Abstract
Purpose
The objective of this exploratory analysis was to determine if individual patient risk factors could be used to optimize chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting (CINV).
Methods
Through validated risk prediction models which quantify patient risk factors, 152 patients with early-stage breast cancer scheduled to received adjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy were categorized as being at low (level 0) or high-risk (level 1) for CINV. Prior to the first cycle of chemotherapy, low-risk patients received ondansetron and dexamethasone, while high-risk level 1 patients also received aprepitant. For subsequent cycles, patients who experienced CINV had their antiemetics changed in a stepwise manner to level 2 (extended-duration dexamethasone) or level 3 (extended-duration dexamethasone and low-dose olanzapine).
Results
The study enrolled 152 patients who received 484 cycles of chemotherapy. Forty patient cycles were classified as low risk (level 0) compared to 201, 162 and 81 that were classified as high-risk levels 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Complete control of acute and delayed vomiting was comparable and was achieved in over 85 % of patients across all risk levels (p = 0.56 and p = 0.99). In contrast, complete control of acute and delayed nausea was reduced in risk levels 1 to 3 compared to level 0 (acute = 51.2, 58.0, 45.7 vs. 70.0 %; p = 0.013)—(delayed = 32.8, 45.7, 34.6 vs. 62.5 %; p < 0.001).
Conclusions
Despite the addition of aprepitant, extended-duration dexamethasone and olanzapine, patients at high risk for CINV due to personal risk factors failed to achieve good nausea control.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Hesketh P (1994) Treatment of chemotherapy-induced emesis in the 1990s: impact of the 5-HT3 receptor antagonists. Support Care Cancer 2:286–292
Schmoll HJ, Aapro MS, Poli-Bigelli S, et al. (2006) Comparison of an aprepitant regimen with a multiple-day ondansetron regimen, both with dexamethasone, for anti-emetic efficacy in high-dose cisplatin treatment. Ann Oncol 7:1000–1006
Hocking CM, Kichenadasse G (2014) Olanzapine for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: a systematic review. Support Care Cancer 22:1143–1151
Navari RM, Nagy CK, Gray SE (2013) The use of olanzapine versus metoclopramide for the treatment of breakthrough chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving highly emetogenic chemotherapy. Support Care Cancer 21:1655–1663
Basch E, Prestrud AA, Hesketh PJ, et al. (2011) Antiemetics: American Society of Clinical Oncology clinical practice guideline update. J Clin Oncol 29:4189–4198
Herrstedt J, Roila F, Guidelines Working Group ESMO (2009) Chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting: ESMO clinical recommendations for prophylaxis. Ann Oncol 20(Suppl 4):156–158
Dranitsaris G, Joy A, Young S, et al. (2009) Identifying patients at high-risk for nausea and vomiting after chemotherapy: the development of a practical prediction tool. J Supp Oncol 7:W1–W8
Petrella T, Clemons M, Joy A, et al. (2009) Identifying patients at high risk for nausea and vomiting after chemotherapy: the development of a practical validated prediction tool. J Supp Oncol:W9–W16
Aapro MS, Bohlius J, Cameron DA, et al. (2011) 2010 update of EORTC guidelines for the use of granulocyte-colony stimulating factor to reduce the incidence ofchemotherapy induced febrile neutropenia in adult patients with lymphoproliferative disorders and solid tumours. Eur J Cancer 47:8–32
Smith TJ, Khatcheressian J, Lyman GH, et al. (2006) 2006 update of recommendations for the use of white blood cell growth factors: an evidence-based clinical practice guideline. J Clin Oncol 24:3187–3205
Bouganim N, Dranitsaris G, Hopkins S, et al. (2012) Prospective validation of risk prediction indices for acute and delayed chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. Curr Oncol 19:e414–e421
Dranitsaris G, Bouganim N, Milano C, et al. (2013) Prospective validation of a prediction tool for identifying patients at high-risk for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting. J Support Oncol 11:14–21
Clemons M, Bouganim N, Smith S, et al. (2015) A randomized trial comparing risk model guided antiemetic prophylaxis to physician’s choice in patients receiving chemotherapy for early stage breast cancer. JAMA Oncol(in press)
Decker GM, DeMeyer ES, Kisko DL (2006) Measuring the maintenance of daily life activities using the functional living index-emesis (FLIE) in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. J Support Oncol 4(35–41):52
Martin AR, Pearson JD, Cai B, et al. (2003) Assessing the impact of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting on patients’ daily lives: a modified version of the Functional Living Index-Emesis (FLIE) with 5-day recall. Support Care Cancer 11:522–527
Saito H, Yoshizawa H, Yoshimori K, et al. (2013) Efficacy and safety of single-dose fosaprepitant in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients receiving high-dose cisplatin: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trial. Ann Oncol 24:1067–1073
Grunberg S, Chua D, Maru A, et al. (2011) Single-dose fosaprepitant for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting associated with cisplatin therapy: randomized, double-blind study protocol–EASE. J Clin Oncol 29:1495–1501
Hesketh PJ, Rossi G, Rizzi G, et al. (2014) Efficacy and safety of NEPA, an oral combination of netupitant and palonosetron, for prevention of chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting following highly emetogenic chemotherapy: a randomized dose-ranging pivotal study. Ann Oncol 25:1340–1346
Tamura K, Aiba K, Saeki T, Nakanishi Y, et al. (2015). Testing the effectiveness of antiemetic guidelines: results of a prospective registry by the CINV Study Group of Japan. Int J Clin Oncol Feb 15.
Foubert J, Vaessen G (2005) Nausea: the neglected symptom? Eur J Oncol Nurs 9:21–32
Acknowledgments
The EPIC study investigators will like to express their gratitude to The Canadian Breast Cancer Research Foundation who funded the study, the research associates Stephanie Guillemot, Patti Spencer and Joanne Roach, the oncologists who enrolled patients into the study and especially the patients and their families.
Conflict of interest
None of the authors has a financial relationship with the organization that sponsored the research. The lead author had full control of all primary data and will allow the journal to review the data if requested.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dranitsaris, G., Mazzarello, S., Smith, S. et al. Measuring the impact of guideline-based antiemetic therapy on nausea and vomiting control in breast cancer patients with multiple risk factors. Support Care Cancer 24, 1563–1569 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-2944-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-2944-x