Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate the effectiveness of prosthetic rehabilitation, as well as the quality of life (QOL) of older edentulous maxillectomy patients.
Methods
Effectiveness of the complete denture obturator prosthesis and QOL of N = 44 older edentulous patients who had resection of the maxilla and were restored with a definitive prosthesis that was in use for a minimum of 1 year was assessed using three instruments: European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Core Questionnaire (QLQ-C30), Head and Neck Cancer Module (QLQ-HN35), and Obturator Functioning Scale (OFS). Data analysis was performed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) on ranks, Spearman rank-order correlation, and hierarchical multivariable rank regression at α = .05 level of significance.
Results
Participants’ gender (P < .001), adjuvant treatment (P = .016), surgical approach (P = .017), size of the maxillary defect (P = .028), participants’ prosthetic history (P = .047), and dental status of the mandible (P = .038) were significantly related to the self-reported effectiveness of the complete denture obturator prosthesis. Perceived functioning of the prosthesis (P = .001), participants’ gender (P = .002), the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status (P = .027), and surgical approach (P = .039) were significant predictors of QOL.
Conclusion
Restoration of the edentulous maxillectomy defect is challenging. An effective definitive complete denture obturator appeared to be the strongest predictor for advanced quality of life in older maxillectomy patients. The physical status of the older participants significantly affected the overall QOL, but did not influence the self-reported functioning of the complete denture obturator prosthesis.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data is available in the hospital’s medical charts. The measurement instruments were described in the materials and methods section of the manuscript.
Code availability
The statistical package used is licensed at NKUA.
References
Marur S, Forastiere AA (2016) Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: update on epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment. Mayo Clin Proc 91:386–396
Crome P, Lally F, Cherubini A, Oristrell J et al (2011) Exclusion of older people from clinical trials: professional views from nine European countries participating in the PREDICT study. Drugs Aging 28:667–677
Reid BC, Alberg AJ, Klassen AC, Samet JM et al (2001) Comorbidity and survival of elderly head and neck carcinoma patients. Cancer 92:2109–2116
Rogers S, Kenyon P, Lowe D, Grant C, Dempsey G (2005) The relation between health-related quality of life, past medical history, and American Society of Anesthesiologists’ ASA grade in patients having primary operations for oral and oropharyngeal cancer. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 43:134–143
Reid BC, Alberg AJ, Klassen AC, Rozier RG, Garcia I, Winn DM et al (2002) A comparison of three comorbidity indexes in a head and neck cancer population. Oral Oncol 38:187–194
Reid BC, Alberg AJ, Klassen AC, Koch WM, Sanet JM (2001) THe American Society of Anesthesiologists' class as a comorbidity index in a cohort of head and neck cancer surgical patietns. Head Neck 23:985–994
The glossary of prosthodontic terms (2017) J Prosthet Dent 117: 1–105
Funk GF, Karnell LH, Christensen AJ (2012) Long-term health related quality of life in survivors of head and neck cancer. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 138:123–133
D’Andréa G, Scheller B, Gal J, Chamorey E, Château Y, Dassonville O, Poissonnet G, Culié D, Koulmann PH, Hechema R, Demard F, Elaldi R, Bozec A (2020) How to select candidates for microvascular head and neck reconstruction in the elderly? Predictive factors of postoperative outcomes. Surg Oncol 34:168–173
Depprich R, Naujoks D, Lind D, Ommerborn M, Meyer U, Kübler NR et al (2011) Evaluation of the quality of life of patients with maxillofacial defects after prosthodontic therapy with obturator prostheses. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 40:71–79
Chigurupati R, Aloor N, Salas R, Schmidt BL (2013) Quality of life after maxillectomy and prosthetic obturator rehabilitation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 71:1471–1478
Artopoulou II, Karademas EC, Papadogeorgakis N, Papathanasiou I, Polyzois G (2017) Effects of sociodemographic, treatment variables, and medical characteristics on quality of life of patietns with maxillectomy restored with obturator prosthesis. J Prosthet Dent 118:783–789
Kumar P, Alvi HA, RaoJ SBP, Jurel SK, Kumar L et al (2015) Assessment of the quality of life in maxillectomy patients. A longitudinal study J Adv Prosthodont 5:29–35
Brown JS, Rogers SN, McNally DN, Boyle M (2000) A modified classification for the maxillectomy defect. Head Neck 22:17–26
Aaronson NK, Ahmedzai S, Bergman B, Bullinger M, Cull A, Duez NJ et al (1993) The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: A quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst 85:365–376
Fayers PM, Aaronson NK, Bjordal K, Groenvold M, Curran D, Bottomley A. on behalf of the EORTC Quality of Life Group (2001) The EORTC QLQ-C30 Scoring Manual, 3d edn. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, p. 6–16
Bjordal K, de Graeff A, Fayers PM, Hammerlid E, van Pattelsberghe C, Curran D et al (2000) A 12-country field study of the EORTC QLQ-C30 (version 3.0) and the head and neck cancer specific module (The EORTC QLQ-HN35). Eur J Cancer 36:213–219
Bjordal K, Ahlner-Elmqvist M, Tolllesson E, Jensen AB, Razani D, Meher EJ et al (1994) Development of a European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer questionnaire module to be used in quality of life assessments in head and neck cancer patients. Acta Oncol 33:879–885
Mystakidou K, Tsilika E, Parpa E, Kalaidopoulou O, Smyrniotis V, Vlachos L (2001) The EORTC core quality of life questionnaire (QLQ-C30 version 3.0) in terminally ill cancer patients under palliative care: validity and realiability in a hellenic sample. Int J Cancer 94:135–139
Nalbadian M, Nikolaidis V, Nikolaou A, Themelis C, Kouloulas A, Vital V (2010) Psychometric properties of the EORTC head and neck-specific quality of life questionnaire in disease-free Greek patients with cancer of pharynx and larynx. Qual Life Res 19:761–768
Kornblith AB, Zlotolow IM, Gooen J, Huryn JM, Lerner T, Strong EW et al (1996) Quality of life of maxillectomy patients using an obturator prosthesis. Head Neck 18:323–334
Katz MR, Irish JC, Devins GM, Rodin GM, Gullane PJ (2000) Psychosocial adjustment in head and neck cancer: the impact of disfigurement, gender and social support. Head Neck 22:132–141
Devlin H, Barker GR (1992) Prosthetic rehabilitation of the edentulous patient requiring a partial maxillectomy. J Prosthet Dent 67:223–227
Sharma AB, Beumer J 3rd (2005) Reconstruction of maxillary defects: the case for prosthetic rehabilitation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 63:1770–1773
King GE, Martin JW (1996) Complete dentures for the obturator patient. Dent Clin North Am 40:217–237
Kreeft AM, Wismeijer KD, Speksnijder CM, Smeele LE, Bosch SD, Muijen MS et al (2012) Oral function after maxillectomy and reconstruction with an obturator. In J Oral Maxillofac Surg 41:1387–1392
Irish J, Sandhu N, Simpson C, Wood R, Gilbert R, Gullane P et al (2009) Quality of life in patients with maxillectomy prostheses. Head Neck 31:813–821
Threader J, McCormack L (2016) Cancer-related trauma, stigma and growth: the ‘lived’ experience of head and neck cancer. Eur J Cancer Care 25:157–169
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Dr. Artopoulou: Conception and design of the study, analysis of data, interpretation of data, drafting of the manuscript, and final approval of the version to be submitted
Dr. Sarafianou: Acquisition of data
Dr. Perisanidis: Critical revision
Dr. Polyzois: Critical revision
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethics approval
The study protocol was approved by the ethics committee of NKUA (2015–268), in compliance with the Helsinki declaration and the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines.
Consent to participate
All the participants signed an informed consent before enrolling in the present study.
Consent for publication
All the participants consent for the publication of any identifiable details, which can include photograph(s) and/or videos, data, case history, and/or details in the present manuscript.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Artopoulou, I.I., Sarafianou, A., Perisanidis, C. et al. Effectiveness of prosthetic rehabilitation and quality of life of older edentulous head and neck cancer survivors following resection of the maxilla: a cross-sectional study. Support Care Cancer 30, 4111–4120 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-022-06850-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-022-06850-9