Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Understanding fascial anatomy and interfascial communication: implications in regional anesthesia

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Journal of Anesthesia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the extensive application of ultrasound in regional anesthesia, there has been rapid development of interfascial plane block techniques recently. Compared with neuraxial anesthesia or nerve plexus blocks, the interfascial plane blocks have many advantages, such as technical simplicity, fewer complications and comparable or better analgesia. The concept of fascial interconnectivity is fundamental in understanding the effects and complications of interfascial plane blocks. Many fascial planes are continuous and communicate with each other without a clear anatomical boundary. The prevertebral fascia of the neck, endothoracic fascia of the chest, transversalis fascia of the abdomen, and the fascia iliaca of the pelvic cavity form a natural fascial continuation. This anatomical feature suggests that the space beneath the cervical prevertebral fascia, the thoracic paravertebral space, the space between transversalis fascia and psoas muscles (psoas major and quadratus lumborum), and the fascia iliaca compartment are a confluent potential cavity. Additionally, the permeability of the fascia at different anatomical locations to local anesthetics is different, which can also influence the block effect and the incidence of complications. This article summarizes the anatomical characteristics and communication relationships of the major fascia which are related to regional anesthesia, and their relationships with block effects and complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stecco C, Tiengo C, Stecco A, Porzionato A, Macchi V, Stern R, De Caro R. Fascia redefined: anatomical features and technical relevance in fascial flap surgery. Surg Radiol Anat. 2013;35:369–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Adstrum S, Hedley G, Schleip R, Stecco C, Yucesoy CA. Defining the fascial system. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2017;21:173–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Elsharkawy H, Pawa A, Mariano ER. Interfascial plane blocks: back to basics. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018;43:341–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Stecco A, Macchi V, Masiero S, Porzionato A, Tiengo C, Stecco C, Delmas V, De Caro R. Pectoral and femoral fasciae: common aspects and regional specializations. Surg Radiol Anat. 2009;31:35–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Willard FH, Vleeming A, Schuenke MD, Danneels L, Schleip R. The thoracolumbar fascia: anatomy, function and clinical considerations. J Anat. 2012;221:507–36.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Xu Z, Mei B, Liu M, Tu L, Zhang H, Zhang M. Fibrous configuration of the fascia iliaca compartment: an epoxy sheet plastination and confocal microscopy study. Sci Rep. 2020;10:1548.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Pandit JJ, Dutta D, Morris JF. Spread of injectate with superficial cervical plexus block in humans: an anatomical study. Br J Anaesth. 2003;91:733–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Havet E, Duparc F, Tobenas-Dujardin AC, Muller JM, Fréger P. Morphometric study of the shoulder and subclavicular innervation by the intermediate and lateral branches of supraclavicular nerves. Surg Radiol Anat. 2007;29:605–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Vieira F, Allen SM, Stocks RMS, Thompson JW. Deep neck infection. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2008;41:459–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Seidel R, Schulze M, Zukowski K. Wree a [Ultrasound-guided intermediate cervical plexus block. Anatomical study]. Anaesthesist. 2015;64:446–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Seidel R, Zukowski K, Wree A, Schulze M. Ultrasound-guided intermediate cervical plexus and additional peripheral facial nerve block for carotid endarterectomy : a prospective pilot study. Anaesthesist. 2018;67:907–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kapral S, Krafft P, Gosch M, Fleischmann D, Weinstabl C. Ultrasound imaging for stellate ganglion block: direct visualization of puncture site and local anesthetic spread. A pilot study Reg Anesth. 1995;20:323–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Shibata Y, Fujiwara Y, Komatsu T. A new approach of ultrasound-guided stellate ganglion block. Anesth Analg. 2007;105:550–1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Usui Y, Kobayashi T, Kakinuma H, Watanabe K, Kitajima T, Matsuno K. An anatomical basis for blocking of the deep cervical plexus and cervical sympathetic tract using an ultrasound-guided technique. Anesth Analg. 2010;110:964–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Telford RJ, Stoneham MD. Correct nomenclature of superficial cervical plexus blocks. Br J Anaesth. 2004;92:775.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Choquet O, Dadure C, Capdevila X. Ultrasound-guided deep or intermediate cervical plexus block: the target should be the posterior cervical space. Anesth Analg. 2010;111:1563–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim JS, Joe HB, Park MC, Ahn H, Lee SY, Chae YJ. Postoperative analgesic effect of ultrasound-guided intermediate cervical plexus block on unipolar sternocleidomastoid release with myectomy in pediatric patients with congenital muscular torticollis: a prospective, randomized controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018;43:634–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kim JS, Lee J, Soh EY, Ahn H, Sang EO, Lee JD, Han BJ. Analgesic effects of ultrasound-guided serratus-intercostal plane block and ultrasound-guided intermediate cervical plexus block after single-incision transaxillary robotic thyroidectomy: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016;41:584–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bhoi D, Bhatia R, Mohan VK, Thakar A, Kalagara R, Sikka K. Efficacy of ultrasound-guided intermediate cervical plexus block by anterior route for perioperative analgesia in robotic thyroidectomy by retroauricular approach: a case series. A A Pract. 2021;15:e01501.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Calderon AL, Zetlaoui P, Benatir F, Davidson J, Desebbe O, Rahali N, Truc C, Feugier P, Lermusiaux P, Allaouchiche B, Boselli E. Ultrasound-guided intermediate cervical plexus block for carotid endarterectomy using a new anterior approach: a two-centre prospective observational study. Anaesthesia. 2015;70:445–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim J-S, Ko JS, Bang S, Kim H, Lee SY. Cervical plexus block. Korean J Anesthesiol. 2018;71:274–88.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Martusevicius R, Swiatek F, Joergensen LG, Nielsen HB. Ultrasound-guided locoregional anaesthesia for carotid endarterectomy: a prospective observational study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012;44:27–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Simon MM. Recurrent laryngeal nerve in thyroid surgery. Am J Surg. 1943;60:212–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kulekci M, Batioglu-Karaaltin A, Saatci O, Uzun I. Relationship between the branches of the recurrent laryngeal nerve and the inferior thyroid artery. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol. 2012;121:650–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Palliyalil M, Anehosur V, Joshi A, Acharya S. Histological assessment of the carotid sheath in patients with oral squamous cell carcinoma. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017;75:2465–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Leblanc I, Chterev V, Rekik M, Boura B, Costanzo A, Bourel P, Combes M, Philip I. Safety and efficiency of ultrasound-guided intermediate cervical plexus block for carotid surgery. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2016;35:109–14.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Alilet A, Petit P, Devaux B, Joly C, Samain E, Pili-Floury S, Besch G. Ultrasound-guided intermediate cervical block versus superficial cervical block for carotid artery endarterectomy: the randomized-controlled CERVECHO trial. Anaesth Crit Care Pain Med. 2017;36:91–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Civelek E, Karasu A, Cansever T, Hepgul K, Kiris T, Sabanc A, Canbolat A. Surgical anatomy of the cervical sympathetic trunk during anterolateral approach to cervical spine. Eur Spine J. 2008;17:991–5.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Goel V, Patwardhan AM, Ibrahim M, Howe CL, Schultz DM, Shankar H. Complications associated with stellate ganglion nerve block: a systematic review. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019;44:669–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Li HP, Zhang WB, Wang LG. Applied anatomy of stellate ganglion block (in Chinese). Chin J Anat Clin. 2005;10:161–2.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Winnie AP. Interscalene brachial plexus block. Anesth Analg. 1970;49:455–66.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Lee JH, Cho SH, Kim SH, Chae WS, Jin HC, Lee JS, Kim YI. Ropivacaine for ultrasound-guided interscalene block: 5 mL provides similar analgesia but less phrenic nerve paralysis than 10 mL. Can J Anaesth. 2011;58:1001–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Stundner O, Meissnitzer M, Brummett CM, Moser S, Forstner R, Koköfer A, Danninger T, Gerner P, Kirchmair L, Fritsch G. Comparison of tissue distribution, phrenic nerve involvement, and epidural spread in standard- vs low-volume ultrasound-guided interscalene plexus block using contrast magnetic resonance imaging: a randomized, controlled trial. Br J Anaesth. 2016;116:405–12.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Mian A, Chaudhry I, Huang R, Rizk E, Tubbs RS, Loukas M. Brachial plexus anesthesia: a review of the relevant anatomy, complications, and anatomical variations. Clin Anat. 2014;27:210–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Takeuchi M, Aoyama M, Wakao N, Tawada Y, Kamiya M, Osuka K, Matsuo N, Takayasu M. Prevalence of C7 level anomalies at the C7 level: an important landmark for cervical nerve ultrasonography. Acta Radiol. 2016;57:318–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Guo CW, Ma JX, Ma XL, Lu B, Wang Y, Tian AX, Sun L, Wang Y, Dong BC, Teng YB. Supraclavicular block versus interscalene brachial plexus block for shoulder surgery: a meta-analysis of clinical control trials. Int J Surg. 2017;45:85–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Lu J, Ebraheim NA, Georgiadis GM, Yang H, Yeasting RA. Anatomic considerations of the vertebral artery: implications for anterior decompression of the cervical spine. J Spinal Disord. 1998;11:233–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Dugan DJ, Samson PC. Surgical significance of the endothoracic fascia. The anatomic basis for empyemectomy and other extrapleural technics. Am J Surg. 1975;130:151–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Karmakar MK, Chung DC. Variability of a thoracic paravertebral block. Are we ignoring the endothoracic fascia? Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2000;25:325–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Taketa Y, Fujitani T. Ultrasound-guided high-thoracic paravertebral block relieves referred pain caused by cervical spondylosis and provides stellate ganglion-blocking effect. J Clin Anesth. 2016;34:490–1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Kim YH, Kim SY, Lee YJ, Kim ED. A prospective, randomized cross-over trial of T2 paravertebral block as a sympathetic block in complex regional pain syndrome. Pain Physician. 2019;22:E417–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Karmakar MK, Gin T, Ho AM. Ipsilateral thoraco-lumbar anaesthesia and paravertebral spread after low thoracic paravertebral injection. Br J Anaesth. 2001;87:312–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Saito T, Den S, Tanuma K, Tanuma Y, Carney E, Carlsson C. Anatomical bases for paravertebral anesthetic block: fluid communication between the thoracic and lumbar paravertebral regions. Surg Radiol Anat. 1999;21:359–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Dam M, Moriggl B, Hansen CK, Hoermann R, Bendtsen TF, Børglum J. The pathway of injectate spread with the transmuscular quadratus lumborum block: a cadaver study. Anesth Analg. 2017;125:303–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Elsharkawy H, El-Boghdadly K, Kolli S, Esa WAS, DeGrande S, Soliman LM, Drake RL. Injectate spread following anterior sub-costal and posterior approaches to the quadratus lumborum block: a comparative cadaveric study. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2017;34:587–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Blanco R. 271. Tap block under ultrasound guidance: the description of a “no pops” technique. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2007;32:130.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Brglum J, Moriggl B, Jensen K, Lnnqvist PA, Christensen AF, Sauter A, Bendtsen TF. Ultrasound-guided transmuscular quadratus lumborum blockade. Br J Anaesth. 2013. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/el_9919.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Elsharkawy H. Quadratus lumborum block with paramedian sagittal oblique (subcostal) approach. Anaesthesia. 2016;71:241–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Li H, Ma D, Liu Y, Wang Y. A transverse approach for ultrasound-guided anterior quadratus lumborum block at the lateral supra-arcuate ligament. Anaesthesia. 2020;75:1400–1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Shi R, Li H, Wang Y. Dermatomal coverage of single-injection ultrasound-guided parasagittal approach to anterior quadratus lumborum block at the lateral supra-arcuate ligament. J Anesth. 2021;35:307–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Li H, Shi R, Shi D, Wang R, Liu Y, Wang Y. Anterior quadratus lumborum block at the lateral supra-arcuate ligament versus transmuscular quadratus lumborum block for postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic nephrectomy: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Anesth. 2021;75:110561.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Hebbard PD. Transversalis fascia plane block, a novel ultrasound-guided abdominal wall nerve block. Can J Anaesth. 2009;56:618–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Chin KJ, Chan V, Hebbard P, Tan JS, Harris M, Factor D. Ultrasound-guided transversalis fascia plane block provides analgesia for anterior iliac crest bone graft harvesting. Can J Anaesth. 2012;59:122–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Serifsoy TE, Tulgar S, Selvi O, Senturk O, Ilter E, Peker BH, Ozer Z. Evaluation of ultrasound-guided transversalis fascia plane block for postoperative analgesia in cesarean section: a prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial. J Clin Anesth. 2020;59:56–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Ahiskalioglu A, Aydin ME, Doymus O, Yayik AM, Celik EC. Ultrasound guided transversalis fascia plane block for lower abdominal surgery: first pediatric report. J Clin Anesth. 2019;55:130–1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Elsharkawy H, El-Boghdadly K, Barrington M. Quadratus lumborum block: anatomical concepts, mechanisms, and techniques. Anesthesiology. 2019;130:322–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Lee S, Goetz T, Gharapetian A. Unanticipated motor weakness with ultrasound-guided transversalis fascia plane block. A A Case Rep. 2015;5:124–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Rosario DJ, Jacob S, Luntley J, Skinner PP, Raftery AT. Mechanism of femoral nerve palsy complicating percutaneous ilioinguinal field block. Br J Anaesth. 1997;78:314–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Dalens B, Vanneuville G, Tanguy A. Comparison of the fascia iliaca compartment block with the 3-in-1 block in children. Anesth Analg. 1989;69:705–13.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Dolan J, Williams A, Murney E, Smith M, Kenny G. Ultrasound guided fascia iliaca block: a comparison with the loss of resistance technique. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2008;33:526–31.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Anagnostopoulou S, Kostopanagiotou G, Paraskeuopoulos T, Chantzi C, Lolis E, Saranteas T. Anatomic variations of the obturator nerve in the inguinal region: implications in conventional and ultrasound regional anesthesia techniques. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009;34:33–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Vermeylen K, Desmet M, Leunen I, Soetens F, Neyrinck A, Carens D, Caerts B, Seynaeve P, Hadzic A, Van de Velde M. Supra-inguinal injection for fascia iliaca compartment block results in more consistent spread towards the lumbar plexus than an infra-inguinal injection: a volunteer study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019;44:483–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Bendtsen TF, Pedersen EM, Peng P. Course of the obturator nerve. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2019;44:1039–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Bendtsen TF, Pedersen EM, Moriggl B, Hebbard P, Ivanusic J, Børglum J, Nielsen TD, Peng P. Anatomical considerations for obturator nerve block with fascia iliaca compartment block. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021;46:806–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Karmakar MK. Thoracic paravertebral block. Anesthesiology. 2001;95:771–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Beijing Hospitals Authority Clinical Medicine Development of Special Funding Support (XMLX202106).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Peiqi Shao and Huili Li contributed to the work

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Anesthesiology, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, 100020, China

    Peiqi Shao, Huili Li, Rong Shi & Yun Wang

  2. Department of Anesthesiology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA

    Jinlei Li

Authors
  1. Peiqi Shao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Huili Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rong Shi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jinlei Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yun Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yun Wang.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shao, P., Li, H., Shi, R. et al. Understanding fascial anatomy and interfascial communication: implications in regional anesthesia. J Anesth 36, 554–563 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-022-03082-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00540-022-03082-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation