Skip to main content
Log in

The influence of brace immobilization on the remodeling potential of thoracolumbar impaction fractures in children and adolescents

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Different treatment methods including immediate mobilization with or without brace, bed rest or immobilization using thoracolumbosacral orthosis have been applied for stable compression fractures of the pediatric spine. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of bracing on the remodeling capacity of pediatric thoracolumbar type A 1.2 impaction fractures. Additionally, the prevalence of pain and functional disabilities were assessed.

Methods

All children treated conservatively between 2000 and 2011 with impaction fractures of the thoracolumbar spine (A 1.2) were included and re-invited for a clinical [including VAS 0–100, Oswestry disability index (ODI)] and radiological follow-up examination. Changes of the sagittal index (SI) at the time of the accident, the latest control visit and at the follow-up examination were analyzed.

Results

Seventy-two patients with a mean age of 12 years (1.8–18 years) and a total number of 133 fractured vertebrae were included. The mean SI at the time of injury was 0.76 (range 0.45–0.94, SD 0.08); 34 patients with 67 fractured vertebrae were included in the follow-up examination after a mean of 7.9 years (2.4–13.1 years). The mean SI of the 67 affected vertebrae at follow-up significantly increased to 0.92 (range 0.74–1, SD 0.06). The initial treatment regimen (brace vs no brace) did not influence the remodeling capacity. More than half of the patients (n = 18, 53 %) complained about occasional back-related pain which was not associated with the remodeling process. The mean ODI was 5.8 (range 0–26, SD 6.6) and the mean VAS of the re-evaluated patients was 87 (range 53–100, SD 14).

Conclusions

A significant remodeling capacity of thoracolumbar vertebral impaction fractures sustained in childhood is demonstrated. Bracing does not seem to influence the long-term outcome of these injuries. More studies have to be performed to define the role of bracing in these fractures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Daniels AH, Sobel AD, Eberson CP (2013) Pediatric thoracolumbar spine trauma. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 21(12):707–716. doi:10.5435/JAAOS-21-12-707

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Schalamon J, Dampf S, Singer G, Ainoedhofer H, Petnehazy T, Hoellwarth ME, Saxena AK (2011) Evaluation of fractures in children and adolescents in a Level I Trauma Center in Austria. J Trauma 71(2):E19–E25. doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e3181f8a903

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Magerl F, Aebi M, Gertzbein SD, Harms J, Nazarian S (1994) A comprehensive classification of thoracic and lumbar injuries. Eur Spine J 3(4):184–201

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dogan S, Safavi-Abbasi S, Theodore N, Chang SW, Horn EM, Mariwalla NR, Rekate HL, Sonntag VK (2007) Thoracolumbar and sacral spinal injuries in children and adolescents: a review of 89 cases. J Neurosurg 106(6 Suppl):426–433. doi:10.3171/ped.2007.106.6.426

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Rajasekaran S (2010) Thoracolumbar burst fractures without neurological deficit: the role for conservative treatment. Eur Spine J 19(Suppl 1):S40–S47. doi:10.1007/s00586-009-1122-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sawyer JR, Beebe M, Creek AT, Yantis M, Kelly DM, Warner WC Jr (2012) Age-related patterns of spine injury in children involved in all-terrain vehicle accidents. J Pediatr Orthop 32(5):435–439. doi:10.1097/BPO.0b013e318259f2b9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Karlsson MK, Moller A, Hasserius R, Besjakov J, Karlsson C, Ohlin A (2003) A modeling capacity of vertebral fractures exists during growth: an up-to-47-year follow-up. Spine 28(18):2087–2092. doi:10.1097/01.BRS.0000084680.76654.B1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Moller A, Hasserius R, Besjakov J, Ohlin A, Karlsson M (2006) Vertebral fractures in late adolescence: a 27 to 47-year follow-up. Eur Spine J 15(8):1247–1254. doi:10.1007/s00586-005-0043-2

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Angelliaume A, Bouty A, Sales De Gauzy J, Vital JM, Gille O, Boissiere L, Tournier C, Aunoble S, Pontailler JR, Lefevre Y (2015) Post-trauma scoliosis after conservative treatment of thoracolumbar spinal fracture in children and adolescents: results in 48 patients. Eur Spine J. doi:10.1007/s00586-014-3744-6

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fairbank JC, Couper J, Davies JB, O’Brien JP (1980) The Oswestry low back pain disability questionnaire. Physiotherapy 66(8):271–273

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sayama C, Chen T, Trost G, Jea A (2014) A review of pediatric lumbar spine trauma. Neurosurg Focus 37(1):E6. doi:10.3171/2014.5.FOCUS1490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Santiago R, Guenther E, Carroll K, Junkins EP Jr (2006) The clinical presentation of pediatric thoracolumbar fractures. J Trauma 60(1):187–192. doi:10.1097/01.ta.0000200852.56822.77

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Sledge JB, Allred D, Hyman J (2001) Use of magnetic resonance imaging in evaluating injuries to the pediatric thoracolumbar spine. J Pediatr Orthop 21(3):288–293

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Gaca AM, Barnhart HX, Bisset GS 3rd (2010) Evaluation of wedging of lower thoracic and upper lumbar vertebral bodies in the pediatric population. AJR 194(2):516–520. doi:10.2214/AJR.09.3065

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Lefevre Y, Journeau P, Angelliaume A, Bouty A, Dobremez E (2014) Proximal humerus fractures in children and adolescents. OTSR 100(1 Suppl):S149–S156. doi:10.1016/j.otsr.2013.06.010

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Zimmermann R, Gschwentner M, Pechlaner S, Gabl M (2004) Remodeling capacity and functional outcome of palmarly versus dorsally displaced pediatric radius fractures in the distal one-third. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124(1):42–48. doi:10.1007/s00402-003-0552-6

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Parisini P, Di Silvestre M, Greggi T (2002) Treatment of spinal fractures in children and adolescents: long-term results in 44 patients. Spine 27(18):1989–1994

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rathleff MS, Roos EM, Olesen JL, Rasmussen S (2013) High prevalence of daily and multi-site pain—a cross-sectional population-based study among 3000 Danish adolescents. BMC pediatrics 13:191. doi:10.1186/1471-2431-13-191

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Georg Singer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

None.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Singer, G., Parzer, S., Castellani, C. et al. The influence of brace immobilization on the remodeling potential of thoracolumbar impaction fractures in children and adolescents. Eur Spine J 25, 607–613 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4250-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-4250-1

Keywords

Navigation