Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Changing trends in surgical outcomes after major hepatobiliary resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a single-center experience over 25 years

  • Topics: Recent advanced in treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma
  • Published:
Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery

Abstract

Background/Purpose

Hepatobiliary resection (HBR) for hilar cholangiocarcinoma (HCCa) remains a technically demanding procedure and is still associated with significant rates of morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to characterize changes in surgical outcomes following major HBR for HCCa at a single center over a 25-year period.

Methods

Between 1980 and 2004, 126 patients undergoing preoperative biliary drainage, portal vein embolization, and major HBR were enrolled in this study. The patients were divided into two groups according to the chronological treatment period; i.e., patients who underwent surgery during the initial 20-year period (1980–1999; early group [EG]) and those who underwent surgery during the most recent 5-year period (2000–2004; late group [LG]). Clinicopathological variables were compared retrospectively between the two groups.

Results

The mortality rate improved from 7.9% in the EG to 0% in the LG, but this difference did not reach the level of statistical significance (P = 0.058). The overall survival rate at 1, 3, and 5 years was 82.4%, 43.9%, and 35.2%, respectively. The overall survival rate was similar in the two groups (P = 0.153). Morbidity was documented in 57.1% of all the patients, and was comparable in the two groups (P = 0.471), but the rate of major morbidity was significantly higher in the EG (P = 0.031). Red blood cell and fresh frozen plasma transfusion requirements were significantly reduced in the LG, both in regard to the number of patients and the amount of blood product administered. The mean length of postoperative hospital stay was significantly reduced, from 74.4 + −56.3 days in the EG to 29.0 + −11.8 days in the LG (P < 0.001). Sixty-nine patients (54.8%) had stage III or IV disease (according to the General rules for surgical and pathological studies on cancer of the biliary tract of the Japanese Society of Biliary Surgery), and 55 patients (43.7%) showed positive surgical margins. There were no differences between the two groups in terms of surgical margins or pathological staging.

Conclusions

Improvements were documented in rates of major morbidity, length of hospital stay, and the mortality rate in the LG when compared with the EG. The overall survival rate was similar in the two groups. Blood transfusion requirements were significantly reduced in the LG when compared with the EG. However, the high proportion of patients with positive surgical margins remains a significant problem.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Y Nimura N Hayakawa J Kamiya S Kondo S Shionoya (1990) ArticleTitleHepatic segmentectomy with caudate lobe resection for bile duct carcinoma of the hepatic hilus World J Surg 14 535–44 Occurrence Handle2166381 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF01658686 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK3czkt1entQ%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. M Nagino J Kamiya K Uesaka T Sano H Yamamoto N Hayakawa et al. (2001) ArticleTitleComplications of hepatectomy for hilar cholangiocarcinoma World J Surg 25 1277–83 Occurrence Handle11596890 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s00268-001-0110-8 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3MrltVKrug%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. P Neuhaus S Jonas WO Bechstein R Lohmann C Radke N Kling et al. (1999) ArticleTitleExtended resections for hilar cholangiocarcinoma Ann Surg 230 808–18 Occurrence Handle10615936 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-199912000-00010 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2FotFKrsA%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. M Miyazaki H Ito K Nakagawa S Ambiru H Shimizu T Okaya et al. (1999) ArticleTitleParenchyma-preserving hepatectomy in the surgical treatment of hilar cholangiocarcinoma J Am Coll Surg 189 575–83 Occurrence Handle10589594 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1072-7515(99)00219-7 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2FlsFGisw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. AW Hemming AI Reed S Fujita DP Foley RJ Howard (2005) ArticleTitleSurgical management of hilar cholangiocarcinoma Ann Surg 241 693–702 Occurrence Handle15849505 Occurrence Handle10.1097/01.sla.0000160701.38945.82

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. WR Jarnagin W Bowne DS Klimstra L Ben-Porat K Roggin K Cymes et al. (2005) ArticleTitlePapillary phenotype confers improved survival after resection of hilar cholangiocarcinoma Ann Surg 241 703–14 Occurrence Handle15849506 Occurrence Handle10.1097/01.sla.0000160817.94472.fd

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. B Launois J Terblanche M Lakehal JM Catheline E Bardaxoglou S Landen et al. (1999) ArticleTitleProximal bile duct cancer: high resectability rate and 5-year survival Ann Surg 230 266–75 Occurrence Handle10450742 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-199908000-00018 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1Mznsl2msw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. NS Hadjis JI Blenharn N Alexander IS Benjamin LH Blumgart (1990) ArticleTitleOutcome of radical surgery in hilar cholangiocarcinoma Surgery 107 597–604 Occurrence Handle2162082 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK3c3otFagsw%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. HU Baer SC Stain AR Dennison B Eggers LH Blumgart (1993) ArticleTitleImprovements in survival by aggressive resections of hilar cholangiocarcinoma Ann Surg 217 20–7 Occurrence Handle8380975 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-199301000-00005 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK3s7ktlCjtw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. R Pichlmayr A Weimann J Klempnauer KJ Oldhafer KH Masche G Tusch B Ringe (1996) ArticleTitleSurgical treatment in proximal bile duct cancer: single-center experience Ann Surg 224 628–38 Occurrence Handle8916878 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-199611000-00007 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2s%2FnsVCmsw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. J Klempnauer GJ Ridder R von Wasielewski M Werner A Weiman R Pichlmayr (1997) ArticleTitleResectional surgery of hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a multivariate analysis of prognostic factors J Clin Oncol 15 947–54 Occurrence Handle9060532 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2s3htlynsQ%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Y Nimura J Kamiya S Kondo M Nagino K Uesaka K Oda et al. (2000) ArticleTitleAggressive preoperative management and extended surgery for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: Nagoya experience J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 7 155–62 Occurrence Handle10982608 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s005340050170 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvotFyqsg%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. SG Lee YJ Lee KM Park S Hwang PC Min (2000) ArticleTitleOne hundred and eleven liver resections for hilar bile duct cancer J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 7 135–41 Occurrence Handle10982605 Occurrence Handle10.1007/s005340050167 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3cvotFyrtQ%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Y Seyama K Kubota K Sano T Noie T Takayama T Kosuge M Makuuchi (2003) ArticleTitleLong-term outcome of extended hemihepatectomy for hilar bile duct cancer with no mortality and high survival rate Ann Surg 238 73–83 Occurrence Handle12832968 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-200307000-00010

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. S Kawasaki H Imamura A Kobayashi T Noike S Miwa S Miyagawa (2003) ArticleTitleResults of surgical resection for patients with hilar bile duct cancer: application of extended hepatectomy after biliary drainage and hemihepatic portal vein embolization Ann Surg 238 84–92 Occurrence Handle12832969 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-200307000-00011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. S Kondo S Hirano Y Ambo E Tanaka S Okushiba T Morikawa H Katoh (2004) ArticleTitleForty consecutive resections of hilar cholangiocarcinoma with no postoperative mortality and no positive ductal margins: results of a prospective study Ann Surg 240 95–101 Occurrence Handle15213624 Occurrence Handle10.1097/01.sla.0000129491.43855.6b

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. L Capussotti A Muratore R Polastri A Ferrero P Massucco (2002) ArticleTitleLiver resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: in-hospital mortality and long term survival J Am Coll Surg 195 641–7 Occurrence Handle12437251 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1072-7515(02)01481-3

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. HS Luft JP Bunker AC Enthoven (1979) ArticleTitleShould operations be regionalized? The empirical relationship between surgical volume and mortality N Engl J Med 301 1364–9 Occurrence Handle503167 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaL3c%2FlsVKmuw%3D%3D Occurrence Handle10.1056/NEJM197912203012503

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. CB Begg LD Cramer WJ Hoskins MF Brennan (1998) ArticleTitleImpact of hospital volume on operative mortality for major cancer surgery JAMA 280 1747–51 Occurrence Handle9842949 Occurrence Handle10.1001/jama.280.20.1747 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1M%2FlslSrsQ%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. JD Birkmeyer (2000) ArticleTitleShould we regionalize major surgery? Potential benefit and policy consideration J Am Coll Surg 190 341–9 Occurrence Handle10703862 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1072-7515(99)00270-7 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c7ms1Khug%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. JB Dimick JA Cowan JA Knol GB Upchurch (2003) ArticleTitleHepatic resection in the United States: indications, outcomes, and hospital procedural volumes from a nationally representative database Arch Surg 138 185–91 Occurrence Handle12578418 Occurrence Handle10.1001/archsurg.138.2.185

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. M Makuuchi BL Thai K Takayasu T Takayama T Kosuge P Gunven et al. (1990) ArticleTitlePreoperative portal embolization to increase safety of major hepatectomy for hilar bile duct carcinoma: a preliminary report Surgery 107 521–7 Occurrence Handle2333592 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK3c3jvFOjsQ%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. M Nagino Y Nimura J Kamiya S Kondo K Uesaka Y Kin et al. (1995) ArticleTitleChanges in hepatic lobe volume in biliary tract cancer patients after right portal vein embolization Hepatology 21 434–9 Occurrence Handle7843717 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2M7ks1Snug%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. M Nagino J Kamiya H Nishio T Ebata T Arai Y Nimura (2006) ArticleTitleTwo hundred forty consecutive portal vein embolizations before extended hepatectomy for biliary cancer: surgical outcome and long-term follow-up Ann Surg 243 364–72 Occurrence Handle16495702 Occurrence Handle10.1097/01.sla.0000201482.11876.14

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. T Kosuge J Yamamoto K Shimada S Yamasaki M Makuuchi (1999) ArticleTitleImproved surgical results for hilar cholangiocarcinoma with procedures including major hepatic resection Ann Surg 230 663–71 Occurrence Handle10561090 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-199911000-00008 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3c%2FitlOntA%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Y Nimura N Hayakawa J Kamiya S Maeda S Kondo A Yasui Shionoya (1991) ArticleTitleHepatopancreatoduodenectomy for advanced carcinoma of the biliary tract Hepatogastroenterology 38 170–5 Occurrence Handle1649788 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK3MzhtVSgsQ%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. M Makuuchi T Takayama P Gunven T Kosuge S Yamazaki H Hasegawa (1989) ArticleTitleRestrictive versus liberal blood transfusion policy for hepatectomies in cirrhotic patients World J Surg 13 644–8 Occurrence Handle2554598 Occurrence Handle10.1007/BF01658893 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK3c%2FltFCjtg%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. International Union Against Cancer (UICC): TNM classification of malignant tumors. 6th Edition. Sobin LH, Wittekind CH (eds). Wiley-Liss, New York, 2002

  29. InstitutionalAuthorNameJapanese Society of Biliary Surgery (2003) General Rules for Surgical and Pathological Studies on Cancer of Biliary Tract EditionNumber5th ed Kanehara Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  30. J Belghiti K Hiramatsu S Benoist PP Massault A Sauvanet O Farges (2000) ArticleTitleSeven hundred forty-seven hepatectomies in the 1990s: an update to evaluate the actual risk of liver resection J Am Coll Surg 191 38–46 Occurrence Handle10898182 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S1072-7515(00)00261-1 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DC%2BD3czlsVGntQ%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. WR Jarnagin M Gonen Y Fong RP DeMatteo L Ben-Porat S Little et al. (2002) ArticleTitleImprovement in perioperative outcome after hepatic resection: analysis of 1803 consecutive cases over the past decade Ann Surg 236 397–406 Occurrence Handle12368667 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-200210000-00001

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. H Imamura Y Seyama N Kokudo A Maema Y Sugawara K Sano et al. (2003) ArticleTitleOne thousand fifty-six hepatectomies without mortality in 8 years Arch Surg 138 1198–206 Occurrence Handle14609867 Occurrence Handle10.1001/archsurg.138.11.1198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. RT Poon ST Fan CM Lo CL Liu CM Lam WK Yuen et al. (2004) ArticleTitleImproving perioperative outcome expands the role of hepatectomy in management of benign and malignant hepatobiliary diseases: analysis of 1222 consecutive patients from a prospective database Ann Surg 240 698–708 Occurrence Handle15383797 Occurrence Handle10.1097/01.sla.0000143808.63039.51

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. M Nagino J Kamiya T Arai H Nishio T Ebata Y Nimura (2005) ArticleTitleOne hundred consecutive hepatobiliary resections for biliary hilar malignancy: preoperative blood donation, blood loss, transfusion, and outcome Surgery 137 148–55 Occurrence Handle15674194 Occurrence Handle10.1016/j.surg.2004.06.006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. JD Cunningham Y Fong C Shriver J Melendez WL Marx LH Blumgart (1994) ArticleTitleOne hundred consecutive hepatic resections: blood loss, transfusion, and operative technique Arch Surg 129 1050–6 Occurrence Handle7944934 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2M%2FjtFKgtA%3D%3D

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. MJ Englesbe SJ Pelletier KM Diehl RS Sung WL Wahl J Punch RH Bartlett (2005) ArticleTitleTransfusions in surgical patients J Am Coll Surg 200 249–54 Occurrence Handle15664101 Occurrence Handle10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2004.09.044

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. E Sakamoto Y Nimura N Hayakawa J Kamiya S Kondo M Nagino et al. (1998) ArticleTitleThe pattern of infiltration at the proximal border of hilar bile duct carcinoma: a histologic analysis of 62 resected cases Ann Surg 227 405–11 Occurrence Handle9527064 Occurrence Handle10.1097/00000658-199803000-00013 Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK1c7os1aqsQ%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. T Wakai Y Shirai T Moroda N Yokoyama K Hatakeyama (2004) ArticleTitleImpact of ductal resection margin status on long-term survival in patients undergoing resection for extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma Cancer 103 1210–6 Occurrence Handle10.1002/cncr.20906

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. S Miyagawa M Makuuchi S Kawasaki M Ogaiwara (1994) ArticleTitleSecond-stage pancreatojejunostomy following pancreatoduodenectomy in high-risk patients Am J Surg 168 66–8 Occurrence Handle7912910 Occurrence Handle10.1016/S0002-9610(05)80073-X Occurrence Handle1:STN:280:DyaK2c3psFyruw%3D%3D

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. M D'Angelica RC Martin Suffix2nd WR Jarnagin Y Fong RP DeMatteo LH Blumgart (2004) ArticleTitleMajor hepatectomy with simultaneous pancreatectomy for advanced hepatobiliary cancer J Am Coll Surg 198 570–6 Occurrence Handle15051011 Occurrence Handle10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2003.11.022

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery Division, National Cancer Center Hospital, 5-1-1 Tsukiji, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0045, Japan

    Tsuyoshi Sano, Kazuaki Shimada, Yoshihiro Sakamoto, Minoru Esaki & Tomoo Kosuge

Authors
  1. Tsuyoshi Sano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kazuaki Shimada
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yoshihiro Sakamoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Minoru Esaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Tomoo Kosuge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

About this article

Cite this article

Sano, T., Shimada, K., Sakamoto, Y. et al. Changing trends in surgical outcomes after major hepatobiliary resection for hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a single-center experience over 25 years. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 14, 455–462 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-006-1194-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00534-006-1194-1

Key words

Search

Navigation