Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Cancer survivors’ greatest challenges of living with an ostomy: findings from the Ostomy Self-Management Telehealth (OSMT) randomized trial

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objectives

An ostomy results in lifelong quality of life changes for a cancer survivor. We describe the greatest challenges reported from a randomized trial of cancer survivors with stomas (ostomies).

Methods

Cancer survivors with ostomies participating in a multi-site randomized prospective trial of an Ostomy Self-Management Telehealth (OSMT) program versus usual care (UC) were surveyed at six months post accrual. An open-ended question requested greatest challenges after ostomy surgery. Quantitative descriptive and qualitative analyses were used to examine greatest challenges reported.

Results

A total of 118 trial participants identified greatest challenges with 55 in the OSMT and 63 in the UC. Six conceptual domains were used to code comments—physical, psychological, social, and spiritual quality of life; ostomy-specific issues, and healthcare issues. The OSMT contributed 187 comments, and UC contributed 235 comments. Ostomy specific issues and social well-being had the most comments overall with UC contributing more comments in all domains except physical well-being. Word Clouds revealed post-operative and treatment-related issues and going out in public as the most common challenges in both groups. Word Clouds compared types of ostomies revealing bowel function challenges (colostomy group), difficulties going out in public (ileostomy group), and positive support (urostomy group).

Conclusions

Fewer challenges submitted by the OSMT group provide the beginning evidence of the OSMT program impact. Dominant challenges across both groups were social well-being and ostomy care. Challenges varied by type of ostomy. Findings support long-term care and support for all cancer survivors with ostomies.

Trial registration

NCT02974634

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Bulkley JE, McMullen CK, Grant M, Wendel C, Hornbrook MC, Krouse RS (2018) Ongoing ostomy self-care challenges of long-term rectal cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer 26(11):3933–3939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hubbard G, Taylor C, Beeken B, Campbell A, Gracey J, Grimmett C et al (2017) Research priorities about stoma-related quality of life from the perspective of people with a stoma: a pilot survey. Health Expect 20(6):1421–1427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mols F, Lemmens V, Bosscha K, van den Broek W, Thong MS (2014) Living with the physical and mental consequences of an ostomy: a study among 1–10-year rectal cancer survivors from the population-based PROFILES registry. Psychooncology 23(9):998–1004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Torquato Lopes AP, Decesaro M (2014) The adjustments experienced by persons with an ostomy: an integrative review of the literature. Ostomy Wound Manage 60(10):34–42

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. United Ostomy Association of America. Living with an ostomyMay 19, 2020. Available from: www.ostomy.org

  6. McMullen CK, Hornbrook MC, Grant M, Baldwin CM, Wendel CS, Mohler MJ et al (2008) The greatest challenges reported by long-term colorectal cancer survivors with stomas. J Support Oncol 6(4):175–182

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sun V, Grant M, McMullen CK, Altschuler A, Mohler MJ, Hornbrook MC et al (2013) Surviving colorectal cancer: long-term, persistent ostomy-specific concerns and adaptations. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 40(1):61–72

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Grant M, McCorkle R, Hornbrook MC, Wendel CS, Krouse R (2013) Development of a chronic care ostomy self-management program. J Cancer Educ 28(1):70–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Krouse RS, Grant M, McCorkle R, Wendel CS, Cobb MD, Tallman NJ et al (2016) A chronic care ostomy self-management program for cancer survivors. Psychooncology 25(5):574–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sun V, Ercolano E, McCorkle R, Grant M, Wendel CS, Tallman NJ et al (2018) Ostomy telehealth for cancer survivors: design of the Ostomy Self-management Training (OSMT) randomized trial. Contemp Clin Trials 64:167–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Grant M, Ferrell B, Dean G, Uman G, Chu D, Krouse R (2004) Revision and psychometric testing of the City of Hope Quality of Life-Ostomy Questionnaire. Qual Life Res 13(8):1445–1457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hsieh HF, Shannon SE (2005) Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 15(9):1277–1288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. McNaught C, Lan P (2010) Using Wordle as supplementary research tool. The Qualitative Report 15(3):630–643

    Google Scholar 

  14. Goldblatt J, Buxey K, Paul E, Foot-Connolly R, Leech T, Bell S (2018) Study on the time taken for patients to achieve the ability to self-care their new stoma. ANZ J Surg 88(6):E503–E506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ramirez M, Altschuler A, McMullen C, Grant M, Hornbrook M, Krouse R (2014) “I didn’t feel like I was a person anymore”: realigning full adult personhood after ostomy surgery. Med Anthropol Q 28(2):242–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ozturk O, Yalçin BM, Unal M, Yildirim K, Ozlem N (2015) Sexual dysfunction among patients having undergone colostomy and its relationship with self-esteem. J Family Med Community Health 2(1):1028

    Google Scholar 

  17. Colwell JC, Kupsick PT, McNichol LL (2016) Outcome criteria for discharging the patient with a new ostomy from home health care: a WOCN Society Consensus Conference. J Wound Ostomy Continence Nurs 43(3):269–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Claessens I, Probert R, Tielemans C, Steen A, Nilsson C, Andersen BD et al (2015) The Ostomy Life Study: the everyday challenges faced by people living with a stoma in a snapshot. Gastrointest Nurs 13(5):18–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Taylor C (2013) Reach for recovery: evaluating a pilot study of a colorectal cancer survivorship programme. Eur J Oncol Nurs 17(2):131–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Nasvall P, Dahlstrand U, Lowenmark T, Rutegard J, Gunnarsson U, Strigard K (2017) Quality of life in patients with a permanent stoma after rectal cancer surgery. Qual Life Res 26(1):55–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. McMullen CK, Bulkley JE, Altschuler A, Wendel CS, Grant M, Hornbrook MC et al (2016) Greatest challenges of rectal cancer survivors: results of a population-based survey. Dis Colon Rectum 59(11):1019–1027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Grant M, McMullen CK, Altschuler A, Mohler MJ, Hornbrook MC, Herrinton LJ et al (2011) Gender differences in quality of life among long-term colorectal cancer survivors with ostomies. Oncol Nurs Forum 38(5):587–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wiltink LM, White K, King MT, Rutherford C (2020) Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines for colorectal and anal cancer: the extent of recommendations for managing long-term symptoms and functional impairments. Support Care Cancer 28(6):2523–2532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Jansen F, van Uden-Kraan CF, Braakman JA, van Keizerswaard PM, Witte BI, Verdonck-de Leeuw IM (2015) A mixed-method study on the generic and ostomy-specific quality of life of cancer and non-cancer ostomy patients. Support Care Cancer 23(6):1689–1697

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Research reported in this publication was supported through a Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute® (PCORI®) Program Award (CDR 1507–31690). Funding for this research has been provided in part by The Benjamin & Mary Siddons Measey Foundation (Miss Mo).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conceptualization: Marcia Grant, Virginia Sun, Ruth McCorkle, Robert S. Krouse. Methodology: Marcia Grant, Virginia Sun, Ruth McCorkle, Robert S. Krouse, Elizabeth Ercolano. Formal analysis: Marcia Grant, Virginia Sun, Ruth McCorkle, Robert S. Krouse. Methodology: Marcia Grant, Virginia Sun, Robert S. Krouse, Elizabeth Ercolano, Nancy J Tallman, Christopher S. Wendel, Christie Simons, Julia Mo, Sabreen Raza, Deborah Donahue, Frank Passero, Joshua Hanson, Lyn MacDougall, Jonathan Friedlaender, Pamela Pitcher, Dan Fry, Pete Yonsetto, Mark C. Hornbrook. Funding acquisition: Marcia Grant, Virginia Sun, Ruth McCorkle, Robert S. Krouse Ronald S Weinstein. Investigation: Marcia Grant, Virginia Sun, Ruth McCorkle, Robert S. Krouse. Project administration: Sabreen Raza. Resources: Pete Yonsetto, Michael J Holcomb, Ronald S Weinstein. Software: Pete Yonsetto, Michael J Holcomb, Ronald S Weinstein. Supervision: Virginia Sun, Ruth McCorkle, Robert S. Krouse. Validation: Marcia Grant, Virginia Sun, Robert S. Krouse. Visualization: Marcia Grant, Virginia Sun, Ruth McCorkle, Robert S. Krouse. Writing, original draft: Marcia Grant. Writing, review and editing: Marcia Grant, Virginia Sun, Nancy J. Tallman, Christopher S. Wendel, Ruth McCorkle, Elizabeth Ercolano, Christie Simons, Julia Mo, Sabreen Raza, Deborah Donahue, Frank Passero, Joshua Henson, Lyn MacDougall, Jonathan Friedlaender, Pamela Pitcher, Dan Fry, Pete Yonsetto, Michael J. Holcomb, BS, Mark C. Hornbrook, Ronald S. Weinstein, Robert S. Krouse.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Marcia Grant.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board at the University of Pennsylvania, City of Hope, and Yale University.

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent for publication

Patients signed informed consent regarding publishing their data.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Disclaimer

All statements presented in this publication are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute® (PCORI®), its Board of Governors or Methodology Committee.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Ruth McCorkle passed away during the preparation of this study.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Grant, M., Sun, V., Tallman, N.J. et al. Cancer survivors’ greatest challenges of living with an ostomy: findings from the Ostomy Self-Management Telehealth (OSMT) randomized trial. Support Care Cancer 30, 1139–1147 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06449-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06449-6

Keywords

Navigation