Abstract
Background
Our previous studies have shown the diagnostic utility of a newly developed dual-focus endoscope with narrow-band imaging (DF-NBI) and simplified dyad criteria for detection of superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SESCC). This clinical trial aimed to study the diagnostic efficacy of DF-NBI with dyad criteria for detecting SESCC compared to white light imaging (WLI).
Methods
This was a single-arm prospective comparative trial. We enrolled 170 consecutive high-risk patients for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Patients were initially examined with WLI by one independent endoscopist and then the other performed DF-NBI blinded to the WLI diagnosis to avoid a carry-over effect. Lesions showing proliferation and/or various shapes of intrapapillary capillary loops (IPCL) under DF-NBI (i.e., dyad criteria) were endoscopically diagnosed as SESCC including high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia. The primary endpoint was sensitivity of WLI and DF-NBI for detecting SESCC. The secondary endpoints were the diagnostic performance (i.e., specificity and accuracy) and inter/intra-observer concordance of DF-NBI with dyad criteria.
Results
A total 77 SESCCs were detected. The sensitivity of DF-NBI for SESCC was significantly higher than that of WLI (91% vs. 51%, P < 0.001). The specificity and accuracy of WLI and DF-NBI using dyad criteria were 100% vs. 84%, and 86% vs. 86%, respectively. Various shapes and proliferation of IPCL showed the highest value in inter-observer and intra-observer agreements (κ = 0.77 and 0.82, respectively).
Conclusion
DF-NBI combined with dyad criteria may be a promising technique with a high sensitivity for diagnosis of SESCC and high inter/intra-observer agreement.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- SESCC:
-
Superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma
- WLI:
-
White light imaging
- NBI:
-
Narrow-band imaging
- CM-NBI:
-
Conventional magnification endoscopy with narrow-band imaging
- DF-NBI:
-
Dual-focus endoscopy with narrow-band imaging
- IPCL:
-
Intrapapillary capillary loop
- IDN:
-
Indefinite for neoplasia
- LGIN:
-
Low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia
- HGIN:
-
High-grade intraepithelial neoplasia
- LPM:
-
Lamina propria mucosae
- MM:
-
Muscularis mucosae
- SM:
-
Submucosa
References
Enzinger PC, Mayer RJ. Esophageal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003;4(349):2241–52.
Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015;136:E359–86.
Muto M, Minashi K, Yano T, et al. Early detection of superficial squamous cell carcinoma in the head and neck region and esophagus by narrow band imaging: a multicenter randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:1566–72.
Goda K, Dobashi A, Yoshimura N, et al. Narrow-band imaging magnifying endoscopy versus lugol chromoendoscopy with pink-color sign assessment in the diagnosis of superficial esophageal squamous neoplasms: a randomised noninferiority trial. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2015;2015:639462.
Gono K, Yamazaki K, Doguchi N, et al. Endoscopic observation of tissue by narrow band illumination. Opt Rev. 2003;10:211–5.
Goda K, Dobashi A, Tajiri H. Perspectives on narrow-band imaging endoscopy for superficial squamous neoplasms of the orohypopharynx and esophagus. Dig Endosc. 2014;26(Suppl 1):1–11.
Goda K, Dobashi A, Yoshimura N, et al. Dual-focus versus conventional magnification endoscopy for the diagnosis of superficial squamous neoplasms in the pharynx and esophagus: a randomized trial. Endoscopy. 2016;48:321–9.
Wallace MB, Crook JE, Coe S, et al. Accuracy of in vivo colorectal polyp discrimination by using dual-focus high-definition narrow-band imaging colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014;80:1072–87.
Prueksapanich P, Pittayanon R, Rerknimitr R, et al. Value of probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) and dual focus narrow-band imaging (dNBI) in diagnosing early squamous cell neoplasms in esophageal Lugol’s voiding lesions. Endosc Int Open. 2015;3:E281–8.
Szura M, Pasternak A, Bucki K, et al. Two-stage optical system for colorectal polyp assessments. Surg Endosc. 2016;30:204–14.
Inoue H, Honda T, Nagai K, et al. Ultra-high magnification endoscopic observation of carcinoma in situ. Dig Endosc. 1997;1:16–8.
Yoshida T, Inoue H, Usui S, et al. Narrow-band imaging system with magnifying endoscopy for superficial esophageal lesions. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004;59:288–95.
Kaga M, Inoue H, Kudo SE, et al. Microvascular architecture of early esophageal neoplasia. Oncol Rep. 2011;26:1063–7.
Sato H, Inoue H, Ikeda H, et al. Utility of intrapapillary capillary loops seen on magnifying narrow-band imaging in estimating invasive depth of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Endoscopy. 2015;47:122–8.
Ishihara R, Inoue T, Uedo N, et al. Significance of each narrow-band imaging finding in diagnosing squamous mucosal high-grade neoplasia of the esophagus. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2010;25:1410–5.
Minami H, Inoue H, Ikeda H, et al. Usefulness of background coloration in detection of esophago-pharyngeal lesions using NBI magnification. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2012;2012:529782.
Mochizuki Y, Saito Y, Kobori A, et al. Magnified endoscopy combined with narrow band imaging of minimal superficial esophageal neoplasia-indicators to differentiate intraepithelial neoplasias. J Gastrointest Cancer. 2012;43:599–606.
Kanzaki H, Ishihara R, Ishiguro S, et al. Histological features responsible for brownish epithelium in squamous neoplasia of the esophagus by narrow band imaging. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;28:274–8.
Takahashi M, Shimizu Y, Ono M, et al. Endoscopic diagnosis of early neoplasia of the esophagus with narrow band imaging: correlations among background coloration and iodine staining findings. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;29:762–8.
Oyama T, Inoue H, Arima M, et al. Prediction of the invasion depth of superficial squamous cell carcinoma based on microvessel morphology: magnifying endoscopic classification of the Japan Esophageal Society. Esophagus. 2017;14:105–12.
Arima M, Tada M, Arima H. Evaluation of microvascular patterns of superficial esophageal cancers by magnifying endoscopy. Esophagus. 2005;2:191–7.
Dobashi A, Goda K, Yoshimura N, et al. Simplified criteria for diagnosing superficial esophageal squamous neoplasms using Narrow Band Imaging magnifying endoscopy. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22:9196–204.
Nagami Y, Tominaga K, Machida H, et al. Usefulness of non-magnifying narrow-band imaging in screening of early esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a prospective comparative study using propensity score matching. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014;109:845–54.
Lee CT, Chang CY, Lee YC, et al. Narrow-band imaging with magnifying endoscopy for the screening of esophageal cancer in patients with primary head and neck cancers. Endoscopy. 2010;42:613–9.
Muto M, Nakane M, Hitomi Y, et al. Association between aldehyde dehydrogenase gene polymorphisms and the phenomenon of field cancerization in patients with head and neck cancer. Carcinogenesis. 2002;23:1759–65.
Shimizu Y, Omori T, Yokoyama A, et al. Endoscopic diagnosis of early squamous neoplasia of the esophagus with iodine staining: high-grade intra-epithelial neoplasia turns pink within a few minutes. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2008;23:546–50.
Gwet K. Inter-rater reliability: dependency on trait prevalence and marginal homogeneity. Stat Methods Inter-Rater Reliab Assess. 2002;2:1–9.
Japan Esophageal Society. Japanese classification of esophageal cancer. 10th ed. Tokyo: Kanehara and Co Ltd; 2007.
Gabbert HE, Shimoda T, Hainault P, et al. Squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus. In: Hamilton SR, Aaltonen IA, editors. Pathology and genetics of tumours of the digestive system. Lyon: World Health Organization Classification of Tumours; 2000. p. 1–9.
Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–74.
Kodama M, Kakegawa T. Treatment of superficial cancer of the esophagus: a summary of responses to a questionnaire on superficial cancer of the esophagus in Japan. Surgery. 1998;123:432–9.
Ono S, Fujishiro M, Niimi K, et al. Long-term outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal squamous cell neoplasms. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009;70:860–6.
Sharma P, Wani S, Bansal A, et al. A feasibility trial of narrow band imaging endoscopy in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Gastroenterology. 2007;133:454–64 (quiz 674).
Lv J, Liu D, Ma SY, et al. Investigation of relationships among gastroesophageal reflux disease subtypes using narrow band imaging magnifying endoscopy. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19:8391–7.
Kumagai Y, Sobajima J, Higashi M, et al. Angiogenesis in superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: assessment of microvessel density based on immunostaining for CD34 and CD105. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2014;44:526–33.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Study design, clinical and endoscopic patient management, and manuscript writing: Akira Dobashi. Study design, clinical and endoscopic patient management, manuscript writing, and overall director: Kenichi Goda. Research coordinator: Yuko Hara and Hiroaki Matsui. Research coordinator and data analysis: Hiroto Furuhashi. Clinical patient management: Shunsuke Kamba and Masakuni Kobayashi. Pathological diagnosis: Shinichi Hirooka and Shigeharu Hamatani. Data and analysis review and manuscript editing: Elizabeth Rajan. Supervisor for overall study: Kazuki Sumiyama, Masahiro Ikegami and Hisao Tajiri.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Akira Dobashi and Elizabeth Rajan hold a patent on application No. US-62628024. Hisao Tajiri had served on an advisory committee by Eisai. Kazuki Sumiyama is a consultant for Lumendi and Creo Medical. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dobashi, A., Goda, K., Furuhashi, H. et al. Diagnostic efficacy of dual-focus endoscopy with narrow-band imaging using simplified dyad criteria for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. J Gastroenterol 54, 501–510 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-018-1527-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-018-1527-2