Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Understanding the relationship between positive and negative social support and the quality of life among African American breast cancer survivors

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Social support improves several quality of life (QOL) domains among African American breast cancer survivors. How different dimensions of social support are associated with QOL among African American breast cancer survivors may however differ from other populations. This study explores this hypothesis by examining associations of positive social support (supportive interactions that promote affection) and negative social support (non-supportive interactions wherein the provider of support may not have the best intended actions) with QOL among Chicago-based African American breast cancer survivors.

Methods

Study participants were eligible if they (1) were identified as being an African American female, (2) were at least 18 years of age or older, and (3) were diagnosed with breast cancer during or after navigation was implemented at the study hospital. Participants completed validated questionnaires via telephone or in-person interviews.

Results

Among our sample of 100 participants, positive support was associated with greater mental well-being in non-imputed (Std β=1.60, CI: 0.51, 2.69, p= 0.004) and imputed models (Std β= 1.67, CI: 0.68, 2.73, p=0.001). There was also a weaker inverse association with negative support and mental well-being when using non-imputed data (Std β=−0.82, CI:−1.65, 0.02, p= 0.05).

Conclusions

Our findings suggest that positive support, in particular, is highly influential for improving mental well-being among African American breast cancer survivors. Simultaneously, negative support appears to be an independent, albeit weaker, determinant of mental well-being.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Interested stakeholders may communicate with the corresponding co-author (YM) to access de-identified data sets.

References

  1. American Cancer Society (2014) Cancer facts & figures 2015. https://www.cancer.org/research/cancer-facts-statistics/all-cancer-factsfigures/cancer-facts-figures-2014.html

  2. Center for Disease Control and Prevention (2016) Breast cancer rates among black women and white women. https://www.cdc.gov/cancer/dcpc/research/articles/breast_cancer_rates_women.htm

  3. Richardson LC, Henley SJ, Miller JW, Massetti G, Thomas CC (2016) Patterns and trends in age-specific black-white differences in breast cancer incidence and mortality–United States, 1999–2014. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 65:1093–1098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Breast Cancer Preventative Partners (2020) African American women and breast cancer. https://www.bcpp.org/resource/african-american-women-and-breast-cancer/

  5. Thompson HS, Littles M, Jacob S, Coker C (2006) Posttreatment breast cancer surveillance and follow-up care experiences of breast cancer survivors of African descent: an exploratory qualitative study. Cancer Nurs 29:478–487

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Torres E, Dixon C, Richman AR (2016) Understanding the breast cancer experience of survivors: a qualitative study of African American women in rural eastern North Carolina. J Cancer Educ 31:198–206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sarason IG, Levine HM, Basham RB, Sarason BR (1983) Assessing social support: the social support questionnaire. J Pers Soc Psychol 44:127–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. WHOQoL Group (1993) Study protocol for the World Health Organization project to develop a quality of life assessment instrument (WHOQOL). Qual Life Res 2:153–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Andersen BL (1999) Psychological interventions for cancer patients to enhance the quality of life. In: R. M. Suinn & G. R. VandenBos (eds) Cancer patients and their families: Readings on disease course, coping, and psychological interventions, p 131–162

  10. Haynes-Maslow L, Allicock M, Johnson L-S (2016) Cancer support needs for African American breast cancer survivors and caregivers. J Cancer Educ 31:166–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13187-015-0832-1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Matthews AK, Tejeda S, Johnson TP, Berbaum ML, Manfredi C (2012) Correlates of quality of life among African American and white cancer survivors. Cancer Nurs 35:355–364. https://doi.org/10.1097/NCC.0b013e31824131d9

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Reker GT, Wong PT (1984) Psychological and physical well-being in the elderly: the Perceived Well-Being Scale (PWB). Can J Aging 3:23–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. World Health Organization (2004) Promoting mental health: concepts, emerging evidence, practice: a report of the World Health Organization, Department of Mental Health and Substance Abuse in collaboration with the Victorian Health Promotion Foundation and the University of Melbourne. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/43286

  14. Flannery IM, Yoo GJ, Levine EG (2019) Keeping us all whole: acknowledging the agency of African American breast cancer survivors and their systems of social support. Support Care Cancer 27:2625–2632

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Cohen S, Wills TA (1985) Stress, social support, and the buffering hypothesis. Psychol Bull 98:310–357

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Martin CM, Greene D, Harrell JP, Mwendwa DT, Williams CD, Horton S, Cradle M, Hudson BD, Taylor TR (2020) The impact of social constraints on insomnia among African-American breast cancer survivors: the mediating role of fear of recurrence. Psycho-Oncology 29:1296–1302

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Ashing-Giwa K, Rosales M (2013) A cross-cultural validation of patient-reported outcomes measures: a study of breast cancers survivors. Qual Life Res 22:295–308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-012-0140-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Rivera Rivera JN, Burris JL (2020) A systematic literature review and head-to-head comparison of social support and social constraint in relation to the psychological functioning of cancer survivors. Ann Behav Med 54:176–192

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kroenke CH, Kwan ML, Neugut AI, Ergas IJ, Wright JD, Caan BJ, Hershman D, Kushi LH (2013) Social networks, social support mechanisms, and quality of life after breast cancer diagnosis. Breast Cancer Res Treat 139:515–527

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Molina Y (2018) A conceptual model of social networks and mechanisms of cancer mortality, and potential strategies to improve survival: an invited commentary. Transl Behav Med 8:643–648

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Revenson TA, Schiaffino KM, Majerovitz SD, Gibofsky A (1991) Social support as a double-edged sword: the relation of positive and problematic support to depression among rheumatoid arthritis patients. Soc Sci Med 33:807–813

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kroenke CH (2018) A conceptual model of social networks and mechanisms of cancer mortality, and potential strategies to improve survival. Transl Behav Med 8:629–642

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Lepore SJ, Revenson TA (2007) Social constraints on disclosure and adjustment to cancer. Soc Personal Psychol Compass 1:313–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hu J, Wang X, Guo S, Chen F, Wu YY, Ji FJ, Fang X (2019) Peer support interventions for breast cancer patients: a systematic review. Breast Cancer Res Treat 174:325–341

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Williams DR, Williams-Morris R (2000) Racism and mental health: the African American experience. Ethn Health 5:243–268

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. West LM, Donovan RA, Roemer L (2010) Coping with racism: what works and doesn’t work for Black women? J Black Psychol 36:331–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Woods-Giscombé CL (2010) Superwoman schema: African American women’s views on stress, strength, and health. Qual Health Res 20:668–683

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Allen AM, Wang Y, Chae DH, Price MM, Powell W, Steed TC, Rose Black A, Dhabhar FS, Marquez-Magaña L, Woods-Giscombe CL (2019) Racial discrimination, the superwoman schema, and allostatic load: exploring an integrative stress-coping model among African American women. Ann N Y Acad Sci 1457:104–127

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Mosher CE, Daily S, Tometich D, Matthias MS, Outcalt SD, Hirsh A, Johns SA, Rand K, Schneider B, Mina L, Storniolo AM, Newton E, Miller K (2018) Factors underlying metastatic breast cancer patients’ perceptions of symptom importance: a qualitative analysis. Eur J Cancer Care 27:e12540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Perez-Tejada J, Labaka A, Pascual-Sagastizabal E et al (2019) Predictors of psychological distress in breast cancer survivors: a biopsychosocial approach. Eur J Cancer Care 28:e13166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Molina Y, Khanna A, Watson KS, Villines D, Bergeron N, Strayhorn S, Strahan D, Skwara A, Cronin M, Mohan P, Walton S, Wang T, Schneider JA, Calhoun EA (2019) Leveraging system sciences methods in clinical trial evaluation: an example concerning African American women diagnosed with breast cancer via the Patient Navigation in Medically Underserved Areas study. Contemp Clin Trials Commun 15:100411

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Molina Y, Kim SJ, Berrios N, Glassgow AE, San Miguel Y, Darnell JS, Pauls H, Vijayasiri G, Warnecke RB, Calhoun EA (2018) Patient navigation improves subsequent breast cancer screening after a noncancerous result: evidence from the Patient Navigation in Medically Underserved Areas study. J Women's Health 27:317–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Qualtrics L (2005) Qualtrics. Qualtrics and all other Qualtrics product or service names are registered trademarks or trademarks of Qualtrics, Provo, UT, USA. https://www.qualtrics.com

  34. Fiscella K, Ransom S, Jean-Pierre P, Cella D, Stein K, Bauer JE, Crane-Okada R, Gentry S, Canosa R, Smith T, Sellers J, Jankowski E, Walsh K (2011) Patient-reported outcome measures suitable to assessment of patient navigation. Cancer 117:3601–3615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Dookeran KA, Silva A, Warnecke RB, Rauscher GH (2015) Race/ethnicity and disparities in mastectomy practice in the Breast Cancer Care in Chicago study. Ann Surg Oncol 22:66–74

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Silva A, Rauscher GH, Hoskins K, Rao R, Ferrans CE (2013) Assessing racial/ethnic disparities in chemotherapy treatment among breast cancer patients in context of changing treatment guidelines. Breast Cancer Res Treat 142:667–672

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Rauscher GH, Ferrans CE, Kaiser K, Campbell RT, Calhoun EE, Warnecke RB (2010) Misconceptions about breast lumps and delayed medical presentation in urban breast cancer patients. Cancer Epidemiol Preve Biomarkers 19:640–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Clarke P, Fisher G, House J et al (2008) Guide to content of the HRS psychosocial leave-behind participant lifestyle questionnaires: 2004 & 2006. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor

    Book  Google Scholar 

  39. Ware JE Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD (1996) A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care 34:220–233

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. SAS Institute Inc (2013) SAS Institute Inc. SAS and all other SAS Institute Inc. product or service names are registered trademarks or trademarks of SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA

  41. Strayhorn SM, Carnahan LR, Zimmermann K, Hastert TA, Watson KS, Ferrans CE, Molina Y (2020) Comorbidities, treatment-related consequences, and health-related quality of life among rural cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer 28:1839–1848

  42. Ahn S, Kim S, Zhang H (2017) Changes in depressive symptoms among older adults with multiple chronic conditions: role of positive and negative social support. Int J Environ Res Public Health 14:16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Strayhorn SM, Lewis-Thames MW, Carnahan LR, Henderson VA, Watson KS, Ferrans CE, Molina Y (2021) Assessing the relationship between patient-provider communication quality and quality of life among rural cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer 29:1913–1921

  44. Arora NK, Finney Rutten LJ, Gustafson DH, Moser R, Hawkins RP (2007) Perceived helpfulness and impact of social support provided by family, friends, and health care providers to women newly diagnosed with breast cancer. Psycho-Oncology 16:474–486

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Badr H, Pasipanodya EC, Laurenceau J-P (2013) An electronic diary study of the effects of patient avoidance and partner social constraints on patient momentary affect in metastatic breast cancer. Ann Behav Med 45:192–202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Code availability

Interested stakeholders may communicate with the corresponding co-author (YM) to access syntax files for analyses.

Funding

This study was funded by the National Cancer Institute (R21CA215252, T32CA057699).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Shaila M. Strayhorn and Yamilé Molina contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection, and analysis were performed by Desmona C. Starhan, Nyahne Q. Bergeron, and Shaila M. Strayhorn under the supervision of Yamilé Molina. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Shaila M Strayhorn and Yamilé Molina. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yamilé Molina.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Several institutional review boards approved the data collection procedures that involve study participants to ensure their accordance with the ethical standards of each institution.

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable/no identifying information used for any individual participant

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Strayhorn, S.M., Bergeron, N.Q., Strahan, D.C. et al. Understanding the relationship between positive and negative social support and the quality of life among African American breast cancer survivors. Support Care Cancer 29, 5219–5226 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06098-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-021-06098-9

Keywords

Navigation