Abstract
Purpose
To compare the clinical and radiological outcomes in patients with congenital scoliosis (CS) and tethered cord syndrome (TCS) undergoing deformity correction with (NI group) versus without (NNI group) prior neurosurgical intervention aimed at detethering the cord.
Methods
A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed. The databases PubMed, Embase and Google Scholar were searched until March 2020. Inclusion criteria was studied describing performance of deformity correction and fusion surgery for congenital scoliosis with tethered cord syndrome with or without prior detethering procedure. Studies describing growth sparing procedures or congenital scoliosis associated with non-tethering pathologies such as syrinx were excluded. Case reports and series with less than 10 subjects were also excluded. NIH quality assessment tool was used for assessing quality of individual study.
Results
Sixteen studies were included for analysis of which eight were found to be retrospective case series (level IV evidence) and retrospective case–control studies (level III evidence) each. Overall proportional meta-analysis found no significant difference in correction rate, operative duration, blood loss or complication rate between the NI and NNI groups. However, subgroup analysis performed after inclusion of only level III evidence studies revealed significantly lesser operative duration and blood loss with comparable correction and complication rate in NNI group.
Conclusion
Deformity correction and fusion surgery may be performed safely and effectively in CS with TCS patients without the need of a prior detethering procedure.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Basu PS, Elsebaie H, Noordeen MHH (2002) Congenital spinal deformity: a comprehensive assessment at presentation. Spine 27:2255–2259. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-200210150-00014
Shen J, Wang Z, Liu J et al (2013) Abnormalities associated with congenital scoliosis: a retrospective study of 226 Chinese surgical cases. Spine 8:814–818. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31827ed125
Kokubun S, Ozawa H, Aizawa T et al (2011) Spine-shortening osteotomy for patients with tethered cord syndrome caused by lipomyelomeningocele. J Neurosurg Spine 15:21–27. https://doi.org/10.3171/2011.2.SPINE10114
Hedequist D, Emans J (2007) Congenital scoliosis: a review and update. J Pediatr Orthop 27:106–116. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPO.0b013e31802b4993
Jayaswal A, Kandwal P, Goswami A et al (2016) Early onset scoliosis with intraspinal anomalies: management with growing rod. Eur Spine J Off Publ Eur Spine Soc Eur Spinal Deform Soc Eur Sect Cerv Spine Res Soc 25:3301–3307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4566-5
Barutçuoğlu M, Selçuki M, Umur AS et al (2016) Scoliosis may be the first symptom of the tethered spinal cord. Indian J Orthop 50:80–86. https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.173506
Yamada S, Won DJ, Yamada SM (2004) Pathophysiology of tethered cord syndrome: correlation with symptomatology. Neurosurg Focus 16:E6. https://doi.org/10.3171/foc.2004.16.2.7
McLone DG, Herman JM, Gabrieli AP, Dias L (1990) Tethered cord as a cause of scoliosis in children with a myelomeningocele. Pediatr Neurosurg 16:8–13. https://doi.org/10.1159/000120495
Mehta VA, Gottfried ON, McGirt MJ et al (2011) Safety and efficacy of concurrent pediatric spinal cord untethering and deformity correction. J Spinal Disord Tech 24:401–405. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182019f4d
Hamzaoglu A, Ozturk C, Tezer M et al (2007) Simultaneous Surgical Treatment in Congenital Scoliosis and/or Kyphosis Associated With Intraspinal Abnormalities. Spine 32:2880–2884. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815b60e3
Chen B, Yuan Z, Chang MS et al (2015) Safety and Efficacy of One-stage Spinal Osteotomy for Severe and Rigid Congenital Scoliosis Associated with Split Spinal Cord Malformation. Spine 40:E1005-1013. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001039
Singrakhia M, Malewar N, Deshmukh S, Deshmukh S (2018) Simultaneous Surgical Treatment of Congenital Spinal Deformity Associated with Intraspinal Anomalies. Asian Spine J 12:466–475. https://doi.org/10.4184/asj.2018.12.3.466
Chern JJ, Dauser RC, Whitehead WE et al (2011) The effect of tethered cord release on coronal spinal balance in tight filum terminale. Spine 36:E944-949. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181fc2edd
Kulwin CG, Patel NB, Ackerman LL et al (2013) Radiographic and clinical outcome of syringomyelia in patients treated for tethered cord syndrome without other significant imaging abnormalities. J Neurosurg Pediatr 11:307–312. https://doi.org/10.3171/2012.11.PEDS12251
Ayvaz M, Alanay A, Yazici M et al (2007) Safety and efficacy of posterior instrumentation for patients with congenital scoliosis and spinal dysraphism. J Pediatr Orthop 27:380–386. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.bpb.0000271334.73643.81
Matsumoto M, Watanabe K, Tsuji T et al (2009) Progressive kyphoscoliosis associated with tethered cord treated by posterior vertebral column resection: a case report. Spine 34:E965-968. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181af7a6a
Altiok H, Riordan A, Graf A et al (2016) Response of Scoliosis in Children with Myelomeningocele to Surgical Release of Tethered Spinal Cord. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil 22:247–252. https://doi.org/10.1310/sci2204-247
McGirt MJ, Mehta V, Garces-Ambrossi G et al (2009) Pediatric tethered cord syndrome: response of scoliosis to untethering procedures: Clinical article. J Neurosurg Pediatr 4:270–274. https://doi.org/10.3171/2009.4.PEDS08463
Fang F, Shen J, Zhou J et al (2016) Clinical Outcomes of Different Surgical Strategy for Patients With Congenital Scoliosis and Type I Split Cord Malformation. Spine 41:1310–1316. https://doi.org/10.1097/brs.0000000000001530
Hui H, Tao H-R, Jiang X-F et al (2012) Safety and Efficacy of 1-Stage Surgical Treatment of Congenital Spinal Deformity Associated With Split Spinal Cord Malformation. Spine 37:2104–2113. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182608988
Zhao Q, Shi B, Sun X et al (2019) Do untreated intraspinal anomalies in congenital scoliosis impact the safety and efficacy of spinal correction surgery? A retrospective case-control study. J Neurosurg Spine 31:40–45. https://doi.org/10.3171/2019.1.SPINE181205
Study Quality Assessment Tools | NHLBI, NIH. https://www.nhlbi.nih.gov/health-topics/study-quality-assessment-tools. Accessed 25 Sep 2020
Tao H, Yang K, Li T et al (2019) Is It Possible to Correct Congenital Spinal Deformity Associated With a Tethered Cord Without Prophylactic Intradural Detethering? Clin Orthop 477:1689–1697. https://doi.org/10.1097/CORR.0000000000000652
Zhang Z, Hui H, Liu T et al (2016) Two-staged correction of Severe Congenital Scoliosis Associated with Intraspinal Abnormalities. Clin Spine Surg 29:E401-405. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0000000000000175
Sun K, Hu H, Gao L et al (2020) Perioperative Halo-Gravity Traction in the Treatment of Scoliosis with Intraspinal Anomalies. World Neurosurg 140:e219–e224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.04.242
Huang J-H, Yang W-Z, Shen C et al (2015) Surgical Treatment of Congenital Scoliosis Associated With Tethered Cord by Thoracic Spine-shortening Osteotomy Without Cord Detethering. Spine 40:E1103-1109. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0000000000001035
Huang Z, Li X, Deng Y et al (2019) The Treatment of Severe Congenital Scoliosis Associated With Type I Split Cord Malformation: Is a Preliminary Bony Septum Resection Always Necessary? Neurosurgery 85:211–222. https://doi.org/10.1093/neuros/nyy237
Shen J, Zhang J, Feng F et al (2016) Corrective Surgery for Congenital Scoliosis Associated with Split Cord Malformation: It May Be Safe to Leave Diastematomyelia Untreated in Patients with Intact or Stable Neurological Status. J Bone Joint Surg Am 98:926–936. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.15.00882
Udayakumaran S, Menon SK, Onyia CU, Tahasildar N (2017) Single-stage deformity correction in children with neurogenic kyphoscoliosis: nuances and a proposal for risk stratification. Neurosurg Focus 43:E13. https://doi.org/10.3171/2017.7.FOCUS17348
Zhou Z, Zhang H, Guo C et al (2017) More preoperative flexibility implies adequate neural pliability for curve correction without prophylactic untethering in scoliosis patients with asymptomatic tethered spinal cord, a retrospective study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 18(1):261. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-017-1615-0
Yang N, Luo M, Yu Y et al (2019) Is It Better to Resect a Bony Spur Before Corrective Surgery for Congenital Scoliosis with Type I Split Cord Malformation? World Neurosurg 125:e1151–e1159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2019.01.265
Winter RB, Haven JJ, Moe JH, Lagaard SM (1974) Diastematomyelia and congenital spine deformities. J Bone Joint Surg Am 56:27–39
Pierz K, Banta J, Thomson J et al (2000) The effect of tethered cord release on scoliosis in myelomeningocele. J Pediatr Orthop 20:362–365
Sinha S, Agarwal D, Mahapatra AK (2006) Split cord malformations: an experience of 203 cases. Childs Nerv Syst 22:3–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-005-1145-1
Gupta DK, Ahmed S, Garg K, Mahapatra AK (2010) Regrowth of Septal Spur in Split Cord Malformation. Pediatr Neurosurg 46:242–244. https://doi.org/10.1159/000318753
Pang D, Parrish RG (1983) Regrowth of diastematomyelic bone spur after extradural resection case report. J Neurosurg 59:887–890. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1983.59.5.0887
Samdani AF, Asghar J, Pahys J et al (2007) Concurrent spinal cord untethering and scoliosis correction: case report. Spine 32:E832–E883. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31815ce6ae
Mooney JF, Glazier SS, Barfield WR (2012) Concurrent orthopedic and neurosurgical procedures in pediatric patients with spinal deformity. J Pediatr Orthop Part B 21:602–605. https://doi.org/10.1097/BPB.0b013e328357ea38
Oda JE, Shah SA, Mackenzie WG et al (2012) Concurrent Tethered Cord Release and Growing-Rod Implantation—Is It Safe? Glob Spine J 2:207–212. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0032-1330941
Li S, Ou Y, Liu B et al (2015) Comparison of osteotomy versus non-osteotomy approach for congenital scoliosis: a retrospective study of three surgical techniques. Anz J Surg 85:249–254. https://doi.org/10.1111/ans.12886
Wang S, Aikenmu K, Zhang J et al (2017) The aim of this retrospective study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of posterior-only vertebral column resection (PVCR) for the treatment of angular and isolated congenital kyphosis. Eur Spine J 26:1817–1825. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4344-9
Kandwal P, Goswami A, Vijayaraghavan G et al (2016) Staged Anterior Release and Posterior Instrumentation in Correction of Severe Rigid Scoliosis (Cobb Angle >100 Degrees). Spine Deform 4:296–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jspd.2015.12.005
Kandwal P, Vijayaraghavan GP, Nagaraja UB, Jayaswal A (2017) Severe Rigid Scoliosis: Review of Management Strategies and Role of Spinal Osteotomies. Asian Spine J 11:494–503. https://doi.org/10.4184/asj.2017.11.3.494
Weiss H-R, Goodall D (2008) Rate of complications in scoliosis surgery–a systematic review of the Pub Med literature. Scoliosis 3:9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1748-7161-3-9
Yaltırık K, El Tecle NE, Pierson MJ et al (2017) Management of concomitant scoliosis and tethered cord syndrome in non-spina bifida pediatric population. Childs Nerv Syst ChNS Off J Int Soc Pediatr Neurosurg 33:1899–1903. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00381-017-3504-0
Kawahara N, Tomita K, Kobayashi T et al (2005) Influence of acute shortening on the spinal cord: an experimental study. Spine 30:613–620. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000155407.87439.a2
Funding
No funds were received in support of this work.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
No conflict of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ahuja, K., Ifthekar, S., Mittal, S. et al. Is detethering necessary before deformity correction in congenital scoliosis associated with tethered cord syndrome: a meta-analysis of current evidence. Eur Spine J 30, 599–611 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06662-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-020-06662-7