Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Quality improvement in sexual health care for oncology patients: a Canadian multidisciplinary clinic experience

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

With the goal of improving the quality of sexual health care provision at our tertiary cancer centre, we developed, implemented, and assessed a multidisciplinary sexuality in an oncology program, to identify patient needs and apply interventions that could be effective in a broader oncology care context.

Methods

The establishment of our institution’s first oncology-focused sexual health program is described within a quality improvement framework. A complementary retrospective chart review was performed to evaluate clinicodemographic data, including responses to validated sexual health questionnaires, from a 2-year clinical pilot.

Results

A sexual health program was introduced for cancer patients identified by health care providers or self-referred, receiving 130 referrals and conducting 64 consultation and 75 follow-up visits within a 2-year pilot period. Patients attending the program were 75% female, of mean age 52 years, and had most often breast (33%) or hematologic (30%) malignancies. Most (84%) had completed curative-intent treatment, with no evidence of disease, with 34% on ongoing endocrine therapy. The most frequent reasons for referral were sexual pain (38%), decreased libido (35%), and vaginal dryness (35% of females). All female patients demonstrated sexual dysfunction on the Female Sexual Function Index, and 80% of male patients demonstrated moderate to severe erectile dysfunction on the Sexual Health Inventory for Men. Patients waited a median of 63 days (SD 107, range 3–516) from referral to consultation, suggesting that demand for multidisciplinary sexual health care overwhelmed existing resources.

Conclusions

We have demonstrated unmet sexual health needs across a diverse oncology patient population and have presented a framework for addressing these issues, highlighting the challenges encountered and proposing improvements. Insights emerging from a quality improvement perspective included the role of group-based sexual health support to improve accessibility and the need for staff education to encourage proactive intervention before referral for specialized care is needed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ananth H, Jones L, King M, Tookman A (2003) The impact of cancer on sexual function: a controlled study. Palliat Med 17(2):202–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ussher J, Perz J, Gilbert E et al (2015) Perceived causes and consequences of sexual changes after cancer for women and men: a mixed method study. BMC Cancer 15:268–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Park E, Norris R, Bober S (2009) Sexual health communication during cancer care. Cancer J 15(1):74–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hautamaki K, Miettinen M, Kellokumpu-Lehtinen P et al (2007) Opening communication with cancer patients about sexuality-related issues. Cancer Nurs 30(5):399–404

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hill E, Sandbo S, Abramsohn E et al (2011) Assessing gynecologic and breast cancer survivors’ sexual health care needs. Cancer. 117(2):2643–2651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Scanlon M, Blaes A, Geller M, Majhail NS, Lindgren B, Haddad T (2012) Patient satisfaction with physician discussions of treatment impact on fertility, menopause and sexual health among premenopausal women with cancer. J Cancer 3:217–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Belbeck A. If sex sells, then are we doing this all wrong? Sexual health and oncology. Oral session presented at Alberta College of Medical Diagnostic & Therapeutic Technologists, Alberta Health Services Annual Conference; April 2013; Edmonton, AB

  8. Vermeer W, Bakker R, Kenter G et al (2014) Sexual issues among cervical cancer survivors: how can we help women seek help? Psycho-Oncology 24(4):458–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rasmusson E, Thomé B (2008) Women’s wishes and need for knowledge concerning sexuality and relationships in connection with gynecological cancer disease. Sex Disabil 26(4):207–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Taylor C, Basen-Engquist K, Shinn E et al (2004) Predictors of sexual functioning in ovarian cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 22(5):881–889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Keller A, McGarvey E, Clayton A (2006) Reliability and construct validity of the Changes in Sexual Functioning Questionnaire short-form (CSFQ-14). J Sex Marital Ther. 32(1):43–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Derogatis L, Rosen R, Leiblum S et al (2002) The Female Sexual Distress Scale (FSDS): initial validation of a standardized scale for assessment of sexually related personal distress in women. J Sex Marital Ther. 28(4):317–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Derogatis L, Clayton A, Lewis-D’Agostino D et al (2008) Validation of the female sexual distress scale-revised for assessing distress in women with hypoactive sexual desire disorder. J Sex Med 5(2):357–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rosen R, Brown C, Heiman J et al (2000) The Female Sexual Function Index (FSFI): a multidimensional self-report instrument for the assessment of female sexual function. J Sex Marital Ther 26(2):191–208

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Wiegel M, Meston C, Rosen R (2005) The female sexual function index (FSFI): cross-validation and development of clinical cutoff scores. J Sex Marital Ther. 31(1):1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. A pRoject Ethics Community Consensus Initiative (ARECCI): Ethics screening tool; Alberta Innovates Health Solutions. www.aihealthsolutions.ca/arecci/screening. Accessed 11 October 2016

  17. Weiner L, Cannon N, Avery-Clark C (2014) Reclaiming the lost art of sensate focus: a clinician’s guide. Family Therapy Magazine 13(5):46–48

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bober S, Reese J, Barbera L et al (2016) How to ask and what to do: a guide for clinical inquiry and intervention regarding female sexual health after cancer. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 10(1):44–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Barbera L, Zwaal C, Elterman D, McPherson K, Wolfman W, Katz A, Matthew A (2017) Interventions to address sexual problems in people with cancer. Curr Oncol 24(3):192–200

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Walker L, Villiger M, Robinson J (2018) Assessing the utility of a distress screening tool at capturing sexual concerns in a gyne-oncology follow-up clinic. Support Care Cancer 26(3):887–893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Sexual health in cancer. de Souza Institute. https://my.desouzainstitute.com/courseCodes/view/IPOD. Accessed 10 January 2019

  22. Leung M, Goldfarb S, Dizon D (2016) Communication about sexuality in advanced illness aligns with a palliative care approach to patient-centred care. Curr Oncol Rep 18(2):11–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. McKee A, Schover L (2001) Sexuality rehabilitation. Cancer. 92(54):1008–1012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kotronoulas G, Papadopoulou C, Patiraki E (2009) Nurses’ knowledge, attitudes, and practices regarding provision of sexual health care in patients with cancer: critical review of the evidence. Support Care Cancer 17(5):479–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Julien J, Thom B, Kline N (2010) Identification of barriers to sexual health assessment in oncology nursing practice. Oncol Nurs Forum 37(3):E186–E190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Stead M, Brown J, Fallowfield L et al (2003) Lack of communication between healthcare professionals and women with ovarian cancer about sexual issues. Br J Cancer 88(5):666–671

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Fitch M, Beaudoin G, Johnson B (2013) Challenges having conversations about sexuality in ambulatory settings: part II – health care provider perspectives. Can Oncol Nurs J 23(3):182–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wiggins D, Wood R, Granai C et al (2007) Sex, intimacy, and the gynecologic oncologists: survey results of the New England Association of Gynecologic Oncologists (NEAGO). J Psychosoc Oncol 25(4):61–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. McCallum M, Jolicoeur L, Lefebvre M, Babchishin LK, Robert-Chauret S, le T, Lebel S (2014) Supportive care needs after gynecologic cancer: where does sexual health fit in? Oncol Nurs Forum 41(3):297–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. McCallum M, Lefebvre M, Jolicoeur L, Maheu C, Lebel S (2012) Sexual health and gynecological cancer: conceptualizing patient needs and overcoming barriers to seeking and accessing services. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 33(3):135–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Patterson L, Handy A, Brotto L (2017) A pilot study of eight-session mindfulness-based cognitive therapy adapted for women’s sexual interest/arousal disorder. J Sex Res 54(7):850–861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Baumgart J, Nilsson K, Evers A et al (2013) Sexual dysfunction in women on adjuvant endocrine therapy after breast cancer. Menopause. 20(2):162–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Broeckel J, Thors C, Jacobsen P et al (2002) Sexual functioning in long-term breast cancer survivors treated with adjuvant chemotherapy. Breast Cancer Res Treat 75(3):241–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Panjari M, Bell R, Davis S (2011) Sexual function after breast cancer. J Sex Med 8(1):294–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. The North American Menopause Society (2017) The 2017 hormone therapy position statement of the North American Menopause Society. Menopause. 42(7):728–753

    Google Scholar 

  36. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Gynecologic Practice, Farrell R (2016) ACOG Committee Opinion No. 659 summary: the use of vaginal estrogen in women with a history of estrogen-dependent breast cancer. Obstet Gynecol 127(3):e93–e96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Stilos K, Doyle C, Daines P (2008) Addressing the sexual health needs of patients with gynecologic cancers. Clin J Oncol Nurs 12(3):457–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Barbera L, Fitch M, Adams L, Doyle C, DasGupta T, Blake J (2011) Improving care for women after gynecological cancer: the development of a sexuality clinic. Menopause. 18(12):1327–1333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Iavazzo C, Johnson K, Savage H, Gallagher S, Datta M, Winter-Roach BA (2015) Sexuality issues in gynaecological oncology patients: post treatment symptoms and therapeutic options. Arch Gynecol Obstet 291(3):653–656

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Matthew A, Lutzky-Cohen N, Jamnicky L et al (2018) The prostate cancer rehabilitation clinic: a biopsychosocial clinic for sexual dysfunction after radical prostatectomy. Curr Oncol 25(6):393–402

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adele Duimering.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Duimering, A., Walker, L.M., Turner, J. et al. Quality improvement in sexual health care for oncology patients: a Canadian multidisciplinary clinic experience. Support Care Cancer 28, 2195–2203 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-05040-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-019-05040-4

Keywords

Navigation