Skip to main content
Log in

Analyzing consensus approaches in fuzzy group decision making: advantages and drawbacks

  • Focus
  • Published:
Soft Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Two processes are necessary to solve group decision making problems: a consensus process and a selection process. The consensus process is necessary to obtain a final solution with a certain level of agreement between the experts, while the selection process is necessary to obtain such a final solution. Clearly, it is preferable that the set of experts reach a high degree of consensus before applying the selection process. In order to measure the degree of consensus, different approaches have been proposed. For example, we can use hard consensus measures, which vary between 0 (no consensus or partial consensus) and 1 (full consensus), or soft consensus measures, which assess the consensus degree in a more flexible way. The aim of this paper is to analyze the different consensus approaches in fuzzy group decision making problems and discuss their advantages and drawbacks. Additionally, we study the future trends.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alonso S, Cabrerizo FJ, Chiclana F, Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E (2009) Group decision-making with incomplete fuzzy linguistic preference relations. Int J Intell Syst 24:201–222

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Arieh D, Chen Z (2006) Linguistic labels aggregation and consensus measure for autocratic decision-making using group recommendations. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A Syst Hum 36:558–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bezdek J, Spillman B, Spillman R (1977) Fuzzy measures of preferences and consensus in group decision making. In: Proceedings of 1977 IEEE conference on decision and control, pp 1303–1309

  • Bezdek J, Spillman B, Spillman R (1978) A fuzzy relation space for group decision theory. Fuzzy Sets Syst 1:255–268

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Bordogna G, Fedrizzi M, Pasi G (1997) A linguistic modeling of consensus for a fuzzy majority in group decision making. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern 27:126–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cabrerizo FJ, Alonso S, Herrera-Viedma E (2009) A consensus model for group decision making problems with unbalanced fuzzy linguistic information. Int J Inform Technol Decis Making 8:109–131

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chiclana F, Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E (1998) Integrating three representation models in fuzzy multipurpose decision making based on fuzzy preference relations. Fuzzy Sets Syst 97:33–48

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chen SJ, Hwang CL (1992) Fuzzy multiple attributive decision making: theory and its applications. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Delgado M, Verdegay JL, Vila MA (1993) On aggregation operations of linguistic labels. Int J Intell Syst 8:351–370

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Fedrizzi M, Kacprzyk J, Nurmi H (1993) Consensus degrees under fuzzy majorities and fuzzy preferences using OWA (ordered weighted average) operators. Control Cybern 22:78–86

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Verdegay JL (1996) A model of consensus in group decision making under linguistic assessments. Fuzzy Sets Syst 78:73–87

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Verdegay JL (1996) Direct approach processes in group decision making using linguistic OWA operators. Fuzzy Sets Syst 79:175–190

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Verdegay JL (1997) Linguistic measures based on fuzzy coincidence for reaching consensus in group decision making. Int J Approx Reason 16:309–334

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Verdegay JL (1997) A rational consensus model in group decision making using linguistic assessments. Fuzzy Sets Syst 88:31–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Verdegay JL (1998) Choice processes for non-homogeneous group decision making in linguistic setting. Fuzzy Sets Syst 94:287–308

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E (2000) Choice functions and mechanisms for linguistic preference relations. Eur J Oper Res 120:144–161

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Martínez M (2008) A fuzzy linguistic methodology to deal with unbalanced linguistic term sets. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 16:354–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera-Viedma E (2001) An information retrieval system with ordinal linguistic weighted queries based on two weighting elements. Int J Uncertain Fuzziness Knowledge-Based Syst 9:77–88

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera-Viedma E, Herrera F, Chiclana F (2002) A consensus model for multiperson decision making with different preference structures. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A Syst Hum 32:394–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera-Viedma E, Martínez L, Mata F, Chiclana F (2005) A consensus support system model for group decision-making problems with multi-granular linguistic preference relations. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 13:644–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera-Viedma E, Alonso S, Chiclana F, Herrera F (2007) A consensus model for group decision making with incomplete fuzzy preference relations. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 15:863–877

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera-Viedma E, Pasi G, López-Herrera AG, Porcel C (2006) Evaluating the information quality of web sites: a methodology based on fuzzy computing with words. J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol 57(4):538–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera-Viedma E, Chiclana F, Herrera F, Alonso S (2007) A group decision-making model with incomplete fuzzy preference relations based on additive consistency. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part B Cybern 37:176–189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herrera-Viedma E, López-Herrera AG (2007) A model of information retrieval system with unbalanced fuzzy linguistic information. Int J Intell Syst 22:1197–1214

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kacprzyk J (1987) On some fuzzy cores and soft consensus measures in group decision making. In: Bezdek J (ed) The analysis of fuzzy information. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 119–130

  • Kacprzyk J, Fedrizzi M (1986) Soft consensus measure for monitoring real consensus reaching processes under fuzzy preferences. Control Cybernet 15:309–323

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kacprzyk J, Fedrizzi M (1988) A soft measure of consensus in the setting of partial (fuzzy) preferences. Eur J Oper Res 34:316–323

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kacprzyk J, Fedrizzi M, Nurmi H (1992) Group decision making and consensus under fuzzy preferences and fuzzy majority. Fuzzy Sets Syst 49:21–31

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Kacprzyk J, Nurmi H, Fedrizzi M (1997) Consensus under fuzziness. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Lu J, Zhang G, Ruan D (2008) Intelligent multi-criteria fuzzy group decision-making for situation assessments. Soft Comput 12:289–299

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Mata F, Martínez L, Herrera-Viedma E (2009) An adaptive consensus support model for group decision making problems in a multi-granular fuzzy linguistic context. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 17:2 279–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montero J (2008) The impact of fuzziness in social choice paradoxes. Soft Comput 12:177–182

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Nurmi H (2008) Fuzzy social choice: a selective retrospect. Soft Comput 12:281–288

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Roubens M (1997) Fuzzy sets and decision analysis. Fuzzy Sets Syst 90:199–206

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Spillman B, Bezdek J, Spillman R (1979) Coalition analysis with fuzzy sets. Kybernetes 8:203–211

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Spillman B, Spillman R, Bezdek J (1980) A fuzzy analysis of consensus in small groups. In: Wang PP, Chang SK (eds) Fuzzy automata and decision processes. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 331–356

  • Yager RR (1988) On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A Syst Hum 18:183–190

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yager RR, Filev DP (1994) Parameterized and-like and or-like OWA operators. Int J Gen Syst 22:297–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh LA (1983) A computational approach to fuzzy quantifiers in natural languages. Comput Math Appl 9:149–184

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This paper has been developed with the financing of the SAINFOWEB project (TIC00602), Feder Funds in FUZZYLING project (TIN2007-61079) and PETRI project (PET 2007-0460).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. J. Cabrerizo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cabrerizo, F.J., Moreno, J.M., Pérez, I.J. et al. Analyzing consensus approaches in fuzzy group decision making: advantages and drawbacks. Soft Comput 14, 451–463 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-009-0453-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-009-0453-x

Keywords

Navigation