Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

New technique of En bloc vertebral resection in the thoracolumbar region assisted by retroperitoneal laparoscopy in a single prone position: first results

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To describe the technique and review the oncological and surgical results of the En Bloc resection assisted by retroperitoneal laparoscopy in a single prone position for tumors in the thoracolumbar region.

Methods

Monocentric retrospective case study. Procedure was performed in a single prone position by a dual team of spine and thoracovascular surgeons. An endoscopic balloon was inflated in the right retroperitoneal cavity. A plan was developed between the anterior spine and vena cava as well as abdominal aorta with segmental vessels ligation. Structures at risk were safely protected under endoscopy during horizontal or sagittal osteotomies.

Results

From 2021, seven patients aged a median 52 years old (range, 34–67) were included. Involved spinal segments went from T11 to L3. Surgery was aborted in one case due to massive bleeding and ventilating difficulties. There were two partial and four total vertebral resections. Median operating duration and estimated blood loss were 405 min (range, 360–540) and 2.1 L (range, 1.2–19), respectively. Postoperative complications consisted of 1 urinary infection; 1 transient urinary retention; 1 posterior wound infection; 1 pneumothorax; 1 persistent partial motor deficit; 1 transient confusion; 1 pulmonary embolism; 1 CSF leak; 1 subdural hematoma; 1 retroperitoneal lymphocele. All margins were uncontaminated. All patients were alive and ambulatory at last follow-up.

Conclusion

Early results suggest En Bloc resection assisted by retroperitoneal videoscopy in tumors from T11 to L3/4 disk space is feasible, less invasive and safe. Careful surgical planning and experience in endoscopic vascular surgery are mandatory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Fisher CG, Saravanja DD, Dvorak MF et al (2011) Surgical management of primary bone tumors of the spine: validation of an approach to enhance cure and reduce local recurrence. Spine 36:830–836. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181e502e5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Missenard G, Bouthors C, Fadel E, Court C (2020) Surgical strategies for primary malignant tumors of the thoracic and lumbar spine. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res OTSR 106:S53–S62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2019.05.028

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Tomita K, Kawahara N, Kobayashi T et al (2001) Surgical strategy for spinal metastases. Spine 26:298–306

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shah AA, Paulino Pereira NR, Pedlow FX et al (2017) Modified en bloc spondylectomy for tumors of the thoracic and lumbar spine: surgical technique and outcomes. J Bone Jt Surg Am 99:1476–1484. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.17.00141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sciubba DM, De la Garza RR, Goodwin CR et al (2016) Total en bloc spondylectomy for locally aggressive and primary malignant tumors of the lumbar spine. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 25:4080–4087. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4641-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Boriani S (2018) En bloc resection in the spine: a procedure of surgical oncology. J Spine Surg Hong Kong 4:668–676. https://doi.org/10.21037/jss.2018.09.02

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fahim DK, Kim SD, Cho D et al (2011) Avoiding abdominal flank bulge after anterolateral approaches to the thoracolumbar spine: cadaveric study and electrophysiological investigation. J Neurosurg Spine 15:532–540. https://doi.org/10.3171/2011.7.SPINE10887

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fadaee N, Zarrinkhoo E, Assani K et al (2022) Flank incisional hernia after lateral approach spine operations: presentation and outcomes after repair. Surg Endosc 36:2138–2145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-021-08450-w

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. de Peretti F, Hovorka I, Fabiani P, Argenson C (1996) New possibilities in L2–L5 lumbar arthrodesis using a lateral retroperitoneal approach assisted by laparoscopy: preliminary results. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 5:210–216. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00395518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Verheyden AP, Hoelzl A, Lill H et al (2004) The endoscopically assisted simultaneous posteroanterior reconstruction of the thoracolumbar spine in prone position. Spine J Off J N Am Spine Soc 4:540–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2004.01.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Doyle DJ, Garmon EH (2018) American Society of Anesthesiologists Classification (ASA Class). In: StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing, Treasure Island (FL)

  12. Yates JW, Chalmer B, McKegney FP (1980) Evaluation of patients with advanced cancer using the Karnofsky performance status. Cancer 45:2220–2224

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Frankel HL (1969) Ascending cord lesion in the early stages following spinal injury. Paraplegia 7:111–118. https://doi.org/10.1038/sc.1969.21

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Boriani S, Weinstein JN, Biagini R (1997) Primary bone tumors of the spine. Terminol Surg Staging Spine 22:1036–1044

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kiensl J, Rosenberg A, Anderson P et al. Bone. In : Amin MB, Edge S, Greene D, et al. (eds). In: AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, 8th edn, Springer

  16. Enneking WF (1986) A system of staging musculoskeletal neoplasms. Clin Orthop 9–24

  17. McDonnell MF, Glassman SD, Dimar JR et al (1996) Perioperative complications of anterior procedures on the spine. J Bone Jt Surg Am 78:839–847

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Court C, Boulate D, Missenard G et al (2021) Video-assisted thoracoscopic en bloc vertebrectomy for spine tumors: technique and outcomes in a series of 33 patients. J Bone Jt Surg Am 103:1104–1114. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.20.01417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Knafo S, Parker F, Herbrecht A et al (2013) Percutaneous treatment of subarachnoid-pleural fistula with Onyx. J Neurosurg Spine 18:378–381. https://doi.org/10.3171/2013.1.SPINE12628

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Tomita K, Kawahara N, Baba H et al (1994) Total en bloc spondylectomy for solitary spinal metastases. Int Orthop 18:291–298

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kawahara N, Tomita K, Murakami H, Demura S (2009) Total en bloc spondylectomy for spinal tumors: surgical techniques and related basic background. Orthop Clin N Am 40(47–63):vi. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ocl.2008.09.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Abe E, Kobayashi T, Murai H et al (2001) Total spondylectomy for primary malignant, aggressive benign, and solitary metastatic bone tumors of the thoracolumbar spine. J Spinal Disord 14:237–246. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002517-200106000-00009

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Dai T, Pan T, Zhang X et al (2019) Feasibility of total en-bloc spondylectomy on L5 by a posterior-only approach: An autopsy study. J Bone Oncol 14:100204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbo.2018.10.003

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Yang S-Z, Zhang Y, Chen W-G et al (2020) Single-stage posterior total en bloc spondylectomy in the treatment of lumbar spinal metastases. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 191:105645. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2019.105645

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Li Z, Lv Z, Li J (2019) Total en bloc spondylectomy for the fifth lumbar solitary metastasis by a posterior-only approach. World Neurosurg 130:235–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.07.054

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Zoccali C, Scotto G, Cannavò L et al (2019) En bloc spondylectomy in patients older than 60 years: indications, results and complications in a series of 37 patients. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 28:1512–1519. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-019-05970-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Bass JE, Redwine MD, Kramer LA et al (2000) Spectrum of congenital anomalies of the inferior vena cava: cross-sectional imaging findings. Radiogr Rev Publ Radiol Soc N Am Inc 20:639–652. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiographics.20.3.g00ma09639

  28. Amendola L, Cappuccio M, De Iure F et al (2014) En bloc resections for primary spinal tumors in 20 years of experience: effectiveness and safety. Spine J Off J N Am Spine Soc 14:2608–2617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2014.02.030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Boriani S, Bandiera S, Donthineni R et al (2010) Morbidity of en bloc resections in the spine. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 19:231–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-009-1137-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Neagoe OC, Ionica M, Mazilu O (2018) The role of pelvic lymphocele in the development of early postoperative complications. Medicine (Baltimore) 97:e12353. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000012353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ghanta S, Cuzzone DA, Torrisi JS et al (2015) Regulation of inflammation and fibrosis by macrophages in lymphedema. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 308:H1065-1077. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajpheart.00598.2014

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Dakwar E, Le TV, Baaj AA et al (2011) Abdominal wall paresis as a complication of minimally invasive lateral transpsoas interbody fusion. Neurosurg Focus 31:E18. https://doi.org/10.3171/2011.7.FOCUS11164

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Timmermans L, Klitsie PJ, Maat APWM et al (2013) Abdominal wall bulging after thoracic surgery, an underdiagnosed wound complication. Hernia J Hernias Abdom Wall Surg 17:89–94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10029-012-0971-9

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was associated to this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charlie Bouthors.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

Charles Court, Antoine Girault, Barthelemy Valteau, Olaf Mercier, Gilles Missenard, Elie Fadel, Charlie Bouthors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Court, C., Girault, A., Valteau, B. et al. New technique of En bloc vertebral resection in the thoracolumbar region assisted by retroperitoneal laparoscopy in a single prone position: first results. Eur Spine J (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-08121-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-023-08121-5

Keywords

Navigation