Skip to main content
Log in

The efficacy and safety of snare traction-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection for circumferential superficial esophageal cancer

  • Published:
Surgical Endoscopy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Objective

This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of snare traction-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for the management of circumferential superficial esophageal cancer.

Methods

A total of 68 patients who underwent ESD for circumferential superficial esophageal cancer were included in this study. All the patients were divided into two groups based on whether the snare traction was used or not; the snare traction group (S-ESD, group n = 35) and the control group (C-ESD, group n = 33).

Results

There was no significant difference in the size of the resected area between the groups [21.98 (18.30, 27.00) cm2 vs 24.00 (15.28, 30.72) cm2, P = 0.976]. The snare traction group had a shorter dissection time [92.00 (74.00, 121.00) min vs 110.00 (92.50, 137.00) min, P = 0.017] and a faster resection speed [0.28 ± 0.13 cm2/min vs 0.22 ± 0.11cm2/min, P = 0.040] compared to the control group. There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of hospital stay, cost, en bloc resection rate, R0 resection rate, curative resection rate, bleeding rate, perforation rate, stricture rate, and recurrence rate (P > 0.05).

Conclusion

Snare traction-assisted ESD is a safe and efficient approach for the treatment of circumferential superficial esophageal cancer. Its advantages includes shorter procedure so the anesthesia requirement, clear operative filed view, improved mucosal dissection efficiency, simple, and easily accessible equipment.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ishihara R, Arima M, Iizuka T et al (2020) Endoscopic submucosal dissection/endoscopic mucosal resection guidelines for esophageal cancer. Dig Endosc 32:452–493

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Draganov PV, Wang AY, Othman MO, Fukami N (2019) Aga institute clinical practice update: endoscopic submucosal dissection in the united states. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 17:16-25.e1

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang W, Zhai Y, Chai N et al (2018) Endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection and endoscopic submucosal dissection for large superficial esophageal squamous cell neoplasm: efficacy and safety study to guide future practice. Surg Endosc 32:2814–2821

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Fukami N (2013) What we want for esd is a second hand! Tract Method Gastrointest Endosc 78:274–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jin P, Yu Y, Fu KI, Yu DL, Li AQ, Sheng JQ (2015) A new traction method with use of the snare as a “second hand” during endoscopic submucosal dissection. Endoscopy. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1392028

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Matsuzaki I, Isobe S, Hirose K, Marukawa T, Esaki M (2017) Magnetic anchor-guided endoscopic submucosal dissection for colonic tumor. VideoGIE 2:74–75

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Abe S, Wu SYS, Ego M et al (2020) Efficacy of current traction techniques for endoscopic submucosal dissection. Gut Liver 14:673–684

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Lü MH, Fu KI, Wang ZQ, Liu Y, Xia HF, Deng MM (2016) Traction with snare during endoscopic submucosal dissection of a gastrointestinal stromal tumor in the gastric fundus. Endoscopy 48(Suppl 1):E183–E185

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Fu S, Gong J, Zhou M, Wang Y, Liu D, Tan Y (2022) Risk factors of non-en bloc resection and non-r0 resection during endoscopic resection in the treatment of superficial duodenal epithelial lesions. Front Oncol 12:881815

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Ye LP, Zheng HH, Mao XL, Zhang Y, Zhou XB, Zhu LH (2016) Complete circular endoscopic resection using submucosal tunnel technique combined with esophageal stent placement for circumferential superficial esophageal lesions. Surg Endosc 30:1078–1085

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Linghu E, Feng X, Wang X, Meng J, Du H, Wang H (2013) Endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection for large esophageal neoplastic lesions. Endoscopy 45:60–62

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhai Y, Linghu E, Li H (2014) Double-tunnel endoscopic submucosal tunnel dissection for circumferential superficial esophageal neoplasms. Endoscopy. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0034-1365390

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hua XL, Jun LL, Wen ZC, Lin JY, Ye T, Liang LX (2016) Using a double-channel gastroscope reduces procedural time in performing gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection. Pak J Med Sci 32:617–621

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Miyamoto S, Ohya TR, Higashino M et al (2020) Clip with thread attachment prior to incision - new strategy for traction-assisted esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection. Endoscopy 52:E328-e329

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Stephant S, Jacques J, Brochard C et al (2023) High proficiency of esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection with a “tunnel + clip traction” strategy:a large french multicentric study. Surg Endosc 37:2359–2366

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Kim GH, Jee SR, Jang JY et al (2014) Stricture occurring after endoscopic submucosal dissection for esophageal and gastric tumors. Clin Endosc 47:516–522

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Martínek J, Juhas S, Dolezel R et al (2018) Prevention of esophageal strictures after circumferential endoscopic submucosal dissection. Minerva Chir 73:394–409

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Isomoto H, Yamaguchi N, Nakayama T et al (2011) Management of esophageal stricture after complete circular endoscopic submucosal dissection for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. BMC Gastroenterol 11:46

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Lu Q, Wang J, Lv X et al (2022) Long-term outcomes of refractory esophageal strictures after endoscopic submucosal dissection of superficial esophageal neoplasms. BMC Gastroenterol 22:147

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Tang J, Kong F, Li J, Liu F, Kong X, Li Z (2021) Independent risk factors for esophageal refractory stricture after extensive endoscopic submucosal dissection. Surg Endosc 35:3618–3627

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Hu W, Yu J, Yao N et al (2022) Efficacy and safety of four different endoscopic treatments for early esophageal cancer: a network meta-analysis. J Gastrointest Surg 26:1097–1108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Ribeiro TML, Arantes VN, Ramos JA, Draganov PV, Yang D, Guimarães RG (2021) Endoscopic submucosal dissection with circumferential incision versus tunneling method for treatment of superficial esophageal cancer. Arq Gastroenterol 58:195–201

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Prof. Bingrong Liu and Dr. Saif Ullah for their help in revising this manuscript.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Conception and design of the work: Nan Dai, Changqing Guo and Xinguang Cao. Data collection and analysis: Nan Dai, Jingwen Zhang, Xiaoyu Wan and Ping Liu. Drafting or revising the work: Nan Dai, Saif Ullah, Shanshan Zhu and Ping Liu. Approval of the final version to be published: Xinguang Cao and Changqing Guo. Agreement to be accountable for all aspects of the work: Xinguang Cao.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Changqing Guo or Xinguang Cao.

Ethics declarations

Disclosures

Authors declare no conflict of interests for this article. Nan Dai, Saif Ullah, Jingwen Zhang, Xiaoyu Wan, Shanshan Zhu, Ping Liu, Changqing Guo and Xinguang Cao have no conflicts of interest or financial ties to disclose.

Ethical approval

The protocol was approved by The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University (No. 2022-KY-1190-001) and informed consent was waived. All the authors have followed the applicable ethical standards to maintain the research integrity without any duplication, fraud or plagiarism issues.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Dai, N., Ullah, S., Zhang, J. et al. The efficacy and safety of snare traction-assisted endoscopic submucosal dissection for circumferential superficial esophageal cancer. Surg Endosc 38, 3329–3336 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-10859-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-024-10859-y

Keywords

Navigation