciatica: a prospective, 1-year follow-up study. Reg Anesth Pain Med 27:343–352

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Sakai T, Aoki H, Hojo M, Takada M, Murata H, Sumikawa K (2008) Adhesiolysis and targeted steroid/local anesthetic injection during epiduroscopy alleviates pain and reduces sensory nerve dysfunction in patients with sciatica. J Anesth 22:242–247

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Richardson J, McGurgan P, Cheema S, Prasad R, Gupta S (2001) Spinal endoscopy in chronic low back pain with radiculopathy A prospective case series. Anaesthesia 56:454–460

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Igarashi T, Kikuchi S, Shubayev V, Myers RR (2000) Exogenous tumor necrosis factor-alpha mimics nucleus pulposus-induced neuropathology: molecular, histologic, and behavioral comparisons in rats. Spine 25:2975–2980

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee HM, Weinstein JN, Meller ST, Hayashi N, Spratt KF, Gebhart GF (1998) The role of steroids and their effects on phospholipase A2: an animal model of radiculopathy. Spine 23:1191–1196

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Miyamoto H, Saura R, Harada T, Doita M, Mizuno K (2000) The role of cyclooxygenase-2 and inflammatory cytokines in pain induction of herniated lumbar intervertebral disc. Kobe J Med Sci 46:13–28

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Berg AO, Allan JD (2001) Introducing the third US preventive services task force. Am J Prev Med 20:3–4

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Epter RS, Helm S, Hayek SM, Benyamin RM, Smith HS, Abdi S (2009) Systematic review of percutaneous adhesiolysis and management of chronic low back pain in post lumbar surgery syndrome. Pain Physician 12:361–378

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Imhoff AB (1995) The use of lasers in orthopaedic surgery. Oper Tech Orthop 5:192–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Knight MTN, Goswami A, Patko JT, Buxton N (2001) Endoscopic foraminoplasty: a prospective study on 250 consecutive patients with independent evaluation. J Clin Laser Med Surg 19:73–81

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Abrisham SMJ, Kermani-Alghoraishi M, Ghahramani R, Jabbari L, Jomeh H, Zare M (2011) Additive effects of low-level laser therapy with exercise on subacromial syndrome: a randomised, double-blind, controlled trial. Clin Rheumatol 30:1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Stergioulas A (2008) Low-power laser treatment in patients with frozen shoulder: preliminary results. Photomed Laser Surg 26:99–105

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Saunders L (2003) Laser versus ultrasound in the treatment of supraspinatus tendinosis: randomised controlled trial. Physiotherapy 89:365–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yeldan I, Cetin E, Razak Ozdincler A (2009) The effectiveness of low-level laser therapy on shoulder function in subacromial impingement syndrome. Disabil Rehabil 31:935–940

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gangi A, Dietemann JL, Ide C, Brunner P, Klinkert A, Warter JM (1996) Percutaneous laser disk decompression under CT and fluoroscopic guidance: indications, technique, and clinical experience. Radiographics 16:89–96

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Yonezawa T, Onomura T, Kosaka R, Miyaji Y, Tanaka S, Watanabe H, Abe Y, Imachi K, Atumi K, Chinzel T (1990) The system and procedures of percutaneous intradiscal laser nucleotomy. Spine 15:1175–1185

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Davis J (1990) Percutaneous discectomy improved with KTP laser. Clin Laser Mon 8:105–106

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gottlob C, Kopchok GE, Peng SK, Tabbara M, Cavaye D, White RA (1992) Holmium:YAG laser ablation of human intervertebral disc: preliminary evaluation. Lasers Surg Med 12:86–91

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Quigley MR, Shih T, Elrifai A, Maroon JC, Lesiecki ML (1992) Percutaneous laser discectomy with the Ho:YAG laser. Lasers Surg Med 12:621–624

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Sato M, Ishihara M, Arai T, Asazuma T, Kikuchi T, Hayashi T, Yamada T, Kikuchi M, Fujikawa K (2001) Use of a new ICG-Dye-enhanced diode laser for percutaneous laser disc decompression. Lasers Surg Med 29:282–287

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Epstein J, Adler R (2000) Laser-assisted percutaneous endoscopic neurolysis. Pain Physician 3:43–45

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Veihelmann A, Devens C, Trouillier H, Birkenmaier C, Gerdesmeyer L, Refior H (2006) Epidural neuroplasty versus physiotherapy to relieve pain in patients with sciatica: a prospective randomized blinded clinical trial. J Orthop Sci 11:365–369

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Vidyasagar K, Champaign I, Manchikanti L (2009) The preliminary results of a comparative effectiveness evaluation of adhesiolysis and caudal epidural injections in managing chronic low back pain secondary to spinal stenosis: a randomized, equivalence controlled trial. Pain Physician 12:E341–E354

    Google Scholar 

  27. Manchikanti L, Pakanati RR, Bakhit CE, Pampati V (1999) Role of adhesiolysis and hypertonic saline neurolysis in management of low back pain: evaluation of modification of the Racz protocol. Pain Digest 9:91–96

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ruetten S, Meyer O, Godolias G (2002) Application of holmium:YAG laser in epiduroscopy: extended practicabilities in the treatment of chronic back pain syndrome. J Clin Laser Med Surg 20:203–206

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wagner AL, Murtagh FR (2002) Selective nerve root blocks. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol 5:194–200

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors have no personal financial or institutional interest in any of the drugs, materials, or devices described in this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jae-Do Kim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lee, G.W., Jang, SJ. & Kim, JD. The efficacy of epiduroscopic neural decompression with Ho:YAG laser ablation in lumbar spinal stenosis. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 24 (Suppl 1), 231–237 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-013-1407-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-013-1407-7

Keywords

Navigation