Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Surgical management of intractable spasticity

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This article was retracted on 19 April 2016

Abstract

Background

Spasticity is motor disorder characterized by a velocity-dependent increase in tonic stretch reflexes (muscle tone) with exaggerated tendon jerks, resulting from hyper-excitability of the stretch reflex, as one component of the upper motor neuron syndrome.

Purpose

This study aimed at comparing between spinally based (dorsal rhizotomy) versus peripherally based (selective neurotomy) surgical procedures in management of hypertonia in the lower limbs of pediatrics.

Methods

Over a 3-year period, 50 children with intractable, lower limb spasticity were prospectively treated by selective neurotomy (group A, 35 patients) and dorsal rhizotomy (group B, 15 patients) with 6 months’ follow-up period.

Results

The operative duration was longer with dorsal rhizotomy with mean of 292.2 min versus 76.8 min with neurotomy (P = 0.001) and the hospital stay of dorsal rhizotomy was longer with mean of 6.2 days versus 1.7 days with neurotomy (P = 0.001). Muscles power exhibited significant improvement in 53.3 % of the total rhizotomies (P = 0.001). Following neurotomies; muscle tone showed marked improvement in 69.3 % muscles which had normal tone and 31.9 % of muscles had mild spasticity (P = 0.001). The H/M ratio following dorsal rhizotomies showed marked reduction of the ratio, and the mean was 0.11 versus 0.58 preoperatively.

Conclusion

Both neurotomies and dorsal rhizotomies were safe surgical procedures and were provided with good improvement in respect of: muscle power, severity of spasticity, patient’s ambulation, gait, range of joint movement, associated pain, functional disability, and nerve excitability with no significant difference between both procedures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

H/M ratio:

H-reflex/M-response

UMNL:

Upper motor neuron lesion

MRCs:

Medical Research Council scale

DREZ:

Dorsal root entry zone

CBC:

Complete blood picture

CT:

Computerized tomography

MRI:

Magnetic Resonance Image

SPN:

Selective peripheral neurotomy

ITB:

Intrathecal baclofen therapy

References

  1. Bhimani R, Anderson L (2014) Clinical Understanding of spasticity: implications for practice. Rehabil Res Pract 2014:279175

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Buffenoir K, Decq P, Hamel O, Lambertz D, Perot C (2013) Long-term neuromechanical results of selective tibial neurotomy in patients with spastic equinus foot. Acta Neurochir 155:1731–1743

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gäverth J, Sandgren M, Lindberg P, Forssberg H, Eliasson A (2013) Test-retest and inter-rater reliability of a method to measure wrist and finger spasticity. J Rehabil Med 45(7):630–636

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Campistol J (2003) Orally administered drugs in the treatment of spasticity. Rev Neurol 37(1):70–74

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dario A, Tomei G (2004) benefit-risk assessment of baclofen in severe spinal spasticity. Drug Saf 27(11):799–818

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kan P, Gooch J, Amini A, Ploeger D, Grams B, Oberg W, Simonsen S, Walker M, Kestle J (2008) Surgical treatment of spasticity in children: comparison of selective dorsal rhizotomy and intrathecal baclofen pump implantation. Childs Nerv Syst 24(2):239–243

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kheder A, Nair K (2012) Spasticity: pathophysiology, evaluation and management. Pract Neurol 12(5):289–298

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lazorthes Y, Sol J, Sallerin B, Verdié J (2002) The surgicalmanagement of spasticity. Eur J Neurol. 9(1):35–41 (dicussion 53–61)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Marrawi J, Mertens P, Luaute J et al (2006) Long term functional results of selective peripheral neurotomy for the treatment of spastic upper limb: prospective study in 31 patients. J Neurosurg 104(2):215–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mayer M (2002) Neurophysiological and kinesiological aspects of spastic gait: the need for a functional approach. Funct Neurol 17(1):11–17

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ozcakir S, Sivrioglu K (2007) Botulinum Toxin in Poststroke Spasticity. Clin Med Res 5(2):132–138

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Reynolds R, Morton R, Walker M, Massagli T, Browd S (2014) Role of dorsal rhizotomy in spinal cord injury-induced spasticity. J Neurosurg Pediatr 14(3):266–270

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Rode G, Maupas E, Luaute J, Courtois-Jacquin S, Boisson D (2003) Medical treatment of spasticity. Neurochirurgie 49(2–3 Pt 2):247–255

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Roujeau T, Di Rocco F, Zérah M (2008) Transition from childhood to adulthood and management of spasticity]. Neurochirurgie 54(5):618–620

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Scheinberg A, Hall K, Lam L, O’Flaherty S (2006) Baclofen in children with cerebral palsy: a double-blind cross-over pilot study. J Paediatr Child Health 42(11):715–720

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Steinbok P (2013) Long-term effect of selective dorsal rhizotomy. Dev Med Child Neurol 55(7):586

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Steinbok P (2015) Outcomes after selective dorsal rhizotomy. Dev Med Child Neurol 57(3):214–215

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Taira T, Hori T (2008) Selective peripheral neurotomy and selective dorsal rhizotomy. Brain Nerve 60(12):1427–1436

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Taricco M, Pagliacci M, Telaro E, Adone R (2006) Pharmacological interventions for spasticity following spinal cord injury: results of a Cochrane systematic review. Eura Medicophys 42(1):5–15

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohamed I. Barakat.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Additional information

This article, ‘Surgical management of intractable spasticity’, Mohamed I. Barakat, Waleed Elhady, Mohamed Gouda, Mahmoud Taha and Ibrahim Metwaly published in European Spine Journal, March 2016, Vol. 25, Issue 3, pp 928-935, First online: 14 December 2015, DOI 10.1007/s00586-015-4326-y, has been retracted at the request of the Editor-in-Chief because this article has considerable overlap with the paper published in the Zagazeg University Journal, Egypt, ISSN 1110-1431, in 10-9-2012. Therefore it does not represent entirely original material and has to be withdrawn. The authors have agreed to retract the article, recognizing that it constitutes duplicate publication. In addition Mohamed Gouda asked to remove his name from the paper as a co-author because he had no direct or indirect relations with this paper.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barakat, M.I., Elhady, W., Gouda, M. et al. RETRACTED ARTICLE: Surgical management of intractable spasticity. Eur Spine J 25, 928–935 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4326-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4326-y

Keywords

Navigation