Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluation of operative cholangiography in 2043 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy

A case for the selective operative cholangiogram

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 01 May 2001

Abstract

Background

There is still some controversy over whether to use laparoscopic operative cholangiograms routinely (RLOC) or selectively (SLOC). Due to their high cost as well as other issues, in March 1997 we converted from RLOC to SLOC. The purpose of this study was to validate that decision.

Methods

The results of 2043 laparoscopic cholecystectomies (LC) were compiled and analyzed. The results of RLOC in 1556 patients undergoing LC from March 1990 through February 1997 were compared to the results of SLOC in 16 patients undergoing LC from March 1989 through February 1990 and 471 patients undergoing LC from March 1997 through December 1998. The literature was reviewed and data were compiled. Reasons that are typically given for operative cholangiograms (OC) were collected and scrutinized. Finally, cost surveys for RLOC and related procedures were obtained.

Results

Overall, laparoscopic operative cholangiogram (LOC) was attempted in 1661 patients and was successful in 1656 cases (99.7%). Bile duct stones (BDS) were evident in 166 patients. Laparoscopic bile duct exploration (LBDE) was attempted in all cases. None were referred for preoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). In the RLOC group, evidence of BDS was observed in 136 patients (9%). Forty-two were unsuspected (2.8%) and five were false positive (0.3%). In a collection of other RLOC studies, the average rate of unsuspected BDS was 2.9%, while the average rate of false positive cholangiograms was 1.6%. In the SLOC group, LOC was indicated in 139 of 487 patients (28.6%). None of the patients who did not have a LOC developed symptomatic residual BDS in ⋜11 years of follow-up. In a large collection of other SLOC studies, the rate of symptomatic residual BDS was 0.3%. A cost survey in February 1997 revealed that the average minimum global charge (MGC) for an OC was $1283.21; for a transcystic duct LBDE it was $1055.10, and for a transcholedochal LBDE it was $31263.61. The MGC for an ERCP with papillotomy was $4303.00. Thus, to avoid one patient with symptomatic residual BDS, 354 unnecessary procedures (333 RLOC, 18 LBDE, and three postoperative ERCP) costing $473,927.52 would be performed. There were no false negatives, bile duct injuries, or other complications attributable to RLOC or SLOC.

Conclusions

The increased morbidity and cost of RLOC to avoid symptomatic residual BDS is not justified. All other reasons given for RLOC are either flawed or indicate that the procedure can be safely employed selectively. SLOC is an effective method of verifying suspected BDS and is safer and less expensive than RLOC.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barkan JS, Fried GM, Barkan AN, Sigman HH, Hinchey EJ, Garzon J, Wexler MJ, Meakins JL (1993) Cholecystectomy without operative cholangiography. Ann Surg 218: 371–379

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bartlett MK, Quinby WC (1956) Mortality and complications of cholecystectomy and choledochostomy for chronic cholecystitis. N Engl J Med 254: 154–156

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Berci G, Sackier JM, Paz-Partlow M (1991) Routine or selected intraoperative cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy? Am J Surg 161: 355–360

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Berci G, Steckell R (1973) Modern radiology in the operating room. Arch Surg 107: 577–586

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bogokowsky H, Slutzki S, Zaidenstein L, Halpern Z, Negri M, Abramsohn R (1987) Selective operative cholangiography. Surg Gynecol Obstet 164: 124–126

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Cahill CJ, Pain JA (1988) Current practice in biliary surgery. Br J Surg 75: 1169–1172

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Clair DG, Carr-Locke DL, Becker JM, Brooks DC (1993) Routine cholangiography is not warranted during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg 128: 551–554

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Donohue JH (1997) Operative cholangiography: routine verses selective. In: Olsen D, Jensen SL, Ferreres AR, Corbitt JD (eds) Textbook of videoscopic surgery. Overseas Publishers Association, Amsterdam, pp 105–109

    Google Scholar 

  9. Dorazio RA (1995) Selective operative cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am Surg 61: 911–913

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Farha GJ, Pearson RN (1974) Duct stones present? Transcystic duct operative cholangiography. J Kan Med Soc 75: 265–267

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Fiore NF, Ledniczky G, Wiebke EA, Broadie TA, Pruitt AL, Goulet RJ, Grosfeld JL, Canal DF (1997) An analysis of perioperative cholangiography in one thousand laparoscopic cholecystectomies. Surgery 122: 817–823

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Flowers JL, Zucker KA, Scott MG, Scoville WA, Imbembo, AL, Bailey RW (1992) Laparoscopic cholangiography: results and indications. Ann Surg 215: 209–215

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gerber A, Apt MK (1982) The case against routine operative cholangiography. Am J Surg 143: 134–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Glenn F, McSherry CK (1975) Calculus biliary tract disease. Curr Probl Surg 12: 26–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Grace PA, Qureshi, A, Burke P, Leahy A, Brindley N, Osborne H, Lane B, Broe P, Bouchier-Hayes D (1993) Selective cholangiography in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 80: 244–246

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gregg RO (1988) The case for selective cholangiography. Am J Surg 155: 540–544

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Grogono JL, Woods WGA (1986) Selective use of operative cholangiography. World J Surg 19: 1009–1013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hamlin JA (1981) Biliary ductal anomalies. In: Berci G, Hamlin JA (eds) Operative biliary radiology. Williams & Wilkins Baltimore, pp 109–137

    Google Scholar 

  19. Hauer-Jensen M, Karesen R, Nygaard K, Solheim K, Amlie EJB, Havig O, Rosseland AR (1993) Prospective randomized study of routine intraoperative cholangiography during open cholecystectomy: long-term follow-up and multivariate analysis of predictors of choledocholithiasis. Surgery 113: 318–323

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hicken NF, McAllister JA (1964) Operative cholangiography as an aid in reducing the incidence of “overlooked” common bile duct stones: a study of 1293 choledochotomies. Surgery 55: 753–758

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Lorimer JW, Fairfull-Smith RJ (1995) Intraoperative cholangiography is not essential to avoid duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg 169: 344–347

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Lygidakis NJ (1982) Potential hazards of intraoperative cholangiography in patients with infected bile. Gut 23: 1015–1018

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Mansberger JA, Davis JB, Scarborough C, Bowden TA (1988) Selective intraoperative cholangiography. Am Surg 54: 31–33

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Mirizzi PL (1937) Operative cholangiography. Surg Gynecol Obstet 65: 702–710

    Google Scholar 

  25. Mofti AB, Ahmed I, Tandon RC, Al-Tameen MM, Al-Khudairy NN (1986) Routine selective peroperative cholangiography. Br J Surg 73: 548–550

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Murison MSC, Gartell PC, McGinn FP (1989) Does selective peroperative cholangiography result in missed common bile duct stones?. Br J Surg 76: 1343 [Abstract]

    Google Scholar 

  27. Pace BW, Cosgrove J, Margolis IB, Breuer B (1992) Intraoperative cholangiography revisited. Arch Surg 127: 448–450

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Pernthaler H, Sandbichler P, Schmid T, Margreiter R (1990) Operative cholangiography in elective cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 77: 399–400

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Robinson BL, Donohue JH, Gunes S, Thompson GB, Grant CS, Michael GS, Farnell MB, van Heerden JA (1995) Selective operative cholangiography, appropriate management for laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Arch Surg 130: 625–630

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Snow LL, Weinstein LS, Hannon JK (1990) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ala Med 59: 18–22.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Snow LL, Weinstein LS, Hannon JK, Lane DR (1999) Management of bile duct stones in 1572 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am Surg 65: 530–547

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Stark ME, Loughry WC (1980) Routine operative cholangiogram with cholecystectomy. Obstet 151: 657–658

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Taylor OM, Sedman PC, Jones BM, Royston CMS, Arulampalam T, Wellwood J (1997) Laparoscopic cholecystectomy without operative cholangiogram: 2038 cases over a 5-year period in two district general hospitals. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 79: 376–380

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Trondsen E, Edwin B, Reiertsen O, Fagertun M, Rosseland A (1995) Selection criteria for endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography in patients with gallstone disease. World J Surg 19: 852–857

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Voyles CR, Sanders DL, Hogan R (1994) Common bile duct evaluation in the era of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg 219: 744–752

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Surgery, University of South Alabama College of Medicine, 603 MSTN 2451 Fillingin Street, 36607, Mobile, AL, USA

    L. L. Snow

  2. Department of Surgery, Mobile Infirmary Medical Center, 5 Mobil Infirmary Circle, 36607, Mobile, AL, USA

    L. S. Weinstein

  3. Department of Surgery, Springhill Memorial Hospital, 3719 Dauphin Street, 36607, Mobile, AL, USA

    J. K. Hannon

  4. Department of Surgery, Providence Hospital, 6801 Airport Boulevard, 36607, Mobile, AL, USA

    D. R. Lane

Authors
  1. L. L. Snow
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. L. S. Weinstein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. J. K. Hannon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. D. R. Lane
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Additional information

Online publication: 20 October 2000

An erratum to this article is available at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00464-001-0043-1.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Snow, L.L., Weinstein, L.S., Hannon, J.K. et al. Evaluation of operative cholangiography in 2043 patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 15, 14–20 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s004640000311

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s004640000311

Key words

Search

Navigation