Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Diagnostic accuracy of multifidus muscle spontaneous activity by needle electromyography for the detection of lumbar foraminal and lateral exit-zone stenosis

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The medial branch of the posterior ramus of the lumbar spinal nerve is well known to be innervated independently and to end in the multifidus muscle without anastomosis. This prospective cohort study aimed to determine the diagnostic specificity and sensitivity of multifidus muscle denervation (MMD) by needle electromyography (N-EMG) for lumbar foraminal and lateral exit-zone stenosis (LF/LEZS).

Methods

We enrolled 61 consecutive patients experiencing unilateral dysesthesia and/or leg pain in the L4 or L5 regions with suspicious LF/LEZS. The Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for leg pain, and N-EMG were examined. In this study protocol, all patients received at least 3 months of conservative therapy. Surgery was performed on patients who experienced less than 50 % VAS pain relief compared with their initial score after confirming the responsible level by lumbar nerve root block. The specificity of N-EMG was the proportion of patients who improved with conservative therapies (non-surgery) after 3 months. The sensitivity of N-EMG was the proportion of patients who improved with surgical therapies (surgery) after more than 12 months.

Results

Twenty-three patients underwent surgery. The initial lower JOA, positive Kemp test and motor weakness were significantly higher in the surgery group. The MMD by N-EMG indicated that 34 of 38 patients were negative in the non-surgery group. In the surgery group, 21 of 23 patients were positive. The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity were 91.3 and 92.1 %, respectively.

Conclusions

Needle electromyography is a simple and available additional method for the diagnosis of LF/LEZS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kunogi J, Hasue M (1991) Diagnosis and operative treatment of intraforaminal and extraforaminal nerve root compression. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 16:1312–1320

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lee CK, Rauschning W, Glenn W (1988) Lateral lumbar spinal canal stenosis: classification, pathologic anatomy and surgical decompression. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 13:313–320

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Maher CO, Henderson FC (1999) Lateral exit-zone stenosis and lumbar radiculopathy. J Neurosurg 90:52–58

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Matsumoto M, Watanabe K, Ishii K, Tsuji T, Takaishi H, Nakamura M, Toyama Y, Chiba K (2010) Posterior decompression surgery for extraforaminal entrapment of the fifth lumbar spinal nerve at the lumbosacral junction. J Neurosurg Spine 12:72–81

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Park YK, Kim JH, Chung HS, Suh JK (2003) Microsurgical midline approach for the decompression of extraforaminal stenosis in L5-S1. J Neurosurg 98:264–270

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Wiltse LL, Guyer RD, Spencer CW, Glenn WV, Porter IS (1984) Alar transverse process impingement of the L5 spinal nerve: the far-out syndrome. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 9:31–41

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Nakao S, Yoshida M, Yamada H, Hashizume H (2010) A new 3-dimensional computed tomography imaging method to diagnose extraforaminal stenosis at the lumbosacral junction. J Spinal Disord Tech 23:e47–e52

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Taguchi T, Kawai S, Hashiguchi T (2002) Reassessment of the diagnostic value of selective lumbosacral radiculography. J Neuroradiol 29:122–127

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chang HS, Zidan I, Fujisawa N, Matsui T (2011) Microsurgical posterolateral transmuscular approach for lumbar foraminal stenosis. J Spinal Disord Tech 24:302–307

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Aota Y, Niwa T, Yoshikawa K, Fujiwara A, Asada T, Saito T (2007) Magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance myelography in the presurgical diagnosis of lumbar foraminal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:896–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Saito T, Steinke H, Miyaki T, Nawa S, Umemoto K, Miyakawa K, Wakao N, Asamoto K, Nakano T (2013) Analysis of the posterior ramus of the lumbar spinal nerve: the structure of the posterior ramus of the spinal nerve. Anesthesiology 118:88–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bogduk N, Wilson AS, Tynan W (1982) The human lumbar dorsal rami. J Anat 134:383–397

    PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Izumida S, Inoue S (1986) Assessment of treatment for low back pain. J Jpn Orthop Assoc 60:391–394

    Google Scholar 

  14. Huskisson EC (1974) Measurement of pain. Lancet 2:1127–1131

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Yeom JS, Lee JW, Park KW, Chang BS, Lee CK, Buchowski JM, Riew KD (2008) Value of diagnostic lumbar selective nerve root block: a prospective controlled study. AJNR 29:1017–1023

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Jacoby GW (1895) Lumbar puncture of the subarachnoid space. NY Med J 28:813–818

    Google Scholar 

  17. Haig AJ (1997) Clinical experience with paraspinal mapping. II: a simplified technique that eliminates three-fourths of needle insertions. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 78:1185–1190

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kimura J (2001) Electrodiagnosis in disease of nerve and muscle. Principles and practice, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tong HC, Young IA, Koch J, Haig AJ, Yamakawa KS, Wallbom A (2003) Paraspinal electromyography that compares concentric with monopolar needles: a blinded study. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 82:917–924

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Johnson EW, Melvin JL (1971) Value of electromyography in lumbar radiculopathy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 52:239–243

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Buchthal F, Rosenfalck P (1966) Spontaneous electrical activity of human muscle. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 20:321–336

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Date ES, Mar EY, Bugola MR, Teraoka JK (1996) The prevalence of lumbar paraspinal spontaneous activity in asymptomatic subjects. Muscle Nerve 19:350–354

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Tong HC, Haig AJ, Yamakawa KS, Miner JA (2005) Paraspinal electromyography: age-correlated normative values in asymptomatic subjects. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:E499–E502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Haig AJ, Geisser ME, Tong HC, Yamakawa KS, Quint DJ, Hoff JT, Chiodo A, Miner JA, Phalke VV (2007) Electromyographic and magnetic resonance imaging to predict lumbar stenosis, low-back pain, and no back symptoms. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:358–366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Morimoto D, Isu T, Kim K, Imai T, Yamazaki K, Matsumoto R, Isobe M (2013) Surgical treatment of superior cluneal nerve entrapment neuropathy. J Neurosurg Spine 19:71–75

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank the following special technicians for their assistance with the study: Aichi Medical University (Mrs. Taeko Kamiya, Mrs. Yuka Shibata, Mr. Hiroshi Moriya). This work was partially supported by the Grant. Research Funding; AO Spine Japan. Consultant; none. Royalty/IP Payments; none. Other compensation; none. This research received the Grant from AO Spine Japan.

Conflict of interest

None.

Ethical standard

The study was approved by the institutional review board of the hospital. The IRB number was 11-052.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mikinobu Takeuchi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Takeuchi, M., Wakao, N., Kamiya, M. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of multifidus muscle spontaneous activity by needle electromyography for the detection of lumbar foraminal and lateral exit-zone stenosis. Eur Spine J 24, 2281–2287 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3846-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-015-3846-9

Keywords

Navigation