Abstract
Objective
In palliative care, gastrostomies are used to provide nutritional support or to decompress the bowel. To evaluate what happened to the patients monitored at our palliative care unit (PCU) who underwent gastrostomy between October 1994 and January 2005, a retrospective audit was made.
Method
The charts of 154 patients were reviewed.
Results
The most frequent reason why a patient underwent a gastrostomy was dysphagia due to head and neck and/or esophageal cancer. Only one patient underwent a drainage gastrostomy because of intestinal obstruction. Interventional radiology performed 96% of the gastrostomies. Early complications occurred in 53 patients (34%) who underwent the gastrostomy for feeding and the most common was local pain, usually mild. However, there was one death due to peritonitis, probably related with the procedure. Late complications also occurred in 53 patients and major complications occurred in 22 patients, the most common was extrusion. The median survival after the performance of the gastrostomy was 61 days (range 1 to 551 days). Nineteen patients (12%) survived 1 week or less, 28 (18%) between 8 and 30 days, 51 (33%) from 31 to 90 days, 53 (35%) 91 days or more, and one unknown. The patient who underwent a gastrostomy for bowel obstruction survived for only 7 days. One hundred and twenty-five patients (81%) died at the PCU, 26 (17%) at home, and four (3%) at other places.
References
Walker LG (1984) L. L. Straton MD, and the first successful gastrostomy in America. Surg Gynecol Obstet 158:387–388
Wollman B, D’Agostino HB, Walus-Wigle JR, Easter DW, Beale A (1995) Radiologic, endoscopic, and surgical gastrostomy: an institutional evaluation and meta-analysis of the literature. Radiology 197:699–704
Preshaw RM (1981) A percutaneous method for inserting a feeding gastrostomy tube. Surg Gynecol Obstet 152:659–660
Ferraz Gonçalves JAS (2001) A Portuguese palliative care unit. Support Care Cancer 9:4–7
Mercadante S (1998) Parenteral versus enteral nutrition in cancer patients: indications and practice. Support Care Cancer 6:85–93
Waitzberg DL, Plopper C, Terra RM (2000) Access route for nutritional therapy. World J Surg 24:1468–1476
Magné N, Marcy PY, Foa C, Falewee MN, Schneider M, Demard F, Bensadoun RJ (2001) Comparison between nasogastric tube feeding and percutaneous fluoroscopic gastrostomy in advanced head and neck cancer patients. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 258:89–92
Park RHR, Allison MC, Lang J et al (1992) Randomised comparison of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy and nasogastric tube feeding in patients with persisting neurological dysphagia. BMJ 304:1406–1409
Hull MA, Rawlings J, Murray FE et al (1993) Audit of outcome of long-term enteral nutrition by percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy. Lancet 341:869–872
Hunter JG, Lauretano L, Shellito PC (1989) Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in head and neck cancer patients. Ann Surg 210:42–46
Malone JM, Koonce T, Larson DM, Freedman RS, Carrasco CHO, Saul PB (1986) Palliation of small bowel obstruction by percutaneous gastrostomy in patients with progressive ovarian carcinoma. Obstet Gynecol 68:431–433
O’Keeffe F, Carrasco CH, Charnsangajev C, Richli WR, Wallace S, Freedman RS (1989) Percutaneous drainage and feeding gastrostomies in 100 patients. Radiology 172:341–343
Scheidbach H, Horbach T, Groitl H, Hohenberger W (1999) Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy/jejunostomy (PEG/PEJ) for decompression in the upper gastrointestinal tract. Surg Endosc 13:1103–1005
Pothuri B, Montemarano M, Gerardi M et al (2005) Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy tube placement in patients with malignant bowel obstruction due to ovarian carcinoma. Gynecol Oncol 96:330–334
Brooksbank MA, Game PA, Ashby MA (2002) Palliative venting gastrostomy in malignant intestinal obstruction. Palliat Med 16:520–526
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gonçalves, F., Mozes, M., Saraiva, I. et al. Gastrostomies in palliative care. Support Care Cancer 14, 1147–1151 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-006-0045-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00520-006-0045-6