Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Compensatory modulation for severe global sagittal imbalance: significance of cervical compensation on quality of life in thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to ankylosing spondylitis

  • Chinese section
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the cervical compensation pattern and to clarify relationships between cervical compensation and quality of life (QOL) in ankylosing spondylitis (AS) patients with thoracolumbar kyphosis.

Methods

A cross-sectional study of consecutive AS patients with thoracolumbar kyphosis was performed. Forty-four patients with hyperlordotic cervical spine were assigned to group A and sixteen with kyphotic cervical spine in group B. Sagittal parameters were measured and compared, including T1 slope, cervical lordosis (CL), cervical sagittal vertical axis (C-SVA), global SVA and global kyphosis (GK). Independent factors for cervical compensation were identified. To exclude confounding variables while comparing QOL between patients with hyperlordotic and kyphotic cervical spine, 31 patients were selected as group A-1, similar to 13 patients in group B-1 in the distribution of matching variables such as age, gender, course of disease, GK, global SVA and radiographic progression assessment for AS. The QOL was assessed by Neck Disability Index (NDI) and other indices.

Results

Mean C-SVA was significantly lower in group A than in group B, whereas mean T1 slope, global SVA and GK were significantly larger in group A. T1 slope (36.0 %) was the independent factor for CL. T1 slope was correlated with CL, GK and global SVA in group A. Group A-1 showed lower NDI score. CL (59.6 %) independently affects NDI.

Conclusion

Notable cervical compensation exists in AS patients with thoracolumbar kyphosis. The cervical compensation responsive to global imbalance was mediated by T1 slope. AS patients with hyperlordotic cervical spine present with better QOL than patients with kyphotic cervical spine.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Debarge R, Demey G, Roussouly P (2010) Radiological analysis of ankylosing spondylitis patients with severe kyphosis before and after pedicle subtraction osteotomy. Eur Spine J 19(1):65–70. doi:10.1007/s00586-009-1158-7

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Qian BP, Jiang J, Qiu Y, Wang B, Yu Y, Zhu ZZ (2014) The presence of a negative sacral slope in patients with ankylosing spondylitis with severe thoracolumbar kyphosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96(22):E188. doi:10.2106/JBJS.M.01070

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Qian BP, Jiang J, Qiu Y, Wang B, Yu Y, Zhu ZZ (2013) Radiographical predictors for postoperative sagittal imbalance in patients with thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to ankylosing spondylitis after lumbar pedicle subtraction osteotomy. Spine 38(26):E1669–E1675. doi:10.1097/BRS.0000000000000021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lamartina C, Berjano P (2014) Classification of sagittal imbalance based on spinal alignment and compensatory mechanisms. Eur Spine J 23(6):1177–1189. doi:10.1007/s00586-014-3227-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ames CP, Smith JS, Eastlack R, Blaskiewicz DJ, Shaffrey CI, Schwab F, Bess S, Kim HJ, Mundis GM Jr, Klineberg E, Gupta M, O’Brien M, Hostin R, Scheer JK, Protopsaltis TS, Fu KG, Hart R, Albert TJ, Riew KD, Fehlings MG, Deviren V, Lafage V, International Spine Study G (2015) Reliability assessment of a novel cervical spine deformity classification system. J Neurosurg Spine. doi:10.3171/2014.12.SPINE14780

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lee JS, Youn MS, Shin JK, Goh TS, Kang SS (2015) Relationship between cervical sagittal alignment and quality of life in ankylosing spondylitis. Eur Spine J 24(6):1199–1203. doi:10.1007/s00586-014-3491-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cecchinato R, Langella F, Bassani R, Sansone V, Lamartina C, Berjano P (2014) Variations of cervical lordosis and head alignment after pedicle subtraction osteotomy surgery for sagittal imbalance. Eur Spine J 23(Suppl 6):644–649. doi:10.1007/s00586-014-3546-x

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lee SH, Kim KT, Seo EM, Suk KS, Kwack YH, Son ES (2012) The influence of thoracic inlet alignment on the craniocervical sagittal balance in asymptomatic adults. J Spinal Disord Tech 25(2):E41–E47. doi:10.1097/BSD.0b013e3182396301

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Knott PT, Mardjetko SM, Techy F (2010) The use of the T1 sagittal angle in predicting overall sagittal balance of the spine. Spine J 10(11):994–998. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2010.08.031

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ohara A, Miyamoto K, Naganawa T, Matsumoto K, Shimizu K (2006) Reliabilities of and correlations among five standard methods of assessing the sagittal alignment of the cervical spine. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31(22):2585–2591. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000240656.79060.18 (discussion 2592)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ames CP, Blondel B, Scheer JK, Schwab FJ, Le Huec JC, Massicotte EM, Patel AA, Traynelis VC, Kim HJ, Shaffrey CI, Smith JS, Lafage V (2013) Cervical radiographical alignment: comprehensive assessment techniques and potential importance in cervical myelopathy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38(22 Suppl 1):S149–S160. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a7f449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Schwab F, Lafage V, Patel A, Farcy JP (2009) Sagittal plane considerations and the pelvis in the adult patient. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34(17):1828–1833. doi:10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181a13c08

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Qian BP, Qiu Y, Wang B, Sun X, Zhu ZZ, Jiang J, Ji ML (2012) Pedicle subtraction osteotomy through pseudarthrosis to correct thoracolumbar kyphotic deformity in advanced ankylosing spondylitis. Eur Spine J 21(4):711–718. doi:10.1007/s00586-011-2054-5

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Barrey C, Roussouly P, Le Huec JC, D’Acunzi G, Perrin G (2013) Compensatory mechanisms contributing to keep the sagittal balance of the spine. Eur Spine J 22(Suppl 6):S834–S841. doi:10.1007/s00586-013-3030-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kuklo TR, Potter BK, Schroeder TM, O’Brien MF (2006) Comparison of manual and digital measurements in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31(11):1240–1246. doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000217774.13433.a7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Boulay C, Tardieu C, Hecquet J, Benaim C, Mouilleseaux B, Marty C, Prat-Pradal D, Legaye J, Duval-Beaupere G, Pelissier J (2006) Sagittal alignment of spine and pelvis regulated by pelvic incidence: standard values and prediction of lordosis. Eur Spine J 15(4):415–422. doi:10.1007/s00586-005-0984-5

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Vernon H, Mior S (1991) The Neck Disability Index: a study of reliability and validity. J Manip Physiol Ther 14(7):409–415

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Fairbank JC, Pynsent PB (2000) The Oswestry Disability Index. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25(22):2940–2952 (discussion 2952)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Creemers MC, Franssen MJ, van’t Hof MA, Gribnau FW, van de Putte LB, van Riel PL (2005) Assessment of outcome in ankylosing spondylitis: an extended radiographic scoring system. Ann Rheum Dis 64(1):127–129. doi:10.1136/ard.2004.020503

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. MacKay K, Mack C, Brophy S, Calin A (1998) The Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Radiology Index (BASRI): a new, validated approach to disease assessment. Arthritis Rheum 41(12):2263–2270. doi:10.1002/1529-0131(199812)41:12<2263:AID-ART23>3.0.CO;2-I

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Tang JA, Scheer JK, Smith JS, Deviren V, Bess S, Hart RA, Lafage V, Shaffrey CI, Schwab F, Ames CP, Issg (2012) The impact of standing regional cervical sagittal alignment on outcomes in posterior cervical fusion surgery. Neurosurgery 71(3):662–669. doi:10.1227/NEU.0b013e31826100c9 (discussion 669)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ward MM, Learch TJ, Gensler LS, Davis JC Jr, Reveille JD, Weisman MH (2013) Regional radiographic damage and functional limitations in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: differences in early and late disease. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 65(2):257–265. doi:10.1002/acr.21821

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Carreon LY, Glassman SD, Campbell MJ, Anderson PA (2010) Neck Disability Index, short form-36 physical component summary, and pain scales for neck and arm pain: the minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit after cervical spine fusion. Spine J 10(6):469–474. doi:10.1016/j.spinee.2010.02.007

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Suk KS, Kim KT, Lee SH, Kim JM (2003) Significance of chin-brow vertical angle in correction of kyphotic deformity of ankylosing spondylitis patients. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 28(17):2001–2005. doi:10.1097/01.BRS.0000083239.06023.78

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

One of the authors (Bang-ping Qian) has received funding from Six Talent Peaks Foundation of Jiangsu Province (2012-WS-004), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81372009), and the Fourth Period of “333” High-level Personnel Training Program of Jiangsu Province.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bang-ping Qian.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No benefits in any form have been or will be received from a commercial party that are related directly or indirectly to the subject of this manuscript.

Additional information

Device Status/Drug Statement The manuscript submitted does not contain information about medical device(s)/drug(s).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Qian, J., Qiu, Y., Qian, Bp. et al. Compensatory modulation for severe global sagittal imbalance: significance of cervical compensation on quality of life in thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to ankylosing spondylitis. Eur Spine J 25, 3715–3722 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4486-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-016-4486-4

Keywords

Navigation