Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Rare presentation of a wooden foreign body in the thigh

  • Up-to date Review and Case Report
  • Published:
European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery & Traumatology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Children are prone to injury with foreign bodies, partly due to their ebullient nature. They may not always give an accurate history, which can lead to delay in diagnosis and treatment. Primary care givers need to be vigilant in eliciting a history of foreign body injury in children. Radiologists should be aware that a neglected foreign body lying close to the bone in the distal femur can evoke a massive periosteal reaction, which can mimic a bone neoplasm. Although metallic foreign bodies are detected with ease on radiographs, detection of wooden foreign bodies remains a challenging task for both the radiologist and the care-giving physician. Wood foreign bodies may induce errors in diagnosis. The paper includes an analysis of the different radiographic methods currently available and their main features. This report would be of relevance to primary care physicians, those concerned with trauma care, and for radiologists who screen for these injuries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

References

  1. Hunter TB, Taljanovic MS (2003) Foreign bodies. Radiographics 23(3):731–757

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. O’Connor CR, Reginato AJ, DeLong WG Jr (1988) Foreign body reactions simulating acute septic arthritis. J Rheumatol 15(10):1568–1571

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Clarke JD, McCaffrey DD (2007) Thorn injury mimicking a septic arthritis of the knee. Ulster Med J 76(3):164–165

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Ochiai H, Yamakawa Y, Fukushima T, Yamada H (1998) Neuroimaging of a wooden foreign body retained for 5 months in the temporalis muscle following penetrating trauma with a chopstick. Neurol Med Chir 39:744–747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Anderson MA, Newmeyer WL, Kilgore ES (1982) Diagnosis and treatment of retained foreign bodies in the hand. Am J Surg 144:63–67

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Monu JU, McManus CM, Ward WG, Haygood TM, Pope TL, Bohrer SP (1995) Soft-tissue masses caused by long-standing foreign bodies in the extremities MR imaging findings. Am J Roentol 165:395–397

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Ginsberg LE, Williams DW, Mathew VP (1993) CT in penetrating craniocervical injury by wooden foreign bodies: reminder of a pitfall. Am J Neuroradiol 14:892–895

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. McGuckin JF, Akhtar N, Ho VT, Smergel EM, Kubacki EJ, Villafana T (1996) CT and MR evaluation of a wooden foreign body in an in vitro model of the orbit. Am J Neuroradiol 17:129–133

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ho VT, McGuckin JF, Smergel EM (1996) Intraorbital wooden foreign body: CT and MR appearance. Am J Neuroradiol 17(1):34–136

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shiels WE II, Babcock DS, Wilson JL, Burch RA (1990) Localization and guided removal of soft-tissue foreign bodies with sonography. Am J Roentgenol 155:1277–1281

    Google Scholar 

  11. Horton LK, Jacobson JA, Powell A, Fessell DP, Hayes CW (2001) Sonography and radiography of soft-tissue foreign bodies. Am J Roentgenol 176:1155–1159

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Peterson JJ, Bancroft LW, Kransdorf MJ (2002) Wooden foreign bodies: imaging appearance. Am J Roentgenol 178:557–562

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Krishna Kumar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kumar, K., Hegazy, A. Rare presentation of a wooden foreign body in the thigh. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 22 (Suppl 1), 155–159 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-011-0896-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00590-011-0896-5

Keywords

Navigation