Skip to main content
Log in

Implantation of an empty polyetheretherketone cage in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective randomised controlled study with 2 years follow-up

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the clinical outcomes, radiographic results and fusion rate of ACDF between empty PEEK cages and PEEK cages packed with β-tricalcium phosphate.

Methods

Forty-five patients were prospectively enrolled with cervical degenerative disc disease who requiring ACDF with a PEEK cage. 23 patients were randomised to the study group (empty cages) and 22 patients were in the control group (cages filled with β-tricalcium phosphate). Both patient groups were fixed with a cervical locking plate. A CT scan was performed 12 months postoperatively and 24 months if not confirmed fused at 12 months to evaluate the status of fusion. Clinical status was evaluated using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).

Results

46 levels (97.88%) in the study group and 44 levels (97.77%) in the control group were confirmed as fused at 24 months. There was no significant difference between the fusion rates observed in the study and control groups (p = 0.82). There was no significant difference in JOA, ODI, or VAS scores at 24 months follow-up. The results showed that the members of the non-fusion group tended to be older than the individuals in the fusion group at 12 months, but was not significant in statistics.

Conclusions

Similar fusion rates and clinical outcomes were achieved when using ACDF with PEEK cages and instrumentation, regardless of whether the cage was filled with bone substitute at 24 months follow-up. Fusion rates improved over time and are comparable between both groups.

Graphical abstract

These slides can be retrieved under Electronic Supplementary material.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Smith GW, Robinson RA (1958) The treatment of certain cervical-spine disorders by anterior removal of the intervertebral disc and interbody fusion. J B Jt Surg Am 40-A(3):607–624

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Yue WM, Brodner W, Highland TR (2005) Long-term results after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with allograft and plating: a 5- to 11-year radiologic and clinical follow-up study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30(19):2138–2144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Majd ME, Vadhva M, Holt RT (1999) Anterior cervical reconstruction using titanium cages with anterior plating. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 24(15):1604–1610

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Boakye M, Mummaneni PV, Garrett M, Rodts G, Haid R (2005) Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion involving a polyetheretherketone spacer and bone morphogenetic protein. J Neurosurg Spine 2(5):521–525

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cho DY, Lee WY, Sheu PC, Chen CC (2005) Cage containing a biphasic calcium phosphate ceramic (Triosite) for the treatment of cervical spondylosis. Surg Neurol 63(6):497–503 (discussion-4)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chiang CJ, Kuo YJ, Chiang YF, Rau G, Tsuang YH (2008) Anterior cervical fusion using a polyetheretherketone cage containing a bovine xenograft: 3 to 5-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33(23):2524–2528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tumialan LM, Pan J, Rodts GE, Mummaneni PV (2008) The safety and efficacy of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with polyetheretherketone spacer and recombinant human bone morphogenetic protein-2: a review of 200 patients. J Neurosurg Spine 8(6):529–535

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Hwang SL, Lin CL, Lieu AS et al (2004) Three-level and four-level anterior cervical discectomies and titanium cage-augmented fusion with and without plate fixation. J Neurosurg Spine 1(2):160–167

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dai LY, Jiang LS (2008) Anterior cervical fusion with interbody cage containing beta-tricalcium phosphate augmented with plate fixation: a prospective randomized study with 2-year follow-up. Eur Spine J 17(5):698–705

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen JF, Wu CT, Lee SC, Lee ST (2005) Use of a polymethylmethacrylate cervical cage in the treatment of single-level cervical disc disease. J Neurosurg Spine 3(1):24–28

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Barlocher CB, Barth A, Krauss JK, Binggeli R, Seiler RW (2002) Comparative evaluation of microdiscectomy only, autograft fusion, polymethylmethacrylate interposition, and threaded titanium cage fusion for treatment of single-level cervical disc disease: a prospective randomized study in 125 patients. Neurosurg Focus 12(1):E4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zevgaridis D, Thome C, Krauss JK (2002) Prospective controlled study of rectangular titanium cage fusion compared with iliac crest autograft fusion in anterior cervical discectomy. Neurosurg Focus 12(1):E2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Agrillo U, Mastronardi L, Puzzilli F (2002) Anterior cervical fusion with carbon fiber cage containing coralline hydroxyapatite: preliminary observations in 45 consecutive cases of soft-disc herniation. J Neurosurg 96(3 Suppl):273–276

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Vavruch L, Hedlund R, Javid D, Leszniewski W, Shalabi A (2002) A prospective randomized comparison between the Cloward procedure and a carbon fiber cage in the cervical spine: a clinical and radiologic study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 27(16):1694–1701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wigfield CC, Nelson RJ (2001) Nonautologous interbody fusion materials in cervical spine surgery: how strong is the evidence to justify their use? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26(6):687–694

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Arts MP, Wolfs JF, Corbin TP (2017) Porous silicon nitride spacers versus PEEK cages for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: clinical and radiological results of a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Eur Spine J 26:2372–2379

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Toth JM, Wang M, Estes BT, Scifert JL, Seim HB 3rd, Turner AS (2006) Polyetheretherketone as a biomaterial for spinal applications. Biomaterials 27(3):324–334

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Buchowski JM, Liu G, Bunmaprasert T, Rose PS, Riew KD (2008) Anterior cervical fusion assessment: surgical exploration versus radiographic evaluation. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 33(11):1185–1191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang JC, McDonough PW, Endow KK, Delamarter RB (2000) Increased fusion rates with cervical plating for two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25(1):41–45

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang JC, McDonough PW, Kanim LE, Endow KK, Delamarter RB (2001) Increased fusion rates with cervical plating for three-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26(6):643–646 (discussion 6–7)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Moreland DB, Asch HL, Clabeaux DE et al (2004) Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with implantable titanium cage: initial impressions, patient outcomes and comparison to fusion with allograft. Spine J 4(2):184–191 (discussion 91)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hwang SL, Hwang YF, Lieu AS et al (2005) Outcome analyses of interbody titanium cage fusion used in the anterior discectomy for cervical degenerative disc disease. J Spinal Disord Tech 18(4):326–331

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Schmieder K, Wolzik-Grossmann M, Pechlivanis I, Engelhardt M, Scholz M, Harders A (2006) Subsidence of the wing titanium cage after anterior cervical interbody fusion: 2-year follow-up study. J Neurosurg Spine 4(6):447–453

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Caroli E, Orlando ER, D’Andrea G, Ferrante L (2007) Anterior cervical fusion with interbody titanium cage containing surgical bone site graft: our institution’s experience in 103 consecutive cases of degenerative spondylosis. J Spinal Disord Tech 20(3):216–220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Pechlivanis I, Thuring T, Brenke C et al (2011) Non-fusion rates in anterior cervical discectomy and implantation of empty polyetheretherketone cages. SpineSpine (Phila Pa 1976) 36(1):15–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Cho DY, Liau WR, Lee WY, Liu JT, Chiu CL, Sheu PC (2002) Preliminary experience using a polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage in the treatment of cervical disc disease. Neurosurgery 51(6):1343–1349 (discussion 9–50)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Shad A et al (2005) Use of the Solis cage and local autologous bone graft for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: early technical experience. J Neurosurg Spine 2(2):116–122

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Kulkarni AG, Hee HT, Wong HK (2007) Solis cage (PEEK) for anterior cervical fusion: preliminary radiological results with emphasis on fusion and subsidence. Spine J 7(2):205–209

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Shiban E, Gapon K, Wostrack M et al (2016) Clinical and radiological outcome after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with stand-alone empty polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 158(2):349–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Abd-Alrahman N, Dokmak AS, Abou-Madawi A (1999) Anterior cervical discectomy (ACD) versus anterior cervical fusion (ACF), clinical and radiological outcome study. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 141(10):1089–1092

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Dowd GC, Wirth FP (1999) Anterior cervical discectomy: is fusion necessary? J Neurosurg 90(1 Suppl):8–12

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Mehren C, Suchomel P, Grochulla F et al (2006) Heterotopic ossification in total cervical artificial disc replacement. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31(24):2802–2806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Samartzis D, Shen FH, Lyon C, Phillips M, Goldberg EJ, An HS (2004) Does rigid instrumentation increase the fusion rate in one-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion? Spine J 4(6):636–643

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The study was supported by Division of Spine Surgery, Orthopaedic Department, Taipei Veterans General Hospital. We thank Hsin-Yi Huang from the Biostatistics Task Force, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, for the statistical assistance.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hsi-Hsien Lin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None of the authors has any potential conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PPTX 258 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Feng, SW., Chang, MC., Chou, PH. et al. Implantation of an empty polyetheretherketone cage in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective randomised controlled study with 2 years follow-up. Eur Spine J 27, 1358–1364 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5450-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-017-5450-7

Keywords

Navigation