Abstract
Comparative study on fertilization process in Pinus sylvestris, Pinus mugo and in their putative hybrid swarm individuals was done involving pre-zygotic and post-zygotic stages. The amount of surviving ovules from open pollination reflecting the mode of interaction between pollen grains and nucellar tissue of an ovule averaged at 8.1 of sound ovules per conelet in Pinus sylvestris, 7.3 ovules in the hybrid swarm population and at 4.9 ovules in Pinus mugo. A strong correlation was observed between the number of surviving ovules and the proportion of germinating seeds in the compared species and hybrids. Normal course of embryogenesis in Pinus sylvestris and Pinus mugo contrasted with increased frequency of disturbances observed in the hybrid swarm individuals. The differential survival rates of the ovules and deviations from typical pattern of embryogenesis are discussed from the standpoint of cross-ability relationship between Pinus sylvestris and Pinus mugo.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bobowicz MA, Stephan BR, Prus-Glowacki W (2000) Genetic variation of F1 hybrids from controlled crosses between Pinus montana var. rostata and P. sylvestris in anatomical needle traits. Acta Soc Bot Pol 69:207–214
Boratyński A, Boratyńska K, Lewandowski A, Gołab Z, Kiciński P (2003) Evidence of the possibility of natural reciprocal crosses between Pinus sylvestris and P. uliginosa based on the phenology of reproductive organs. Flora 198:377–388
Buchholz JT (1944) The cause of sterility in cross-pollinations between certain species of pines. Am J Bot 31:25–26
Businsky R (1998) Pinus mugo complex in former Czechoslovakia—taxonomy, distribution, hybrid populations and endangerment. Rep Czech Bot Soc Prague 33:29–52 [In Czech]
Chamberlain CJ (1935) Gymnosperms. Chicago Press, Chicago
Christensen K, Dar GH (1997) A morphometric analysis of spontaneous and artificial hybrids of Pinus mugo × P. sylvestris (Pinaceae). Nord J Bot 17:77–86
Dobrinov I (1965) Study on natural hybrids between Pinus sylvestris and Pinus mugo var. mughus in Bulgaria, vol 13. Naucne Trudy Lesotechnitscheskogo Instituta, Sofia, pp 39–48 [In Bulgarian]
Dobrinov I, Jagdzidis G (1971) Spontaneous hybrids between Pinus sylvestris and Pinus mugo in Bulgaria. Gorsko Stop 11:28–30 [In Bulgarian]
Duffield JW (1952) Relationships and species hybridization in the genus Pinus. Z Forstgen Forstpflanz 1:93–97
Filppula S, Szmidt AE, Savolainen O (1992) Genetic comparison between Pinus sylvestris and P. mugo using isozymes and chloroplast DNA. Nord J Bot 12:381–386
Håkansson A (1959) Seed development of Picea abies and Pinus silvestris. Med Stat Skogsforskningsinst 46:6–23
Kormutak A, Ostrolucka M, Vookova B, Pretova A, Feckova M (2005) Artificial hybridizatzion of Pinus sylvestris L. and Pinus mugo Turra. Acta Biol Crac Ser Bot 47:129–134
Kormutak A, Bohovičova J, Vookova B, Gömöry D (2007a) Pollen viability in hybrid swarm populations of Pinus mugo Turra and P. sylvestris L. Acta Biol Crac Ser Bot 49:61–66
Kormutak A, Demankova B, Libantova J (2007b) Genetic status of the putative hybrid swarm populations of Pinus sylvestris L. and P. mugo Turra in Slovakia. For Genet (in press)
Kriebel HB (1972) Embryo development and hybridity barriers in the white pines (Section Strobus). Silvae Genet 21:39–43
Musil I (1977a) Needle variation in the complex Pinus mugo and Pinus sylvestris. Preslia (Prague) 19:1–6 [In Czech]
Musil I (1977b) Morphological variation of seeds in the complex Pinus mugo. Lesnictví 23:235–248 [In Czech]
Nĕmec B (1962) Botanical microtechnique. ČSAV Press, Prague [In Czech]
Net-Sarqueda C, Plumettaz Clot AC, Bécholey I (1988) Mise en évidence de l’hybridation introgressive entre Pinus sylvestris L. et Pinus uncinata DC en Valais (Suisse) par deux méthodes multivariées. Bot Helv 98:161–169
Prus-Glowacki W, Szweykowski J (1980) Serological characteristics of some putative individuals from a Pinus sylvestris × Pinus mugo hybrid swarm population. Acta Soc Bot Pol 49:127–142
Prus-Glowacki W, Sadowski J, Szweykowski J, Wiatroszak I (1981) Quantitative and qualitative analysis of needle antigens of Pinus sylvestris, Pinus mugo, Pinus uliginosa and Pinus nigra and of some individuals from hybrid swarm population. Genet Pol 22:447–454
Sarvas R (1962) Investigations on the flowering and seed crop of Pinus silvestris. Comm Inst For Fenniae 53:51–198
Simak M, Gustafsson Å (1953) X-ray photography and sensitivity in forest tree species. Hereditas 39:458–468
Staszkiewicz J (1994) Comparative study on Pinus × rhaetica (Pinaceae) population in “Medzi Bormi” reserve in Slovakia. Fragm Flor Geobot Ser Pol 1:223–233 [In Polish]
Staszkiewicz J (1996) Natural hybrids of Pinus mugo × P. sylvestris (Pinaceae) in Tatra Mts. Fragm Flor Goebot Ser Pol 3:23–30 [In Polish]
Staszkiewicz J, Tyszkiewicz M (1969) Natural hybrids of Pinus mugo Turra × Pinus sylvestris L. in Nowy Targ valley. Fragm Flor Geobot Ser Pol 15:187–212 [In Polish]
Stebbins GLJ (1950) Variation and Evolution in Plants. Columbia University Press, New York
Stern K, Roche L (1974) Genetics of forest ecosystems. Springer, Berlin
Viewegh J (1981) Variability of the hybrid swarms Pinus mugo × Pinus sylvestris on peat-bog in Zuberec, Orava. Folia Dendrol 8:41–59 [In Czech]
Wachowiak W, Stephan BR, Schulze I, Prus-Glowacki W, Ziegenhagen B (2006) A critical evaluation of reproductive barriers between closely related species using DNA markers—a case study in Pinus. Pl Syst Evol 257:1–8
Acknowledgment
This work was supported by Science and Technology Assistance Agency under contract No. APVT-51-004-004.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by P. von Aderkas.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kormutak, A., Vookova, B., Manka, P. et al. Abortive embryogenesis in hybrid swarm populations of Pinus sylvestris L. and Pinus muga Turra. Trees 22, 657–662 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-008-0223-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-008-0223-x