Abstract
Two processes are necessary to solve group decision making problems: a consensus process and a selection process. The consensus process is necessary to obtain a final solution with a certain level of agreement between the experts, while the selection process is necessary to obtain such a final solution. Clearly, it is preferable that the set of experts reach a high degree of consensus before applying the selection process. In order to measure the degree of consensus, different approaches have been proposed. For example, we can use hard consensus measures, which vary between 0 (no consensus or partial consensus) and 1 (full consensus), or soft consensus measures, which assess the consensus degree in a more flexible way. The aim of this paper is to analyze the different consensus approaches in fuzzy group decision making problems and discuss their advantages and drawbacks. Additionally, we study the future trends.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alonso S, Cabrerizo FJ, Chiclana F, Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E (2009) Group decision-making with incomplete fuzzy linguistic preference relations. Int J Intell Syst 24:201–222
Ben-Arieh D, Chen Z (2006) Linguistic labels aggregation and consensus measure for autocratic decision-making using group recommendations. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A Syst Hum 36:558–568
Bezdek J, Spillman B, Spillman R (1977) Fuzzy measures of preferences and consensus in group decision making. In: Proceedings of 1977 IEEE conference on decision and control, pp 1303–1309
Bezdek J, Spillman B, Spillman R (1978) A fuzzy relation space for group decision theory. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1:255–268
Bordogna G, Fedrizzi M, Pasi G (1997) A linguistic modeling of consensus for a fuzzy majority in group decision making. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 27:126–132
Cabrerizo FJ, Alonso S, Herrera-Viedma E (2009) A consensus model for group decision making problems with unbalanced fuzzy linguistic information. Int J Inform Technol Decis Making 8:109–131
Chiclana F, Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E (1998) Integrating three representation models in fuzzy multipurpose decision making based on fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Sets Syst 97:33–48
Chen SJ, Hwang CL (1992) Fuzzy multiple attributive decision making: theory and its applications. Springer, Berlin
Delgado M, Verdegay JL, Vila MA (1993) On aggregation operations of linguistic labels. Int J Intell Syst 8:351–370
Fedrizzi M, Kacprzyk J, Nurmi H (1993) Consensus degrees under fuzzy majorities and fuzzy preferences using OWA (ordered weighted average) operators. Control Cybern 22:78–86
Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Verdegay JL (1996) A model of consensus in group decision making under linguistic assessments. Fuzzy Sets Syst 78:73–87
Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Verdegay JL (1996) Direct approach processes in group decision making using linguistic OWA operators. Fuzzy Sets Syst 79:175–190
Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Verdegay JL (1997) Linguistic measures based on fuzzy coincidence for reaching consensus in group decision making. Int J Approx Reason 16:309–334
Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Verdegay JL (1997) A rational consensus model in group decision making using linguistic assessments. Fuzzy Sets Syst 88:31–49
Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Verdegay JL (1998) Choice processes for non-homogeneous group decision making in linguistic setting. Fuzzy Sets Syst 94:287–308
Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E (2000) Choice functions and mechanisms for linguistic preference relations. Eur J Oper Res 120:144–161
Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Martínez M (2008) A fuzzy linguistic methodology to deal with unbalanced linguistic term sets. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 16:354–370
Herrera-Viedma E (2001) An information retrieval system with ordinal linguistic weighted queries based on two weighting elements. Int J Uncertain Fuzziness Knowledge-Based Syst 9:77–88
Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F, Chiclana F (2002) A consensus model for multiperson decision making with different preference structures. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A Syst Hum 32:394–402
Herrera-Viedma E, Martínez L, Mata F, Chiclana F (2005) A consensus support system model for group decision-making problems with multi-granular linguistic preference relations. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 13:644–658
Herrera-Viedma E, Alonso S, Chiclana F, Herrera F (2007) A consensus model for group decision making with incomplete fuzzy preference relations. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 15:863–877
Herrera-Viedma E, Pasi G, López-Herrera AG, Porcel C (2006) Evaluating the information quality of web sites: a methodology based on fuzzy computing with words. J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol 57(4):538–549
Herrera-Viedma E, Chiclana F, Herrera F, Alonso S (2007) A group decision-making model with incomplete fuzzy preference relations based on additive consistency. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part B Cybern 37:176–189
Herrera-Viedma E, López-Herrera AG (2007) A model of information retrieval system with unbalanced fuzzy linguistic information. Int J Intell Syst 22:1197–1214
Kacprzyk J (1987) On some fuzzy cores and soft consensus measures in group decision making. In: Bezdek J (ed) The analysis of fuzzy information. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 119–130
Kacprzyk J, Fedrizzi M (1986) Soft consensus measure for monitoring real consensus reaching processes under fuzzy preferences. Control Cybernet 15:309–323
Kacprzyk J, Fedrizzi M (1988) A soft measure of consensus in the setting of partial (fuzzy) preferences. Eur J Oper Res 34:316–323
Kacprzyk J, Fedrizzi M, Nurmi H (1992) Group decision making and consensus under fuzzy preferences and fuzzy majority. Fuzzy Sets Syst 49:21–31
Kacprzyk J, Nurmi H, Fedrizzi M (1997) Consensus under fuzziness. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston
Lu J, Zhang G, Ruan D (2008) Intelligent multi-criteria fuzzy group decision-making for situation assessments. Soft Comput 12:289–299
Mata F, Martínez L, Herrera-Viedma E (2009) An adaptive consensus support model for group decision making problems in a multi-granular fuzzy linguistic context. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 17:2 279–290
Montero J (2008) The impact of fuzziness in social choice paradoxes. Soft Comput 12:177–182
Nurmi H (2008) Fuzzy social choice: a selective retrospect. Soft Comput 12:281–288
Roubens M (1997) Fuzzy sets and decision analysis. Fuzzy Sets Syst 90:199–206
Spillman B, Bezdek J, Spillman R (1979) Coalition analysis with fuzzy sets. Kybernetes 8:203–211
Spillman B, Spillman R, Bezdek J (1980) A fuzzy analysis of consensus in small groups. In: Wang PP, Chang SK (eds) Fuzzy automata and decision processes. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 331–356
Yager RR (1988) On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A Syst Hum 18:183–190
Yager RR, Filev DP (1994) Parameterized and-like and or-like OWA operators. Int J Gen Syst 22:297–316
Zadeh LA (1983) A computational approach to fuzzy quantifiers in natural languages. Comput Math Appl 9:149–184
Acknowledgements
This paper has been developed with the financing of the SAINFOWEB project (TIC00602), Feder Funds in FUZZYLING project (TIN2007-61079) and PETRI project (PET 2007-0460).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cabrerizo, F.J., Moreno, J.M., Pérez, I.J. et al. Analyzing consensus approaches in fuzzy group decision making: advantages and drawbacks. Soft Comput 14, 451–463 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-009-0453-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-009-0453-x