Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Is detethering necessary before deformity correction in congenital scoliosis associated with tethered cord syndrome: a meta-analysis of current evidence

  • Review Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes in patients with congenital scoliosis (CS) and tethered cord syndrome (TCS) undergoing deformity correction with (NI group) versus without (NNI group) prior neurosurgical intervention aimed at detethering the cord.

Methods

A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed. The databases PubMed, Embase and Google Scholar were searched until March 2020. Inclusion criteria was studied describing performance of deformity correction and fusion surgery for congenital scoliosis with tethered cord syndrome with or without prior detethering procedure. Studies describing growth sparing procedures or congenital scoliosis associated with non-tethering pathologies such as syrinx were excluded. Case reports and series with less than 10 subjects were also excluded. NIH quality assessment tool was used for assessing quality of individual study.

Results

Sixteen studies were included for analysis of which eight were found to be retrospective case series (level IV evidence) and retrospective case–control studies (level III evidence) each. Overall proportional meta-analysis found no significant difference in correction rate, operative duration, blood loss or complication rate between the NI and NNI groups. However, subgroup analysis performed after inclusion of only level III evidence studies revealed significantly lesser operative duration and blood loss with comparable correction and complication rate in NNI group.

Conclusion

Deformity correction and fusion surgery may be performed safely and effectively in CS with TCS patients without the need of a prior detethering procedure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Basu PS, Elsebaie H, Noordeen MHH (2002) Congenital spinal deformity: a comprehensive assessment at presentation. Spine 27:2255–2259. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200210150-00014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Shen J, Wang Z, Liu J et al (2013) Abnormalities associated with congenital scoliosis: a retrospective study of 226 Chinese surgical cases. Spine 8:814–818. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31827ed125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kokubun S, Ozawa H, Aizawa T et al (2011) Spine-shortening osteotomy for patients with tethered cord syndrome caused by lipomyelomeningocele. J Neurosurg Spine 15:21–27. https://doi.org/10.3171/2011.2.SPINE10114

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hedequist D, Emans J (2007) Congenital scoliosis: a review and update. J Pediatr Orthop 27:106–116. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0b013e31802b4993

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Jayaswal A, Kandwal P, Goswami A et al (2016) Early onset scoliosis with intraspinal anomalies: management with growing rod. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 25:3301–3307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4566-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Barutçuoğlu M, Selçuki M, Umur AS et al (2016) Scoliosis may be the first symptom of the tethered spinal cord. Indian J Orthop 50:80–86. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.173506

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Yamada S, Won DJ, Yamada SM (2004) Pathophysiology of tethered cord syndrome: correlation with symptomatology. Neurosurg Focus 16:E6. https://doi.org/10.3171/foc.2004.16.2.7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. McLone DG, Herman JM, Gabrieli AP, Dias L (1990) Tethered cord as a cause of scoliosis in children with a myelomeningocele. Pediatr Neurosurg 16:8–13. https://doi.org/10.1159/000120495

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Mehta VA, Gottfried ON, McGirt MJ et al (2011) Safety and efficacy of concurrent pediatric spinal cord untethering and deformity correction. J Spinal Disord Tech 24:401–405. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182019f4d

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hamzaoglu A, Ozturk C, Tezer M et al (2007) Simultaneous Surgical Treatment in Congenital Scoliosis and/or Kyphosis Associated With Intraspinal Abnormalities. Spine 32:2880–2884. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815b60e3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Chen B, Yuan Z, Chang MS et al (2015) Safety and Efficacy of One-stage Spinal Osteotomy for Severe and Rigid Congenital Scoliosis Associated with Split Spinal Cord Malformation. Spine 40:E1005-1013. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001039

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Singrakhia M, Malewar N, Deshmukh S, Deshmukh S (2018) Simultaneous Surgical Treatment of Congenital Spinal Deformity Associated with Intraspinal Anomalies. Asian Spine J 12:466–475. https://doi.org/10.4184/asj.2018.12.3.466

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Chern JJ, Dauser RC, Whitehead WE et al (2011) The effect of tethered cord release on coronal spinal balance in tight filum terminale. Spine 36:E944-949. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181fc2edd

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Kulwin CG, Patel NB, Ackerman LL et al (2013) Radiographic and clinical outcome of syringomyelia in patients treated for tethered cord syndrome without other significant imaging abnormalities. J Neurosurg Pediatr 11:307–312. https://doi.org/10.3171/2012.11.PEDS12251

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Ayvaz M, Alanay A, Yazici M et al (2007) Safety and efficacy of posterior instrumentation for patients with congenital scoliosis and spinal dysraphism. J Pediatr Orthop 27:380–386. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.bpb.0000271334.73643.81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Matsumoto M, Watanabe K, Tsuji T et al (2009) Progressive kyphoscoliosis associated with tethered cord treated by posterior vertebral column resection: a case report. Spine 34:E965-968. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181af7a6a

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Altiok H, Riordan A, Graf A et al (2016) Response of Scoliosis in Children with Myelomeningocele to Surgical Release of Tethered Spinal Cord. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 22:247–252. https://doi.org/10.1310/sci2204-247

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. McGirt MJ, Mehta V, Garces-Ambrossi G et al (2009) Pediatric tethered cord syndrome: response of scoliosis to untethering procedures: Clinical article. J Neurosurg Pediatr 4:270–274. https://doi.org/10.3171/2009.4.PEDS08463

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Fang F, Shen J, Zhou J et al (2016) Clinical Outcomes of Different Surgical Strategy for Patients With Congenital Scoliosis and Type I Split Cord Malformation. Spine 41:1310–1316. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000001530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hui H, Tao H-R, Jiang X-F et al (2012) Safety and Efficacy of 1-Stage Surgical Treatment of Congenital Spinal Deformity Associated With Split Spinal Cord Malformation. Spine 37:2104–2113. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182608988

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhao Q, Shi B, Sun X et al (2019) Do untreated intraspinal anomalies in congenital scoliosis impact the safety and efficacy of spinal correction surgery? A retrospective case-control study. J Neurosurg Spine 31:40–45. https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.1.SPINE181205

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Study Quality Assessment Tools | NHLBI, NIH. https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools. Accessed 25 Sep 2020

  23. Tao H, Yang K, Li T et al (2019) Is It Possible to Correct Congenital Spinal Deformity Associated With a Tethered Cord Without Prophylactic Intradural Detethering? Clin Orthop 477:1689–1697. https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000000652

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang Z, Hui H, Liu T et al (2016) Two-staged correction of Severe Congenital Scoliosis Associated with Intraspinal Abnormalities. Clin Spine Surg 29:E401-405. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000175

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Sun K, Hu H, Gao L et al (2020) Perioperative Halo-Gravity Traction in the Treatment of Scoliosis with Intraspinal Anomalies. World Neurosurg 140:e219–e224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.04.242

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Huang J-H, Yang W-Z, Shen C et al (2015) Surgical Treatment of Congenital Scoliosis Associated With Tethered Cord by Thoracic Spine-shortening Osteotomy Without Cord Detethering. Spine 40:E1103-1109. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001035

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Huang Z, Li X, Deng Y et al (2019) The Treatment of Severe Congenital Scoliosis Associated With Type I Split Cord Malformation: Is a Preliminary Bony Septum Resection Always Necessary? Neurosurgery 85:211–222. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyy237

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Shen J, Zhang J, Feng F et al (2016) Corrective Surgery for Congenital Scoliosis Associated with Split Cord Malformation: It May Be Safe to Leave Diastematomyelia Untreated in Patients with Intact or Stable Neurological Status. J Bone Joint Surg Am 98:926–936. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.15.00882

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Udayakumaran S, Menon SK, Onyia CU, Tahasildar N (2017) Single-stage deformity correction in children with neurogenic kyphoscoliosis: nuances and a proposal for risk stratification. Neurosurg Focus 43:E13. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.7.FOCUS17348

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhou Z, Zhang H, Guo C et al (2017) More preoperative flexibility implies adequate neural pliability for curve correction without prophylactic untethering in scoliosis patients with asymptomatic tethered spinal cord, a retrospective study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 18(1):261. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1615-0

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Yang N, Luo M, Yu Y et al (2019) Is It Better to Resect a Bony Spur Before Corrective Surgery for Congenital Scoliosis with Type I Split Cord Malformation? World Neurosurg 125:e1151–e1159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.01.265

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Winter RB, Haven JJ, Moe JH, Lagaard SM (1974) Diastematomyelia and congenital spine deformities. J Bone Joint Surg Am 56:27–39

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Pierz K, Banta J, Thomson J et al (2000) The effect of tethered cord release on scoliosis in myelomeningocele. J Pediatr Orthop 20:362–365

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Sinha S, Agarwal D, Mahapatra AK (2006) Split cord malformations: an experience of 203 cases. Childs Nerv Syst 22:3–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-005-1145-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Gupta DK, Ahmed S, Garg K, Mahapatra AK (2010) Regrowth of Septal Spur in Split Cord Malformation. Pediatr Neurosurg 46:242–244. https://doi.org/10.1159/000318753

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Pang D, Parrish RG (1983) Regrowth of diastematomyelic bone spur after extradural resection case report. J Neurosurg 59:887–890. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1983.59.5.0887

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Samdani AF, Asghar J, Pahys J et al (2007) Concurrent spinal cord untethering and scoliosis correction: case report. Spine 32:E832–E883. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815ce6ae

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Mooney JF, Glazier SS, Barfield WR (2012) Concurrent orthopedic and neurosurgical procedures in pediatric patients with spinal deformity. J Pediatr Orthop Part B 21:602–605. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPB.0b013e328357ea38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Oda JE, Shah SA, Mackenzie WG et al (2012) Concurrent Tethered Cord Release and Growing-Rod Implantation—Is It Safe? Glob Spine J 2:207–212. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1330941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Li S, Ou Y, Liu B et al (2015) Comparison of osteotomy versus non-osteotomy approach for congenital scoliosis: a retrospective study of three surgical techniques. Anz J Surg 85:249–254. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.12886

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Wang S, Aikenmu K, Zhang J et al (2017) The aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of posterior-only vertebral column resection (PVCR) for the treatment of angular and isolated congenital kyphosis. Eur Spine J 26:1817–1825. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4344-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Kandwal P, Goswami A, Vijayaraghavan G et al (2016) Staged Anterior Release and Posterior Instrumentation in Correction of Severe Rigid Scoliosis (Cobb Angle >100 Degrees). Spine Deform 4:296–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2015.12.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Kandwal P, Vijayaraghavan GP, Nagaraja UB, Jayaswal A (2017) Severe Rigid Scoliosis: Review of Management Strategies and Role of Spinal Osteotomies. Asian Spine J 11:494–503. https://doi.org/10.4184/asj.2017.11.3.494

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Weiss H-R, Goodall D (2008) Rate of complications in scoliosis surgery–a systematic review of the Pub Med literature. Scoliosis 3:9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-7161-3-9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Yaltırık K, El Tecle NE, Pierson MJ et al (2017) Management of concomitant scoliosis and tethered cord syndrome in non-spina bifida pediatric population. Childs Nerv Syst ChNS Off J Int Soc Pediatr Neurosurg 33:1899–1903. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-017-3504-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Kawahara N, Tomita K, Kobayashi T et al (2005) Influence of acute shortening on the spinal cord: an experimental study. Spine 30:613–620. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000155407.87439.a2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funds were received in support of this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pankaj Kandwal.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ahuja, K., Ifthekar, S., Mittal, S. et al. Is detethering necessary before deformity correction in congenital scoliosis associated with tethered cord syndrome: a meta-analysis of current evidence. Eur Spine J 30, 599–611 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06662-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06662-7

Keywords

Navigation