Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

What determines the timing of discussions on forgoing anticancer treatment? A national survey of medical oncologists

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

End-of-life discussions (EOLd) including the option of forgoing anticancer treatment infrequently occur until treatment options have been exhausted for advanced cancer patients. We aimed to identify oncologist-related factors contributing to the timing of discussing the option of forgoing anticancer treatment.

Methods

In this nationwide survey of 864 medical oncologists, we asked about physicians’ attitudes toward the timing of discussing the option of forgoing anticancer treatment for a simulated patient with newly diagnosed metastatic cancer, physicians’ experience of EOLd, perceptions of a good death, and beliefs. Multivariate analyses identified determinants of early discussions.

Results

Among 490 physicians (response rate = 57%), 167 (35%) would discuss the option of forgoing anticancer treatment “now (at the diagnosis).” Physicians’ attitudes toward discussing the option “now” were significantly correlated with a greater physician-perceived importance of life completion (odds ratio (OR) = 1.30, 95%CI = 1.00–1.69, p = 0.048) and dying in a preferred place (OR = 1.29, 95%CI = 1.01–1.65, p = 0.045) for a good death, and not perceiving EOLd as being severely distressing for patients/families (OR = 0.70, 95%CI = 0.54–0.95, p = 0.021). In multivariate analyses, independent determinants of the attitude toward discussing the option now included a greater physician-perceived importance of life completion for a good death (OR = 1.38, 95%CI = 1.05–1.81, p = 0.019), and not perceiving EOLd as being severely distressing for patients/families (OR = 0.70, 95%CI = 0.52–0.94, p = 0.017).

Conclusions

Reflection by oncologists on their own perception regarding a good death and beliefs about EOLd may help oncologists individualize the timing of discussing the option of forgoing anticancer treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Burstein HJ, Krilov L, Aragon-Ching JB, Baxter NN, Chiorean EG, Chow WA, De Groot JF, Devine SM, DuBois SG, El-Deiry WS, Epstein AS, Heymach J, Jones JA, Mayer DK, Miksad RA, Pennell NA, Sabel MS, Schilsky RL, Schuchter LM, Tung N, Winkfield KM, Wirth LJ, Dizon DS (2017) Clinical Cancer Advances 2017: annual report on progress against Cancer from the American Society of Clinical Oncology. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 35(12):1341–1367. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2016.71.5292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Earle CC, Neville BA, Landrum MB, Ayanian JZ, Block SD, Weeks JC (2004) Trends in the aggressiveness of cancer care near the end of life. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 22(2):315–321. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2004.08.136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Earle CC, Landrum MB, Souza JM, Neville BA, Weeks JC, Ayanian JZ (2008) Aggressiveness of cancer care near the end of life: is it a quality-of-care issue? J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 26(23):3860–3866. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2007.15.8253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Emanuel EJ, Young-Xu Y, Levinsky NG, Gazelle G, Saynina O, Ash AS (2003) Chemotherapy use among Medicare beneficiaries at the end of life. Ann Intern Med 138(8):639–643

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Braga S (2011) Why do our patients get chemotherapy until the end of life? Ann Oncol 22(11):2345–2348. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdr416

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Rochigneux P, Raoul JL, Beaussant Y, Aubry R, Goldwasser F, Tournigand C, Morin L (2017) Use of chemotherapy near the end of life: what factors matter? Ann Oncol 28(4):809–817. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdw654

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wright AA, Zhang B, Keating NL, Weeks JC, Prigerson HG (2014) Associations between palliative chemotherapy and adult cancer patients’ end of life care and place of death: prospective cohort study. Bmj 348:g1219. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.g1219

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Prigerson HG, Bao Y, Shah MA, Paulk ME, LeBlanc TW, Schneider BJ, Garrido MM, Reid MC, Berlin DA, Adelson KB, Neugut AI, Maciejewski PK (2015) Chemotherapy use, performance status, and quality of life at the end of life. JAMA Oncol 1(6):778–784. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.2378

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Schnipper LE, Smith TJ, Raghavan D, Blayney DW, Ganz PA, Mulvey TM, Wollins DS (2012) American Society of Clinical Oncology identifies five key opportunities to improve care and reduce costs: the top five list for oncology. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 30(14):1715–1724. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2012.42.8375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Peppercorn JM, Smith TJ, Helft PR, Debono DJ, Berry SR, Wollins DS, Hayes DM, Von Roenn JH, Schnipper LE, American Society of Clinical O (2011) American society of clinical oncology statement: toward individualized care for patients with advanced cancer. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 29(6):755–760. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2010.33.1744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bernacki RE, Block SD, American College of Physicians High Value Care Task F (2014) Communication about serious illness care goals: a review and synthesis of best practices. JAMA Intern Med 174(12):1994–2003. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.5271

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lundquist G, Rasmussen BH, Axelsson B (2011) Information of imminent death or not: does it make a difference? J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 29(29):3927–3931. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2011.34.6247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mack JW, Weeks JC, Wright AA, Block SD, Prigerson HG (2010) End-of-life discussions, goal attainment, and distress at the end of life: predictors and outcomes of receipt of care consistent with preferences. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 28(7):1203–1208. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2009.25.4672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wright AA, Zhang B, Ray A, Mack JW, Trice E, Balboni T, Mitchell SL, Jackson VA, Block SD, Maciejewski PK, Prigerson HG (2008) Associations between end-of-life discussions, patient mental health, medical care near death, and caregiver bereavement adjustment. JAMA 300(14):1665–1673. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.300.14.1665

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kinoshita H, Maeda I, Morita T, Miyashita M, Yamagishi A, Shirahige Y, Takebayashi T, Yamaguchi T, Igarashi A, Eguchi K (2015) Place of death and the differences in patient quality of death and dying and caregiver burden. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 33(4):357–363. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2014.55.7355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Keating NL, Landrum MB, Rogers SO Jr, Baum SK, Virnig BA, Huskamp HA, Earle CC, Kahn KL (2010) Physician factors associated with discussions about end-of-life care. Cancer 116(4):998–1006. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.24761

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Otani H, Morita T, Esaki T, Ariyama H, Tsukasa K, Oshima A, Shiraisi K (2011) Burden on oncologists when communicating the discontinuation of anticancer treatment. Jpn J Clin Oncol 41(8):999–1006. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyr092

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Hashimoto K, Yonemori K, Katsumata N, Hotchi M, Kouno T, Shimizu C, Tamura K, Ando M, Takeuchi M, Fujiwara Y (2009) Factors that affect the duration of the interval between the completion of palliative chemotherapy and death. Oncologist 14(7):752–759. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2008-0257

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Mori M, Shimizu C, Ogawa A, Okusaka T, Yoshida S, Morita T (2015) A National Survey to systematically identify factors associated with oncologists’ attitudes toward end-of-life discussions: what determines timing of end-of-life discussions? Oncologist 20(11):1304–1311. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2015-0147

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Baile WF, Lenzi R, Parker PA, Buckman R, Cohen L (2002) Oncologists’ attitudes toward and practices in giving bad news: an exploratory study. J Clin Oncol Off J Am Soc Clin Oncol 20(8):2189–2196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bradley EH, Cicchetti DV, Fried TR, Rousseau DM, Johnson-Hurzeler R, Kasl SV, Horwitz SM (2000) Attitudes about care at the end of life among clinicians: a quick, reliable, and valid assessment instrument. J Palliat Care 16(1):6–14

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Curtis JR, Patrick DL, Caldwell ES, Collier AC (2000) Why don’t patients and physicians talk about end-of-life care? Barriers to communication for patients with acquired immunodeficiency syndrome and their primary care clinicians. Arch Intern Med 160(11):1690–1696

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Granek L, Krzyzanowska MK, Tozer R, Mazzotta P (2013) Oncologists’ strategies and barriers to effective communication about the end of life. J Oncol Pract 9(4):e129–e135. https://doi.org/10.1200/JOP.2012.000800

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Levin TT, Li Y, Weiner JS, Lewis F, Bartell A, Piercy J, Kissane DW (2008) How do-not-resuscitate orders are utilized in cancer patients: timing relative to death and communication-training implications. Palliat Support Care 6(4):341–348. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1478951508000540

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Markson L, Clark J, Glantz L, Lamberton V, Kern D, Stollerman G (1997) The doctor’s role in discussing advance preferences for end-of-life care: perceptions of physicians practicing in the VA. J Am Geriatr Soc 45(4):399–406

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Mebane EW, Oman RF, Kroonen LT, Goldstein MK (1999) The influence of physician race, age, and gender on physician attitudes toward advance care directives and preferences for end-of-life decision-making. J Am Geriatr Soc 47(5):579–591

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Reilly BM, Magnussen CR, Ross J, Ash J, Papa L, Wagner M (1994) Can we talk? Inpatient discussions about advance directives in a community hospital. Attending physicians’ attitudes, their inpatients’ wishes, and reported experience. Arch Intern Med 154(20):2299–2308

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Ruhnke GW, Wilson SR, Akamatsu T, Kinoue T, Takashima Y, Goldstein MK, Koenig BA, Hornberger JC, Raffin TA (2000) Ethical decision making and patient autonomy: a comparison of physicians and patients in Japan and the United States. Chest 118(4):1172–1182

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Lu D, Fall K, Sparen P, Ye W, Adami HO, Valdimarsdottir U, Fang F (2013) Suicide and suicide attempt after a cancer diagnosis among young individuals. Ann Oncol 24(12):3112–3117. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdt415

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Yamauchi T, Inagaki M, Yonemoto N, Iwasaki M, Inoue M, Akechi T, Iso H, Tsugane S, Group JS (2014) Death by suicide and other externally caused injuries following a cancer diagnosis: the Japan public health center-based prospective study. Psycho-Oncology 23(9):1034–1041. https://doi.org/10.1002/pon.3529

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Miyashita M, Sanjo M, Morita T, Hirai K, Uchitomi Y (2007) Good death in cancer care: a nationwide quantitative study. Ann Oncol 18(6):1090–1097. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdm068

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Morita T, Oyama Y, Cheng SY, Suh SY, Koh SJ, Kim HS, Chiu TY, Hwang SJ, Shirado A, Tsuneto S (2015) Palliative care physicians’ attitudes toward patient autonomy and a good death in east Asian countries. J Pain Symptom Manag 50(2):190–199 e191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2015.02.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Shimada A, Mori I, Maeda I, Watanabe H, Kikuchi N, Ding H, Morita T (2015) Physicians’ attitude toward recurrent hypercalcemia in terminally ill cancer patients. Support Care Cancer 23(1):177–183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-014-2355-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Temel JS, Greer JA, Muzikansky A, Gallagher ER, Admane S, Jackson VA, Dahlin CM, Blinderman CD, Jacobsen J, Pirl WF, Billings JA, Lynch TJ (2010) Early palliative care for patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med 363(8):733–742. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1000678

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Yoong J, Park ER, Greer JA, Jackson VA, Gallagher ER, Pirl WF, Back AL, Temel JS (2013) Early palliative care in advanced lung cancer: a qualitative study. JAMA Intern Med 173(4):283–290. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.1874

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Yamaguchi T, Maeda I, Hatano Y, Mori M, Shima Y, Tsuneto S, Kizawa Y, Morita T, Yamaguchi T, Aoyama M, Miyashita M (2017) Effects of end-of-life discussions on the mental health of bereaved family members and quality of patient death and care. J Pain Symptom Manag 54:17–26.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2017.03.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Umezawa S, Fujimori M, Matsushima E, Kinoshita H, Uchitomi Y (2015) Preferences of advanced cancer patients for communication on anticancer treatment cessation and the transition to palliative care. Cancer 121(23):4240–4249. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.29635

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Cherny N (2010) The oncologist’s role in delivering palliative care. Cancer J 16(5):411–422. https://doi.org/10.1097/PPO.0b013e3181f28b8d

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Tanco K, Rhondali W, Perez-Cruz P, Tanzi S, Chisholm GB, Baile W, Frisbee-Hume S, Williams J, Masino C, Cantu H, Sisson A, Arthur J, Bruera E (2015) Patient perception of physician compassion after a more optimistic vs a less optimistic message: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Oncol 1(2):176–183. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2014.297

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank all the study participants for participating in this survey.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Cancer Center Research and Development Fund [25-B-5]. This study was partially supported by the Mitsubishi Foundation, the Japan Hospice Palliative Care Foundation, and Japan Society for the Promotion of Science KAKENHI Grant Number JP16K15418.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chikako Shimizu.

Ethics declarations

Disclaimers

The funding bodies were not involved in the conducting of this study or its submission. We have no financial or personal relationships with individuals, organizations, or companies that might be perceived as a bias to this work.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Electronic supplementary material

ESM 1

(DOCX 19 kb)

Appendix Table 1

(DOCX 17 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mori, M., Shimizu, C., Ogawa, A. et al. What determines the timing of discussions on forgoing anticancer treatment? A national survey of medical oncologists. Support Care Cancer 27, 1375–1382 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4423-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-018-4423-7

Keywords

Navigation