Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Cognitive strategies and quality of life of patients with high-grade glioma

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Supportive Care in Cancer Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to analyze the psychological well-being, quality of life, and cognitive strategies activated by patients with high-grade glioma. We hypothesized that the self-perceived quality of life is modulated by physical and psychological factors and that in order to understand this modulation more psychometric approaches are necessary. Data were collected from a sample of 73 consecutive patients with a histological diagnosis of primary malignant brain cancer (grade IV glioblastoma and grade III anaplastic astrocytoma) hospitalized in a specialized Italian center. The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT) scale and the Schedule of Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life–Direct Weighting (SEIQoL-DW) scale were used to assess quality of life. The mean FACT-Brain (Br) score was 122.37. Similarly, the median SEIQoL-DW score was 72.9 out of a maximum value of 100. No gender effect was found in relation to overall quality of life. Patients with high depression and/or anxiety scores reported lower quality of life (QoL) scores in all the instruments considered. We did not find any gender effect concerning depression and anxiety levels. However, we found that men and women, though having similar physical and functional well-being, reported different QoL determinants, since men seem to rely more on physical adjustment, while women activate more introspective strategies. Positive actions, family issues, negative thoughts, health, and positive thoughts were found to be the most reported themes. In conclusion, the present study strongly suggests that a positive psychological adjustment is possible also in the event of a severe diagnosis and during aggressive treatments, but QoL determinants might be considered too in order to help health professionals to understand patients’ experience and to meet their needs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Louis DN, Ohgaki H, Wiestler OD, Cavenee WK, Burger PC, Jouvet A, Kleihues P (2007) The 2007 WHO classification of tumours of the central nervous system. Acta Neuropathol 114:97–109. doi:10.1007/s00401-007-0243-4

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ostrom QT, Bauchet L, Davis FG, Deltour I, Fisher JL, Langer CE, Barnholtz-Sloan JS (2014) The epidemiology of glioma in adults: a “state of the science” review. Neuro Oncol 16(7):896–913

  3. Stupp R, Mason WP, Van Den Bent MJ, Weller M, Fisher B, Taphoorn MJ et al (2005) Radiotherapy plus concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide for glioblastoma. N Engl J Med 352(10):987–996

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Taphoorn MJ, Sizoo EM, Bottomley A (2010) Review on quality of life issues in patients with primary brain tumors. Oncologist 15(6):618–626

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bottomley A (2002) The cancer patient and quality of life. Oncologist 7:120–125. doi:10.1634/theoncologist.7-2-120

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Carr AJ, Gibson B, Robinson PG (2001) Measuring quality of life: Is quality of life determined by expectations or experience? BMJ 322:1240–1243. doi:10.1136/bmj.322.7296.1240

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Keir ST, Calhoun Eagan RD, Swartz JJ, Saleh OA, Friedman HS (2008) Screening for distress in patients with brain cancer using the NCCN's rapid screening measure. PsychoOncology 17:621–625

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Pelletier G, Verhoef MJ, Khatri N, Hagen N (2002) Quality of life in brain tumor patients: the relative contributions of depression, fatigue, emotional distress, and existential issues. J Neurooncol 57:41–49. doi:10.1023/A:1015728825642

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cheng JX, Zhang X, Liu BL (2009) Health-related quality of life in patients with high-grade glioma. NeuroOncol 11:41–50. doi:10.1215/15228517-2008-050

    Google Scholar 

  10. Wasner M, Paal P, Borasio GD (2013) Psychosocial care for the caregivers of primary malignant brain tumor patients. J Soc Work End-Life Palliat Care 9(1):74–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Bosma I, Reijneveld JC, Douw L, Vos MJ, Postma TJ, Aaronson NK, Klein M (2009) Health-related quality of life of long-term high-grade glioma survivors. Neuro Oncol 11(1):51–58

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Strang S, Strang P (2001) Spiritual thoughts, coping and ‘sense of coherence’ in brain tumour patients and their spouses. Palliat Med 15(2):127–134

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Holzner B, Kemmler G, Sperner-Unterweger B, Kopp M, Dunser M, Margreiter R, Greil R (2001) Quality of life measurement in oncology – a matter of the assessment instrument? Eur J Cancer 37:2349–2356. doi:10.1016/S0959-8049(01)00307-0

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lucchiari C, Botturi A, Pravettoni G (2010) The impact of decision models on self-perceived quality of life: a study on brain cancer patients. ecancer 4:187–196. doi:10.3332/ecancer.2010.187

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Waldron D, O'Boyle AC, Kearney M, Moriarty M, Carney D (1999) Quality-of-life measurement in advanced cancer: Assessing the individual. J Clin Oncol 17:3603–3611

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Matud MP (2004) Gender differences in stress and coping styles. Personal Individ Differ 37:1401–1415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR (1975) Mini-mental state. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12:189–198

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Costantini M, Musso M, Viterbori P, Bonci F, Del Mastro L, Garrone O et al (1999) Detecting psychological distress in cancer patients: validity of the Italian version of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Support Care Cancer 7:121–127. doi:10.1007/s005209900026

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP (1983) The hospital anxiety and depression scale. Acta Psychiat Scand 67:361–370. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb09716.x

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cella DF, Bonomi AE, Lloyd SR, Tulsky DS, Kaplan E, Bonomi P (1995) Reliability and validity of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy–Lung (FACT-L) quality of life instrument. Lung Cancer 12(3):199–220

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hickey AM, Bury G, O’Boyle CA, Bradley F, O’Kelly FD, Shannon W (1996) A new short form individual quality of life measure (SEIQoL-DW): Application in a cohort of individuals with HIV/AIDS. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 313:29–33

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Felgoise SH, Stewart JL, Bremer BA, Walsh SM, Bromberg MB, Simmons Z (2009) The SEIQoL-DW for assessing quality of life in ALS: strengths and limitations. Amyotroph Lateral Scler 10(5–6):456–462

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Wettergren L, Kettis-Lindblad Å, Sprangers M, Ring L (2009) The use, feasibility and psychometric properties of an individualised quality-of-life instrument: a systematic review of the SEIQoL-DW. Qual Life Res 18(6):737–746

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Farquhar M, Ewing G, Higginson IJ, Booth S (2010) The experience of using the SEIQoL-DW with patients with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): issues of process and outcome. Qual Life Res 19(5):619–629

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Moons P, Marquet K, Budts W, De Geest S (2004) Validity, reliability and responsiveness of the “Schedule for the Evaluation of Individual Quality of Life - Direct Weighting” (SEIQoL-DW) in congenital heart disease. Health Qual Life Outcomes 2:27

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Ritchie J, Spencer L (1994) Qualitative data analysis applied policy research. In: Bryman A, Burgess T (eds) Analysing qualitative data. Routledge, London, pp 173–194

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Kvale EA, Murthy R, Taylor R, Lee JY, Nabors LB (2009) Distress and quality of life in primary high-grade brain tumor patients. Support Care Cancer 17:793–799. doi:10.1007/s00520-008-0551-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Brown PD, Ballman KV, Rummans TA, Maurer MJ, Sloan JA, Boeve BF et al (2006) Prospective study of quality of life in adults with newly diagnosed high-grade glioma. J Neurooncol 76:283–291. doi:10.1007/s11060-005-7020-9

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Giovagnoli AR, Tamburini M, Boiardi A (1996) Quality of life in brain tumor patients. J Neurooncol 30(1):71–80. doi:10.1007/BF00177445

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Pringle AM, Taylor R, Whittle IR (1999) Anxiety and depression in patients with an intracranial neoplasm before and after tumour surgery. Br J Neurosurg 13:46–51. doi:10.1080/02688699944177

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Litofsky NS, Farace E, Anderson F, Meyers CA, Huang W, Laws ER Jr (2004) Depression in patients with high-grade glioma: results of the Glioma Outcomes Project. Neurosurgery 54:358–366. doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000103450.94724.A2

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Catt S, Chalmers A, Fallowfield L (2008) Psychosocial and supportive-care needs in high-grade glioma. Lancet Oncol 9:884–891. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70230-4

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Zeidner M, Saklofske D (1996) Adaptive and maladaptive coping. In: Zeidner M, Endler NS (eds) Handbook of coping: theory, research, applications. John Wiley & Sons, Oxford, pp 505–531, xxi

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Role of funding source

The study was not funded

Conflict of interest

Authors declared no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Health Sciences, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy

    C. Lucchiari, M. Masiero & G. Pravettoni

  2. Department of Neurooncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico C. Besta, Milan, Italy

    A. Botturi, A. Silvani, E. Lamperti, P. Gaviani, A. Innocenti & C. Y. Finocchiaro

  3. Applied Research Unit for Cognitive and Psychological Science, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, Italy

    C. Lucchiari, M. Masiero & G. Pravettoni

  4. Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy

    C. Y. Finocchiaro

Authors
  1. C. Lucchiari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. Botturi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. A. Silvani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. E. Lamperti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. P. Gaviani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. A. Innocenti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. C. Y. Finocchiaro
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. M. Masiero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. G. Pravettoni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Lucchiari.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lucchiari, C., Botturi, A., Silvani, A. et al. Cognitive strategies and quality of life of patients with high-grade glioma. Support Care Cancer 23, 3427–3435 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-2691-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-015-2691-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation