Abstract
Purpose
We present 120 patients (37 males, 83 females) affected by thoracic lumbar scoliosis, treated by posterior instrumented arthrodesis with the insertion of pedicle screws by “free hand technique”, without any image guided system, radioscopy use during insertion or intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring.
Methods
Seventy-two (60%) patients have been treated by hybrid instrumentation with lumbar and thoracic screws, hooks and wires at thoracic levels, while the remaining 48 (40%) patients have used only lumbar and thoracic pedicle screws. Mean Cobb grades value of the main scoliotic curve was 73° before surgery in patients treated by hybrid instrumentation, reduced to 37.5° after surgery. In patients treated only by screws, mean Cobb grades value of the main scoliotic curve was 65°, reduced to 16° after surgery.
Results
Minimum follow up has been 3 years; mean patient age at surgery was 15 years and 4 months. We placed a total number of 1,004 pedicle screws, 487 of which at thoracic level. In 12 patients (10%) a total number of 20 screws were misplaced at postoperatory exam, without any clinical complication for the patients or consequences on the arthrodesis or on maintaining the correction of the curve.
Conclusions
In our experience pedicle screws is the method that leads to best correction and balance on vertebral bodies, with best results at distance concerning correction maintaining. Our experience shows that even at thoracic level, pedicle screws insertion by free-hand technique is safe and reliable.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Xu R, Ebraheim NA, Ou Y, Yeasting RA (1998) Anatomic consideration of pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine: Roy-Camille technique versus open-lamina technique. Spine 23(9):1065–1068
Yongjung JK, Lenke LG (2005) Thoracic pedicle screw placement: free-hand technique. Neurol India 53(4):512–519
Rampersaud RR, Simon DA, Foley KT (2001) Accuracy requirements for image-guided spinal pedicle screw placement. Spine 26(4):352–359
Parent S, Labelle H, Skalli W, de Guise J (2004) Thoracic pedicle morphometry in vertebrae from scoliotic spines. Spine 29:239–248
Misenheimer GR, Peek RD, Wiltse LL, Rothman SL, Widell EH (1989) Anatomic analysis of pedicle cortical and cancellous diameter as related to screw size. Spine 14:367–372
Kothe R, O’Holleran JD, Liu W, Panjabi MM (1996) Internal architecture of the thoracic pedicle. An anatomic study. Spine 21:264–270
Hou S, Hu R, Shi Y (1993) Pedicle morphology of the lower thoracic and lumbar spine in a Chinese population. Spine 18:1850–1855
Panjabi MM, O’Holleran JD, Crisco JJ, Kothe R (1997) Compexity of the thoracic spine pedicle anatomy. Eur Spine J 6:19–24
Zindrick MR, Knight GW, Sartori MJ, Carnevale TJ, Patwardhan AG, Lorentz MA (2000) Pedicle morphology in the immature thoracolumbar spine. Spine 25:2726–2735
Vaccaro AR, Rizzolo SJ, Allardyce TJ, Ramsey M, Salvo J, Balderston RA, Cotler JM (1995) Placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine. Part I: morphometric analysis of the thoracic vertebrae. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:1193–1199
Ebraheim NA, Jabaly G, Xu R, Yeasting RA (1997) Anatomic relations of the thoracic pedicle to the adjacent neural structures. Spine 22:1553–1557
Vaccaro AR, Rizzolo SJ, Baldestron RA, Allardyce TJ, Garfin SR, Dolinskas C, An HS (1995) Placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine. Part II: an anatomical and radiographic assessment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:1200–1206
Cinotti G, Gumina S, Ripani M, Postacchini F (1999) Pedicle instrumentation in the thoracic spine. A morphometric and cadaveric study for placement of screws. Spine 24:114–119
Mattei TA, Meneses MS, Milano JB, Ramina R (2009) Free hand technique for thoracolumbar pedicle screw instrumentation: critical appraisal of current “State of Art”. Neurol India 57:715–721
Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, Cho YS, Riew KD (2004) Free hand pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine: is it safe? Spine 29(3):333–342
Chung KJ, Shu SW, Desai S, Song HR (2008) Ideal entry point for the thoracic pedicle screw during the free hand technique. Int Orthop 32:657–662
Castro WH, Halm H, Jerosch J, Malms J, Steinbeck J, Blasius S (2006) Accuracy of pedicle screw placement in lumbar vertebrae. Spine 21:1320–1324
Farber GL, Place HM, Mazur RA, Jones DE, Damiano TR (1995) Accuracy of pedicle screw placement in lumbar fusions by plain radiographs and computed tomography. Spine 20:1494–1499
Berlemann U, Heini P, Muller U, Stoupis C, Schwarzenbach O (1997) Reliability of pedicle screw assessment utilizing plain radiographs versus CT reconstruction. Eur Spine J 6:406–410
Liljenqvist UR, Halm HF, Link TM (1997) Pedicle screw instrumentation of the thoracic spine in idiopathic scoliosis. Spine 22:2239–2245
Weinstein JN, Spratt KF, Spengler D, Brick C, Reid S (1988) Spinal pedicle fixation: reliability and validity of roentgenogram-based assessment and surgical factors on successful screw placement. Spine 13:1012–1018
Lonstein JE, Denis F, Perra JH, Pinto MR, Smith MD, Winter RB (2001) Complications associated with pedicle screws. J Bone Joint Surg Am 81(11):1519–1528
Halm HF, Niemer T, Link TM (2000) Segmental pedicle screw instrumentation in idiopathic thoracolumbar and lumbar scoliosis. Eur Spine J 9:192–197
Belmont PJ, Klemme WR, Dhawan A (2001) In vivo accuracy of thoracic pedicle screws. Spine 26:2340–2346
Papin P, Arlet V, Marchesi D, Rosenblatt B, Aebi M (1999) Unusual presentation of spinal cord compression related to misplaced pedicle screws in thoracic scoliosis. Eur Spine J 8:156–160
Conflict of interest
None.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Crostelli, M., Mazza, O. & Mariani, M. Free-hand pedicle screws insertion technique in the treatment of 120 consecutive scoliosis cases operated without use of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring. Eur Spine J 21 (Suppl 1), 43–49 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2218-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-012-2218-y